Appearance before the Standing Committee on Public Accounts of Canada on OAG Report 8: Emergency Management in First Nations Communities - Indigenous Services Canada, March 20, 2023

Table of contents

Scenario Note

Logistics

Date: March 20, 2023

Time: 11:00am – 1:00pm (EST)

Location: In-person and virtual (hybrid)

Subject: Report 8 - Emergency Management in First Nations Communities—Indigenous Services Canada of the 2022 Reports 5 to 8 of the Auditor General of Canada

Appearing

Indigenous Services Canada (ISC)

  • Minister Patty Hajdu (in person)
  • Gina Wilson, Deputy Minister (in person)
  • Valerie Gideon, Associate Deputy Minister (in person)
  • Joanne Wilkinson, Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Regional Operations Sector (in person)
  • Kenza El Bied, Director General, Sector Operations Branch, Regional Operations (in person)
  • Rory O'Connor, Director General, Regional Infrastructure Delivery Branch, Regional Operations (in person)

Context on Committee Membership

MP Valerie Bradford (LIB – ONT) At the November 25, 2022 PACP appearance, she asked about unmet structural mitigation needs being met, especially the backlog of projects in Alberta and British Columbia, as well as what further work could be done by the Department without further resources.

MP Han Dong (LIB – ONT) has spoken out about Indigenous people being overrepresented in the homeless population, and has raised questions on whether the current housing stock is adequate. (Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, January 28, 2021)

MP Jean Yip (LIB – ONT) is the Chair of PACP and has expressed concerns with the high number of Indigenous women who are incarcerated. (Standing Committee on Public Accounts, April 17, 2018)

MP Peter Fragiskatos (LIB - ONT), Parliamentary Secretary National Revenue, has spoken on Indigenous issues including Indigenous over-representation in the correctional system (Hansard, October 19, 2018), Attawapiskat First Nation (Hansard, April 10, 2019), and supporting Indigenous cultural production. (Hansard, June 13, 2022)

MP Brenda Shanahan (LIB - QC) has recently spoken about a variety of Indigenous issues, including: culturally sensitive first nations policing, (Hansard, June 8, 2022) progress on the TRC Calls to Action, (Hansard, September 29, 2022) and housing issues in Kahnawake. (Hansard, October 17, 2022). At the November 25, 2022 PACP appearance, she asked about what impact INAC being split into ISC and CIRNAC had on service delivery.

MP John Williamson (CPC - NB) (Chair), has spoken regarding Atlantic fishing rights for Indigenous groups: "Indigenous communities are already a part of Canada's traditionally regulated fishing communities. It started small. It is growing, but it is happening. They hold licences. They adhere to DFO guidelines, and they follow the rules. When the government works in silos to change the rules of the game, it is working to undermine the progress that has already been made." (Hansard, October 19, 2020)

MP Garnett Genuis (CPC - AB), Critic for International Development, has spoken about Indigenous issues, including those relating to the justice system and residential schools, "The horror of residential schools, in particular, involved children being taken away from their communities, and it also involved children being taken away from their families. This attack on the sacred bond between parents and children by a system that thought it had a right to replace parental authority with state-coordinated enculturation in dominant values was deeply evil." (Hansard, May 4, 2022)

MP Michael Kram (CPC - SK) has spoken in support of Indigenous economic opportunities specific to the Alaska to Alberta railway (Hansard, November 2, 2020). At the November 25, 2022 PACP appearance, his questions focused on Kashechewan and whether the community and Department were working on a permanent solution on community relocation.

MP Kelly McCauley (CPC - AB) spoke about "setting targets for government contracts for indigenous businesses" relating to PPE contracts during the COVID-19 pandemic (Hansard, June 15, 2021). At the November 25, 2022 PACP appearance, he asked about the Department's shift from being reactive to being proactive in terms of emergency management.

MP Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné (BQ) (Vice-Chair), Critic for Public Accounts; Pandemic Programs; Economic Development Agencies, has been vocal in her advocacy for Québec-related issues. At the November 25, 2022 PACP appearance, she asked why after 3 reports from the OAG, why there was so little progress being made despite climate change accelerating these issues and the Department still being focused on response instead of proactive measures.

MP Blake Desjarlais (NDP - AB), Critic for Treasury Board; Diversity and Inclusion; Youth; Sport and Post-Secondary Education, is Indigenous, born in Edmonton and raised in the Fishing Lake Métis Settlement. At the November 25, 2022 PACP appearance, he asked about the First Nation Infrastructure Fund and whether the Department had sufficient funding to undertake all necessary projects and whether the Department was seeking additional funding for further projects.

Previous Appearance at PACP on OAG Report 8 – Emergency Management

This will be the Department's third committee appearance on this topic following the PACP Appearance on November 25th, and INAN appearance on December 1st. This will be the first meeting at PACP with the Minister in attendance.

At the previous PACP appearance the general themes of the questions from Committee Members included shifting funding from recovery to being more proactive, ongoing mitigation projects and funding for future projects, as well as the impact on results that the split of INAC has had on ISC and CIRNAC.

There was one follow up stemming from the previous appearance which related to the Department's recent discussions with Kashechewan First Nation regarding flooding and potential community relocation.

PACP Background

Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3) of the House of Commons, the mandate of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts is to review and report on:

  • The Public Accounts of Canada;
  • All reports of the Auditor General of Canada;
  • The Office of the Auditor General's Departmental Plan and Departmental Results Report; and,
  • Any other matter that the House of Commons shall, from time to time, refer to the Committee.

When the Speaker tables a report by the Auditor General in the House of Commons, it is automatically referred to the Public Accounts Committee. The Committee selects the chapters of the report it wants to study and calls the Auditor General and senior public servants from the audited organizations to appear before it to respond to the Office of the Auditor General's findings.

Related Audits

In the Media

On November 15, 2022, various news outlets ran stories outlining the findings of the OAG Report, including the finding that the Government had not provided First Nations with appropriate supports to respond to emergencies.

On November 16, 2022, the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs released a statement in response to the OAG Report, arguing that "It is deeply concerning that this 2022 Auditor General of Canada's report to the Parliament of Canada on Emergency Management in First Nations outlines the same issues we have been advocating on for years… It is a devastatingly slow response time and an irresponsible funding model. We must advocate and lobby for a new way of delivering Emergency Management Services".

A recent article (February 15, 2023) in The Narwhal on flood mapping in Manitoba also referenced the OAG Report and ISC's role in Emergency Management.

Meeting Proceedings

The meeting is scheduled for March 20, 2023 from 11:00am – 1:00pm (EST), and will be a hybrid meeting.

Witnesses who are appearing virtually will be asked to access the meeting prior to its start (10:30pm) to conduct sound/video/connectivity checks. The Zoom link will be sent directly from the House of Commons to the witnesses.

The Chair will call the meeting to order and provide instructions for the meeting proceedings. He will then introduce the witnesses and invite the Minister to deliver opening remarks. This will be followed by a Q&A period (details below).

It is recommended that all speakers speak slowly and at an appropriate volume to ensure they are heard by the interpreters. All witnesses are asked to mute their microphones unless they are speaking.

While simultaneous translation will be available, witnesses appearing via Zoom are asked to respond to questions in either English or French, but to limit switching between languages as this often creates technology/interpretation challenges.

Following the opening remarks, there will be rounds of questions from Committee members (as listed below). The rounds of questioning will repeat when the second panel commences in the second hour.

Committee members will pose their questions in the following order:

  • First round (6 minutes for each Party)
    • Conservative Party of Canada
    • Liberal Party of Canada
    • Bloc Québécois
    • New Democratic Party of Canada
  • Second round
    • Conservative Party of Canada (5 minutes)
    • Liberal Party of Canada (5 minutes)
    • Bloc Québécois (2.5 minutes)
    • New Democratic Party of Canada (2.5 minutes)
    • Conservative Party of Canada (5 minutes)
    • Liberal Party of Canada (5 minutes)

The meeting can be watched via ParlVU, however there may be an up to 70-second delay with the webcast.

Other Information for Appearing In-Person

  • Witnesses should arrive early to allow time for security screening. Screening could take 30 minutes or more for those without a Hill pass.

Opening Remarks

Opening Remarks for the Honourable Patty Hajdu Minister of Indigenous Services

March 20, 2023

Kwe kwe, hello, bonjour.

Before we begin, I acknowledge that we're on the traditional unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishnaabeg People.

Joining me today is Deputy Minister Gina Wilson, Associate Deputy Minister Valerie Gideon; Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Joanne Wilkinson; Director General responsible for emergency management, Kenza El Bied; and, Director General responsible for community infrastructure, Rory O'Connor.

In December, I appeared at the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs and I will reiterate that we fully agree with the Auditor General's report.

We know we need to pivot to more prevention and adaptation measures, while responding quickly to emergencies.

Approaches designed by First Nations communities for their own communities work best.

The days of the federal government-knows-best approach are over. First Nations are taking on services and programs, as we look at new, more flexible funding agreements.

As an example, Ontario First Nations have put forward a joint command Governance model that includes Indigenous partners such as Tribal Councils; Missanabie [Mis-an-a-bi] Cree; the province of Ontario and Indigenous Services Canada.

This approach ensures that as soon as an emergency occurs, affected First Nations have a say in the emergency management process, including decisions about evacuation.

We know that when First Nations are equipped with the tools they need to deliver their own services, results are palpable. For example, with support from ISC, the First Nations' Emergency Services Society of British Columbia is supporting First Nations to deliver emergency management services that integrate cultural and traditional practices. They also deliver ISC's FireSmart program, which provides BC First Nations with resources to reduce wildfires.

We support First Nations across the country with wildfire mitigation, and I look forward to the upcoming AFN-led Fire Gathering.

These are concrete examples of a transition to an approach that is inclusive of First Nations as full and equal partners and supportive of the right to self-determination. However, to do this right, and in a culturally appropriate way, takes time.

I understand many of you received a copy of ISC's Management Action Plan. I will provide a brief overview of some of the elements we've already advanced since the last appearance:

  • ISC's Emergency Management Assistant Program's terms and conditions were amended to increase our flexibility to provide advance payments. With this change we can lessen the burden communities experience by advancing funding to support the access to the services they need.
  • Another amendment increased the program's maximum amount payable in a fiscal year to First Nations communities, moving from $25 to $50 million, and from $50 to $100 million for emergency management organizations. This ensures we are providing the resources needed to effectively respond and recover from an event.
  • We are also actively finding solutions to address unfunded structural mitigation projects. Since our last appearance we have reduced these projects down from 112 to 58.
  • We're continuing to initiate multilateral conversations with Indigenous leadership, First Nations, and all provincial and territorial governments on emergency management service agreements.
    • For instance, we're taking steps to expand a bilateral agreement with BC First Nations to a new trilateral agreement.
    • In January, we heard Manitoba Chiefs' visions for emergency management and will work with First Nations to establish a Manitoba First Nations Emergency Management Partnership table.
    • We continue regular meetings between Peguis First Nation's Chief and Council and senior ISC officials on flood response, preparation and mitigation initiatives.
    • In Alberta, we're working with First Nations Leadership and the province to discuss the future of emergency management on reserve and the development of a new multilateral EM service agreement.
    • We're overhauling the way we measure performance, ensuring that the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals are considered.
    • And, finally, we are working to ensure that emergency management services on-reserve are culturally competent and in-line with community needs and priorities.

