Appearance before the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs on the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer's Report on the Research and Comparative Analysis on the Estimates of the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and the Department of Indigenous Services (May 17, 2023)

Table of contents

Scenario Note

Logistics

Date: May 17, 2023
Time: 4:30 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Location: Wellington Building, Room 415

Information for Appearing In-Person

  • Witnesses (especially those without a Hill pass) should arrive at least 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting to proceed through security

Appearing

  • Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC)
    • The Hon. Marc Miller P.C., M.P., Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations
    • Daniel Quan-Watson, Deputy Minister
    • Darlene Bess, Chief Finances Results and Delivery Officer
  • Indigenous Services Canada (ISC)
    • The Hon. Patty Hajdu, P.C., M.P., Minister of Indigenous Services
    • Valerie Gideon, Associate Deputy Minister
    • Philippe Thompson, Chief Finances Results and Delivery Officer

Streaming

  • The meeting can be watched via Parlvu, however, there may be an up to 70–second delay with the feed. A real time audio line will be shared if one is provided for this meeting.

Meeting Proceedings

The Chair will call the meeting to order and provide instructions for the meeting proceedings. He will then introduce the witnesses and invite the Minister to deliver her opening remarks (5 minutes). This will be followed by a Q&A period (details below).

It is recommended that all speakers speak slowly and at an appropriate volume to ensure they are heard by the interpreters. All witnesses are asked to mute their microphones unless they are speaking.

While simultaneous translation will be available, witnesses are asked to respond to questions in either English or French, but to limit switching back and forth between languages as this often creates technology/interpretation challenges. It is recommended that the speeches are made in one official language.

Following the opening remarks, there will be rounds of questions from Committee members (as listed below).

Committee members will pose their questions in the following order:

  • First round (6 minutes for each Party)
    • Conservative Party of Canada
    • Liberal Party of Canada
    • Bloc Québécois
    • New Democratic Party of Canada
  • Second round
    • Conservative Party of Canada (5 minutes)
    • Liberal Party of Canada (5 minutes)
    • Bloc Québécois (2.5 minutes)
    • New Democratic Party of Canada (2.5 minutes)
    • Conservative Party of Canada (5 minutes)
    • Liberal Party of Canada (5 minutes)

Context

Potential Areas of Interest for Members of the Committee:

  • Emergency Management
    • The Minister of Indigenous Services and/or ISC senior officials have appeared before INAN and PACP on three occasions to discuss the Auditor General's Report on Emergency Management in First Nations Communities
      • MP Ste-Marie (BQ) asked if there was sufficient funding to move forward on all of the projects identified in the OAG report
      • MP Idlout (NDP) asked if the $358 million that the department had requested to be added First Nations Infrastructure Fund would be in Budget 2023.
      • MP Melillo (CPC) referenced the PBO report and asked if the Department had plans to change funding models to mitigation and prevention instead of responding
      • MP Zimmer (CPC) asked about accountability measures in place to ensure outcomes are realized when dealing with third-party service providers via contracts
      • MP Idlout (NDP) also asked about the lack of use of data regarding First Nations' communities capacity and risk levels
  • Education
    • MP Vidal (CPC) asked questions regarding DRR data showing a decrease in secondary school graduation rates and further challenged on the use of Statistics Canada data instead of DRR data
    • MP Gill (BQ) asked questions regarding the Office Auditor General of Canada's 2018 report regarding the issue of data collection discrepancies between Indigenous and non-Indigenous education
    • MP Melillo (CPC) questioned officials about graduation rate targets, on-reserve vs. off-reserve data, and metrics the Department uses regarding socio-economic gaps
  • Departmental Results Reports and Departmental Plans Reports
    • MP Idlout (NDP) and MP McLeod (Lib) asked about construction delays, costs, and investments for housing in the North
    • MP Gill (BQ) and MP Idlout (NDP) asked questions about accountability and results for addressing food insecurity in the North
  • Planned spending versus actual spending
    • MP Zimmer (CPC) asked about funding breakdowns for Specific Claims
    • Senators at the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance (NFFN) asked several questions during an appearance of ISC and CIRNAC senior officials about changes in planned spending in the Supplementary Estimates (C)

Other Potential Areas of Questioning, Based on the PBO Report and Other Appearances by Sr. Officials

  • Departmental metrics/indicators and how they've changed or been removed
  • Data collection lags and data collection gaps
  • Increases in FTEs
  • Bonuses allocated to Department executives
  • Accountability for Department officials when targets aren't met
  • Use of consultants and other third party professional services, accountability and costs

Background

On November 21, 2022, INAN adopted the following motion:

That the committee invite the Parliamentary Budget Officer, the Minister of Indigenous Services Canada and the Minister for Crown-Indigenous Relations to appear before the committee to discuss the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer's report on the research and comparative analysis on the Estimates of the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and the Department of Indigenous Services, and that the meeting be televised.

The Committee is scheduled to hold its first meeting on this study on Monday, April 24th, when the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer will appear [A summary of that meeting will be provided when available].

Recent INAN Studies

  • Improving Graduation Rates and Successful Outcomes for Indigenous Students
    • 7 meetings have been held
    • The Minister of Indigenous Services appeared on March 6, 2023
      • There was one follow-up pertaining to the construction of schools in Nunavut
  • Indigenous Languages Study
    • 5 meetings have been held
    • The Minister of Canadian Heritage appeared on February 6, 2023
  • Supplementary Estimates (B), 2022-23
    • 1 meeting
    • The Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and the Minister of Northern Affairs appeared on December 8, 2022
      • There was one follow-up pertaining to the construction of housing in the North
  • Bill S-219, An Act respecting a National Ribbon Skirt Day
    • 1 meeting
  • Arctic Sovereignty, Security and Emergency Preparedness of Indigenous Peoples
    • 11 meetings were held
    • The Minister of Indigenous Services appeared on December 1, 2022
      • There were two follow-ups – one regarding the whole of government approach to flood mitigation, and one regarding families unable to return to their communities after evacuations

In the Media

Opening Remarks

Kwe kwe. Unusakut. Hello. Bonjour.

I too am with you here on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinabe people.

I'd like to thank the Parliamentary Budget Officer for his report.

I welcome the opportunity to address this committee today to help clarify some key points about the work of Indigenous Services Canada in partnership with first nations, Inuit and Métis to achieve transformative change.

The creation of Indigenous Services Canada and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada was driven by the Liberal government's efforts to begin the important work of rebuilding trust with indigenous partners by demonstrating that the extensive consultations undertaken by the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples over two decades earlier wouldn't be forgotten. In fact, the split of the department is a direct response to an RCAP suggestion.

It's important to note that despite all of this rapid evolution, the overhead for the Department of Indigenous Services Canada remains below average. In 2023-24, it's only 0.6%, as reflected in the main estimates.

The investments that we're making now are starting to show positive results. For example, since 2015, the federal government has invested in 15,690 housing projects, with 4,460 new homes being built, 9,359 renovations and upgrade projects, and 1,871 lots serviced. This means, according to the 2021 census, 1,455 fewer on-reserve households are now considered overcrowded.

In 2022-23, 100% of the funding envelope for first nations on-reserve housing was fully allocated. This means over $662 million was spent to build on-reserve housing.

True reconciliation means understanding and supporting a shift to the principles and actions that support self-determination. Indeed, many governments before us imposed solutions on first nations that led to short-term fixes that didn't meet the long-term needs of communities. When you think about it, reconciliation is equally about dismantling colonial structures that impose solutions and learning to support and work with goals that are set by communities that can better meet their needs and their vision.

Since 2016, we've been advancing on a new fiscal relationship with first nations. This has resulted in access by 142 first nations to a 10-year grant that provides funding predictability, sufficiency and flexibility.

Since the coming into force of An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families, 200 indigenous groups have received capacity funding to work towards exercising jurisdiction and developing their own child and family services laws and models. So far there are seven agreements across Canada over four provinces, and we expect more to be concluded soon.

I would say, having been at these ceremonies, that this work represents generational change. This is about keeping children rooted in culture, family and community, changing their reality and increasing their chances of reaching their full potential.

Long-term drinking water advisories; aging infrastructure that was often beyond repair; unequal access and funding for education; and no commitment to any concept of Jordan's principle, the essential program that provides services and products to support children's healthy development were features of the previous government. We now have an additional $10.9 billion budgeted for 2023-24. This is an annual increase of over 90%.

When communities have lived with austerity for over 150 years, the gap is huge, and it takes large investments and it takes time to build up infrastructure, capacity and much more. Since 2015, investments have been unprecedented, and they've been aimed at catching up with this chronic underfunding of core services. In fact, many indigenous partners have noted this unprecedented investment and are excited about what the future holds.

For 2023-24, Indigenous Services Canada has allocated $39.6 billion in maintenance. That includes $19.6 billion for the department to partner with indigenous peoples to deliver programs and services, along with $20 billion for a settlement for family and child services, a need that I might point out has arisen as a result of the decades of systemic racism and underfunding.

Decades of denial, neglect and systemic racism will take generations to fully address and heal. We, as a government, have sought a balance in focusing of resources into both immediate measures and enduring change.

The creation of Indigenous Services as a stand-alone department right from the start has had a positive impact by focusing the attention of an entire department on service delivery and meeting the needs of communities. This is, as my colleague pointed out, most evident in the broadening of the type of services that Indigenous Services Canada can provide during emergencies. As we're seeing just in the past several weeks—and there are many examples over the last number of years—first nations communities are on the front line of the impacts of climate change, and now the department is able to plan for integrated health and social services as part of the emergency response.

During the emergence of COVID-19, ISC took a holisitic approach to supporting communities facing this emergency, with every area of the department involved. In addition to public health, supports were mobilized in regard to food security, transportation, mental health, schools and income supports. This could never have been done as quickly or as holistically without all service and funding areas being together under one roof.

Formerly, in previous times, there was one minister charged with overseeing what was then known as Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada. The creation of the two departments means that first nations, Inuit and Métis peoples have three ministers who are now working with them to undo these decades of racist colonial policies.

When the Conservative government left office, the annual spend to educate, house and provide health services to indigenous peoples, amongst other needs, was $8 billion. As I mentioned, this chronic underfunding left first nations communities in desperate need.

As I've spoken about here previously, the nine regional education agreements to set the foundation for the future success are a critical example of how things are beginning to transform across nations. These education agreements now mean that first nations have control over the education of their students and have the full authority and capacity to ensure that the curriculum protects and promotes culture and language. These are both evidenced ways to keep children resilient and healthy.

The latest departmental results framework and indicators have been co-developed with the AFN and the ITK. This work means that now first nations and indigenous peoples are in control not only of how things happen but also of what they believe needs to be measured. Outcomes must be important to the communities, and they must have full control over determining how to assess how best to reach them and when progress is made.

The work of self-determination means that the federal government must learn new ways to let go of control and to work to return control to indigenous peoples.

I'd like to thank the commission for its interest in such an important undertaking.

Meegwetch. Qujannamiik. Marsee. Thank you.

Overview of the PBO Report and Key Findings

Key Messages

  • The Government of Canada has made significant investments to improve the quality of life for Indigenous communities, families and youth, as well as to renew the nation-to-nation, Inuit-Crown, government-to-government relationship between Canada and First Nations, Inuit and Métis, and to support greater self-determination.
  • Following the dissolution of Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada in 2017, ISC has been undergoing significant organizational changes and has undertaken steps to stabilize its structure.
  • Many of the expenditures highlighted in the Parliamentary Budget Officer's report were a result of investments made through the annual federal budget cycle, and as such were not reflected in the Main Estimates that were used in preparation of the departmental planned spending, but rather in subsequent supplementary estimates.
  • As a result, many of the variances noted in the report are not a result of a flawed forecasting processes, but rather of significant new investments incorporated into departmental budgets through the normal budgetary cycle.
  • In recent years, efforts to establish targets may have been affected by the context of co-development and engagement with Indigenous partners versus previous efforts where targets may have been set unilaterally.
  • Many indicators were subject to delays in the collection and compilation of the 2019-20 and 2020-21 results due to COVID-19.
  • As part of a continued focus on improving performance measurement, ISC recently renewed its Departmental Results Framework to better align services and resource allocations with the high-level results. The new framework was approved by Treasury Board in November 2022.

Background

  • The report presents the Parliamentary Budget Officer's (PBO) response to a request made in February 2022 by the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs to conduct research and comparative analysis on the Estimates of the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC) and the Department of Indigenous Services Canada (ISC).
  • PBO accessed publicly available data to conduct this analysis, primarily GC InfoBase, Departmental Plans, Departmental Results Reports and reports from the Office of the Auditor General.
  • The report looked at two time periods:
    • 2015-2016 to 2017-2018: when predecessor organizations were active
    • 2018-2019 to 2022-2023: current active organization structure
  • For both timeframes, an analysis was made taking two approaches:
    • A quantitative component focused on planned and actual spending and human resources.
    • A qualitative component focused on the changes to departmental result indicators (DRIs) and their ability to realize their objectives.

Key Findings – Quantitative Analysis

2012-2013 to 2017-2018

  • Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) results showed gradual increases in spending above planned budgets in 30 occurrences, as well as significant discrepancies between forecasted and actual FTEs in 11 occurrences.
  • Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada and the Canadian Polar Commission (AANDC-CPC) was reported to have a 39% deviation in actual spending from planned spending on internal services – there were 2 instances where spending was far below projections. FTE planned projections were also below the actual need (difference of 44%).
  • Health Canada's analysis ended in 2016-2017 prior to the program transfer to ISC in 2017-2018. A 39% difference was reported between planned and actual spending as well as between planned and actual FTEs. FTEs remained lower than actual needs and continued to be chronically underestimated.

2018-2019 to 2022-2023

  • The analysis indicated there had been a significant increase in the amount of financial resources allocated to providing Indigenous services during the report period.
  • However, it was reported the increase in expenditures did not result in a comparable increase in the ability to achieve set targets.
  • Actual spending for ISC was reported to diverge from planned spending in 13 instances, an absolute average difference of 48% ($863 million).
  • Significant differences were found between planned and actual FTEs in 8 instances, with an absolute average difference of 39% (267 FTEs).

Impact of Transition

  • Results did not match forecasts and significant differences gradually arose over time.
  • Organizations appeared to have resisted the structural change imposed by the creation of new departments.

Key Findings – Qualitative Analysis

  • While the goals related to high level outcomes have remained relatively consistent, departmental indicators have fluctuated as mandates and programming has evolved.
  • The portfolio exhibited some volatility to achieving targets, particularly for indicators that were introduced in the early years of ISC's operation and had not yet matured enough for the objectives to be fulfilled.
  • The ability of both organizations to achieve specified targets has declined.

2015-2016 to 2018-2019

  • INAC experienced significant changes due to movement driven by structural changes from the former AANDC-CPC. Some departmental result indicators were dropped because they were "sunsetting" that year.
  • Health Canada increased the number of indicators they monitored mainly focused on Indigenous and Inuit health and removed those that had met their objectives.
  • While both departments were able to specify goals for their indicators, they both reported consistent trends in pushing target dates.
  • DRIs that were added later during this time had no actuals since they did not have enough time to mature and produce measurable results.
  • Both organizations exhibited a capacity to achieve their objectives.