I want you to know that when we were last here we heard your concerns. We also want better results and are committed to doing better.

I would be happy to engage with you on questions that you may have.

Meegwetch. Thank you. Merci.

Previous ISC Emergency Management Audits and Management Action Plans

Issue Summary

  • Audits of the Emergency Management Assistance Program focus on whether Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) provided the emergency management support needed by First Nations communities.

Key Messages

  • ISC is responsible for ensuring that First Nations communities receive emergency management services, including emergency planning, flooding prevention (such as sandbagging), and wildfire suppression.
  • ISC does not provide direct emergency response services to First Nations communities. The Department negotiates emergency management service agreements with provinces or other service providers, such as the Canadian Red Cross, to provide emergency services in First Nations communities.
  • The recent Office of the Auditor General audit is the third examination of emergency management service delivery to on-reserve First Nations communities in Canada. The Office of the Auditor General conducted audits in 2013 and 2022. The department conducted an internal evaluation in 2017.
  • The first audit took place in Fall 2013 and assessed Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) roles and responsibilities on-reserve in the event of an emergency, the authorities for its emergency management program with the Emergency Management Act, regional emergency management plans and development of national emergency management supporting guidelines.
  • All 8 of the recommendations included in the 2013 audit were agreed with and supported by AANDC.
  • One of the key outcomes of the 2013 audit was bolstering Emergency Management Assistance Program from a recovery-based program to one that focused on the four pillars of emergency management.
  • A second examination, this time specifically of Emergency Management Assistance Program, was released in 2017, covering a period between April 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, and included a review of program governance, program design and implementation, the four pillars of emergency management, and financial management and controls.
  • The 2017 internal evaluation found that, while most of the elements that would be expected of an Emergency Management Assistance program are in place, opportunities to improve exist in the areas such as access to a national all-hazards risk assessment, the revision and finalization of key program documents, improved performance indicators, and the implementation of a centralized control framework.

Background

  • Audits are conducted because emergencies have significant health, environmental, and economic effects on the people affected, ranging from psychosocial trauma to lost economic opportunities. Once emergencies and evacuations are over, their effects continue to be felt by communities because it can take years to fully restore services and infrastructure.
  • Over the last 13 years, First Nations communities experienced more than 1,300 emergencies leading to more than 580 evacuations affecting more than 130,000 people.
  • Over the last 4 fiscal years (2018–19 to 2021–22), Indigenous Services Canada spent approximately $828 million on emergency management supports for First Nations communities.
  • As of April 2022, 39% of structural mitigation projects were eligible but waiting for funding. The greatest unmet structural mitigation needs were in British Columbia and Alberta.
  • Recommendations from the 2013 audit were, in summary:
    • AANDC should clarify federal roles and responsibilities.
    • AANDC should align the authorities of the Emergency Management Assistance Program with the Emergency Management Act and An Emergency Management Framework for Canada.
    • AANDC should finalize regional emergency management plans.
    • AANDC should implement a risk based all-hazards approach.
    • AANDC should streamline the funding process for the emergency management support provided to First Nations and strengthen internal controls over the management of federal emergency management funds.
    • AANDC should maintain proper documentation to substantiate its assessment of program risks.
    • AANDC should develop mechanisms to coordinate departmental activities for emergencies on reserves.
  • In response to the 2013 audit and previous management action plans, the Government of Canada introduced a single window to secure funding for First Nations emergency costs. Furthermore, AANDC (now ISC / CIRNAC) worked with First Nations, Health Canada, Public Safety Canada, and other federal organizations as appropriate, to clarify roles and responsibilities for the delivery of emergency management services on reserve, and enhanced collaboration within the emergency management community. To complement the above, AANDC: working with Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada; developed a structural mitigation priority ranking framework; and drafting a Management Control Framework for the Emergency Management Assistance Program. These were implemented in 2017.
  • In the 2022 audit, the Office of the Auditor General found that the risk assessment developed by Emergency Management Assistance Program in response to previous audits did not meet their definition of "risk-based" and further, highlighted the waitlist of structural mitigation projects as an area to improve program delivery.

Current Status

  • ISC is developing an action plan to not only address the 2022 report recommendations, but to ensure that the department supports First Nations in their efforts to manage emergencies affecting their communities.
  • This work is guided by the recognition that First Nations must be full and equal partners in decisions that affect their own communities, as well as in the delivery of their own emergency management planning and response.

ISC Management Action Plan

Report Ref. No. 8.32

OAG Recommendation

Indigenous Services Canada should work with First Nations to implement a risk-based approach to inform program planning and decisions on where to invest in preparedness and mitigation activities to maximize support to communities at highest risk of being affected by emergencies.

Departmental Response

The department's response. Agreed. In collaboration with First Nations, Indigenous Services Canada is committed to implement a risk-based approach to inform funding decisions. Targeted investments by the department will consider, as it has to date, the communities' willingness, readiness and interest in undertaking emergency preparedness activities by empowering First Nations to take the lead in preparing for and managing emergencies, as well as the likelihood of being impacted by an emergency event. The department is committed to support First Nations in their endeavors to identify their unique communities' level of risk and priorities to seek funding from the department to enhance emergency preparedness.

Description of Final Expected Outcome/Results

ISC is committed to using an updated risk-based approach to better inform funding decisions by integrating climate change projections and by clarifying the dimensions of risk, including causes, likelihood of occurrence and possible severity of consequences. The outcome of this recommendation will be an updated risk-based formula that will be used to best allocate funding by the beginning of fiscal year 2024-2025.

Expected Implementation Date

Full implementation expected by FY 2024-2025.

Key Interim Milestones

  • Review of current program planning, funding and risk formulas used by the Emergency Management Assistance Program – by April 2023
  • Analyze the current risk-based approach and determine gaps in the existing approach – by June 2023
  • Further the analysis of risk factors that impact communities and engagement with internal and OGD partners to inform risk-based approach – by October 2023
  • Engagement of First Nation partners to ensure participation in the formula governing emergency management funding allocation – by December 2023
  • Complete analysis identifying communities at highest risk of an emergency event – by December 2023
  • Development of new risk-based approach that better informs the allocation of mitigation and preparedness funding in order to maximize support for communities at the highest risk of being impacted by emergency events (i.e. consider public risk management approach) – by February 2024
  • Implementation of new risk-based approach – beginning in April 2024
  • Post-implementation feedback to be gathered on an ongoing basis from regional offices and First Nation communities to ensure effectiveness of updated approach and adjust as required – ongoing from April 2024

Responsible Organization/Point of Contact

Indigenous Services Canada – Emergency Management Directorate, Programs, supported by Policy

Report Ref. No. 8.36

OAG Recommendation

Indigenous Services Canada should work with First Nations communities to address the backlogs of eligible but unfunded structural mitigation projects and unreviewed structural mitigation projects to effectively allocate resources to reduce the impact of emergencies on First Nations communities.

Departmental Response

The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is currently working with First Nations to identify the infrastructure gap, which includes structural mitigation needs. The department will support First Nations to work towards closing that gap in the long term. In addition, the department is committed to work with First Nations, as well as collaborate with central agencies, other government departments and all levels of government to leverage partnership opportunities and explore alternate financing options to meet the needs of First Nations in structural mitigation while working toward the transfer of infrastructure services.

Description of Final Expected Outcome/Results

ISC will continue to work with First Nations to identify and invest in structural mitigation projects to help communities become more resilient to potential hazards and mitigate the most urgent and safety risks.

Expected Implementation Date

Ongoing - with an immediate focus on highest priority projects.

Key Interim Milestones

  • ISC will continue to work with First Nations to determine which eligible unfunded structural mitigation projects remain a priority for their community, if there are other sources of funds available to First Nations to address these priority projects, and update Integrated Capital Management System (ICMS) with project information as required – by April 2023
  • Identify implementation timelines based on an understanding of the communities at highest risk and availability of funding for the remaining eligible unfunded priority projects:
    • In the short term for fiscal year 2023-24 identify what projects could be implemented using available resources – by May 2023
    • In the medium and long term, use Other Community Infrastructure (OCI) funding as available until 2027-28, and pursue new infrastructure funds, to address structural mitigation projects remaining eligible and unfunded – ongoing to March 2028
  • ISC will work with partners to review unreviewed structural mitigation projects – by April 2024.

Responsible Organization/Point of Contact

Indigenous Services Canada - Regional Infrastructure Delivery Branch

Report Ref. No. 8.39

OAG Recommendation

Indigenous Services Canada should, on the basis of an assessments of risks, regularly update outdated departmental and regional emergency management plans and take immediate action to develop regional emergency management plans for the 3 regions that do not have them. These plans should be used to make informed decisions and take concrete actions to assist First Nations communities with managing the risks related to emergencies.

Departmental Response

The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada, in collaboration with First Nations, will proceed to review and update the department's national Emergency Management Plan and regional plans and will develop customized regional emergency management plans based on an assessment of risks.

Description of Final Expected Outcome/Results

Indigenous Services Canada has a national and regional Emergency Management plans that include a process for periodically reviewing and updating them. These plans will have been written up with input from First Nations and EM partners and stakeholders and final approved versions will be communicated back to them for awareness as public facing documents.

Expected Implementation Date

Review, update or create EM plans by March 2024, and ongoing implementation beyond that date with, at a minimum, a review process every three years.

Key Interim Milestones

  • Pursue continued engagement of ISC Regional EM staff to review existing EM Plans and identify leads in each region – by April 2023.
  • Development and agreement on a template for the National EM Plan and Regional Annexes – by June 2023.
  • Engagement with First Nation partners on EM National and Regional Plans – by December 2023
  • Update EM Plans and Annexes, including input from First Nations, PTs and other partners – by December 2023.
  • Internal Reviews and Approvals – by January 2024.

Responsible Organization/Point of Contact

Indigenous Services Canada – Emergency Management Directorate (W/ collaboration with each Regional Office)

Report Ref. No. 8.42

OAG Recommendation

Indigenous Services Canada, in collaboration with First Nations, should determine how many emergency management coordinator positions are required and allocate funding for these positions on the basis of risk and need to ensure First Nations have sustained capacity to manage emergencies.

Departmental Response

The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is committed to working in partnership with First Nations to build emergency management capacity. The department also agrees that funding for emergency management positions, provided through the Emergency Management Assistance Program's capacity enhancement funding stream, should be expanded. Emergency management coordinators, of which the department currently funds 196 full or part-time positions across the country, provide First Nations with valuable emergency preparedness and planning capacity. The department is diligently working to secure additional funding to provide more positions to First Nations communities, on the basis of risk.

Description of Final Expected Outcome/Results

Candidates for additional community-based EMC positions will be identified on the basis of risk and need as determined by the risk based approach being developed concurrently as part of this plan. Should additional resources for capacity enhancement be secured ISC would then fund these positions.

Expected Implementation Date

Utilizing the above risk based data, we will identify and determine where community-based EMCs are needed and allocate them in a way that aligns with risk model, pending additional resources.