2018-2019 to 2022-2023

  • Both ISC and CIRNAC had increased the number of DRIs due in part to a more disaggregated approach to monitoring as well as the creation of new areas of responsibility.
  • CIRNAC showed progressive improvement in specifying targets, while ISC showed a decline in its ability to set targets partly due to the "Indigenous Self-Determined Services".
  • Both performed poorly in maintaining targets and showed a trend of extending target dates with each Departmental Plan.
  • ISC also fell short of CIRNAC's ability to specific and maintain targets for "flow" goals — those indicators that did not have specific targets but instead have a yearly change that they target.
  • The changes in portfolios during this time exhibited some volatility to achieving targets, particularly for those indicators introduced in the early years of operation and had not yet matured enough for the objectives to be fulfilled.

If pressed on DRF engagement with Indigenous Partners

  • The renewal of ISC's Departmental Results Framework, and the engagement of two National Indigenous Organizations (Assembly of First Nations and Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami) in this process, speaks to the department's vision of on-going involvement of Indigenous stakeholders in performance measurement planning. Departmental performance measurement activities are also informed by mandates, authorities, government policies and directives, and Treasury Board Secretariat direction and approvals.
  • Our engagement with Partners is focusing on the results we are seeking to achieve, as well as the measures by which we can track progress. We are working to improve the quality and relevance of data and measures by aligning them with our Partners' priorities.

Annex

ISC Qualitative Factors
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
DRI added to the protfolio 28 14 6   8
DRI removed from the protfolio   -22 -1   -5
DRIs received from another organization 8   6    
DRIs given to another organization          
Active DRI 36 28 39 39 42
DRI has a target and date to complete consistent with last observation 19 11 11 8 8
DRI has a target and date to complete consistent with the last observation   4 14 16 15
DRI has a target and date to complete specified 19 15 25 24 23
DRI has some actual result within the last 5 fiscal years 29 22 32 32 30
DRI has been achieved in the most recent observation 5 4 9 10 6

Source: Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
Note: Departmental result reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 have not yet been published at the time of writting.

CIRNAC Qualitative Factors
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
DRI added to the protfolio 21   11 8  
DRI removed from the protfolio     -13 -6  
DRIs received from another organization 4        
DRIs given to another organization     -5    
Active DRI 25 25 18 20 20
DRI has a target and date to complete consistent with last observation 18 4 11 10 7
DRI has a target and date to complete inconsistent with the last observation   17 6 9 13
DRI has a target and date to complete specified 18 21 17 19 20
DRI has some actual result within the last 5 fiscal years 24 25 17 13 14
DRI has been achieved in the most recent observation 9 8 11 4 4

Source: Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
Note: Departmental result reports for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 have not yet been published at the time of writting.

Overview of the CIRNAC and ISC Split

Key Messages

  • The dissolution of Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) resulted in the creation of two departments, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC) and Indigenous Services Canada (ISC), with distinct mandates and sharing most of their internal services.
  • ISC is constantly assessing it's shared services model to ensure the department is organizationally aligned with its mandate.

Background

Chronology

  • August 28, 2017: the Prime Minister announced the dissolution of Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada and the creation of CIRNAC and ISC based on recommendations made by the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
    • CIRNAC: to advance nation-to-nation, Inuit-Crown, and government-to-government relationships; support Indigenous Peoples' vision of self-determination; and lead the Government of Canada's work in the North.
    • ISC: to improve access to high-quality services for First Nations, Inuit and Métis; support and empower Indigenous Peoples to control the delivery of those services; and improve the socio-economic conditions, quality of life and safety in their communities.
  • November 30, 2017: ISC was established as per Orders in Council formalizing the creation of a new Department that brought together essential and mutually reinforcing services:
    • First Nations and Inuit health services (formerly with Health Canada)
    • education services
    • essential social services
    • child and family services programs
    • housing and infrastructure services (formerly with Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada).
  • February 7, 2019: ISC and CIRNAC accessed additional funds to operationalize the departments.
  • June 21, 2019: legislation to formally establish ISC and CIRNAC received Royal Assent.
  • July 15, 2019: Department of Indigenous Services Act came into force establishing ISC as a department. It also included the transfer to ISC of five programs from the newly established Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC) including:
    • Individuals Affairs Program
    • Indigenous Entrepreneurship and Business Development
    • Economic Development Capacity and Readiness
    • Land, Natural Resources and Environmental Management
    • Statutory, Legislative and Policy Support to First Nations Governance.
  • July 22, 2019: the creation of ISC and CIRNAC was formalized through an Order in Council that specifies the powers, duties, and functions of the three Ministers and finalized the structures of the departments, including a shared internal services model for certain functions.
  • March 13, 2020: ISC and CIRNAC accessed additional funding to operationalize the departments.

Context

  • Indigenous Services Canada's (ISC) mandate is unique to the Government of Canada given its focus on ensuring the provision of services to First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities, while having a clear responsibility for the gradual transfer of such services to Indigenous organizations in support of self-determination.
  • The department operates within a particularly complex environment, with distinction-based funding and services being administered to over 600 communities across the country; an important regional footprint, including those located in remote and isolated communities; and a client base that is continually growing. ISC's constant state of evolution requires flexible and adaptable internal service structures that are purpose-built to meet its unique needs.
  • When ISC was created, the Government brought together related programs and services, and it retained most of the organizational structures inherited from previous departments.
  • As a result, ISC's internal services remain fragmented across regional operations and sectors. In many cases, these organizations continued to use policies and systems from their previous department, creating misalignments and interoperability issues that prevented effective collaboration, progress toward enterprise-wide objectives, as well as standardization of best practices, processes and controls.
  • Since the Order in Council, some adjustments were made to the partially shared model by drawing from experiences to reflect evolving needs. For example, the risk function and the internal/external financial reporting function, which were both shared across ISC and CIRNAC, were split into two distinct functions in each department and positioned within the Chief Financial and Results Delivery Officer sectors. Otherwise, the shared model remained largely intact where functions are either provided by CIRNAC to ISC (e.g. human resources), by ISC to CIRNAC (e.g. information technology, communications), or through distinct units in each department (e.g. resource management).
  • ISC and CIRNAC also established an overarching Memorandum of Understanding to govern the management of respective internal services functions. The Memorandum, which was updated in March 2021, establishes:
    • Guiding principles for the provision of shared services in a transparent and fair manner that leverage opportunities for innovation where possible;
    • A commitment to track information and level of effort, and to develop improved service standards and performance metrics to inform a risk-based approach;
    • Financial provisions, including a requirement for scheduled invoices, and a commitment to report on expenditures and forecasts for shared functions; and
    • A governance committee that is chaired by both Chief Finances, Results and Delivery Officers and comprised of the relevant shared services leads.
  • In addition, ISC and CIRNAC developed Service Level Agreements between the functional leads of each shared internal service and the delegated authority from the department in receipt of services. The agreements add details to performance indicators, financial arrangements, governance, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Service standards were also established where feasible. The functions agreed to collect data to inform service standards over time. The departments' on-going collection of service data for each function will be essential for determining the required resource levels in subsequent years. These Service Level Agreements are reviewed annually.

Current Status

Internal Services housed in CIRNAC

  • Human Resources and Workplace Services (HRWSB)
  • Contingent Liabilities (CFRDO)
  • Provisions of shared internal services support to the CIRNAC-ISC Legal Services Unit (Legal/CFRDO)
  • Ministerial Correspondence: WEBCIMS and ccm Enterprise (Corporate Secretariat)
  • Access to Information and Privacy (Corporate Secretariat)
  • Internal Audit, and Assessment and Investigations (AES)
  • Cabinet Affairs (PSD)
  • Litigation Management and Oversight (PSD)
  • Historical Research Services (PSD)

Internal Services housed in ISC

  • Communications and Public Affairs (CPA)
  • Information Management Branch (CFRDO)
  • Administrative Services Branch (CFRDO)
  • Transfer Payments and Regional Corporate Services (CFRDO)
  • Corporate Accounting, Services and Operations (CFRDO)
  • Regulatory, Parliamentary and Legislative Affairs (SPP)
  • Strategic Research and Data Innovation (SPP)

Division of Programs/Services Between Departments

Clarity in Division of Responsibilities

Engagement processes have shown that there is a lack of clarity with respect to the division of responsibilities between ISC and CIRNAC. As Transformation progresses, new communication materials will be produced that will assist our partners and clients in understanding the division of responsibilities, while internally, our departments will work together to ensure that programs and services are delivered seamlessly.

CIRNAC's primary responsibilities will be to guide and coordinate the whole-of-government relationship with Section 35 rights holders and Indigenous nations, to reach and implement agreements to accelerate self determination (through self-government and land claim agreements, including reconstituting nations), and to managing Northern programing and Arctic Policy.

ISC's primary responsibilities will be the delivery of services and programs to Section 91(24) Indigenous communities, with a particular emphasis on closing the socio-economic gap between Indigenous People and non-Indigenous Canadians and building up the capacity of Indigenous communities so that they have the means and ability to move forward on the path to self-determination.

CIRNAC

Crown-Indigenous Relations

  • Bilateral mechanism (PSD)
  • Nation to Nation, Inuit-Crown, Government to Government relations (PSD)
  • RIIR Framework (TAG)
  • Land claims negotiations (TAG)
  • Self-Government negotiations (TAG)
  • Specific Claims (TAG)
  • Treaty implementation (Implementation)
  • Residential Schools Resolution (R&P)
  • Matrimonial Real Property (R&P)
  • First Nations Fiscal Management Act (R&P)
    • First Nations Tax Commission
    • First Nations Financial Management Board
    • First Nations Finance Authority
  • First Nations Land Management Act (R&P)
    • First Nations Lands Management Board

Northern Affairs (NAO)

  • Territorial governments
  • Devolution
  • Arctic Policy Framework
  • Arctic Science
  • Nutrition North
  • Polar Knowledge Canada
  • Contaminated sites

ISC

  • Indigenous Health (FNIHB)
  • Housing and Infrastructure (RO)
  • Education (ESDPP)
  • Social Services (ESDPP)
  • Child and Family Services (ESDPP)
  • Status and Registrar (RO)
  • Governance, Bylaws and First Nations Election Act
  • Economic Development (LED)
    • Economic Policy
    • Aboriginal Entrepreneurship and Business Development
    • National Indigenous Economic Development Board
  • Lands (LED)
  • Environmental management (LED)
  • Indian Oil and Gas Canada and FNOGMA (LED)

ISC Programs Delivered By Northern CIRNAC Regions

ISC Programs Delivered by Yukon in 22/23
(Below are Vote 10: G&C Expenditures for reference of scale)
Row Labels Sum of Actual
D2002 – Child and Family Services BYP08 $36,937,455
D4001 – Community Infrastructure BYP13 $28,226,272
D2003 – Income Supports BYP09 $20,473,496
D1002 – Home and Long-Term Care BYP02 $15,129,100
D4003 – Emergency Management Assistance BYP15 $7,939,456
D3001 – Elementary & Secondary Education BYP11 $4,958,701
D6001 – Indigenous Governance & Capacity BYP18 $3,982,393
D3002 – Post Secondary Education BYP12 $2,687,173
D2001 – Safety & Prevention Services BYP07 $2,507,590
D1006 – Jordan's Principle & Inuit Child First Initiative BYP06 $1,069,252
D4002 – Communities & Environment BYP14 $998,500
D2004 – Urban Programming for Indigenous Peoples BYP10 $260,000
D5001 – Community Economic Development BYP16 $222,000
Total $125,391,389
ISC Programs Delivered by NWT in 22/23
(Below are Vote 10: G&C Expenditures for reference of scale)
Row Labels Sum of Actual
D3002 – Post Secondary Education BYP12 $10,639,159
D6001 – Indigenous Governance & Capacity BYP18 $8,514,938
D2004 – Urban Programming for Indigenous Peoples BYP10 $8,090,751
D4001 – Community Infrastructure BYP13 $2,938,951
D4003 – Emergency Management Assistance BYP15 $1,874,780
D2001 – Safety & Prevention Services BYP07 $1,390,665
D3001 – Elementary & Secondary Education BYP11 $962,379
D4002 – Communities & Environment BYP14 $673,112
D5001 – Community Economic Development BYP16 $25,000
Total $35,109,737
ISC Programs Delivered by Nunavut in 22/23
(Below are Vote 10: G&C Expenditures for reference of scale)
Row Labels Sum of Actual
D2004 – Urban Programming for Indigenous Peoples BYP10 $16,462,460
D3002 – Post Secondary Education BYP12 $9,300,705
D6001 – Indigenous Governance & Capacity BYP18 $1,454,703
D2001 – Safety & Prevention Services BYP07 $1,325,000
D3001 – Elementary & Secondary Education BYP11 $275,000
D5002 – Indigenous Entrepreneurship & Business Development BYP17 $30,425
Total $28,848,293
Sum of Actual — D64500
CC Region Code CC Region Descr Program Inventory Code2 Program Inventory Descr2 Total
D64500 Northern Affairs Organization D5001 Community Economic Dev BYP16 $100,785
Northern Affairs Organization Total Total $100,785
Grand Total $100,785
Sum of Actual — D64200
CC Region Code CC Region Descr Program Inventory Code2 Program Inventory Descr2 Total
D64200 Policy and Strategic Direction D2001 Safety & Prevent Service BYP07 $1,492,369
D2002 Child and Family Services BYP08 $9,679,032
D2003 Income Supports BYP09 $630,945
D2004 Urban Prog Indig Peoples BYP10 $34,359,952
D3001 Elem & Sec Education BYP11 $3,728,000
D3002 Post Secondary Education BYP12 $0
D4001 Community Infrastructure BYP13 $6,088,403
D4002 Communities & Environment BYP14 $125,000
D4003 Emergency MGMT Assistance BYP154 $519,525
D5001 Community Economic Dev BYP16 $0
D5002 Indig Entrep & Business Dev BYP17 $1,445,682
D6001 Indig Govern & Capacity BYP18 $1,828,933
Policy and Strategic Direction Total $59,897,841
Grand Total $59,897,841

List of Internal Services

Shared Internal Services housed in CIRNAC:

  • Human Resources and Workplace Services (HRWSB)
  • Contingent Liabilities (CFRDO)
  • Provisions of shared internal services support to the CIRNAC-ISC Legal Services Unit (Legal/CFRDO)
  • Ministerial Correspondence: WEBCIMS and ccm Enterprise (Corporate Secretariat)
  • Access to Information and Privacy (Corporate Secretariat)
  • Internal Audit, and Assessment and Investigations (AES)
  • Cabinet Affairs (PSD)
  • Litigation Management and Oversight (PSD)
  • Historical Research Services (PSD)

Shared Internal Services housed in ISC:

  • Communications and Public Affairs (CPA)
  • Information Management Branch (CFRDO)
  • Administrative Services Branch (CFRDO)
  • Transfer Payments and Regional Corporate Services (CFRDO)
  • Corporate Accounting, Services and Operations (CFRDO)
  • Regulatory, Parliamentary and Legislative Affairs (SPP)
  • Strategic Research and Data Innovation (SPP)

List of Distinct Services (duplicated and housed in both CIRNAC and ISC):

  • Strategic Policy
  • Evaluation and Performance Measurement
  • Resource Management
  • Financial Planning
  • Financial Reporting
  • Internal/External Reporting
  • Corporate Results
  • Integrated Planning
  • Ministerial Correspondence
  • Horizontal Coordination/Ministerial Trips
  • Planning and Coordination
  • Risk Management

Internal Services (Administrative Overhead) Budgetary Expenditures Main Estimates 2023-24 – Indigenous Services Canada

Key Messages

  • The 2023-24 Main Estimates include an allocation of $228.9 million for Internal Services (Administrative Overhead) within its Budgetary Expenditures. This represents 1% of the Department's Main Estimates budget. This is significantly below the average of comparable departments (in FTEs).
  • ISC will continue to ensure that all programs and regions are supported by high quality internal services that are continually evolving to better serve clients and to align with the departmental mandate, including the transfer of services to Indigenous partners.

Background

Internal Services are those groups of related activities and resources that the federal government considers to be services in support of programs and/or required to meet corporate obligations of an organization. Internal services refer to the activities and resources of the 10 distinct service categories that support program delivery in the organization, regardless of the internal services delivery model in a department. The 10 service categories are:

  • acquisition management services
  • communication services
  • financial management services
  • human resources management services
  • information management services
  • information technology services
  • legal services
  • material management services
  • management and oversight services
  • real property management services

Since 2018-19, ISC's Internal Services averages below 1% of it's total Main Estimates expenditures. There was an increase in 2019-20 and 2020-20 due to the one time funding received to support our Internal Services following by a decrease in 2021-22 and 2022-23.

As reflected in the table below, Internal Services for the Department, in Main Estimates 2023-24, represents 0.6% of its total budget. This is significantly below the average of comparable departments*.

Organizations Core Responsabilities Main Estimates 2023-24 % Main Estimates 2023-24 FTE 2023-24 %
FTE 2023-24
Department of Indigenous Services Indigenous Well-Being and Self-Determination 39,378,545,794 99.4% 5,508 77.9%
Internal Services 228,930,692 0.6% 1,562 22.1%
Total 39,607,476,486 100.00% 7,070 100.00%
Department of Health Other Core Responsibilities 3,792,294,682 92.5% 6,756 76.7%
Internal Services 307,931,603 7.5% 2,056 23.3%
Total 4,100,226,285 100.00% 8,812 100.00%
Department of the Environment Other Core Responsibilities 2,204,185,504 90.1% 5,912 76.8%
Internal Services 241,892,170 9.9% 1,787 23.2%
Total 2,446,077,674 100.00% 7,699 100.00%
Department of Transport Other Core Responsibilities 3,338,909,710 93.8% 4,973 77.4%
Internal Services 224,027,300 6.2% 1,449 22.6%
Total 3,612,937,010 100.00% 6,422 100.00%
Department of Industry Other Core Responsibilities 5,661,106,104 96.7% 4,481 71.2%
Internal Services 190,669,086 3.3% 1,813 28.8%
Total 5,851,775,190 100.00% 6,294 100.00%
Canadian Food Inspection Agency Safe food and healthy plants and animals 669,767,999 79.5% 5,212 82.9%
Internal Services 172,315,473 20.5% 1,075 17.1%
Total 842,083,472 100.00% 6,287 100.00%
Statistics Canada Statistical Information 459,311,471 86.3% 5,415 89.9%
Internal Services 72,783,788 13.7% 610 10.1%
Total 532,095,259 100.00% 6,025 100.00%
Parks Canada Agency Protecting and Presenting Canada's Natural and Cultural Heritage 1,168,310,163 90.3% 4,850 83.3%
Internal Services 125,702,968 9.7% 973 16.7%
Total 1,294,013,131 100.00% 5,823 100.00%
Department of Justice Justice System Support 667,792,826 67.6% 372 7.2%
Legal Services 234,869,583 23.8% 3,681 71.1%
Internal Services 84,890,347 8.6% 1,127 21.8%
Total 987,552,756 100.00% 5,180 100.00%
Average other Departments with similar total FTEs (ME 2023-24) 177,526,592 9.9% 1,361 20.5%
* Comparable departments based on similar size FTE complements.

Following the dissolution of INAC and the creation of CIRNAC and ISC, a shared internal services model was established. Currently, the following internal services are shared between ISC and CIRNAC:

Internal Services housed in CIRNAC

  • Human Resources and Workplace Services (HRWSB)
  • Contingent Liabilities (CFRDO)
  • Provisions of shared internal services support to the CIRNAC-ISC Legal Services Unit (Legal/CFRDO)
  • Ministerial Correspondence: WEBCIMS and CCM Enterprise (Corporate Secretariat)
  • Access to Information and Privacy (Corporate Secretariat)
  • Internal Audit, and Assessment and Investigations (AES)
  • Cabinet Affairs (PSD)
  • Litigation Management and Oversight (PSD)
  • Historical Research Services (PSD)

Internal Services housed in ISC

  • Communications and Public Affairs (CPA)
  • Information Management Branch (CFRDO)
  • Administrative Services Branch (CFRDO)
  • Transfer Payments and Regional Corporate Services (CFRDO)
  • Corporate Accounting, Services and Operations (CFRDO)
  • Regulatory, Parliamentary and Legislative Affairs (SPP)
  • Strategic Research and Data Innovation (SPP)

As outlined in an earlier report, Report to the President of the Treasury Board on Internal Services at Crown-Indigenous Relations and North Affairs Canada and Indigenous Services Canada (September 2020), an assessment by the Office of the Comptroller General revealed that the internal services of CIRNAC and ISC combined were compared to the internal services of the former INAC and to comparable federal departments. This assessment focused on FTEs and operating funds but did not account for the significant magnitude of transfer payments that are managed by both departments. This assessment also did not take into account the portion of additional work required to support Ministers across two departments, including two Deputy Ministers and three Minister's offices, and the many instances where separate products are required for each department. Despite these factors, the combined CIRNAC/ISC benchmark results, which measure the level of internal services FTEs over programs FTEs, falls in the lower ranges of comparable departments.

Current Status

The 2023-24 Main Estimates include an allocation of $228.9 million for Internal Services within its Budgetary Expenditures. This represents 1% of the Department's Main Estimates budget.

In 2023-24, ISC will support service delivery to Indigenous Peoples through greater integrated planning to allow risks and results to guide decision-making and oversight by, but not limited to:

  • Promoting increased and continued involvement of Indigenous partners in the strategic planning process and review of performance indicators to help the department improve its capacities in risk, results measurement, investment and project management to better align resources with key objectives.
  • Promoting greater accountability, transparency and oversight through internal audits and financial reviews to provide assurance of departmental governance and controls, and support appropriate use of human and financial resources.
  • Providing First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities with timely and relevant information they need to access high quality programs and services.
  • Providing strategic and timely communications services in support of ministerial, department and Government of Canada priorities.
  • Infusing policies, resources, and tools with distinct Indigenous lenses to leverage the talents and strengths of Indigenous employees and support the recruitment, career paths, well-being, and retention of First Nations, Inuit and Métis employees.
  • Continuing the implementation of the 2021-2024 Well-being and Mental Health Strategy as the catalyst for change and the continued investment in a psychologically healthier workplace.

Evolution of Targets, Metrics and Measurements at Indigenous Services Canada

Key Messages

  • ISC recognizes that its Departmental Result Indicators and targets have been fluctuating since the department was established. Changes in the indicators can be attributed to the reframing of existing indicators, removal of duplicates or challenges collecting/accessing the necessary data.
  • To support self-determination and service transfer, ISC is co-developing performance measures and targets with its Indigenous Partners for some Programs. These targets will be reported when co-development is complete.
  • ISC has renewed its Departmental Results Framework with an improved focus on outcomes and an assessment of indicators to strengthen its ability to measure and report on progress. It continues to build rigorous performance strategies at the Program level.

Background

  • The background of the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) report can be found in Issue Sheet: Overview of PBO report and key findings.
  • It should be noted that the PBO report focuses on Departmental Results Indicators (DRIs), but additional context regarding both departmental and Program level indicators can be found below. Data collection and measures at the Program level must align with and support performance measurement at the departmental level.

Performance Measurement at ISC

  • The Departmental Results Indicators are identified in the Departmental Results Framework and can only be amended with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury Board of Canada.
  • ISC reports annually on the Departmental Results Indicators through its Departmental Plan, Departmental Results Report, and via GCInfobase, a publicly available tool from TBS for information on government spending and results against plans and priorities. Publicly reported Program-level indicators are also reported on GCInfobase.
  • Targets for DRIs are set by the Programs and reported annually in the Departmental Plan. The Departmental Results Report provides actual DRI results achieved against the expected results set out in the Departmental Plan.
  • In its initial years, the department revised the DRIs to better align them with results and outcomes and changes in departmental Core Responsibilities.
  • On occasion, DRIs were removed to be reframed in improved language or replaced by more comprehensive DRIs. The 2019-20 fiscal year was a prime example of such revisions. For example, in this year, the following 3 DRIs were removed:
    • Percentage of First Nation and Inuit communities that control the design, delivery and management of health programs and services;
    • Percentage of students being educated under First Nation school boards (or other transformative models); and
    • Percentage of First Nation communities that run their own Child and Family Services.

These three DRIs were replaced by a new DRI, "Number of First Nation communities that have opted into a self-determined service agreement". This new DRI enabled flexibility to include different and expanding types of self-determined service agreements from multiple sectors as more communities assume service delivery in various areas e.g. housing, education, health, etc.

Similarly, the DRI "Percentage of First Nation communities that run their own Family and Community Well-Being programs" was replaced with "Percentage of First Nation communities offering family support services aimed at keeping families together" as it is all-encompassing.

  • DRIs were also removed if they reflected methodological challenges. For example, in 2019-20, the DRI "First Nations and Inuit life expectancy at birth" was removed because life expectancy is difficult to compare over time and across groups since there are different ways to estimate it and there have been changes in data availability. The ISC Chief Data Officer is currently collaborating with Statistics Canada to develop a methodology for life expectancy estimates that may be available for future performance measurement. Similarly, in 2022-23, the Departmental Indicator "Percentage of First Nations on reserve students who graduate from secondary school" was replaced with two new indicators that differentiate between students who graduate on-time versus extended-time. These indicators use a revised methodology to better reflect the realities of the path First Nations students take to reach secondary school graduation, in response to an Office of the Auditor General Report (Report 5—Socio-economic Gaps on First Nations Reserves).
  • DRIs were also removed if they were not well aligned with departmental results or better suited for program-level reporting. In the 2019-20 Departmental Plan, the DRI "Number of approved requests for products and services to support First Nation children under the Jordan's Principle Child First Initiative" was removed. However, it was retained at the Program level and reported on GC Infobase.
  • Some DRIs have targets measured annually on an on-going basis, and as per the TBS defined process, the date to achieve the target will automatically be set for the same month of the following year. For example, the indicator " Percentage of First Nations housing that is adequate as assessed and reported by First Nations" is set to 100% each year to retain line of sight and consistently measure progress year-over-year. This practice has been interpreted in the PBO report as the DRI having a target and date to complete inconsistent with the last observation.
  • For some targets, Canada is co-developing the target dates with its Indigenous Partners and these target dates cannot be set until co-development is complete. For example, for the DRI "Percentage of First Nations children on-reserve in care" targets and dates to achieve will be co-developed with First Nations partners by March 2024.
Challenges in Setting Targets
  • In the context of self-determined services, ISC is engaging with its Indigenous Partners to co-develop realistic targets in some Programs. Here, targets cannot be set solely by ISC as it would not be meaningful or relevant for the purpose or intent the program is meant to support. Examples include:
    • Urban Programming for Indigenous Peoples program taking measures to engage with its recipients with the ultimate objective of co-creating performance measures grounded in Indigenous methodologies and measures of success;
    • 10-year New Fiscal Relationship grant, whereby First Nations have the flexibility to design and deliver services based on their own plans and priorities;
    • Children and Family Services Program co-developing a Program performance measurement framework with First Nations partners; and
    • Education Programs where First Nations have indicated a preference to develop results frameworks that better reflect and respond to their education goals and priorities through the development of regional education agreements.
Challenges in Reporting Results
  • The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant delays in data collection by ISC and its Indigenous Partners. For example, in 2020-21, all annual performance inspections for Community Infrastructure were cancelled due to public health restrictions. These inspections were further delayed in 2021-22 and 2022-23 resulting in data becoming available in 2023-24.
  • The pandemic also affected external data resources that ISC relies on for reporting. For example, the Regional Health Survey by the First Nations Information Governance Centre provides the data to measure health-related indicators for First Nations on Reserve on a five-year basis. This survey was scheduled to take place in 2020 but has been delayed to 2023.
  • For some departmental indicators, ISC has made changes to its methodology to improve its performance measurement. For example, in the Elementary and Secondary School Education Program, a new graduation rate methodology was introduced in 2022-23 to calculate the Percentage of First Nations on reserve students who graduate from secondary school (on-time and extended-time). This new methodology, which uses a grade 10 cohort-based approach, was developed by the Canadian Education Statistics Council and published by Statistics Canada, as recommended by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada. Given that the timing of a school's academic year does not align with the government's fiscal year, data for this indicator is reported one year behind.

Current Status

  • ISC's 2023-24 Departmental Results Framework enables the strengthening of performance measurement and provides an opportunity to implement quality and relevant data, performance indicators and targets by service area that will be more reflective of outcomes to which ISC's Programs and services contribute.
  • For the 2023-24 Departmental Plan, Programs were challenged to set realistic but ambitious targets.
  • ISC is currently undergoing a comprehensive renewal of the Performance Information Profiles for all its Programs. As part of this renewal, ISC Programs will further assess the relevancy and usefulness of indicators for continued use.
  • ISC will be building further rigor in its performance measurement practices including periodic follow-ups on targets with Programs where applicable.

If pressed about the transition from 2022-23 DRF to 2023-24 DRF

For 2023-24, 34 Departmental Indicators Results Indicators have been identified. This is a reduction of 9 indicators from 2022-23 where 43 indicators were identified.

Of the 43 indicators reported in 2022-23:

  • 17 indicators were retained as-is.
  • 13 indicators were not retained as DRIs because they primarily measure outputs of services delivered, which in many cases do not meaningfully link ISC Programs to Departmental Results. These indicators will continue to be tracked publicly at the Program level in GCInfobase.
  • 13 were removed for other reasons such as duplication, reframing as new indicators to reflect distinctions or updated methodology or inclusion in Performance Information Profile at the program level

Indigenous led data collection, analysis and indicator development

Key Messages

  • ISC's vision is to support and empower Indigenous peoples to independently deliver services and address the socio-economic conditions in their communities.
  • The environment in which ISC operates is shaped by a variety of factors that influence its current and future delivery of services including the expressed needs of our Indigenous partners, our support for Indigenous self-determination, and the transfer of responsibilities and jurisdiction to Indigenous partners.
  • Supporting Indigenous data sovereignty and capacity is critical to successful service transfer and to supporting the exercise of Indigenous jurisdiction.
  • ISC has taken steps towards better program alignment, expenditure management and reporting on results. Through the new 2023-24 Departmental Results Framework (DRF), ISC's reporting structure moves to a single Core Responsibility that focuses more on Indigenous Well-Being and Self-Determination than on more operational results relating to service delivery.
  • Through greater engagement with stakeholders we hope to harmonize the Department's performance frameworks, including those at the level of our programs, with the priorities of our Indigenous partners.
  • The departmental will, over time, move away from departmental results in the traditional sense of program outcomes to indicators in the context of mutual accountability, while supporting efforts to build capacity in First Nations to collect and analyze the outcomes of their programs.