Key Interim Milestones

  • ISC to analyze information received in previous engagements and complete further planned engagements with current EMCs and First Nations to identify program gaps. ISC will also identify areas that lack EMC positions and their relative risk in comparison to other communities. This exercise will prioritize areas for EMC allocation  – by April 2024
  • ISC will utilize risk-based data gathered through the development of a new risk based approach to inform the distribution of community-based EMCs  – by April 2024

Responsible Organization/Point of Contact

Indigenous Services Canada – Emergency Management Directorate

Report Ref. No. 8.62

OAG Recommendation

Indigenous Services Canada should, in collaboration with First Nations, provincial governments and other service providers, ensure that First Nations communities receive the emergency management services they need by

  • establishing emergency management service agreements and wildfire agreements in all jurisdictions that include all First Nations
  • establishing mutually agreed-upon evacuation service standards in the jurisdictions that lack such standards
  • increasing support for First Nations-led approaches to emergency management

Departmental Response

The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is committed to engage and work in partnership with First Nations and emergency management partners to establish comprehensive emergency management service agreements, inclusive of mutually agreed-upon service standards, and increase supports for First Nations-led approaches to emergency management.

Description of Final Expected Outcome/Results

New multilateral emergency management service agreements are inclusive of First Nations as full and equal partners and are negotiated and established at a pace set by First Nations. Such agreements will outline mutually agreed-upon evacuation service standards.

Wildfire agreements are renewed or established in all jurisdictions and ensure the provision of wildfire suppression services for all First Nations.

There is an increase in First Nations-led approaches to emergency management that better meet the realities of the communities that are served and contribute to the establishment of culturally appropriate evacuation service standards.

Expected Implementation Date

Provide continued and new funding, as available, to support First Nation-led engagement on their vision for emergency management and the development of new emergency management models and regional specific strategies. (April 2025)

Continue existing negotiations and launch new negotiations with First Nations and provincial and territorial governments related to establishing new emergency management service agreements with willing partners in all jurisdictions. Should a First Nation not agree to be included in new multilateral service agreements, activation procedures will continue to be followed and ISC will look for opportunities to increase support for First Nations-led approaches to emergency management. (April 2026)

Establish or update wildfire agreements in all jurisdictions. (April 2026)

Key Interim Milestones

  • ISC will continue to work with and support First Nations to engage with their members on their vision for emergency management, and will provide additional funding to initiate and enable First Nation partners to develop their own First Nation-led emergency management models. This will help set the stage for multilateral discussions that bring all partners together to develop new multilateral service agreements – by April 2025
  • ISC will continue to work to advance existing multilateral conversations and initiate new conversations with First Nations, Indigenous leadership, and with all provincial and territorial governments across Canada on the future of emergency management service agreements. The department will work with partners to develop region-specific strategies and plans for advancing a new agreement(s) (e.g., negotiation models and plans for engagement) – April 2025
  • As part of establishing new multilateral service agreements, ISC will continue to assess internal capacity and work with partners to develop mutually agreed-upon service standards, costing models, governance structures, and implementation plans – by April 2027
  • In jurisdictions where wildfire agreements already exist (BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, and QC), ISC will engage with the provincial government and First Nations to review the wildfire agreement and propose changes to be implemented the following fiscal year or at the nearest agreement renewal cycle (e.g., prior to any expiry dates) – by April 2025
  • In jurisdictions where wildfire agreements do not exist -, ISC will engage with provincial governments and First Nations to establish wildfire agreements. Should a Province and/or First Nation not agree to establish a new wildfire agreement, ISC will ensure activation procedures will continue. ISC will develop regional specific plans for new agreements by April 2024  and establish new agreements  – by April 2025

Responsible Organization/Point of Contact

Indigenous Services Canada – Sector Operations Branch

Report Ref. No. 8.66

OAG Recommendation

Indigenous Services Canada should develop performance indicators to allow the department to measure progress against the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and use these indicators to track and report publicly on progress.

Departmental Response

The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada agrees that certain performance indicators could be improved to better measure progress against the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Moving forward, the department will ask its programs that use performance indicators related to emergency management to review and consider revising how they measure progress against the Sustainable Development Goals. The review process will involve programs analyzing both the federal and departmental sustainable development strategies as well as the Sustainable Development Goal targets to understand how the programs could best measure progress and to identify which performance indicators should be utilized to do so.

The Government of Canada also reports on progress made to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals domestically and uses performance indicators from the Canadian Indicator Framework (see Taking Action Together – Canada's 2021 Annual Report on the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals). The Department supports this whole-of-government process by providing information on relevant departmental actions and initiatives that contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals.

Description of Final Expected Outcome/Results

In consultation internal partners, ISC will review and revise how it measures progress against the SDGs within the next annual reporting cycle. The expected outcome is that new performance indicators will be developed to measure progress made against the UN SDGs.

Expected Implementation Date

While internal work with begin immediately, the department is aligned with Statistics Canada's strategic three year review of the "Canadian Indicator Framework scheduled for April 2024.

Key Interim Milestones

  • Pursue additional and new reviews of current program and performance indicators used by the Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) done in collaboration with regional colleagues, to measure progress made against the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – by August 2023. 
  • Development of new indicators, in consultation with internal and First Nation partners, to measure progress against the SDGs – by December 2023
  • Approval of new indicators – by March 2024
  • Implementation of new indicators to measure the SDGs Fiscal Year 24-25 – by April 2024
  • Reporting on progress made against the UN SDGs with new indicators through the Departmental Results Report – by March 2025

Responsible Organization/Point of Contact

Indigenous Services Canada – Emergency Management Directorate

Indigenous Services Canada - Chief Finances, Results and Delivery Officer, Strategic Policy

Report Ref. No. 8.68

OAG Recommendation

Indigenous Services Canada should, in collaboration with First Nations, provincial governments and other service providers, ensure that First Nations communities receive the emergency management services they need by

  • defining what is meant by comparable services for First Nations in relation to those available to municipalities of similar size and circumstance in each jurisdiction
  • monitoring the services provided to First Nations to ensure that they are comparable to services provided to non-Indigenous communities, are culturally appropriate, and address the needs of marginalized groups
  • identifying and addressing shortcomings by monitoring emergency management service agreements and conducting lessons-learned exercises

Departmental Response

The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is committed to work in partnership with First Nations and emergency management partners to establish comprehensive emergency management service agreements that will define comparability of services and monitoring and reporting components to identify and address shortcomings for continuous improvement.

Description of Final Expected Outcome/Results

Future multilateral comprehensive emergency management agreement negotiations will include and define agreed upon EM service standards and monitoring and reporting mechanisms that will allow gaps to be addressed as part of a continuous improvement approach.

Expected Implementation Date

A calendar with timelines and milestones will be developed in partnership with First Nations and Emergency Management Stakeholders. (December 2023)

Key Interim Milestones

Under bilateral service agreements

  • Review and further the existing analysis of bilateral agreements to determine if existing reporting requirements are effectively monitoring services provided – July 2023
  • Work with regional offices to assess if, and how, they define and assess municipal comparability, culturally appropriate services, and meeting the needs of marginalized populations; and if and how they conduct lessons-learned exercises – August 2023
  • Engage with First Nation partners to understand how ISC can measure and understand the provision of culturally appropriate services – by December 2023
  • Develop an interim report template whereby ISC, P/Ts and third parties can conduct lessons learned on how services can be improved to be more culturally appropriate, and better address the needs of marginalized people – December 2023
  • Support First Nations to develop their own EM service standards (in lieu of monitoring based on municipal comparability) that are culturally appropriate and address the needs of marginalized people – Beginning in March 2023

Under multilateral service agreements

  • Develop a calendar with timelines and milestones for reaching multilateral agreements, in partnership with First Nations and Emergency Management Stakeholders – March 2023
  • In negotiation with First Nations and PTs, integrate First Nation-led EM service standards and lessons learned reporting into multilateral agreements –  As per dates identified in calendar above

Responsible Organization/Point of Contact

Indigenous Services Canada – Emergency Management Directorate

Emergency Management Assistance Program

Issue Summary

  • In partnership with First Nations communities, provincial and territorial governments and non-government organizations, Indigenous Services Canada's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) helps communities on reserve access emergency assistance services.
  • EMAP provides funding to First Nations communities so they can build resiliency, prepare for natural hazards and respond to them using the four pillars of emergency management: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery.

Key Messages

  • The Government continues to negotiate multilateral agreements with First Nations and the provinces and territories, to work towards a more inclusive emergency management system.
  • The government is committed to work in partnership with First Nations and emergency management partners to establish comprehensive emergency management service agreements that will define comparability of service as well as monitoring and reporting components to identify and address shortcomings for continuous improvement. 
  • Climate change is disproportionally impacting Indigenous communities due to their remote locations, close ties to the land and reliance on natural resources. Supporting Indigenous communities to ensure the health and safety of these communities is a top government priority.
  • EMAP supports emergency management services and works to ensure the health and safety of First Nation residents. A robust emergency management plan that focuses on an all hazard approach is the key to increasing community resiliency.
  • Engaging Indigenous leaders, and implementing adaptation measures are key to reducing impacts and increasing resiliency in communities. The Government will continue to work with communities to use their local knowledge.
  • The Government is committed to enhancing First Nations community capacity and preparing for emergency events, especially in the context of climate change.
  • Indigenous Services Canada's (ISC) EMAP continues to support culturally competent responses during evacuations and an emphasis is placed on improved community engagement during the recovery phase.
  • These efforts will result in more resilient communities and improved health, safety and economic outcomes.

Background

  • ISC's EMAP Program helps communities on reserve access emergency assistance services. EMAP provides funding to First Nation communities so they can build resiliency, prepare for natural hazards and respond to emergencies using the four pillars of emergency management (mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery).
  • ISC works with provincial and territorial governments to ensure First Nation communities have access to comparable emergency assistance services available to other residents in their respective jurisdictions.
  • Provinces and territories are responsible for emergency management within their areas of jurisdiction and therefore, have the expertise and capacity to deliver services on behalf of ISC. To ensure that First Nation communities have the assistance they need within the broader provincial or territorial emergency management system, ISC is in regular contact with provincial and territorial emergency management officials.
  • ISC is working with First Nation leaders across the country, and the provinces and territories to advance trilateral emergency management agreements. These agreements will see First Nations becomes full and equal partners in emergency management moving forward.
  • ISC works with Public Safety Canada to prepare for future emergencies, and focus on recovery efforts from recent events.

Response

Issue Summary

  • The Emergency Management Assistance Program's (EMAP) response funding stream provides appropriate and necessary actions to manage the short-term consequences of an imminent or occurring emergency.
  • EMAP has seen a notable increase in annual costs associated with response efforts. Almost $700M has been reimbursed over the last ten years and to date, $180M was reimbursed in fiscal year 2022-2023 for response efforts.

Key messages

  • The department provides timely response activities to First Nations that experience an emergency event, takes actions to prevent loss of life or injury and mitigate damages to infrastructure and environment.
  • The department aims to provide response services to First Nations that are comparable to non-First Nation communities.
  • The department has developed a Building Back Better Strategy Guide that supports risk reduction and community recovery. One of the key principles of this guide is to provide social, cultural and psychological support to aid community recovery.
  • With increased pressures from climate change and a notable increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the EMAP's response pillar is essential in protecting the health and safety of on-reserve First Nations members and their infrastructure from hazards.
  • The department continuously strives to meet the changing needs of First Nations communities. One recent initiative was the inclusion of Health Emergencies into EMAP Terms and Conditions (April 2022), which allows ISC to better support communities with their response to health emergencies.
  • The department supports the resiliency of First Nation communities to respond to and recover from emergency events by encouraging collaborative partnerships, ensuring provincial comparability, and supporting cultural continuity. 

Background

  • The response pillar protects the health and safety of on-reserve First Nations members and their infrastructure from natural or accidental hazards.
  • Eligible response activities may include measures to mitigate damages and protect people and infrastructure, actions that decrease the chance of evacuations or support evacuations when unavoidable, and actions associated with addressing health emergencies.
  • A health emergency may include communicable disease outbreaks, food and waste contamination, environmental health hazards and mental wellness emergencies.
  • ISC works with provincial and territorial governments to ensure First Nation communities have access to comparable emergency assistance services available to other residents in their respective jurisdictions.
  • In relation to evacuations, the response program aims to:
    • address the gap between the much higher likelihood of evacuation on reserve as compared to off reserve,
    • minimize the impacts on First Nations during evacuations.

Current Status

  • Due to an increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the costs associated with response activities has increased over time.
  • EMAP's Response & Recovery A-Base funding of $29.3M has consistently not been sufficient and annual off-cycle requests are required to meet response needs. 
  • With Budget 2022, EMAP was able to access additional A-base funding of $85.7M per year over 3 years for Response and Recovery.
  • On average, First Nation communities experience 54 flood emergencies, 32 wildland fires and 36 other emergencies.
  • Over 145,000 First Nation community members living on reserve have been evacuated since 2009.

Recovery

Issue Summary

  • The Emergency Management Assistance Program's (EMAP) recovery funding stream supports measures taken after an emergency to repair and restore conditions to an acceptable level that existed prior to the emergency.
  • EMAP has seen a notable increase in annual costs associated with recovery efforts. Over $460M has been reimbursed over the last ten years and over $68M was reimbursed in fiscal year 2022-2023 for recovery efforts.

Key Messages

  • The department supports the resiliency of First Nation communities to recover from emergency events by returning evacuees to their communities as quickly and as safely as possible, by encouraging collaborative partnerships, ensuring provincial comparability, and supporting cultural continuity. 
  • The department has developed a Building Back Better Strategy Guide that supports the restoration of communities and assets in a manner that reduces the vulnerability of First Nation communities to disasters and strengthens the First Nations' community resilience. In consultation with impacted First Nations, a recovery project plan may include mitigation measures to improve its planning for future emergency events.
  • With increased pressures from climate change and a notable increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the EMAP's recovery pillar is essential to assist First Nations with the remediation work required on impacted infrastructure and houses to restore them to pre-disaster conditions as rapidly as possible.
  • The department continuously strives to meet the changing needs of First Nations communities. One recent initiative was the inclusion of Health Emergencies to EMAP Terms and Conditions (May 2022). This allows the department to better support communities with recovery activities in relation to health emergencies by providing holistic and culturally appropriate strategies to address health and social concerns following an emergency.

Background

  • The recovery pillar involves efforts which serves those on-reserve residents that have damages to their primary residence and community infrastructure.
  • Recovery measures may commence during the response phase. 
  • First Nation residents are supported in the clean-up, restoration, repair, and replacement of basic and essential property through the recovery stream of EMAP.
  • Building back better is a recovery framework that centres on supporting the restoration of communities and assets in a manner that achieves two goals:
    1. Reduces the vulnerability of First Nation communities to disasters
    2. Strengthens the First Nations' community resilience
  • First Nations, tribal councils, provincial, territorial and other emergency service partners will be supported to adopt and implement activities that support the EMAP build back better goals.
  • Mitigation enhancements undertaken within repair or reconstruction projects of damaged infrastructure to reduce vulnerability to future emergencies are considered for EMAP eligibility.

Current Status

  • Due to an increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the costs associated with recovery activities has increased over time.
  • EMAP'S Response & Recovery A-Base funding of $29.3M has consistently been exceeded and annual off-cycle requests are required to meet response needs. 
  • With Budget 2022, EMAP was successful in accessing additional A-base funding of $85.7M per year over 3 years for Response and Recovery.

Mitigation and Preparedness

Issue Summary

  • The Auditor General of Canada's report, Managing Emergencies in First Nations Communities, included a number of findings on the Department's mitigation and preparedness programs, notably that ISC's actions were more reactive than preventative and that ISC had not identified capacity needs of First Nations communities and highest-risk First Nations communities.
  • ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) directly supports on-reserve communities through the Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness funding stream, FireSmart program and the Capacity Enhancement program. These program elements strengthen communities, build resilience and directly support: (1) mitigation - activities and practices designed to avoid or minimize impacts of an emergency; and (2) preparedness - planning and readiness measures to enable effective response to and recovery from an emergency.

Key Messages

  • The department's Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness funding stream, and its FireSmart, and Capacity Enhancement programs are part of the proactive approach to emergency management and directly support First Nations across the country.
  • In alignment with our mandate to transfer services, ISC's mitigation and preparedness programs support First Nation communities to identify needs and develop specific projects to address emergency events. This includes enhancement of emergency management capacity by increasing emergency coordinator positions in communities. ISC will continue to support these positions as requested by First Nations to ensure the sustainably of capacity to manage emergencies.
  • ISC is committed to respecting First Nation and Tribal Council autonomy during all phases of emergency events and supports communities as they administer their own emergency services. As such, the department respects that Emergency Management plans are community owned and updated when the First Nation deems necessary.
  • The Risk level of a community is considered by ISC regional offices during the proposal review process in conjunction with the First Nation Partner who has requested ISC funding. The Risk level is also taken into account by EMAP in the determination of regional allocations for the preparedness funding streams using the following criteria: cost of First Nation emergencies, population, number of community-reported Emergencies, remoteness, and number of First Nation bands.
  • Funding for mitigation and preparedness proposals has increased over the last years due to increased visibility of ISC programs and an awareness of the benefits of mitigation and preparedness measures. However, we acknowledge that more needs to do be done, so we are continuing to expand our reach and support initiatives across the country in collaboration with First Nations, especially in high risk areas.

Background

  • The Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness program ($69 million over 5 years, starting in FY 2019-2020) supports small-scale projects undertaken by First Nations communities on reserve to prepare for and mitigate emergencies caused by natural disasters. Programming includes emergency management plan development and testing, all-hazard risk assessments, flood mapping, and emergency management forums.
  • The FireSmart program ($47.72 million over 5 years, starting in FY 2019-2020) enhances First Nation communities' wildfire management capacity by supporting wildland fire non-structural mitigation and preparedness initiatives. Programming includes training First Nations teams in wildfire suppression duties, wildfire risk assessments, as well as fuel management and vegetation clearing, which reduces the intensity and spread of wildfires.
  • The Capacity Enhancement program ($43.6 million over 5 years, starting in FY 2019-2020; $12.9 million ongoing) supports community disaster resilience by providing funding for First Nations to hire emergency management coordinators.

Current Status

Proposals for the mitigation and preparedness programs are reviewed on an ongoing basis until funding is exhausted. The mitigation and preparedness programs stay flexible to adapt and answer needs identified by First Nation communities as they prepare for future potential emergencies.

Funding
  • From FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22, more than $53 million has been allocated in support of Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness projects.
    • In FY 2021-22, $17,532,809 was allocated to support Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness projects.
  • From FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22, $25.8 million has been allocated in support of FireSmart projects.
    • In FY 2021-22, $10,128,048 was allocated to support FireSmart projects.
  • From FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22, nearly $26.9 million has been allocated in support of capacity enhancement in communities.
    • In FY 2021-22, $12,381,507 was allocated to support the hiring of emergency management coordinators in communities.
Examples of Recent Preparedness and Mitigation Projects

Saskatchewan:

  • EMAP currently supports 68 of 70 First Nations, 7 of 9 Tribal Councils, and Saskatchewan First Nation Emergency Management Organization with funding supports to continue to build and enhance emergency management capacity at the community level with a focus on completion of all-hazard emergency plans and risk assessments including FireSmart activities.
  • In 2022-2023, ISC Saskatchewan Region will have invested more than $4.85 million in support of preparedness and capacity development led by First Nations and Tribal Councils, including FireSmart supports.
  • Recent preparedness activities include Tribal Councils Emergency Management program coordinators working with the Canadian Red Cross to develop emergency social services capacity and training to support communities with expertise to manage emergency evacuations. In addition, preparedness activities include wildland firefighting and search and recovery capacity and training.

Quebec:

  • The Grand Council of the Waban-Aki Nation provides support to First Nation communities in Quebec before, during and after disasters, in coordination with tribal councils and various levels of government. It works within the four pillars of emergency management: prevention, preparedness, response and recovery in support of local communities. The Grand Council of the Waban-Aki Nation do not have the mandate to speak on behalf of all Quebec First Nations for emergency management, but have taken a keen interest in developing their capacity to support First Nations in the province. As a result, ISC funds 5 Emergency Management Coordinator positions within the Grand Council of the Waban-Aki Nation. 

Atlantic:

  • On September 23, 2022, Hurricane Fiona made landfall near Canso Nova Scotia,  bringing high winds and rain in the region, affecting all Atlantic provinces. Preparedness measures like having an updated emergency response plan and operational communication equipment are part of the advance work of communities rely on in an emergency response.
  • From April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022, ISC Atlantic invested $2.79 million to support preparedness and non-structural mitigation projects led by First Nations and tribal councils in the Atlantic region.

Infrastructure/Structural Mitigation

Issue Summary

  • Indigenous communities are increasingly vulnerable to climate-related and other natural hazards due to remoteness, community size, inadequate infrastructure, socio-economic conditions, limited access to emergency management resources and community capacity.
  • It is more cost-effective to invest in mitigation and preparedness efforts than to respond to emergencies when they occur. Public Safety Canada estimated that for every $1 invested in mitigation efforts, $7 to $10 can be saved in post-recovery costs.
  • Through the First Nation Infrastructure Fund (FNIF), Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) invests in structural mitigation projects to make communities more resilient but currently, community-identified structural mitigation project needs far exceed available, dedicated structural mitigation funds.
  • Investing in structural mitigation is key to the social and economic well-being of communities and  to make communities more sustainable and resilient to natural hazardous events.
  • The Office of the Auditor General (OAG) reported that as of May 2022, ISC had 112 eligible structural mitigation projects that were identified as unfunded in the Integrated Capital Management System (ICMS).
  • As of March 10th, 2023, 54 projects (or 48%) have been removed so there are now 58 eligible unfunded structural mitigation projects that remain a priority for communities with an estimated project cost of approximately $82.5 million. 