Background & Current Status

  • The Department is pursuing engagement opportunities at the program level with the aim of aligning program results with the needs, priorities and shared outcomes of our Indigenous partners, as well as reducing reporting burden and leveraging and improving on other available data sources. To this end, ISC program representatives have been working, and will continue to work, with Partners to inform its performance frameworks, including their results, performance indicators and targets, for a number of our programs, including in the areas of Child and Family Services, and Urban Programming for Indigenous Peoples.
  • ISC has also proposed the development of a First Nation Child, Young People and Families Index in collaboration with experts from the Institute for Fiscal Studies and Development (IFSD), Nishnawbe Aski Nation (NAN), the First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC), the National Advisory Committee on Child and Family Services (NAC), First Nations Health Authority (FNHA), and others who may be able to support in this effort. ISC hopes this approach would lead to clearer objectives, better collaboration, streamlined reporting and data collection processes, and address some of the structural drivers underlying the over-representation of First Nations children in care.
  • In addition to the context above, other activities and opportunities to move the department along the continuum of service towards service transfer leveraging performance measurement and data are outlined below.
    • There have been several calls for a comprehensive set of national-level indicators to track improvements in the well-being of First Nations. ISC is working with the Assembly of First Nations and First Nations to develop a National Outcome-Based Framework that would measure the closure of socio-economic gaps between First Nations and non-Indigenous Canadians.  (See details in Annex A: National Outcome Based Framework).
    • Statistics Canada distinctions based survey and census data, including the Indigenous Peoples Survey, can provide important insights on socio-economic gaps. (See details in Annex B: Summary of Status of Socio-Economic Gaps).
    • Both the Draft UNDA Action Plan and the Federal Data Strategy highlight the importance of supporting Indigenous data sovereignty as a whole-of-government priority. In alignment with Canada's commitments under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, Indigenous Services Canada's commitment to service transfer, the Transformational Approach to Indigenous Data focuses on advancing Indigenous data capacity to support the inherent strengths, resilience, and knowledge systems of Indigenous Peoples as a foundational component of Indigenous self-determination (See Annex C: Supporting Indigenous-led statistical institutions).
    • Indigenous survey data is better if the surveys are Indigenous led. By promising greater cultural relevance of the questions and more culturally competent data collection and management processes, Indigenous-led surveys can achieve better data quality and ultimately empower Indigenous Peoples to tell their own stories based on their unique world views, and to design and deliver effective programs, policies, and services. (See Annex D: Supporting Indigenous-led Surveys: The Surveys on Indigenous Peoples)
    • ISC First Nation and Inuit health Branch (FNIHB) financially supports two national health surveys: (1) the First Nations Regional Health Survey (RHS), which is managed and conducted by the First Nations Information Governance Centre ($24.5M over 5 years), and (2) Qanuippitaa? National Inuit Health Survey (QNIHS) which is managed and conducted by Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and the four Inuit Land Claim Organizations ($41M over 5 years). FNIHB draws heavily on RHS results for evidence-based program planning and policy development as well as for departmental reporting commitments. (See Annex E: Inuit Qanuippitaa National Inuit Health Survey (QNIHS) and Regional Health Survey (RHS)).

Annex A: Briefing Materials on the National Outcome-Based Framework

  • There have been several calls for a comprehensive set of national-level indicators to track improvements in the well-being of First Nations, including:
    • Call to Action #19 in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission;
    • The Auditor General of Canada's Spring 2018 report on socio-economic gaps on reserves;
    • The corresponding House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts report on the audit;
    • The ISC-AFN Joint Advisory Committee on Fiscal Relations; and
    • Various Calls for Justice from the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls.
  • Since 2017, Indigenous Services Canada has been working with the Assembly of First Nations and First Nations to develop a National Outcome-Based Framework that would measure the closure of socio-economic gaps between First Nations and non-Indigenous Canadians.
  • The Framework will be an important element of mutual accountability, whereby the Government of Canada and First Nations hold each other accountable for commitments to improve the well-being of First Nations.
  • It is also part of a broader effort to move away from indicators of program-based outputs to outcomes that reflect First Nations ways of seeing, knowing and understanding.
  • The Framework would include desired outcomes and statistical indicators on a variety of themes, such as health, social, education, economic prosperity, housing, and community infrastructure, as well as themes identified by First Nations as being particularly meaningful in terms of reconciliation, such as land, language, culture and governance.
  • The Framework will seek to complement, but not replace, First Nations developed community well-being frameworks or community development plans.
  • ISC has made progress on the development of the Framework:
    • ISC initially worked with partners to identify principles to guide the Framework and conducted a scan of First Nations well-being frameworks, from which a draft Framework was prepared;
    • ISC then engaged program officials and technical experts on First Nations data to inform revisions to the draft;
    • Engagements with First Nations leaders and organizations have begun and are expected to be completed in mid-2023;
    • The results of the engagements will subsequently be analyzed and a final version of the Framework prepared.
  • When ISC and its partners have agreed upon a final framework, with the associated outcomes and indicators, a report will be prepared with baseline data, context and disaggregation by various identity factors where feasible.
  • The Framework is intended to be evergreen and will evolve as First Nations develop their data and statistical capacity.

Annex B: An Update on the Socio-Economic Gaps Between Indigenous Peoples in Canada and the Non-Indigenous Population

In 2020, the Department's Annual Report to ParliamentFootnote 1 focused on providing benchmark indicators to assess the nature and scope of the socio-economic gaps between Indigenous Peoples in Canada and the non-Indigenous population. New data on indicators related to income, employment, education, housing, foster care, Indigenous languages and incarceration are now available from the 2021 Census and the Adult Correctional Services Survey. For a complete overview of the main indicators for each domain see Appendix A.

Indigenous Peoples in Canada face significant and long-standing socioeconomic gaps when compared to non-Indigenous people. These gaps have been shaped by a long history of colonialism, discrimination, and marginalization, which have had a profound impact on Indigenous peoples and continue to affect their lives today. Despite the ongoing gaps, significant work is being done to narrow these gaps and improve conditions.

Income and Employment

  • Even after accounting for inflation, income was higher for all Indigenous identities and increased at a higher rate than that of the Non-Indigenous population and a large narrowing of the gap was observed for each of the Indigenous groups with increases ranging from $4,500 to $9,900 since 2015.
  • Although a similar proportion of individuals were employed in 2021 compared to 2016, those who were employed made more money even - bringing home an extra $800 to $4,200 a year in income after accounting for inflation.
  • Overall, 136,000 fewer Indigenous people living in a low-income situation since 2015.
  • Census 2026 will be important to determine whether there has been lasting changes of these gaps beyond the availability of government benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Education

  • Overall, there were in 2021 80,280 more Indigenous people aged 25-64 with a high school level education since 2016.
  • From 2016 to 2021, an additional 47,980 Indigenous people obtained a university education. Despite these gains, the gaps in university completion with the Non-Indigenous population widened for all Indigenous groups from 15.9 to 22.9 percent.

Housing

  • The gaps in both the proportion of dwellings that were crowded or in need of major repair generally narrowed between census cycles. However, the narrowing of the gap in the proportion of dwellings that were crowded was due in part to increases in increased crowding for the Non-Indigenous population.
  • The greatest improvements in the number of crowded households was found for Registered Indians living on reserve going from 12,160 crowded households in 2016 to 10,705 in 2021, a difference of 1,455.
  • Similarly, 6,005 fewer households of Registered Indians living on reserve and 485 fewer households of Registered Indians living off reserve required major repairs to their dwelling.

Foster Care

  • As the census only collects data from private households, only children living in foster care in a private home are counted. This means those residing in institutions, group homes or other care arrangements are excluded from the census counts.
  • The proportion of Registered Indians, Non-status Indian and Métis children in foster care were actually fairly stable over the period. There was an almost one percentage point increase for Inuit children.
  • In total, there were 17,410 Indigenous children in foster care in 2016 compared to 17,320 in 2021.

Indigenous Languages

  • In 2021, 243,155 individuals could conduct a conversation in an Indigenous language, 188,905 people reported having at least one Indigenous mother tongue and 182,925 reported speaking an Indigenous language at home at least on a regular basis.
  • There were over 70 Indigenous languages spoken in Canada with over 20 (28.6 percent) of them having 500 or fewer people reporting speaking them as their mother tongue.Footnote 2

Incarceration

  • From 2016 to 2021, there was a slight increase in the proportion of Indigenous adults admitted to correctional services going from 29.9 percent in 2016 to 31.2 percent in 2021.
  • The total number of incarcerated adults dropped considerably during this time. Overall, number of incarcerated Indigenous adults fell from 74,823 in 2016 to 46,633 in 2021, a difference of 28,190 people.Footnote 3

Addressing socio-economic gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples in areas such as income, employment, education, housing, foster care and incarceration is crucial for reconciliation. These gaps are a result of systemic barriers and inequalities that have led to the marginalization and oppression of Indigenous Peoples.

Appendix A

Overview of the change in the observed gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations from 2016-2021 for all domain indicators, Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations, Canada

Median Individual Income (adjusted)
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2015 $ $22,100 $35,400 $37,400 $36,000 $44,300 $46,600
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -$24,500 -$11,200 -$9,200 -$10,600 -$2,300  
2020 $ $32,000 $42,000 $43,200 $42,800 $48,800 $50,400
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -$18,400 -$8,400 -$7,200 -$7,600 -$1,600  
5 Year Change $ $9,900 $6,600 $5,800 $6,800 $4,500 $3,800
% Change in the Gap -24.9% -25.0% -21.7% -28.3% -30.4%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap Large Large Large Large Large  
Direction of the Gap Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing  
Percentage Living in a Low-Income Situation
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2015 % 47.7% 30.3% 25.2% 22.3% 17.3% 13.8%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 33.9% 16.5% 11.4% 8.5% 3.5%  
2020 % 31.3% 19.8% 16.8% 16.5% 12.6% 10.7%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 20.6% 9.1% 6.1% 5.8% 1.9%  
5 Year Change % -16.4% -10.5% -8.4% -5.8% -4.7% -3.1%
% Change in the Gap -39.2% -44.8% -46.5% -31.8% -45.7%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap Large Large Large Large Large  
Direction of the Gap Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing  
Employment Rate
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2016 % 46.9% 60.2% 66.1% 57.4% 70.4% 76.0%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -29.1% -15.8% -9.9% -18.6% -5.6%  
2021 % 47.1% 58.7% 64.8% 55.2% 69.1% 74.1%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -27.0% -15.4% -9.3% -18.9% -5.0%  
5 Year Change % 0.2% -1.5% -1.3% -2.2% -1.3% -1.9%
% Change in the Gap -7.2% -2.5% -6.1% 1.6% -10.7%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap Small No change Small No change Small  
Direction of the Gap Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing  
Median Employment Income (adjusted)
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2015 $ $25,200 $38,300 $39,500 $35,400 $44,800 $46,200
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -$21,000 -$7,900 -$6,700 -$10,800 -$1,400  
2020 $ $29,400 $40,000 $40,400 $39,600 $45,600 $47,600
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -$18,200 -$7,600 -$7,200 -$8,000 -$2,000  
5 Year Change $ $4,200 $1,700 $900 $4,200 $800 $1,400
% Change in the Gap -13.3% -3.8% 7.5% -25.9% 42.9%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap Medium No change Small Large Large  
Direction of the Gap Narrowing Widening Narrowing Widening  
Percentage with at Least a High School Credential
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2016 % 57.0% 75.0% 80.3% 55.9% 82.3% 89.2%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 32.2% -14.2% -8.9% -33.3% -6.9%  
2021 % 59.9% 78.2% 82.7% 56.0% 85.5% 90.7%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -30.8% -12.5% -8.0% -34.7% -5.2%  
5 Year Change % 2.9% 3.2% 2.4% 0.1% 3.2% 1.5%
% Change in the Gap -4.3% -12.0% -10.1% 4.2% -24.6%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap No change Small Small No change Large  
Direction of the Gap Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing  
Percentage with a University Degree
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2016 % 5.4% 11.3% 11.9% 5.3% 13.6% 29.3%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -23.9% -18.0% -17.4% -24.0% -15.7%  
2021 $ 9.1% 15.7% 16.4% 7.6% 18.8% 37.0%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population -27.9% -21.3% -20.6% -29.4% -18.2%  
5 Year Change % 3.7% 4.4% 4.5% 2.3% 5.2% 7.7%
% Change in the Gap 16.7% 18.3% 18.4% 22.5% 15.9%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap Medium Medium Medium Large Medium  
Direction of the Gap Widening Widening Widening Widening Widening  
Percentage of Dwellings Classified as Crowded
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2016 % 12.7% 2.7% 1.1% 16.0% 0.8% 1.8%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 10.9% 0.9% -0.7% 14.2% -1.0%  
2021 % 11.3% 2.8% 0.9% 13.9% 1.0% 2.3%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 9.0% 0.5% -1.4% 11.6% -1.3%  
5 Year Change % -1.4% 0.1% -0.2% -2.1% 0.2% 0.5%
% Change in the Gap -17.4% -44.4% 100.0% -18.3% 30.0%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap Medium Large No Gap Medium No Gap  
Direction of the Gap Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing  
Percentage of Dwellings in Need of Major Repair
  Registered Indian on reserve Registered Indian off reserve Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2016 % 40.0% 12.2% 12.3% 21.8% 10.3% 6.0%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 34.0% 6.2% 6.3% 15.8% 4.3%  
2021 % 34.0% 10.9% 10.7% 21.2% 9.4% 5.7%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 28.3% 5.2% 5.0% 15.5% 3.7%  
5 Year Change % -6.0% -1.3% -1.6% -0.6% -0.9% -0.3%
% Change in the Gap -16.8% -16.1% -20.6% -1.9% -14.0%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap Medium Medium Large No Change Medium  
Direction of the Gap Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing Narrowing  
Percentage of Children Aged 0-17 in Foster Care
  Registered Indian
on reserve
Non-Status Indian Inuit Métis Non-Indigenous
2016 % 4.5% 3.1% 2.4% 1.3% 0.3%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 4.2% 2.8% 2.1% 1.0%  
2021 % 4.5% 3.0% 3.3% 1.2% 0.2%
Difference Non-Indigenous Population 4.3% 2.8% 3.1% 1.0%  
5 Year
Change
% 0.0% 0.1% 0.9% -0.1% -0.1%
% Change in the Gap 2.4% 0.0% 47.6% 0.0%  
Results Size of Change in the Gap No
change
No
change
Large No
Change
 
Direction of the Gap Widening  

Source: Indigenous Services Canada. Custom Tabulations, 2016 & 2021 Census of Population

Note:

According to Cohen's conventions (Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), a percent change of 5 percent would be considered a small effect size, a percent change of 12.5 percent would be considered a medium effect size, and a percent change of 20 percent or more would be considered a large effect size.