Key Messages

  • Emergency management includes four pillars: hazard mitigation and prevention, emergency preparedness, emergency response, and recovery activities.
  • The FNIF supports hazard mitigation and prevention projects to address the first pillar, and works closely with ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program as they address preparedness, response and recovery projects.
  • Through the FNIF, ISC works with First Nation communities on reserves to mitigate natural hazards and provides dedicated funding for climate resilience infrastructure through structural mitigation. This includes maintaining winter road integrity, building dikes, sea walls, nature-based infrastructure, fire breaks, erosion controls, culverts, and projects to protect schools and water and wastewater systems from a changing climate as well as floods, landslides, wildfires, permafrost thaw, and other natural disasters.
  • Indigenous Services Canada is working on integrating climate change considerations throughout the life cycle management of assets to ensure infrastructure on reserve is resilient to the impact of climate change.

Background

  • Through the First Nation Infrastructure Fund (FNIF), Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) funds eight types of Other Community Infrastructure (roads and bridges, connectivity, cultural and recreational facilities, fire protection, energy systems, planning and skills, band administrative buildings and structural mitigation) and solid waste management projects.
  • Structural mitigation projects are infrastructure projects that prevent and modify hazards, segregating hazards by keeping them away from people and assets, and altering the design and construction of assets to make them resilient to potential hazards.
  • Although supporting resilient infrastructure on reserves is a priority for ISC, there is limited dedicated funding for mitigating natural disasters and climate adaptation. To support our partners, ISC works with various government departments that provide funding to First Nation recipients through a variety of programs, including:
    • Collaborating with Infrastructure Canada on the Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Fund;
    • Working with Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, responsible to support First Nation communities identify and assess climate risks through First Nations Adapt Program, and Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) on the development of the National Adaptation Strategy;
    • Participating, in partnership with other federal government departments, in the Joint Committee on Climate Action co-chaired by the Assembly of First Nations and ECCC whose objective is to advance climate change adaptation and mitigation measures for First Nations.
  • Structural mitigation projects have dedicated, fenced funding under the FNIF of $12 million per year from 2020-21 to 2023-24. After that, structural mitigation projects will only be eligible to receive a limited share of funding for other community infrastructure project priorities eligible under the FNIF.

Current Status

Since 2016 and as of December 31, 2022, ISC has invested more than $1.73 billion in targeted funds to support 2,656 Other Community Infrastructure projects, 1,771 of which are complete.

Since 2016 and as of December 31, 2022, ISC has invested $129.8 million (excluding operating expenses) to support 112 Structural Mitigation projects, 63 of which are complete. These projects will benefit 111 communities serving approximately 122,000 people.

The Office of the Auditor General (OAG) reported that as of May 2022, ISC had 112 eligible structural mitigation projects that were identified as unfunded in the Integrated Capital Management System (ICMS).

As of March 10th, 2023, 54 projects (or 48%) have been removed so there are now 58 eligible unfunded structural mitigation projects that remain a priority for communities with an estimated project cost of approximately $82.5 million. 

There are numerous reasons for the reduction of 54 projects from the list, specifically:

  • 3 projects have changed from 'unfunded' to 'in-progress';
  • 52 projects are now considered closed
    • 9 – Closed – Duplicate Project
    • 4 – Closed – Not a Structural Mitigation Project
    • 32 – Closed – Funded (other program / project)
    • 7 – Closed – Not pursued by community
  • 1 additional unfunded project was added

This net change is a result of the work Indigenous Services Canada has been and continues to undertake, in conjunction with First Nation communities, to determine which eligible but unfunded structural mitigation projects on the OAG list remain a priority for communities, update the Integrated Capital Management System accordingly and develop an implementation plan in the time frame that aligns with the Management Response Action Plan.

The 58 structural mitigation projects remain unfunded not because of delays, but rather because of limited funds available for structural mitigation projects that help First Nations prepare for extreme weather events caused by climate change.

To respond to the growing need to address climate change impacts and to close the gap between the funding that is available and the projects that are identified by First Nation partners, additional funding for structural mitigation projects is required.

Fire Protection

Issue Summary

  • ISC supports fire protection in First Nations through the Capital Facilities and Maintenance Program, which includes support for core fire safety services to protect people and infrastructure, including housing. Fire protection includes more than trucks and fire halls; it requires individual knowledge (e.g., escape plans), private equipment (e.g., smoke alarms and fire extinguishers), trained firefighters in appropriate numbers, and appropriate governance structures.
  • First Nation Band Councils manage on-reserve fire protection services. Between 2016-2017 and 2021-2022, ISC provided an average of $43.8 million annually in targeted funding for fire protection, including annual averages of:
    • $11.0 million for capital investments (i.e., fire trucks, fire halls, etc.);
    • $15.0 million for the operations and maintenance of assets;
    • $5.0 million for firefighter training; and,
    • $12.9 million in additional targeted and statutory funding.
  • Budget 2022 provided $39.2 million over five years to support wildland-urban firefighting equipment and training for on-reserve communities. Communities with the highest risk of a wildfire event are prioritized for receiving this funding. 
  • First Nation communities are disproportionately impacted by fires with on-reserve mortality rates at 10.4 times higher than the Canadian average (1980-1999 data). Off-reserve Indigenous mortality rates are 5.3 times higher than the Canadian average (2021).
  • Inadequate and overcrowded housing, a lack of smoke detectors, varied levels of fire services, and a lack of compliance with building and fire codes all contribute to this matter. Small and remote communities face additional challenges as they are often unable to maintain the number of firefighters required to be able to respond to a fire. Many of these communities do not have neighbouring municipalities from which to purchase services.
  • Since 2010, ISC has maintained a five-year fire protection strategy. The first version of this strategy was developed with a number of interested organizations, while, in 2015, a renewed strategy was drafted in partnership with the Aboriginal Firefighters Association of Canada. The latest strategy is has been co-developed with the Assembly of First Nations; ISC and the Assembly of First Nations are working together to finalize the Strategy and determine next steps for its release.
  • ISC provides support, through funding agreements with eligible recipients, in the planning, acquisition, design, construction, and disposal of capital assets, including fire protection infrastructure. As a condition of funding recipients must ensure the infrastructure adheres to provincial or territorial fire protection statutes and regulations (as specified in the Protocol for ISC-Funded Infrastructure). In the absence of provincial or territorial statutes and regulations pertaining to fire protection, the National Fire Code of Canada applies.
  • While ISC encourages the Protocol for ISC-Funded Infrastructure to be applied to all infrastructure and housing on-reserve, there are limited enforcement mechanisms as there is no specific on-reserve legislative or regulatory building and fire code regime.
  • To support the development of an Indigenous Fire Marshal's Office, the Aboriginal Firefighters Association of Canada led engagement sessions with Indigenous communities and stakeholders throughout 2018 and 2019. The purpose of the engagement was to seek input on the scope, mandate, governance structure, and any associated legislation for an Indigenous Fire Marshal's Office.
  • Following engagement activities, the Aboriginal Fire Fighters Association of Canada (now the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council) determined that "the development of a national fire protection act should be the mandate of Indigenous leadership with technical support from (the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council)" and stopped actively pursuing the development of a compliance, and enforcement approach to fire protection.
  • The Assembly of First Nations does not support a legislative approach to enforcing compliance with building and fire codes. 

Key Messages

  • The Government recognizes that Indigenous communities are disproportionately affected by fire incidents that can have devastating impacts on families and communities.
  • Between 2016-17 and 2021-22, an annual average of $43.8 million was provided for fire protection services on reserve – not including band support funding. This includes $5.0 million for fire protection services training and $15.0 million for operations and maintenance annually.
  • Fire education and prevention are key to reducing the number of injuries and deaths caused by fire. That is why we are continuing to support partner-led education and prevention campaigns, including a campaign in December 2022 that saw fire safety posters and information sheets mailed to First Nation communities. 
  • Budget 2022 provides $39.2 million over five years, starting in 2022-23, to support the purchase of wildland-urban interface firefighting equipment and training by First Nation communities.

Background

On reserves, fire protection is managed by the First Nation band council. ISC provides funding for fire protection every year as part of the First Nation's core capital funding.

The level of funding each First Nation receives for fire protection is determined through a regionally based formula. It looks at several factors, including the number of buildings on the reserve, population, local environment and how close the reserve is to other communities.

First Nation band councils can use these funds to run their own fire departments or to contract fire protection services from nearby communities. If a First Nation decides to have a contract with a nearby community, it is the responsibility of the First Nation to manage that agreement. First Nations may also access 9-1-1 services through agreements with provinces. First Nations may choose to use certain fire protection funding on other priorities.

In addition to band support funding, from 2016-2017 to 2020-2021, ISC provided an average of $43.8 million annually in funding for fire protection on reserve, including annual averages of:

  • $11.0 million for capital investments (fire trucks, fire halls, etc.);
  • $15.0 million for operations and maintenance of assets;
  • $5.0 million for firefighter training; and
  • $12.9 million in additional targeted and statutory funding.

ISC funds Mental Health Therapist services and crisis response teams for community members dealing with the devastating loss following a fire. ISC also ensures that resources are available to debrief first responders.

On August 16, 2019, the Minister of Indigenous Services announced Budget 2019 funding of $9.97 million over three years, starting in 2019–2020, to support the creation of an Indigenous Fire Marshal Office. The funding was to support Indigenous partners in establishing a new Indigenous Fire Marshal Office, including the structure, governance and mandate of the office. The idea was for an Indigenous Fire Marshal Office to promote fire safety and prevention, undertake public education, and support the use of fire safety, building codes and regular building inspections in Indigenous communities.

In May 2020 the Aboriginal Fire Fighters Association of Canada renamed the Indigenous Fire Marshal Office Project the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council. The Aboriginal Firefighters Association of Canada is no longer pursuing a compliance and enforcement type of organization as originally envisioned, and the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council will focus primarily on data collection, research, direct program delivery to communities, and general education / prevention initiatives.

Current Status

  • A new co-developed fire protection strategy has been developed with the Assembly of First Nations, but has not yet been published.
  • Budget 2022 funding for wildland-urban interface firefighting equipment and training is being delivered to First Nation communities most at risk of wildfire. 
  • The Department is supporting First Nations, regional partner organizations and the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council to deliver education and prevention initiatives, smoke alarm installations and purchase equipment and infrastructure.

Emergency Management

British Columbia

Issue Summary

British Columbia has seen a series of emergencies over the past five years, with devastating fire seasons in 2017, 2018 and 2021 and compounding impacts of fires and flooding due to an atmospheric river in 2021. Following the 2018 Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs report, From the Ashes (PDF), ISC negotiated a tripartite Memorandum of Understanding with the First Nations Leadership Council and the Province of British Columbia to work collectively to advance meaningful recognition and enhanced capacity of First Nations within all pillars of emergency management. As a next step to the existing tripartite Memorandum of Understanding, and in response to increasingly intense and frequent emergency events, the parties are discussing the pathway to negotiate a new emergency management agreement with the Province of British Columbia and the First Nations Leadership Council to advance inclusion of First Nations in the four pillars of Emergency Management. The First Nations Leadership Council put forward two of three resolutions at the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and First Nations Summit Annual General Assemblies related to First Nations involvement in negotiations on a new tripartite agreement for Emergency Services Funding. British Columbia Chiefs directed the First Nations Leadership Council to engage with First Nations in British Columbia and provide possible negotiation models for First Nations consideration in order for First Nations to engage in negotiation with Canada and British Columbia on the new trilateral agreement. The First Nations Leadership Council will report back to the British Columbia Chiefs with a final negotiation model for consideration. It is anticipated that the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations will put forward a resolution at the March Annual General Assembly.

Key Messages

  • There is a continued priority to implement the current tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding with the First Nations Leadership Council and the province of British Columbia and establish a new multilateral relationship for First Nations Emergency Management in British Columbia.
  • Over the past year, progress has been made in British Columbia towards creating a new pathway for Emergency Management in British Columbia, and investments have been made to support First Nation-led service delivery, which builds regional capacity.
  • Canada is committed to true and lasting reconciliation with First Nations in British Columbia and will work to develop a new relationship that implements the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and respecting First Nation knowledge, laws, values and approaches to ensure the inclusion of First Nations within emergency management.
  • A five-year extension to the Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement with the Tsilhqot'in National government was signed in May 2022, to advance a government-to-government framework for emergency and wildfire management. The agreement is the first of its kind, and the extension includes funding for implementation.
  • The 2021 and 2022 wildfire season and the Atmospheric River Event resulted in complex and challenging recovery issues for First Nation communities across British Columbia. ISC recognizes the need for increased preparedness and mitigation for First Nations in British Columbia. We are working together with First Nations, Emergency Management and Climate Resilience British Columbia, the First Nations Emergency Services Society and the First Nations Health Authority with the goal to co-develop approaches for sustainable changes to improve emergency management.
  • Since 2021 ISC has committed over $80 million in recovery funding to  affected First Nation communities in British Columbia. ISC is working closely with First Nations and partners to support complex recovery efforts, including loss of reserve land, replacing critical infrastructure and mitigating land erosion. The recovery funding provided through the Emergency Management Assistance Program is in addition to the funds provided through the Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements program to the Province of BC.
  • There is also significant recovery work with the Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council, which includes Lytton First Nation, which is rebuilding following wildfires in line with Commitment Letters signed by the Provincial and Federal governments to work collaboratively in new ways together.
  • In 2022-2023, the department provided over $11 million to the First Nations Emergency Services Society to support their work in all four pillars of emergency management: Preparedness, Mitigation, Response and Recovery in support of First Nations communities in British Columbia. Transferring emergency management service delivery to First Nations organizations is a key part of the department's work to improve emergency management programming

Background

Tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding
  • In 2017, ISC signed a service agreement with the Province of British Columbia to provide First Nations in British Columbia with the Emergency Management service equivalent to what is provided to local authorities.
  • Following this bilateral agreement, British Columbia and Canada negotiated a tripartite Emergency Management Memorandum of Understanding with the First Nations Leadership Council with the goal of establishing a new trilateral relationship for First Nations emergency management.
  • The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) established a process for the parties to work collectively to advance meaningful recognition and enhanced capacity of First Nations within all pillars of emergency management, including preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery. The MOU commits to advance a relationship based on the inherent right of self-determination held by First Nations, increase information sharing and capacity development, strengthen dialogue at the political, senior, and technical levels and work collaboratively to identify funding to enhance First Nations resources, infrastructure and enhanced capacity to support First Nations communities to respond, adapt to and mitigate the impact of emergency events.
  • As a next step to the MOU, the parties have developed a critical pathway to support the planning to begin negotiating a tripartite agreement to replace the bilateral service agreement with the Province of British Columbia.
  • During an Emergency Management Forum on June 28 and 29, 2022, hosted by the partners to the MOU (the First Nations Leadership Council, ISC and Emergency Management British Columbia), and attended by British Columbia Chiefs, First Nation Emergency Management representatives, the First Nations Leadership Council, the First Nations' Emergency Services Society, and government officials from Canada and British Columbia, the First Nations Leadership Council stressed the importance of directly integrating climate change and adaptation into the future of emergency management planning as well as the need for additional resources to support Emergency Management Coordinators for First Nations.
  • A Wildfire Management Agreement was signed with the province in 2016. The agreement has a term of 10 years.
Previous work of the Committee
  • In 2018, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs released the report From the Ashes on the 2017 wildfires. Budget 2019 included the following investments to implement recommendations from that report:
    • $211 million over five years to support increased resiliency and emergency management on reserve.
    • $48 million over four years for infrastructure projects on reserve that will protect communities from climate-related hazards.
  • Budget 2022 included the following emergency management investment of $24.7 million over five years to establish a secretariat to support the Minister of Emergency Preparedness and to enhance federal coordination of emergency responses.
Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement
  • In 2018, the Tŝilhqot'in National Government signed a three-year Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement with the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia.
  • The agreement, the first of its kind, was prompted by issues that arose in the response to fires in Tŝilhqot'in territory in 2017. The Tŝilhqot'in National Government commissioned a report titled The Fires Awakened Us detailing problems with emergency management and listing calls to action for emergency management going forward.
  • The 2018 agreement established a high-level engagement process among federal and provincial elected officials and the Tŝilhqot'in National Government.
  • A five-year extension to the agreement was signed in May 2022, with a commitment of $250,000 per year from ISC to implement the agreement.
  • In 2022-23, ISC committed $1.4 million to support the planning for a Emergency Management Centre, fire equipment and community planning.
  • ISC continues to identify additional funding sources and engage with other federal departments on funding opportunities in support of the Tŝilhqot'in National Government's EM priority areas
  • Other First Nations in British Columbia have requested Collaborative Emergency Management Agreements, and the early stages of developing these agreements are underway.
Communities and recovery needs
  • First Nations who have experienced significant land loss from the 2021 Atmospheric River events have requested that the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia replace lost land.
  • In partnership with the province of British Columbia, ISC is working with the four affected First Nations,  Shackan Indian Band, Nooaitch Indian Band, Cooks Ferry First Nation and Coldwater Indian Band to assess the amount of land that has been lost due to the event as well as complete a risk assessment on the cost of mitigation for flood risks to the existing reserve versus acquiring new land.
  • Lytton First Nation, a member of the Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council, was severely impacted by fires in 2021 and 2022. Following the 2021 fire, at the request of member Chiefs, Canada and British Columbia committed to working collaboratively with the Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council on wildfire recovery and rail safety.
  • The Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council, Canada, and British Columbia Coordination Task Force continue to meet biweekly
  • This recovery work, led by a collaborative leadership table, has focused on interim housing and recovery efforts. In total, 46 homes were lost in fires between 2021 and 2022. ISC has approved over $40 million in recovery funding to the Lytton First Nation for projects and activities including a community recovery team staffing, interim housing, community debris removal, interim community infrastructure and required assessments and inspections.
Committee of British Columbia and Federal Ministers on Disaster Response and Climate Resilience membership
  • Following five meetings of the Committee, attended by twenty federal and British Columbia ministers and three representatives from the First Nations Leadership Council, the Federal government announced $870 million for British Columbia to support flood, landslide and storm recovery efforts in the province.
  • The Committee also identified priorities including advancing the Tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding, providing direct supports to impacted First Nations communities, and exploring options for additions to reserves following land erosion caused by the 2021 atmospheric river event.

Current Status

Tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding
  • The First Nations Leadership Council put forward two of three resolutions at the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations, Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and First Nations Summit Annual General Assemblies related to First Nations involvement in negotiations on a new tripartite agreement for Emergency Services Funding. It is anticipated that the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations will put forward a resolution at the March Annual General Assembly.
  • The resolution supports Canada and British Columbia expanding the Bilateral Agreement to a new trilateral agreement with First Nations in British Columbia, for the purposes of ensuring satisfactory, effective and equitable funding and resourcing within the four pillars of emergency management in First Nations communities.
  • British Columbia Chiefs directed the First Nations Leadership Council to engage with First Nations in British Columbia and provide possible negotiation models for First Nations consideration in order for First Nations to engage in negotiation with Canada and British Columbia on the new trilateral agreement. The First Nations Leadership Council will report back to the British Columbia Chiefs with a final negotiation model for consideration.
Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement
  • The recently signed extension to the Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement with Tŝilhqot'in National Government included a provision that the parties will reach agreement by February 28, 2023, on funding from the federal and provincial governments to support the agreement over the five-year term.
  • ISC is working with the Province of British Columbia and Tŝilhqot'in National Government to determine what funding is needed beyond the $250,000 per year currently committed, and to identify potential sources of funding.
  • In 2022/23, ISC has committed to providing an additional $1.4 million to support the implementation of the Tŝilhqot'in National Government Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement.
  • ISC is engaging in preliminary discussions with the Secwepemc Health Caucus regarding exploring a Collaborative Emergency Management. ISC is aware of nine Nation groupings interested in similar Collaborative Emergency Management Agreements representing 79 of BC's 203 First Nations and is working to establish a procedure to support new agreements.
ISC BC Region Emergency Management Plan
  • ISC BC Region Emergency Management has a draft regional emergency management plan that is being reviewed and updated following the 2021 and 2022 emergency events and response in British Columbia.
  • The plan will be updated as part of a national effort coordinated with other regions over the next year.

Alberta

Issue Summary

  • Alberta's efforts to support First Nation communities in preparing for, and responding to emergency events.

Key Messages

  • Our program funds Alberta Emergency Management Agency to collaborate with First Nations to create and maintain disaster plans, focusing on future emergency events and how to prepare for them.
  • We engage with First Nations to determine if additional resources, training and development are required in wildfire prevention and protection, Emergency Preparedness, and Disaster Mitigation and fund eligible activities based on First Nations' priorities.
  • Our Government continues to engage with Indigenous leaders to support emergency preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery from emergency events, in collaboration with the province and non-governmental organizations.