The on/off reserve breakdown is not included for children in foster care as it may be misleading, since Registered Indian children living in foster care off reserve may come from families living on reserve.

Annex C — Supporting Indigenous-led Statistical Institutions

Key Messages

  • ISC recognizes that one key to addressing longstanding data gaps related to Indigenous Peoples is to support First Nations, Inuit, and Métis to collect, hold, and manage their own data.
  • Both the Draft UNDA Action Plan and the Federal Data Strategy highlight the importance of supporting Indigenous data sovereignty as a whole-of-government priority.
  • Supported by $81.5 million announced in Budget 2021, ISC is proceeding with Phase 1 (2022-23 to 2024-25) of a Transformational Approach to Indigenous Data. The initiative is expected to take a minimum of three phases and six years of development, and will culminate in First Nations, Inuit, and Métis-led statistical capacity in the form of distinctions-based institutions, organizations, or functions that are structured and governed according to the unique needs and perspectives of each distinctions group.
  • In alignment with Canada's commitments under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, Indigenous Services Canada's commitment to service transfer, the Transformational Approach to Indigenous Data focuses on advancing Indigenous data capacity to support the inherent strengths, resilience, and knowledge systems of Indigenous Peoples as a foundational component of Indigenous self-determination.

Background

  • The five work streams under the Transformational Approach to Indigenous Data are described below.
    • Stream 1: Readying ISC Data Transition ($9.5M): The objective of this work stream is to facilitate data sharing with Indigenous partners as a first step towards the eventual transfer of departmental data assets to Indigenous control along with related service delivery responsibilities.
    • Stream 2: Strengthening First Nations Data Capacity ($51.1M): The objective of this stream in Phase 1 is for First Nations, led by the First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC) and its regional partners, to establish Data Champion Teams at the regional and national levels. These teams will engage with rights holders to develop detailed plans for the First Nations‑led, network of national and regional information governance centres (RIGCs) that was envisioned in the 2020 First Nations Data Governance Strategy, and will comprise the foundation on which that network will be established starting in Phase 2.
    • Stream 3: Strengthening Inuit Data Capacity ($4.0M): The objective of this stream is for Inuit, led by Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), to develop an Inuit Data Strategy identifying their long-term data and data capacity needs. This work will align with and support the Inuit Nunangat Policy, and build upon ITK's 2018 National Inuit Strategy on Research, particularly Priority #4, which is "to ensure Inuit access, ownership, and control over data and information."
    • Stream 4: Strengthening Métis Nation Data Capacity ($4.0M): The objective of this stream is for the signatories to the Canada-Métis Nation Accord to develop Métis Nation data strategies identifying their long-term data and data capacity needs.
    • Stream 5: Engaging Statistics Canada to Support Indigenous Data Capacity ($13.0M): The objectives of this work stream are for Statistics Canada to support the Indigenous Delivery Partners in building Indigenous data capacity (as per streams 2-4), and to improve the visibility of Indigenous Peoples in Canada's national statistics.

Current Status

  • The Transformational Approach to Indigenous Data is featured in the Federal Data Strategy that was released on April 19, 2023. The strategy also highlights "Support for Indigenous data sovereignty" as one of its five desired outcomes.
  • The draft UNDA Action Plan also includes support for Indigenous data sovereignty as cross-cutting priority.
  • Contribution agreements are in place with Indigenous partners and each is progressing on its 3-year work plan for Phase 1 of the Transformational Approach to Indigenous Data.
  • For the First Nations Information Governance Centre, the first phase of implementation started with the recruitment of First Nations-led Data Champion Teams – one in every region and at the national level – who will focus on the development of blueprints for their future centers prior to building them up in phase 2. These phase 1 blueprints will be for: the design of permanent, expert-driven regional data governance bodies, and the identification of data capacity building priorities.
    • At the national level, the Data Champion Team has begun to engage First Nations-led partner organizations to identify their priority needs as future users of the network, as well as to establish new collaboration frameworks with key federal departments, including with respect to data governance, access to First Nations data, data sharing and data transition.
  • Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami has made significant progress on its year 1 milestones, including scoping activities and baseline data needs assessments for ITK itself and the Inuit Treaty Organizations.
  • Regarding the Métis Nations, $3 million was allocated to the Métis National Council and its member organizations to support the development of a Métis Nation Data Strategy, and $1 million was allocated to the Manitoba Métis Federation to support the development of a Red River Métis Data Governance Strategy, which will identify their long-term data and data capacity needs. Following some delays in developing their proposals, by the close of 2022-23, Métis partners had established good momentum on implementing their work plans.

If pressed about future phases of the Transformational Approach to Indigenous Data

  • ISC recognizes that supporting Indigenous data sovereignty and capacity is critical to successful service transfer and to supporting the exercise of Indigenous jurisdiction. Things like the draft UNDA Action Plan and the Federal Data Strategy demonstrate that this is a whole-of-government priority linked to Indigenous self-determination and nation-to-nation relationships.
  • ISC looks forward to supporting First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Nations as they develop their respective visions for data sovereignty.

Annex D – Supporting Indigenous-led Surveys: The Surveys on Indigenous Peoples

Key Messages

  • ISC recognizes that one key to addressing longstanding data gaps related to Indigenous Peoples is to support First Nations, Inuit, and Métis to collect, hold, and manage their own data.
  • Indigenous survey data is better if the surveys are Indigenous led. By promising greater cultural relevance of the questions and more culturally competent data collection and management processes, Indigenous-led surveys can achieve better data quality and ultimately empower Indigenous Peoples to tell their own stories based on their unique world views, and to design and deliver effective programs, policies, and services.
  • ISC funds several major Indigenous-led surveys, including the First Nations Regional Social Survey, which has been led since 2011 by the First Nations Information Governance Centre, in compliance with the First Nations principles of OCAP®.
  • It is incumbent upon the department to not only support Indigenous-led surveys, but to use the evidence they provide to guide our own decision-making. Doing this means working with Indigenous partners to access these data, and ensure we use them in a respectful and culturally competent way.

Background

The Surveys on Indigenous Peoples
  • The Surveys on Indigenous Peoples program was launched in November, 2011, following a redesign of the old "Aboriginal Peoples Survey" that Statistics Canada had been conducting since 1991, but with increasingly difficulty in securing on-reserve participation.
  • As part of the redesign, ISC entered into a partnership with the First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC) to conduct the on-reserve component, building on their established success conduction the First Nations Regional Health Survey in compliance with the First Nations principles of OCAP®. This new survey is known as the First Nations Regional Social Survey.
  • Statistics Canada continues to conduct the off-reserve component, which is now known as the Indigenous Peoples Survey, and which covers First Nations living off-reserve, Métis and Inuit.
  • Although the Surveys on Indigenous Peoples program was new, its inaugural cycle was deemed its fourth cycle, in recognition that Statistics Canada had conducted the Aboriginal Peoples Survey three times previously, in 1991, 2001, and 2006.
  • Following funding provided in Budget 2011, the initiative launched its fourth survey cycle (2011-12 to 2015-16) with the theme of Education and Employment, focusing on education and the transition to the labour force.
  • Funding for the surveys was then renewed for a fifth cycle (2015-16 to 2020-21) through Budget 2015, with the theme of Participation in the Economy, which focuses on Indigenous adults and the barriers and levers they face in the labour force.
  • The program achieved permanent funding through Budget 2019, and the sixth cycle (2021-22 to 2025-26) was launched with the theme of Children and Families, which explores barriers and levers to supporting Indigenous children and families to thrive.

Current Status

  • 2023-24 constitutes year three of the current five year survey cycle, based on the theme "Children and Families."
  • Statistics Canada completed collection of the 2022 Indigenous Peoples Survey in March 2023 for First Nations living off reserve, Inuit and Métis; and are working with the federal funding partners on the design of the data and research products that will be released starting in summer 2024.
  • The First Nations Information Governance Centre is currently designing the on-reserve survey, with plans to go into the field in fall 2024.
  • Statistics Canada and the First Nations Information Governance Centre continue to collaborate on various technical dimensions of their respective surveys to share best practices and troubleshoot potential issues, particularly with respect to challenges to data collection in the COVID-19 context.

Annex E – Inuit Qanuippitaa? National Inuit Health Survey (QNIHS) and Regional Health Survey (RHS)

We are focusing specifically on the Associate's question relevant to FNIHB asking for more information on "The Indigenous led data collection, analysis and indicator development efforts underway (e.g. Inuit health survey and RHS)".

  • ISC-FNIHB financially supports two national health surveys: (1) the First Nations Regional Health Survey, which is managed and conducted by the First Nations Information Governance Centre ($24.5M over 5 years), and (2) Qanuippitaa? National Inuit Health Survey (QNIHS) which is managed and conducted by Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and the four Inuit Land Claim Organizations ($41M over 5 years). Indicator selection and development for each survey is determined by the Indigenous organizations in accordance with their regional and population health data needs. The surveys collect information based on both Western and traditional understandings of health and well-being.
  • FNIHB draws heavily on RHS results for evidence-based program planning and policy development as well as for departmental reporting commitments. For example, RHS provides results for indicators like mental health status, quality and accessibility of health services, and rates for certain health conditions, which are used to inform several departmental reporting requirements (e.g., the Departmental Results Report and Horizontal Initiative Results Frameworks).
  • ISC-FNIHB purchase RHS results through a contractual agreement with the First Nations Governance Centre. This agreement respects the principles of Ownership, Control, Access and Possession (OCAP), while allowing ISC-FNIHB to obtain customized results for a multitude of specialized reporting indicators. QNIHS results, once available, will also be obtained through a contractual agreement with Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami.
  • In addition to federal — National NIO work, FNIGC regional partners in Atlantic region, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia continue to work with their provincial health organizations to extract First Nation specific information from health administrative databases (i.e., deaths, hospitalizations, coroner's data). These data enable First Nations to report on regionally prevalent health conditions such as COVID-19 and substance abuse, as well as opioid deaths. Although it is currently not possible to reproduce these statistics across all provincial/territorial jurisdictions, FNIGC regional partnering organizations continue to work towards structuring data governance approaches that will eventually enable this type of reporting.

We think the above adequately covers what the Associate is looking for, but here are some further details with respect to your particular questions below:

Status of these surveys (e.g., conducted in 2022) and ISC role (e.g., funding)

  • FNIHB financially supports two national health surveys: (1) the First Nations Regional Health Survey, which is managed and conducted by the First Nations Information Governance Centre ($24.5M over 5 years), and (2) Qanuippitaa? National Inuit Health Survey (QNIHS) which is managed and conducted by Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and the four Inuit Land Claim Organizations ($41M over 5 years). Indicator selection and development for each survey is determined by the Indigenous organizations in accordance with their regional and population health data needs. The surveys collect information based on both Western and traditional understandings of health and well-being.

Impact of COVID (e.g., survey delays, data gaps for x years)

  • COVID-19 has significantly impacted the completion timeline for both the RHS and QNIHS. Both surveys rely on face-to-face data collection methods and the direct impacts of COVID-19 as well as post-pandemic after affects have impeded advancement as communities and regions have had to prioritize response and recovery activities, and subsequently are exhausted. The two surveys are currently in the data collection phase, which will be completed in FY 2023-24. However, the pandemic has delayed the overall cycle completion by approximately 2.5 years.

ISC's use of this survey data including examples of specific robust indicators (e.g., trends we have observed, are we closing the socio-economic gap?)

  • FNIHB draws heavily on RHS results for evidence-based program planning and policy development as well as for departmental reporting commitments. For example, RHS provides results for indicators like mental health status, quality and accessibility of health services, and rates for certain health conditions, which are used to inform several departmental reporting requirements (e.g., the Departmental Results Report and Horizontal Initiative Results Frameworks).

Any outstanding actions (e.g., we need to develop an information sharing agreement with party xyz to access the survey data)

  • ISC-FNIHB purchase RHS results through a contractual agreement with the First Nations Governance Centre. This agreement respects the principles of Ownership, Control, Access and Possession (OCAP), while allowing ISC- FNIHB to obtain customized results for a multitude of specialized reporting indicators. QNIHS results, once available, will also be obtained through a contractual agreement with Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami.
  • In addition to federal – National NIO work, FNIGC regional partners in Atlantic region, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia continue to work with their provincial health organizations to extract First Nation specific information from health administrative databases (i.e., deaths, hospitalizations, coroner's data). These data enable First Nations to report on regionally prevalent health conditions such as COVID-19 and substance abuse, as well as opioid deaths. Although it is currently not possible to reproduce these statistics across all provincial/territorial jurisdictions, FNIGC regional partnering organizations continue to work towards structuring data governance approaches that will eventually enable this type of reporting.

Budget 2023

If pressed on Economic Reconciliation:

  • Budget 2023 proposes to provide $30 million over five years to ensure that First Nations can develop capacity to exercise increased responsibility over their lands, resources, and environment.
  • Budget 2023 also:
    • reaffirms our commitment to negotiate a renewed operating funding formula with the Lands Advisory Board, and;
    • provides $5 million to support the co-development of an Economic Reconciliation Framework that will increase economic opportunities for Indigenous Peoples, communities, and businesses.

If pressed on Health Equity:

  • Budget 2023 proposes $810.6 million to support medical travel and to maintain medically necessary services through the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program, including mental health services, dental and vision care, and medications.
  • Additionally, Budget 2023 proposes $16.2 million for interventions to reduce rates of tuberculosis in Inuit communities.

If pressed on Governance and Capacity:

  • Budget 2023 proposes to provide $76.3 million to continue to support the administrative capacity of First Nations governments and tribal councils delivering critical programs and services to their members.

If pressed on Implementation of jurisdictional rights for child and family services:

  • With funding announced in the 2022 Fall Economic Statement, Budget 2023 also provides support to Peguis First Nation in Manitoba and Louis Bull Tribe First Nation in Alberta to exercise jurisdiction over their child welfare systems and make decisions about what is best for their children and families.

Background

First Nations governments need resources to meet the needs of their communities and deliver the services and programs their communities rely on. Supporting First Nations governments is an essential part of supporting self-determination.

  • Budget 2023 proposes to provide $76.3 million in 2023-24 to Indigenous Services Canada to continue to support the administrative capacity of First Nations governments and tribal councils delivering critical programs and services to their members.

Economic reconciliation is critical to Indigenous self-determination. To move forward and build prosperity, systemic barriers must be removed and supports put in place for Indigenous communities to fully participate in the economy in line with their constitutionally protected rights.

  • Budget 2023 proposes to provide $5 million in 2023-24 to Indigenous Services Canada to support the co-development of an Economic Reconciliation Framework with Indigenous partners that will increase economic opportunities for Indigenous Peoples, communities, and businesses.

The federal government is committed to supporting initiatives that return control and decision-making over the use of First Nations lands back to First Nations communities. This supports economic growth and self-determination for First Nations, and moves us further along the path of reconciliation.