Background

Agreements between ISC and province of Alberta:
  • ISC and the province of Alberta have two 10-year agreements related to Emergency Management.
    • Wildfire agreement: runs from 2015 to 2025 focusing on cost sharing pre-suppress, detections, prevention, and firefighting activities in the forest protection area.
    • Emergency management agreement: runs from 2014 to 2024 with Alberta Emergency Management Agency focusing on providing training, emergency exercises, an annual emergency management conference, and information management supports during emergency events.
  • Local disaster is led by the community, which can request support from the Alberta Emergency Management Agency (agency). In large-scale events requiring large-scale response, Alberta Emergency Management Agency leads the provincial coordination of response during emergencies, including prevention, preparedness, response and recovery. The agency also works to ensure public services, such as government services and first responders, are available during a crisis that exceeds the responding community's capacity.
Engagement with First Nations on the future of emergency management:
  • Through capacity funding, Alberta supported the staffing of an Emergency Management Coordinator for each of the treaty areas in Alberta. In the 2020-2021 fiscal year, this funding was expanded to tribal councils.
  • In 2022, ISC prioritized the engagement with Nations that identified a need for individual representation on perspective of the future of Emergency Management. The department is evaluating potential funding models that would equitably support Alberta Nations in all four pillars of Emergency Management.
  • ISC has engaged regularly with the province on the need for Indigenous partners to be included in developing a multilateral service agreement.
  • The ISC Alberta Regional Office held an Emergency Management Chief's Forum in partnership with the province of Alberta (Alberta Emergency Management Agency) March 7, 2023 in Edmonton. This was an opportunity to begin the dialogue and gauge First Nations' interest in exploring new multilateral emergency management service agreements. Coming out of this Forum the department received strong buy-in from Alberta Chiefs on moving forward towards a multilateral emergency management service agreement in the province.
Dene Tha' First Nation Flooding Event:
  • In May 2022, the Dene Tha' First Nation evacuated 874 individuals due to flooding. The damage has been extensive. As of February 1, 2023, 7 Nation members remain evacuated until repairs to their severely damaged home is completed or alternate long term housing can be obtained.
  • ISC regional and headquarters staff toured the community in October 2022 and met with Dene Tha' First Nation representatives to discuss emergency management rebuilding and mitigation work.
    • Dene Tha' First Nation has requested additional dedicated resources and has been supported for two casual positions to complete their claim submission.
    • Dene Tha' First Nation also requested an extension of funding support for mental wellness services and have been advised that additional flood-related mental wellness supports are eligible until March 2023.
  • ISC regional staff and Dene Tha' First Nation representatives met on February 1, 2023, as a follow up to October, 2022 discussions on emergency management rebuilding and mitigation work.
    • Dene Tha' First Nation is continuing with recovery activities which includes repairs to the damaged homes and is completing a recovery plan for the community which will include long term flood mitigation recommendations.
    • A further follow-up meeting between ISC regional staff and Dene Tha' First Nation representatives will be scheduled in the coming months to review the progress of the recovery efforts and long term recovery plan.
  • Due to the cost of the response efforts ISC regional and headquarters staff work in partnership to receive approval to increase the $30 million maximum amount payable in 2022-2023 to a First Nation in order to flow appropriate funds to Dene Tha' First Nation to pay the outstanding response invoices.

Current Status

  • The agreement with Alberta Emergency Management Agency will expire in 2024, however, there is a possibility of an extension. Further, the wildfire agreement is set to expire in 2025. This agreement may also be extended.
  • Engagement sessions with Indigenous communities in Alberta on the future of emergency management are ongoing. As of August 31, 2022, 14 First Nations, and one tribal council have participated in initial engagement discussions. The First Nations and tribal council will provide further comments on the future of emergency management in Alberta.
  • Funding totaling $45,488,029 has been provided to Dene Tha' First Nation for reimbursement for expenses incurred in responding to the disaster event. ISC regional staff continues to work with the Nation to identify additional funding needs.

Saskatchewan

Issue Summary

  • The Saskatchewan Region consists of 9 Tribal Councils and 70 First Nations (10 of which are Independent from a Tribal Council). The Region is susceptible to emergency events including wildfire, flood, severe weather, extended power outages and impacts to critical infrastructure resulting from natural disasters. The region is also susceptible to health and social emergencies, brought on by the lingering effects of the pandemic, intergenerational trauma, and gaps in community infrastructure.
  • As of April 1, 2022, the Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) expanded its scope to better respond to all-hazard emergency situations within current authorities, including public health emergencies in First Nation communities. By working in partnership, Indigenous Services Canada is advancing reconciliation through an all-hazard emergency management approach that includes four phases: mitigation/prevention, preparedness, response and recovery.
  • The Emergency Management Assistance Program along with the Health Emergency Management/Communicable Disease Emergencies Program has developed  processes to meet the needs of our First Nation partners. Moving forward, ISC will work to ensure the consistent delivery of EMAP (within current authorities) and its work to advance self-determination. The department is committed to continuing to engage and work with Indigenous partners to establish shared priorities as they relate to All Hazards Emergency Management working towards a more coordinated and inclusive approach to support all hazards preparedness, response, and recovery.
  • ISC encourages and supports the development of emergency response plans that includes a health component and in which community responsibilities and processes are consistent and efficient. This includes support for dedicated Emergency Management Coordinator positions at the community level to develop all-hazard emergency plans, community risk assessments and training.

Key Messages

  • ISC Saskatchewan Region has adopted an all-hazard approach to emergency management. Integrated emergency management is a shared responsibility between all levels of government and First Nations partners. Within Indigenous Services Canada (ISC), Emergency Management (EM) and Health Emergency Management (HEM) are aligning themselves to work together when responding to on-reserve emergency events.
  • In partnership with First Nations communities, Tribal Councils, and provincial and non-government organizations, Indigenous Services Canada's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) supports First Nation communities on reserve to access emergency assistance services comparable to services provided off reserve.
  • EMAP aims to be flexible, culturally sensitive, responsive to the unique strengths and customs of First Nation communities, and adaptive to the evolving challenges resulting from emergency events.
  • This all hazards approach to Emergency Management supports the direction of Indigenous partners within Saskatchewan Region during emergency events to provide access to additional emergency supports in a streamlined manner. This approach also provides Indigenous partners with up-to-date information and communications on current status in the community and creates an opportunity for partners to have direct access to updates and ISC supports.
  • Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) Regional Emergency Management Program engages and has built relationships with First Nations, Tribal Councils, Indigenous organizations (Saskatchewan First Nations Emergency Management, Northern Inter-Tribal Health Authority), and federal/provincial/agency partners (i.e., Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency, Public Safety Canada, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Canadian Red Cross) to ensure a full spectrum of supports are in place to support First Nations during emergency events.
  • ISC continues to engage closely with First Nations partners to establish shared priorities as they relate to Emergency Management.
  • ISC Saskatchewan Region has developed a Critical Response Team (CRT) approach, working collaboratively with partners, to ensure regional coordination, program support and expertise during event response to support First Nations. This streamlined methodology aligns with the department's service excellence approach and provides partners a one window approach to emergency response.
  • A recent emergency event that occurred in the Region that impacted a First Nation (James Smith Cree Nation) required extensive coordination and communication with the community's emergency management coordinator and leadership, as well as multiple Tribal Council emergency management coordinators and mental wellness providers to ensure community requests for supports were coordinated in a timely and effective manner.
  • Throughout the event, ISC senior leadership, staff and partners remain fully engaged with First Nation leadership and representatives for situational awareness updates, requests for support, coordination of resources, communications with internal and external partners and ensuring essential services and supplies requested by the community were in place to support response.
  • The Regional coordinated response supports First Nation natural disaster and health emergencies, implementing lessons learned from First Nation responses and investments into capacity development to manage emergency events and are supported through ISC's All Hazards Emergency Management Assistance Program. 

Background

Preparedness
  • ISC's Regional Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) currently supports 68 of 70 First Nations, 7 of 9 Tribal Councils, and Saskatchewan First Nation Emergency Management Organization (SFNEM) with funding supports to continue to build and enhance emergency management capacity at the community level with a focus on completion of all-hazard emergency plans, risk assessments, and FireSmart activities. The program also supports communities directly with response and recovery costs.
  • ISC First Nations Inuit Health Branch has invested significantly into community capacity development to respond to social and health emergencies, through mental wellness, communicable disease, health protection and promotion programming. This includes the expansion of mental wellness teams, opioid agonist treatment sites, and access to multiple training opportunities to respond to social emergencies for community staff.
  • ISC holds a wildfire management agreement with the province, signed in 1993, which provides funding to the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency (SPSA) for wildfire suppression costs on reserve within the forest boundary.
  • The majority of wildfires in the province occur in the forest boundary, which is in the northern part of the province. The SPSA and First Nations partners work together to ensure wildfire suppression services are available across the province for any First Nation in need of assistance. ISC supports the First Nation portion of the cost-share agreement (50-50) with the SPSA to contract First Nation fire suppression crews.
  • The ISC Saskatchewan Region has supported five (5) Tribal Councils to continue to develop emergency management models on an aggregate level inclusive of associated costing. The models will deem the "way forward" in emergency management respective to each Tribal Council area and member First Nations.
  • In 2022-2023, ISC Saskatchewan Region will have invested $9,483,060 in support of preparedness and capacity development led by First Nations and Tribal Councils, including FireSmart supports.
  • Recent preparedness activities include Tribal Councils Emergency Management program coordinators working with the Canadian Red Cross to develop emergency social services capacity and training to support communities with expertise to manage emergency evacuations. In addition, preparedness activities include wildland firefighting and search and recovery capacity and training.
  • The ISC Saskatchewan Region also provides funding support for the Saskatchewan First Nations Emergency Management Forum led by First Nations as an avenue to gather all First Nations and Tribal Council emergency management coordinators and teams to network with each other and partners, as well as share emergency management model development and capacity growth. The 2022 Forum was held November 7-10, 2022 showcasing First Nation and Tribal Council emergency management capacity development and working together to support each other in preparedness and during emergency events.
  • First Nation and Tribal Council Emergency Management Coordinators have also developed a Technical Working Group focused on working together to enhance capacity and training opportunities including identification of service and support gaps.
Emergency Management Partnerships
  • While there is no formal bilateral service agreement established in the Saskatchewan Region, regular engagement with key emergency management partners, specifically Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency and Public Safety Canada occurs and includes situational awareness messaging regarding emergency situations. ISC officials participate on First Nation and provincial operations calls.
    • No bilateral service agreement between ISC and the Province has been established due to criticisms by Saskatchewan First Nations that the federal and provincial government should not enter into such an agreement without First Nations at the table.
    • Out of respect, ISC has moved forward to support EM model development inclusive of multilateral service agreement arrangements First Nations and Tribal Councils have developed at the community level to support emergency management preparedness, response, and recovery.
  • The ongoing engagement is key for partners in preparing for and responding to emergency events impacting First Nations and the relationships are working well in coordinating response supports.
  • A recent example of engagement includes coordination of partners in developing all-hazard preparedness and response, with a recent focus on social emergencies (i.e., enhanced policing and health supports on reserve to support drug, alcohol, and gang issues). Ongoing meetings on emerging topics, issues, and available federal/provincial supports are also discussed.

Current Status

  • Regional Emergency Management continues to engage and work with First Nations, Tribal Councils, and federal/provincial partners to support First Nations capacity development on reserve through all pillars of emergency management. This includes identifying areas for additional resources and supports for planning, training, and human capacity to move forward in managing and decision-making.
  • ISC Saskatchewan Region continues to support First Nations needs related to emergency management preparedness, response, and recovery as they are brought forward. At the request of the First Nation, the Regional Emergency Management Team coordinates and leverages program supports inclusive of health emergencies, impacts to infrastructure, and environmental hazards.
  • Funding has been distributed to five Tribal Councils (Meadow Lake, Prince Albert, Saskatoon, Yorkton, and File Hills Qu'Appelle) to fund a temporary resource in each Tribal Council who would engage with their member communities to conceptualize their vision for emergency management and develop all-hazards concept models. This will help communities be in a position to begin engaging with ISC and the province on the contents of a multilateral service agreement.

Manitoba

Issue Management

  • Indigenous Service Canada's (ISC) Manitoba Region has a service agreement with the Canadian Red Cross to provide response services to First Nation communities during emergency events at the request of the Nation. This agreement expires on March 31, 2023. It is expected that this agreement will be extended for the next fiscal year.
  • Multilateral relationships are being explored with Indigenous Organizations in Manitoba, to assist in supporting First Nations affected by emergency events.
  • ISC-Manitoba Region maintains an annual agreement with the Province of Manitoba's Wildfire Services for wildfire suppression on reserve.