  • Budget 2023 proposes to provide $30 million over five years, starting in 202324, to Indigenous Services Canada to enhance the Reserve Land and Environment Management Program, ensuring First Nations can develop capacity to exercise increased responsibility over their lands, resources, and environment.
  • Through Budget 2023, the government reaffirms its commitment to negotiate a renewed operating funding formula with the Lands Advisory Board to ensure the continued growth and success of First Nation Land Management.

As part of the federal government's plan to strengthen Canada's universal public health care system, the government is investing $2 billion in new, additional funding over ten years for a distinctions-based Indigenous Health Equity Fund. This fund will address the unique challenges Indigenous Peoples face when accessing health care services, and support immediate and long-term Indigenous health priorities. Building on this investment, Budget 2023 proposes additional new measures to maintain essential health care services. Budget 2023 proposes to provide:

  • $810.6 million over five years, beginning in 2023-24, to support medical travel and to maintain medically necessary services through the NonInsured Health Benefits Program, including mental health services, dental and vision care, and medications.
  • $16.2 million over three years, beginning in 2023-24, for interventions to reduce rates of tuberculosis in Inuit communities.

The government also continues to work with First Nations partners on long- term reforms for child welfare, and to support community-led solutions to reduce the number of children in care and keep children and youth connected to their families, their communities, and their culture. In addition, the government is supporting First Nations in developing their own child and family services that reflect their values and traditions under An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families.

  • Budget 2023 proposes to provide $171 million in 2022-23 to Indigenous Services Canada to ensure First Nations children continue to receive the support they need through Jordan's Principle.
  • With funding announced in the 2022 Fall Economic Statement, Budget 2023 also provides $444.2 million over three years, starting in 2022-23, to support Peguis First Nation in Manitoba and Louis Bull Tribe First Nation in Alberta to exercise jurisdiction over their child welfare systems and make decisions about what is best for their children and families.

Infrastructure

Key Messages

General

  • The Government of Canada has committed to closing the critical infrastructure gap in First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities by 2030.
  • Since 2016 and as of December 31, 2022, $8.55 billion in targeted funds have been invested, supporting 8,342 infrastructure projects in First Nations.
  • This includes:
    • 1,058 water and wastewater projects;
    • The construction, renovation or retrofit of 14,986 housing units;
    • 273 schools projects, including 67 new schools;
    • 257 health projects, including construction or renovation of 79 health facilities; and,
    • 2,656 projects to support other community infrastructure, including everything from roads and bridges to fire protection to cultural and recreational facilities.
  • We know there is more to do and we continue to work in partnership with Indigenous leadership and communities to implement community-led solutions and invest in the future of Indigenous peoples to improve their quality of life and create new opportunities.

Closing the Infrastructure Gap

  • As mandated through the 2020 Fall Economic Statement, Indigenous Services Canada and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada worked collaboratively with Indigenous organizations and communities to support an engagement and co-development process that provided the federal government with a better understanding of the infrastructure needs in Indigenous communities.
  • Indigenous Services Canada engaged with First Nations and Inuit partners to co-develop distinctions-based infrastructure plans. As of April 13, 2023, 405 of the 564 First Nations that Indigenous Services Canada engaged submitted infrastructure needs lists, reflecting a response rate of 72%. The top categories of infrastructure needs identified by First Nations were community assets, housing, transportation infrastructure, water, wastewater and utilities, and emergency services.
  • Using a co-development, distinctions-based approach ensures Indigenous leaders and communities are partners in the design and delivery of services that reflect their priorities. This approach also reflects the importance of Canada's relationship with Indigenous peoples and our commitment to reconciliation.

Reform

  • Indigenous Services Canada continues to work with First Nations on ways to improve infrastructure service delivery as part of Canada's commitment to closing the infrastructure gap in Indigenous communities by 2030.
  • Starting in spring 2023, Indigenous Services Canada will engage with First Nations on ways to improve how infrastructure programs are delivered on-reserve. This builds off of the work that the Department started in 2022, when ISC engaged with First Nations to identify infrastructure gaps.

Transfer

  • As our shared goal, First Nations organizations and Indigenous Services Canada are partnering to advance First Nations self-determination in housing and community infrastructure.
  • With funding from Indigenous Services Canada, First Nations organizations will determine new models of service delivery, including infrastructure services, that meet their own diverse needs, priorities and approaches. All models are opt-in and must be supported by leadership.

Background

General

  • In 2019, the Government of Canada made a commitment to work with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis partners to close infrastructure gaps by 2030. Infrastructure service delivery for First Nations on-reserve needs major transformation and investment to achieve the Government of Canada's mandate to close the infrastructure gap by 2030.

Closing the Infrastructure Gap

  • Throughout 2021-22, Indigenous Services Canada and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada worked collaboratively with distinctions-based Indigenous partners to understand community infrastructure needs for closing the infrastructure gap.
  • Indigenous Services Canada engaged with individual First Nations as a part of this initiative. Letters were sent to 564 First Nations across Canada in the spring of 2022, requesting information on needed infrastructure assets and order of paramountcy. This exercise saw a response rate of 72%.
  • The Assembly of First Nations was also engaged and co-developed, with Indigenous Services Canada, a comprehensive cost report to close the First Nations infrastructure gap by 2030. In the report, the Assembly of First Nations estimated the cost to close the First Nations infrastructure gap would be $349.2 billion. As part of this report, the Assembly of First Nations also called for moving away from project-based investment approaches, guaranteeing reliable funding, and co-developing a self-governed First Nations Infrastructure Bank, amongst other measures.
  • Indigenous Services Canada engaged with Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami who engaged the four Inuit regional Land Claims Organizations and submitted a report outlining priority infrastructure projects in Inuit Nunangat. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami estimated that $55.3 billion over 10 years and $793.7 million annually would be required to support priority projects to narrow the infrastructure gap in Inuit Nunangat.
  • Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada conducted engagement with the Métis National Council and Manitoba Métis Federation, who identified infrastructure needs in their pre-Budget submissions. The Métis National Council identified immediate infrastructure investment needs of $2.41 billion over 6 years, while the Manitoba Métis Federation identified immediate investment needs of $299.2 million over 10 years.

Reform

  • While significant investments have been made to date and initiatives are underway to transfer infrastructure service delivery to First Nation communities, further work is required to transform infrastructure delivery so that it is equitable; focuses on self-determination; involves whole-of-government approaches to infrastructure delivery; and includes financial reforms that promote long-term, sustainable, and predictable funding.

Transfer

  • Since 2017, Indigenous Services Canada has been supporting First Nations partners to develop and deliver infrastructure solutions from the ground up to advance our shared goal of transferring responsibility of departmental housing and community infrastructure programs to First Nations organizations.
  • Indigenous Services Canada is also supporting these partners to ensure that new First Nations-designed service delivery models suit their needs, while recognizing and implementing the inherent right to self-determination.

Current Status

Closing the Infrastructure Gap

  • Indigenous Services Canada will provide First Nations communities with a detailed report on the information received during the Closing the Infrastructure Gap engagements in the Spring of 2023.

Reform

  • Over the next year, Indigenous Services Canada will work with First Nations communities and organizations, with other government departments, and with financial institutions to define a bold, new approach to how the Department funds on-reserve infrastructure. Changes will take time to implement and Indigenous Services Canada will engage First Nations communities on how they will be implemented.

Transfer

  • Since 2017, the Government of Canada has provided $108.89 million (until 2025–2026) to support engagements and institution-building related to transferring housing and infrastructure services.
  • The Government of Canada is also providing funding to support the implementation of a service delivery transfer agreement with the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority (AFNWA). Budget 2022 announced $173.2 million over 10 years (2022–2023 to 2031-2032) to support the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority as it takes control of operating and maintaining water and wastewater systems on-reserve in the Atlantic First Nations that choose to participate.
  • This long-term, sustainable funding will support the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority in delivering high-quality water and wastewater services to participating First Nations.

Safe Drinking Water

Key Messages

  • All Canadians deserve access to safe, clean and reliable drinking water.
  • As of December 31, 2022, more than $3.03 billion of targeted funding has been invested to support 1,058 water and wastewater projects, of which 525 are now complete and 533 are ongoing. These projects will serve 470,000 people in 589 First Nations communities.
  • First Nations, with support from Indigenous Services Canada, have lifted 138 long term drinking water advisories to date.
    • Approximately 38% of remaining long-term drinking water advisories are expected to be lifted by the end of June 2023.
    • 248 short-term drinking water advisories were also addressed, preventing them from becoming long-term drinking water advisories.
  • Initiatives are underway in 28 communities to resolve the remaining 32 advisories.

Background

  • Responsibility for safe drinking water on reserves is shared between First Nation communities and the Government of Canada.
    • First Nations are the managers and operators of their water and wastewater systems and are responsible for issuing or rescinding drinking water advisories, generally based on the advice of an environmental public health officer.
    • ISC provides advice and financial support to First Nations communities for their public water and wastewater systems and ensures that drinking water quality monitoring programs are in place.
  • Since 2016, the Government of Canada has committed $4.39 billion of targeted funds until 2023–2024 ($4.20 billion excluding funding for Indigenous Services Canada [ISC] departmental operating expenses, i.e. operating expenses related to ISC's administration of the targeted infrastructure investment portfolio). An additional $1.22 billion in new funding has been committed to support First Nations to operate and maintain their water and wastewater infrastructure, for a total commitment of $5.61 billion.
    • Budget 2016 committed $1.83 billion over five years ($1.73 billion excluding funding for operating expenses) to improve water and wastewater infrastructure on reserves, ensure proper facility operations and maintenance, and strengthen capacity by enhancing the training of water system operators in First Nations communities (sunsetted).
      • Budget 2016 also included $141.7 million in new funding to continue providing independent public health advice, guidance and recommendations to improve drinking water monitoring and testing on reserves.
    • Budget 2017 committed $49.1 million over three years, starting in 2018–2019, to improve water and wastewater infrastructure on reserves (sunsetted).
      • An additional $4.5 million over one year (2018–2019) from Operation Return Home was committed to support water and wastewater projects in Lake St. Martin-area First Nations displaced by floods in 2011 (sunsetted).
    • Budget 2018 committed $172.6 million over three years to improve access to clean and safe drinking water on reserves (sunsetted). Budget 2018 supported repairs to high-risk water systems, recruitment, training and retention initiatives, and the establishment of innovative First Nations-led service delivery models.
    • Budget 2019 committed $1 billion over five years, which includes:
      • $133.4 million over two years, starting in 2019–2020, to support urgent repairs to vulnerable water and wastewater systems (sunsetted);
      • $605.6 million over four years, starting in 2020–2021, and $184.9 million per year ongoing thereafter, to support the operations and maintenance of water and wastewater infrastructure in First Nations communities;
    • The 2020 Fall Economic Statement (FES) committed $1.5 billion in funding to help meet the Government of Canada's commitment to clean drinking water in First Nations communities:
      • $520.5 million over one year ($494.6 million excluding funding for operating expenses) to continue funding water and wastewater infrastructure on reserves to prevent future drinking water advisories from occurring (sunsetted);
      • $309.8 million over one year ($308.2 million excluding funding for operating expenses) to support and accelerate ongoing work to lift all long-term drinking water advisories on public systems on reserves by helping to respond to project delays including those caused by COVID-19 (sunsetted);
      • $616.3 million over six years and $114.1 million per year ongoing thereafter to support the operation and maintenance of water and wastewater infrastructure on reserves;
      • $32.9 million for Environment Public Health Officers who provide critical public health services in First Nations communities, including efforts to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19.
      • $19.7 million over two years (excluding funding for ISC departmental operating expenses), starting in 2021–2022, toward a water treatment facility in Asubpeeschoseewagong Netum Anishinabek (Grassy Narrows First Nation).
        • This targeted investment was part of a larger $200.1 million announcement for the construction and operations of a water treatment facility and mercury care home and in Grassy Narrows First Nation, and a mercury wellness centre in neighboring community, Wabaseemoong Independent Nations.
    • Budget 2021 committed $1.04 billion over two years ($989.3 million excluding funding for operating expenses), starting in 2022–2023, for the First Nations Water and Wastewater Enhanced Program. These investments will support the planning (including feasibility and design studies), procurement, construction, and commissioning of both minor and major water and wastewater capital projects for new builds and system repairs and upgrades in First Nations communities.
    • Budget 2022 committed $301.5 million ($292.7 million excluding funding for operating expenses) to improve access to clean drinking water on reserves, including:
      • $246.6 million over two years ($238.2 million excluding funding for operating expenses) to address and prevent long-term drinking water advisories affecting public systems on reserves;
      • $54.9 million in 2023–2024 ($54.5 million excluding funding for operating expenses) for the Curve Lake First Nation water treatment plant and distribution system.
Departmental Result 7: Indigenous Peoples have reliable and sustainable infrastructure
Performance indicators Target Date to achieve target 2019-20 Actual results 2020-21 Actual results 2021-22 Actual results
Number of long-term drinking water advisories affecting public water systems on reserve 0 Initiative underway 61 53 34
  • Improving access to clean water has important positive impacts in the context of social determinants of health and closing gaps for sub-populations facing the greatest barriers including individuals with disproportionate caretaking responsibilities, often women and/or single parents; low-income households; people who are pregnant or have underlying health conditions; disabled people; elders; and children.
    • Boiling water or transporting bottled water can add hours to simple caregiving tasks, such as bathing and other personal hygiene, cleaning, cooking, preparing infant formulas, and/or doing the laundry.
    • Additionally, boiling water or transporting bottled water requires additional labour that can be especially challenging for children, elders and persons with disabilities. Furthermore, costs associated with boiling water or purchasing bottled water disproportionately impact low-income households.
    • Labour and resources which can be redirected away from accessing clean water to other priorities may also advance well-being, such as by pursuing education or purchasing more nutritious food.
  • Budget 2022 also committed to provide $173.2 million over ten years, starting in 2022-23, to support the transfer of water and wastewater services in 17 communities to the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority.
  • The Water Authority's model supports Indigenous self-determination and accountability over how water and wastewater services and assets are being planned, prioritized, funded, managed and delivered to participating Atlantic First Nations.
  • First Nations communities do not have legally enforceable safe drinking water protections comparable to what's in place in provinces and territories.
  • In 2013, the Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act was created to support the development of federal regulations to support First Nations' access to clean, reliable drinking water and effective treatment of wastewater. However, First Nations voiced concerns about this legislation during ongoing engagement since 2018, saying the law was not effective.
    • In response to these concerns, and aligned with the Safe Drinking Water Class Action Settlement Agreement, the Government of Canada repealed the 2013 Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act on June 23, 2022. The Government of Canada is committed to developing and introducing new First Nations drinking water and wastewater legislation, in consultation with First Nations.
    • Following repeal of the 2013 Act, the Government of Canada enhanced engagement with First Nations rights holders to advance the development of a legislative proposal for First Nations drinking water and wastewater.
    • Engagement on the consultation draft of the legislative proposal is ongoing until April 23, 2023.
  • The Government of Canada's engagement approach includes
    • advancing development of a legislative proposal for drinking water and wastewater with the Assembly of First Nations
    • ongoing direct engagement with First Nations rights holders, Modern Treaty and Self Governing Nations, including group-based sessions and individual sessions
    • engaging provinces and territories on source water protection to inform the development of the legislative proposal
  • First Nations governments and citizens must be able to shape this work and assess if it will meet their needs.