Key Message

  • The Government of Canada continues to engage with Indigenous leaders to support emergency preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery from floods, in collaboration with provinces and non-governmental organizations.
  • The department is committed to supporting First Nation communities requests for long-term plans and strategies to prepare for and mitigate against the increasing number of emergency events, which in turn reduces response activities.
  • ISC's capacity enhancement funding provides support to all First Nations and Tribal Councils in Manitoba to enhance capacity by employing emergency coordinators.
  • Record breaking spring and summer weather systems in 2022 brought significant rain to southern Manitoba, causing overland flooding, loss of road access and evacuations. ISC worked directly with First Nations, the Province of Manitoba, and the Canadian Red Cross (CRC) to provide support to evacuated community members.
  • Peguis First Nation evacuees are currently transitioning to long-term evacuee supports through the Canadian Red Cross. 688 members remain evacuated.
  • ISC has provided payments in the amount of $18.8M to Peguis in fiscal year 22-23 for response and recovery activities. This includes a payment in the amount of 2.5 million for the Nation's Season 2023 Flood Preparation Plan.  
  • ISC, Peguis First Nation and the Province of Manitoba will establish a working group to actively and comprehensively plan for long-term solutions.

Background

ISC established a 5-year service agreement with the CRC effective April 1, 2017, which provides preparedness and response services to First Nations in Manitoba during emergency situations as requested by the Nation. The agreement was renewed for an additional year, expiring March 31, 2023.

In emergencies such as wildfire and flood, First Nations in Manitoba can request the supports of the CRC, through ISC, to provide evacuee services. This may include emergency lodging and meals, reception, activities, personal services and family reunification services, financial assistance to address incremental costs of being out of their homes, the process of returning to their community once an emergency is over and it is safe to return.

Due to record levels of precipitation beginning in the spring and through the summer of 2022, widespread unprecedented overland flooding occurred throughout the central and southern portions of Manitoba. 

ISC supported the following related to the 2022 spring and summer flooding:

  • 27 First Nation communities requesting supports for flood mitigation and response activities;
  • 8 First Nation communities declaring a state of local emergency;
  • 7 First Nation communities experiencing partial evacuations due to road closures and flooding of houses and community infrastructure; and,
  • 1 First Nation community experiencing a full evacuation.

Current Status

In 2022, two major events affected First Nations in Manitoba: spring and summer weather conditions (widespread flooding, extreme precipitation, over saturation of soils) and a 53,000ha wildfire in northwest Manitoba.

Due to flooding, the Peguis First Nation experienced a full evacuation, supported by the Canadian Red Cross beginning May 1, 2022.

Due to the wildfire and subsequent long-term hydro outage, Mathias Colomb Cree Nation experienced a full evacuation of 2,173 individuals, supported by ISC and the Canadian Red Cross, for a total of 52 days.

In 2022-23 (April 1 – October 31), the Regional Emergency Management team:

  • Received 95 initial emergency calls to the ISC-RO 24/7 Duty Officer from 28 First Nations and 9 stakeholders.
  • Responded to 18 severe weather events and three wildfires impacting 30 First Nations and 2 Nations experiencing issues with community safety.
  • Supported the full evacuation of one Nation due to wildfire (2173 evacuees).
  • Supported partial evacuation of 12 First Nations (2384 evacuees) due to flooding and severe weather events.
  • Supporting 15 Nations through post event recovery efforts.
2022 Evacuated Communities # of Individuals evacuated 2022 long-term evacuees remaining
Peguis First Nation 2,085 716
Pine Creek First Nation 30 fully repatriated
Little Saskatchewan First Nation 2 fully repatriated
Pauingassi First Nation 39 9
Little Grand Rapids First Nation 21 fully repatriated
Sioux Valley Dakota Nation 13 fully repatriated
O-Pipon-Na-Piwin Cree Nation 23 fully repatriated
Sapotaweyak Cree Nation 3 priority-one medical fully repatriated
Long Plain First Nation 155 fully repatriated
Fisher River Cree Nation 3 households fully repatriated
Kinonjeoshtegon First Nation 35 fully repatriated
Sagkeeng First Nation 2 households fully repatriated
Roseau River Anishinaabe First Nation 4 households fully repatriated
Mathias Colomb Cree Nation 2,173 fully repatriated
Multilateral Agreements
  • Funding has been distributed to the Manitoba Assembly of Chiefs, Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak, Southern Chiefs' Organization, Island Lake Tribal Council to facilitate engagement sessions and conduct a needs analysis on emergency management for their member communities.
  • ISC is now looking to these Indigenous Representative Organizations to outline a strategy based on engagements that determine key roles and responsibilities of existing and potential partners, specific to the future of emergency management in Manitoba.
  • The ISC Manitoba Regional Office has recommended that, in collaboration with First Nations communities, a Manitoba First Nations Emergency Management Partnership table (FNEMP) be established to bring all partners (e.g., Canadian Red Cross, the province, etc.) to a common table to determine roles and responsibilities in all four pillars of emergency management in Manitoba.

Ontario

Issue Summary

Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) works closely with communities to support their response efforts, administering response and mitigation funding through the Emergency Management Assistance Program. First Nations communities along the James Bay and Hudson Bay coasts are disproportionately affected by flooding. During the 2022 flooding season, ISC introduced the Joint Command Approach to accelerate emergency management risk assessments and decision-making processes with key partners.

Currently, ISC and the Province of Ontario have a bilateral Emergency Management Service Agreement to ensure that First Nations on reserve receive emergency management services when needed. The department recognizes the opportunity to work with First Nations as full and equal partners in emergency management service agreements and response activities. To address this, the department is undertaking initiatives to develop and implement multilateral service agreements with Indigenous-led organizations across the province.

Key Messages

  • Our Government continues to engage with Indigenous leaders as full and equal partners to support emergency preparedness, mitigation, and response and recovery efforts, in collaboration with provincial and non-governmental organizations.
  • The Joint Command approach to emergency management was implemented during the 2022 spring flood season to ensure the full and equal participation of First Nations and Indigenous partners, streamline the processes for risk assessments, evacuation decision-making, and funding approvals so that partners could implement rapid responses.
  • Given that there is no one-size-fits-all model, the department is advancing multilateral service agreements with Ontario and Indigenous-led organizations, while also prioritizing capacity building, so that First Nations are best equipped to manage emergencies in their communities.

Background

  • Under the Emergency Management Assistance Program, ISC provides funding to First Nations, Tribal Councils, Indigenous Representative Organizations and other Indigenous-led organizations to mitigate and recover from emergencies. The Canadian Armed forces accepted the request for assistance to evacuate communities impacted by 2022 spring flooding along James Bay and Hudson Bay, including Kashechewan, Fort Albany and Attawapiskat. All persons evacuated have been repatriated back to their respective communities.
  • The 2022 wildfire season saw significantly fewer fires (221) than the 10-year average of 825, and last year's peak of 1,198 total wildfires. Nevertheless, the department's commitment to build First Nation emergency response capacity and to build back better will help ensure Indigenous communities are prepared for future events.
  • ISC funds a network of Emergency Management Coordinators, which include Indigenous subject matter experts who are able to deploy to First Nations in crisis. Funding support for coordinator positions are allocated to Indigenous organizations where most of the emergencies historically happen, aiding in rapid response efforts.
  • The current 10-year bilateral agreement between ISC and Ontario expires in 2028, however work is underway to engage First Nations on the development of  multilateral agreements that recognize First Nations as full and equal partners in decision-making processes and implementation mechanisms, supporting the right to self-determination, and building a foundation for the department's service transfer mandate.
  • Indigenous Services Canada funded a cost-effective community-driven initiative for evacuations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kashechewan First Nation is in northern Ontario on the western coast of James Bay. The on-reserve population in 2019 was 1,825 band members. Kashechewan is a fly-in community without an all-season road. The closest urban community is Timmins, about 460 kilometres away.  Every year since 2012, the community has been evacuated because of flooding or as a precaution because of the risk of spring flooding. Typically, the community was evacuated to host communities in northern Ontario. In both 2020 and 2021, community members were evacuated because of the risk of flooding. Rather than staying in a host community, the First Nation requested and received funding from Indigenous Services Canada to remain on their land and move to higher ground on their traditional hunting camps. Each of these evacuations lasted about 6 weeks. While they were living on their land, members participated in safe and culturally relevant activities, such as traditional community food harvesting and gathering, intergenerational knowledge sharing, and Indigenous language education. The cost of the 2 evacuations in 2020 and 2021 was about $140 per person per day compared with about $235 per person per day to evacuate to host communities in 2018 and 2019.

Current Status

  • ISC supports First Nations affected by emergencies with expedited response and recovery invoice reconciliation processes and funding. The department is also advancing funding for projects that prepare for and mitigate risks ahead of the 2023 flood season.
  • ISC is continuing to make investments in Indigenous-led and culturally appropriate training at the community level such as: ISN Maskwa all female evacuation support specialty security training in Thunder Bay in March 2022; mental health first aid; evacuation support specialist protection training in 2021; basic security guard training including first aid and CPR; critical incident stress debriefing; and search and rescue.
  • ISC is working with partners to develop a regional strategy for multilateral emergency management service agreements. A proposed approach has been circulated to guide discussions with First Nation partners, including Chiefs of Ontario and other Indigenous-led organizations, as well as the province of Ontario.
  • The department has proposed the following phased approach:
    • Bolster First Nation Emergency Management leadership, which includes formalizing the Joint Command approach;
    • Identify First Nation partners;
    • Engage on the new Emergency Management paradigm;
    • Develop a Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding
    • Co-develop the new paradigm with First Nation partners;
    • Develop Authority to Sign new agreements; and,
    • Implement Multilateral Service Agreements
  • Concurrently, ISC is working with the province and First Nation partners on a "lessons learned" process to evaluate and improve existing emergency management mitigation and response processes. Looking forward, to respond to concerns from the province of Ontario, ISC will work with partners to clarify roles and responsibilities associated with the communication and dissemination of timely and critical information, in addition to review options for safe and culturally appropriate evacuation facilities.
  • ISC has engaged regularly with the province on formalizing the Joint Command Governance Model and on moving forward with Indigenous partners to develop a multilateral service agreement.
  • In December, 2022, Deputy Minister Wilson and Public Safety's Deputy Minister Tupper, met with Ontario's Deputy Minister Derible (Emergency Management) and Deputy Minister Batisse (Indigenous Affairs) where consensus was reached on the need for a new multilateral agreement in the province. Deputies also agreed to meet again in the spring to ensure there is mutual agreement on a path forward with First Nation partners.
  • ISC continues to meet with Missanabie Cree, Mushkegowuk Council, and the Independent First Nations Alliance to secure their participation in moving forward with engaging on a new multilateral approach to emergency management.
  • ISC has also reached out to other First Nations, Tribal Councils, and Indigenous Regional Organizations to invite them to meet with ISC and discuss how they see themselves being involved in multilateral discussions moving forward. 
  • ISC is hoping to have a first multilateral meeting with all engaged partners in April to discuss a governance structure and forward approach.
  • A Wildfire Management Agreement was signed with the province in 1991. The agreement has no set termination date