Current Status

  • It is currently expected that:
    • 12 of the remaining 32 LTDWAs will be lifted by the end of June 2023;
    • 3 by December 2023;
    • 2 by summer 2024; and,
    • 1 by fall 2025.
  • There are 14 LTDWAs in effect for which target lift dates cannot be estimated at this time due to the nature of the issues, or because the project is not sufficiently advanced to be able to set a date.
  • ISC, the Circuit Rider Trainer Program, and Ontario Hubs are providing support to communities to advance projects and establish schedules for repairs, upgrades, operator training and lift dates.
  • Currently, there are communities unable to lift LTDWAs due to capacity issues for water and wastewater operators. In line with closing the infrastructure gap by 2030, future program needs may need to be expanded in order to ensure communities have sufficient resources to train, retain and certify water and wastewater operators on reserve.
  • Ultimately, the decision to put in place a particular solution is made by the First Nation's leadership.
    • In some cases, a small repair or the replacement of a piece of equipment is needed to restore water and/or wastewater services to the community.
    • In other cases, the drinking water and/or wastewater infrastructure no longer works and needs to be completely replaced, which may take several years to plan, design and build.
    • Where possible, we work with First Nations to develop an interim solution, which could include a repair or upgrade to the system while new infrastructure is being constructed.
  • ISC has taken all possible measures to monitor, assess, prevent, mitigate, and respond to risks as needed throughout 2021-22. First Nations, particularly in remote locations, faced supply issues, limited contractor availability, and market saturation which can delay funding implementation.
    • The current global shortage for supplies, equipment, and capacity, due to the pandemic, posed a risk that could impact project schedules, and the ability to meet previously established target lift dates for the remaining long-term drinking water advisories.
    • Compounded by the pandemic measures in place, resource shortages had the potential to delay the implementation of various infrastructure projects and significantly impact forecasted project costs.
  • An internal evaluation of the First Nations Water and Wastewater Activities On-Reserve is scheduled for 2025-26. The timing for these evaluations may change based on the needs, risks, and priorities assessed through the annual departmental evaluation planning exercise.

Jordan's Principle

Issue Summary

Jordan's Principle is a legal obligation of the Government of Canada to ensure all First Nations children living in Canada can access the products, services and supports they need, when they need them. Funding is demand-driven, and can help with a wide range of health, social and educational needs unmet through other programming at the federal, provincial/territorial, and/or local levels.

Jordan's Principle is named in memory of Jordan River Anderson. He was a young boy from Norway House Cree Nation in Manitoba.

Key Messages

  • The Government of Canada is committed to the full implementation of Jordan's Principle, and to working with First Nations communities and partners to ensure that First Nations children can access the products, services and supports they need, when they need them.
  • Jordan's Principle supports families in accessing products and services for First Nations children and youth to help with a wide range of health, social and educational needs.
  • Between July 2016 and January 31, 2023, the reach of approved products and services was 2.47 million under Jordan's Principle. These include speech therapy, educational supports, medical equipment, mental health services and more.
  • While we continue to provide support to First Nations children through Jordan's Principle, we will also work with First Nations partners, provinces and territories to develop longer-term approaches to help better address the unique health, social, and education needs of First Nations children.

Background

In 2005, at the age of five, Jordan River Anderson, a First Nations child from Norway House Cree Nation in Manitoba, died in the hospital while the provincial and federal governments could not agree on who was financially responsible for his home care in a medical foster home.

That year, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society (Caring Society) released the Wen:De reports, among the policy recommendations was the concept of Jordan's Principle, a child-first principle to ensure that services for First Nations children are not delayed due to jurisdictional disputes.

In February 2007, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society (Caring Society) filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) that alleged that pursuant to section 5 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (the Act), Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) discriminates in the provision of child and family services to First Nations on reserve and in the Yukon, on the basis of race and/or national or ethnic origin, by providing inequitable and insufficient funding for those services. The implementation of Jordan's Principle was identified as a solution to jurisdictional disputes as part of this complaint.

On December 12, 2007, a Private Member's Motion No. 296 in support of Jordan's Principle was passed with unanimous support in the House of Commons in honor of Jordan River Anderson, "The government should immediately adopt a child first principle, based on Jordan's Principle, to resolve jurisdictional disputes involving the care of First Nations children."

In August 2007, the Government of Canada announced $11M in new funding to Health Canada for the implementation of Jordan's Principle. This implementation focused on jurisdictional disputes involving First Nations children living on-reserve with multiple disabilities requiring services from multiple service providers.

Under the federal response, no Jordan's Principle cases were identified (given the narrow scope) and the fund was eliminated. Requests for services that came forward were managed through federal/provincial contacts and services provided through existing programs.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission released its Final Report in 2015. Call to Action #3 calls on "all levels of government to fully implement Jordan's Principle."

On January 26, 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) issued its first ruling with respect to the 2007 complaint by the Caring Society and AFN. The ruling substantiated the complaint and made a finding of discrimination against the Attorney General of Canada (for the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs) that Canada was failing to provide an adequate level of child welfare services to First Nations families on reserve. The CHRT ordered Canada "to cease applying its narrow definition of Jordan's Principle and to take measures to immediately implement the full meaning and scope of Jordan's Principle."

Since that time, the CHRT has issued many other orders, clarifying eligibility, establishing definitions and timelines, and most recently, ordering Canada to fund on-reserve capital projects to support the delivery of Jordan's Principle services (2021 CHRT 41).

Current Status

Update as of April 5, 2023

On April 5, 2023, a revised final settlement agreement now totalling more than $23 billion was reached by the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), Moushoom and Trout class actions plaintiffs, and Canada to compensate those harmed by discriminatory underfunding of First Nations child and family services and those impacted by the federal government's narrow definition of Jordan's Principle. The First Nations Child and Family Caring Society was an integral part of the discussions and has also signalled its support for this agreement.

The revised agreement is designed to fully meet the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT)'s compensation orders as well as the Moushoom and Trout Class Actions. The agreement is a meaningful step towards resolution and compensation. It also includes comprehensive wellness supports for claimants.

Background

On December 31, 2021, two Agreements-in-Principle were reached between Canada, the Assembly of First Nations, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, the Chiefs of Ontario, the Nishnawbe Aski Nation and counsels for the AFN-Moushoom and Trout class actions (collectively, "the Parties"). One Agreement in Principle is for compensation for those harmed by discriminatory underfunding of First Nations child and family services and for those who were denied, or delayed in receiving, services under Jordan's Principle, and the other pertains to the long-term reform of the First Nations Child and Family Services Program and Jordan's Principle.

These Agreements-in-Principle provide a basis for final settlement agreements to be negotiated over the coming months. The Agreements-in-Principle include:

  • $20 billion in compensation for First Nations children on-reserve and in the Yukon, who were removed from their homes between April 1, 1991 and March 31, 2022, and for their parents and caregivers. This also includes compensation for those impacted by the government's narrow definition of Jordan's Principle between December 12, 2007 and November 2, 2017, as well as for children who did not receive or were delayed receiving an essential public service or product between April 1, 1991 and December 11, 2007 and their families. Our shared goal is to achieve a settlement that can be delivered to families as soon as possible.
  • Approximately $20 billion, over five years, for long-term reform of the First Nations Child and Family Services program and Jordan's Principle to ensure that the discrimination found by the CHRT never repeats itself. Canada will take urgent steps to implement the measures set out in the "Work Plan to Improve Outcomes under Jordan's Principle, based on Indigenous Services Canada's Compliance with the Tribunal's Orders." The Work Plan specifically includes commitments to:
    • Identify, respond to and report on urgent requests;
    • Develop and implement Indigenous Services Canada internal quality assurance measures, including training on various topics, a complaint mechanism, and an independent office to ensure compliance;
    • Ensure privacy is protected, that least intrusive approach is used, and for the parties to engage the Privacy Commissioner;
    • Ensure that professional recommendations are respected, and that clinical case conferencing only takes place where reasonably required to ascertain needs;
    • Ensure that reapplications and/or cessation or disruption in funding, and/or payment procedures do not negatively impact First Nations children;
    • Increase national consistency and standards, especially with respect to group requests, develop and implement tracking to achieve this, and provide for re-review;
    • Increase specificity and personalization in denial rationales with prompt communication to requestor;
    • Implement "Back to Basics" approach and culture change to determination of Jordan's Principle requests; and
    • Identify mechanisms for off-reserve capital where required to provide safe, accessible, confidential, and culturally- and age-appropriate spaces to support the delivery of Jordan's Principle and confirmed through needs assessments and feasibility studies, in the course of negotiating Final Settlement.
    • The Parties will discuss options for First Nations to take on a larger a role in approving and delivering services, products and supports under Jordan's Principle. Following a needs assessment and feedback from First Nations and service providers, the Parties will develop an implementation approach for long-term reform of Jordan's Principle.

Budget 2022 proposed to provide $4 billion over six years, starting in 2021‑22, to ensure First Nations children continue to receive the support they need through Jordan's Principle. This funding will also support long-term reforms to improve the implementation of Jordan's Principle, which includes the above Agreement in Principle deliverables and development and implementation of a "Back to Basics" Approach.

Canada will continue to implement the measures set out in the Agreement-in-Principle on Long-Term Reform of the First Nations Child and Family Services Program and Jordan's Principle signed on January 4, 2022 by Canada and the Parties, including a back-to-basics approach to Jordan's Principle.

Canada was ordered (2022 CHRT 8) to fund and provide data in support of research to be conducted with the Institute of Fiscal and Democratic Studies to guide further development of the Long Term Approach to Jordan's Principle, and to engage with partners on the resources required in support of post-age of majority service navigation supports.

Canada will continue to implement the January 18, 2022 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal capital order (2022 CHRT 41) to fund the purchase or construction of capital assets, needs assessments and feasibility studies necessary to support the delivery of First Nations Child and Family Services and Jordan's Principle services.

Following the November 25, 2022 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal letter-decision indicating that the proposed Final Settlement Agreement signed on July 4, 2022, does not satisfy the orders, Canada will continue to negotiate Final Settlement Agreements on Compensation for children removed from their families, communities and culture under First Nations Child and Family Services and children impacted by the narrow definition of Jordan's Principle.

Canada will continue to advance towards a Final Settlement Agreement on Long Term Reform to prevent the reoccurrence of discrimination and end of CHRT oversight. As part of this Settlement, Canada will continue to work on long term approach for Jordan's Principle.

Additional Information

Other Litigation

CHRC Complaints involving First Nations Adults with Disabilities in Manitoba:
  • A complaint was filed to the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) by a group of families alleging ongoing systemic discrimination against First Nation adults with disabilities in Manitoba on the basis of age, race and disability.
  • The complaint alleges that ISC is failing to provide necessary supports and services to First Nations adults with disabilities who reside on-reserve.
  • Additionally, the complaint notes that individuals age out of Jordan's Principle at the age of majority, despite the fact that their needs do not change. This causes a disruption of services with required health, social and educational services being denied on the basis of age and race.

ISC's lack of legal principle akin to Jordan's Principle or, to a lack of adequate federal programs to support First Nations adults with disabilities, notably for those who reside on-reserve.

CHRC Complaint involving First Nations Adults with Disabilities in Alberta:
  • A complaint was filed to the CHRC by a group of three First Nations in Alberta. The complaint was filed on the basis of age, race and disability. The complaint alleges that Canada has discriminated against adult members of their nations living on-reserve with disabilities. The Complainant further alleges that current Indigenous Services Canada's services neither meet the diverse needs of adult members with disabilities nor are they comparable to services found off-reserve in Alberta.

CHRT Ruling

Revised settlement agreement of $23.34 billion reached to compensate First Nations children and families

Key Messages

  • All parties have worked collaboratively to reach a First Nations-led and designed final settlement agreement on compensation. This settlement agreement, the largest in Canadian history, will compensate First Nations children and families harmed by the underfunding of the First Nations Child and Family Services Program and the narrow application of Jordan's Principle.
  • We are happy that the compensation agreement was supported by a resolution at the Assembly of First Nations Special Chiefs Assembly held between April 3 and 6, 2023.
  • The agreement will be brought to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal asking for the Tribunal to confirm that the agreement meets its 2019 order on compensation. Following this, the agreement must be approved by the Federal Court. These steps will take several months and only after that can the agreement be implemented.
  • We are eager to take these next steps with the parties to obtain the approvals of the Tribunal and the Federal Court so that the agreement can be implemented as soon as possible.

Background

  • Given that the Moushoom, Assembly of First Nations and Trout class actions and the CHRT's 2019 compensation order all revolve around Canada's past discriminatory practices in connection with the First Nations Child and Family Services Program and the delay and denial of essential services both under Jordan's Principle and prior to the Principle, negotiations to reach a global settlement began in late 2021.
  • On December 31, 2021, an Agreement-in-Principle (AIP) that committed $20 billion in compensation to children and caregivers affected by Canada's discrimination was signed.
  • On July 4, 2022, a First Nations-led and designed proposed final settlement agreement on compensation was reached by the parties. It was intended to compensate those harmed by the discriminatory underfunding of the FNCFS Program and those impacted by the federal government's narrow definition of Jordan's Principle, as found in the CHRT's January 26, 2016 decision but also expanded to include classes not covered by the Tribunal's orders (1991-2006).
  • However, the Tribunal, in its ruling of October 24, 2022, did not agree that the proposed Final Settlement Agreement fully satisfied the 2019 compensation order.

Current Status

  • In early April 2023, a revised Final Settlement Agreement addressing the Tribunal's decision was reached between Canada, the Assembly of First Nations, the plaintiffs in the Moushoom and Trout class actions as well with the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society.
  • The agreement was supported by a resolution at the Assembly of First Nations Special Chiefs Assembly held between April 3 and 6, 2023.
  • The agreement will be brought to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal asking for the Tribunal to confirm that the agreement meets its 2019 order on compensation. Following this, the agreement must be approved by the Federal Court. These steps will take several months and only after that can the agreement be implemented.
  • The AFN is maintaining a website where updates and the latest information on implementation can be found: Finalizing the agreement on compensation for First Nations

Implementation of An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families

Key Messages

  • ISC is working with Indigenous groups, communities and peoples, as well as provinces and territories, to support the exercise of Indigenous child and family services jurisdiction under the Act.
  • ISC has set quantitative targets to conclude coordination agreements with 40 Indigenous governing bodies by 2024-2025, enabling them to exercise jurisdiction under their own child and family services laws.
  • To date, agreements have been concluded with seven Indigenous governing bodies. An additional twelve agreements are anticipated in 2023-2024, tracking to achieve ISC targets.

Background

Overview

  • An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families (the Act) was co-developed with Indigenous partners and received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019. The Act came into force on January 1, 2020.
  • As of January 1, 2020, every service provider delivering child and family services in relation to Indigenous children must follow the minimum standards of the Act.
  • As part of the July 2020 Economic and Fiscal Snapshot, the Government of Canada has committed almost $542 million over five years, starting in 2020-21, to support the implementation of the Act. This historic legislation enables First Nations, Inuit and Métis to choose their own solutions for their children and families. Funding for the operationalization of the Act is requested separately once tripartite coordination agreements are reached.
  • Section 25 of the Act requires that certain information provided under section 20 be posted online or made accessible to the public. On its website, ISC now displays the notices provided under section 20 of the Act as well as information provided to ISC concerning Indigenous child and family services laws developed under the framework made pursuant to the Act. As of March 2023, 19 coordination agreement discussion tables have been established.
  • A coordination agreement facilitates the implementation of Indigenous jurisdiction over child and family services. It articulates the roles and responsibilities of the signing parties and supports coordination between the three different jurisdictions (federal, provincial/territorial and Indigenous) on matters related to the exercise of jurisdiction to prevent jurisdictional disputes, duplication or gaps in services.
  • Consistent with the Act, coordination agreements also include fiscal agreements that are sustainable, needs-based and consistent with the principle of substantive equality between the federal government, the provincial/territorial government and the Indigenous governing body in relation to the provision of child and family services by the Indigenous governing body.

Data and performance measurement

  • ISC uses quantitative internal data to measure its achievement of defined targets under the Act. For example, the expected ultimate result of the Act is that more Indigenous Peoples exercise jurisdiction in relation to child and family services with Indigenous laws operating harmoniously with federal and provincial laws.
    • This outcome aligns with ISC's Departmental Results Framework 2022-23 under its core responsibility: health and social services and its Departmental Result 4: Indigenous Peoples receive social services that respond to community needs. The goal is to ensure that Indigenous children receive culturally-relevant services, and grow up immersed in their communities, languages and cultures.
  • Key quantitative indicators are tracked for this outcome, including:
    1. Number of First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities that will develop and implement child and family services resulting from tripartite (federal, provincial/territorial and Indigenous partners) coordination agreements and fiscal arrangements through the framework provided by the Act.
    2. Total First Nations, Métis and Inuit populations that receive CFS under Indigenous laws through the framework provided by the Act (using the membership information at the time of the development of the coordination agreement and fiscal arrangement).
  • ISC fosters capacity building for Indigenous governing bodies interested in topics related to child and family service data, e.g. data sovereignty, data governance, records and information management, to help them "measure what matters" under their new self-determined service delivery models.

Current Status

  • Indigenous Services Canada has projected that 40 Indigenous governing bodies will seek to conclude coordination agreements by 2024-2025, in support of their exercise of child and family services jurisdiction under the Act.
  • As of the end of 2022-2023, six trilateral coordination agreements and one bilateral fiscal agreement have been concluded with seven Indigenous governing bodies, enabling them to exercise jurisdiction under their own child and family services laws.
  • Canada has signed coordination agreements with the following groups:
    • Peerless Trout First Nation, Lubicon Lake Band, Loon River First Nation (Founding First Nations) and the Province of Alberta (Canada's contribution is $149.4 million over five years, these could potentially be higher pending future capital proposals);
    • Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug and the Province of Ontario (Canada's contribution is $93.8 million over four years, these could potentially be higher pending future capital proposals);
    • Splatsin and the Province of British Columbia (Canada's contribution is $136.2 million over ten years);
    • Peguis First Nation and the Province of Manitoba (Canada's contribution is up to $309.0 million over three years, pending Capital proposals);
    • Wabaseemoong Independent Nations and the Province of Ontario (Canada's contribution is $340.8 million over ten years, discussions are taking place to amend these agreements);
    • Cowessess First Nation and the Province of Saskatchewan (Canada's contribution is $38.7 million over two years, discussions are taking place to amend these agreements).
  • Canada has also entered into a fiscal agreement with Louis Bull Tribe (Canada's contribution is up to $124.8 million over three years, pending Capital proposals). This is a bilateral fiscal agreement between Louis Bull Tribe and Canada and does not include a trilateral coordination agreement with Province of Alberta.
  • It is anticipated that twelve additional coordination agreements will be concluded with Indigenous governing bodies this year, tracking to achieve ISC projections that will help ISC ensure it has sufficient support for the ongoing implementation of the Act.

Landback/Additions to Reserve

Key Messages

  • Federal responsibility for additions to reserve is shared between the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and the Minister of Indigenous Services.
  • The creation of CIRNAC and ISC has not resulted in increased costs for ISC for the processing of additions to reserve proposals. While departmental responsibilities for the Additions to Reserve approval process have shifted slightly, ISC continues to assist First Nations in completing the technical requirements of the Additions to Reserve/ Reserve Creation Policy such as surveys, environmental site assessments and resolving third party interests.
  • ISC was allocated $32.2 million through Budget 2021 to address the existing inventory of additions to reserve, strengthen First Nation capacity through the training of land managers, and develop modern digital solutions to enhance on-reserve land management.

Background

  • Additions to reserve contribute significantly to reconciliation with First Nations and improve their ability to access lands and resources for community and economic development opportunities. The process to add lands to reserve is First Nation led, requiring the participation of multiple stakeholders. Each addition to reserve takes approximately 2 to 8 years to complete.
  • The Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations is responsible for the Addition of Lands to Reserves and Reserve Creation Act and the First Nations Land Management Act. This includes the authority to issue a Ministerial Order, pursuant to these acts, to set land apart as reserve for the use and benefit of a First Nation.
  • ISC is responsible for the administration of the additions to reserve process in accordance with the 2016 Additions to Reserve Policy, the Addition of Lands to Reserves and Reserve Creation Act and the First Nations Land Management Act. Once land has been set apart as reserve, ISC has the statutory and fiduciary obligation to administer the land in accordance with the Indian Act.
  • On August 29, 2019, the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, pursuant to section 9 of the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Act, delegated the administrative functions and duties of the Addition of Lands to Reserves and Reserve Creation Act to the Minister of Indigenous Services, while retaining final sign off on all additions to reserve.
  • On April 19, 2021, the federal budget announced $43 million over three years, starting in 2021-22, to work with Indigenous partners and other stakeholders to redesign the 2016 Additions to Reserve/Reserve Creation Policy and to accelerate work on existing requests from First Nations across the country. Of the $43 million, $32.2 million is provided to ISC for the reduction of the additions to reserve inventory, while the remaining $10.8 million is dedicated to the policy redesign currently led by Crown-Indigenous Relations.
  • New ISC resources secured pursuant to Budget 2021 are intended to support capacity development within Indigenous organizations and First Nations, allowing them to gradually assume greater control over their additions to reserve processes. It will also improve their governance capacity and support self-determination through partnerships with neighbouring governments and third parties, as well as with internal community engagements. These investments are also directed at increasing the capacity of ISC regional and headquarters staff to process addition to reserve proposals.

Current Status

  • There are approximately 700 active additions to reserve proposals in the inventory.
  • ISC continues to work directly with Indigenous institutions, regional offices and First Nation land managers to flow Budget 2021 investments and continue to develop strategies and tools to reduce the inventory of addition to reserve proposals.
  • One such tool is the new modernized National Additions to Reserve Tracking System, live as of March 2023. This system, developed in partnership with First Nations, will streamline processes across regional offices and provide direct access to First Nations to their proposals with the help of an innovative, cloud-based platform. As a result, transaction costs and uncertainty over roles and responsibilities will be reduced in real time, and communications between the Department and First Nations will be enhanced. It will enable ISC staff to monitor file progress accurately, identify specific steps in the process where delays occur and also enable First Nations to take a more active role in managing their addition to reserve proposals.
  • ISC also continues to support CIR in their efforts to re-design the Additions to Reserve policy.

On-Reserve First Nation Emergency Management

Key Messages

First Nation Emergency Management Governance

  • As First Nations continue to express a desire to be considered as partners in the delivery of emergency management services, the department is actively listening and working to develop new multilateral agreements. The department is also working to strengthen capacity and engaging First Nations on approaches that are aligned with their vision.
  • The department is taking steps to develop multilateral service agreements. This includes engaging and initiating conversations with all partners to identify the right tools. New regional strategies are being used to inform a cohesive national approach for the future of emergency management service delivery for all on-reserve First Nations.

Responding to the Office of the Auditor General

  • Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) has accepted all of the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) recommendations that were provided in November 2022 and are actively working on a Management Action Plan that will address each recommendation with concrete option.

Program Evolution

  • The Government is committed to enhancing First Nations community capacity and preparing for emergency events, especially in the context of climate change. It plans to do this through increasing financial flexibility, increasing access to funding for First Nation communities, and the freedom to use the funds in a manner best suited to their community.
  • Following recommendations in the OAG Report, the department has put forward plans to update EMAP to allow for more proactive funding measures and increasing the program's ability to adapt to needs identified by First Nations. The department aims to make the program more flexible in order to better align with a true all-hazards approach to emergency management.

Background

  • In partnership with First Nations communities, provincial and territorial governments and non-government organizations, Indigenous Services Canada's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) helps First Nation communities on reserve access emergency assistance services.
  • EMAP provides funding to First Nations communities so they can build resiliency, prepare for natural hazards and respond to them using the four pillars of emergency management: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery.
  • Since April 1, 2014, the Department has been providing emergency management services under four pillars – mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery – to on-reserve First Nation communities through the EMAP. Services were traditionally governed by emergency management service agreements between the Government of Canada and the provinces and territories.
  • Budget 2019 provided $201 million over five years, starting in 2019-20, with $49.4 million per year ongoing to support increased resiliency and emergency management on-reserve, including health emergencies. This led to the establishment of key program streams, such as the implementation of Emergency Management Coordinators in on-reserve First Nation communities and the establishment of the Firesmart program.
  • The Minister of Indigenous Services has been mandated to work with First Nations and provincial and territorial government partners to strengthen the governance and service delivery for First Nations emergency preparedness, management and recovery.
  • As First Nations were not included as signatories in existing bilateral agreements between ISC and the provinces and territories, ISC is now moving towards establishing multilateral emergency management service agreements to include First Nations as full and equal partners.
  • The establishment of multilateral service agreements, with First Nations as full and equal partners, are a step toward strengthening governance models to enable First Nation-led service delivery.
  • The OAG's Performance Audit of ISC's Emergency Management in First Nation Communities was tabled in Parliament on November 15, 2022.
  • The purpose of the audit was to determine whether ISC provided the emergency management support needed by First Nation communities. The report makes seven recommendations.

Current Status

  • Eight bilateral agreements have been established across Canada. As some of these agreements are set to expire within the next few years, ISC is using this as an opportunity to transition its approach to move forward with multilateral agreements that include the department, provinces and territories or third parties, and First Nation communities as full and equal partners.
  • To ensure the full engagement of First Nation partners, ISC is working to develop regional strategies that take into account each regional context.
  • ISC has developed a Management Action Plan that addresses all seven recommendations. Implementation will begin, once approved.
  • ISC is developing a strategic path forward to develop a consistent approach to developing multilateral service agreements, focusing on financial flexibility, with First Nation partners and provincial and territorial counterparts. These plans are being informed through engagement with Regional Office colleagues and First Nation partners.
  • ISC will build on 2019 investments and continue to target funding opportunities to expand EMAP and the department's ability to provide more timely, and higher-quality services to First Nation on-reserve communities.
  • ISC will continue to engage First Nation partners and other partners on how to expand and enhance the EMAP program to better meet the needs of First Nation communities, and create an environment of First Nation-led service delivery.

Indigenous Health Equity Fund

Key Messages

  • On February 7 2023, the Prime Minister announced plans to increase health funding to provinces and territories by $198.6 billion over ten years, including $46.2 billion in funding for new initiatives.
  • This included a complementary investment of $2 billion over ten years through the new Indigenous Health Equity Fund to ensure access to quality and culturally safe health care services, in line with the shared health priorities and the self-determined priorities of Indigenous peoples.
  • This long-term, sustainable and predictable funding will be distributed on a distinctions basis to ensure support to regional First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities and service delivery organizations.
  • Over the coming weeks and months, I will be reaching out to national and regional Indigenous partners on the design and implementation of the Fund.

Background

  • The new Indigenous Health Equity Fund is part of the Government of Canada's plan to increase health investments by $198.6 billion over ten years, including $46.2 billion in funding for new initiatives. This includes the following:
    • An immediate, unconditional $2 billion Canada Health Transfer top-up to address immediate pressures on the health care system. In addition, the Government of Canada is providing a 5% guarantee for the next five years, which will be provided through annual top-up payments. This is projected to provide an additional $17.3 billion over 10 years in new support.
    • $25 billion over ten years to provinces and territories to advance shared health priorities through tailored bilateral agreements that will support the needs of people in four areas of shared priority:
      • family health services;
      • health workers and backlogs;
      • mental health and substance use; and
      • a modernized health system with standardized health data and digital tools.
    • $2 billion over ten years to address the unique challenges Indigenous Peoples face when it comes to fair and equitable access to quality and culturally safe health care services. Funding will be provided directly to First Nation, Inuit and Métis partners. The government will work with Indigenous partners to prioritize investments.

Current Status

  • Shared Health Priorities: Health Canada is working with provinces and territories to reach tailored bilateral health care funding agreements, and together with ISC, is supporting meaningful engagement between provinces and territories and Indigenous organizations to address gaps, support Indigenous health priorities and work towards eliminating health inequalities for all. On March 29, 2023, invitation letters were sent to National Indigenous Organizations informing them of plans underway to schedule a series of trilateral meetings in spring 2023 that will bring together provinces and territories and regional Indigenous leadership to discuss shared priorities.
    • The first regional trilateral meeting took place in in Vancouver, British Columbia on April 13 from 8:00 to 10:30 a.m. The meeting included Minister Duclos, the BC Minister of Health, Adrian Dix, and Indigenous representation from the First Nations Health Authority, the First Nations Health Council and the Métis Nation British Columbia. The discussion was overwhelmingly positive and all meeting participants were appreciative of the opportunity to have a seat at the table to discuss their health priorities and next steps. Key priorities identified by regional Indigenous partners aligned positively with the four shared health priorities (mental wellness and substance use, access to primary care services, health human resources, and data). The key priority underpinning was a strong emphasis on culture and traditional healing. All partners underlined the need to leverage Indigenous culture as a means of prevention and addressing many health care issues.
  • Indigenous Health Equity Fund: Through the Budget, announced on March 28, 2023, the Government of Canada reaffirmed $2 billion in new, additional funding over ten years for a distinctions-based Indigenous Health Equity Fund. This fund is intended to address the unique challenges Indigenous Peoples face when accessing health care services, and support immediate and long-term Indigenous health priorities. The Government of Canada is committed to work with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis partners across the country on the design and implementation of the Fund, ensuring alignment with Indigenous-led regional and community health priorities. ISC will initiate bilateral engagement with national and regional Indigenous leadership this spring.
    • ISC is working with central agencies to finalize a policy paper that lays out a plan for implementing a new program with a dedicated set of Terms and Conditions, which would provide broad flexibilities for distinctions-based approaches to health.

PBO Report

Did you find what you were looking for?

What was wrong?

You will not receive a reply. Don't include personal information (telephone, email, SIN, financial, medical, or work details).
Maximum 300 characters

Thank you for your feedback

Date modified: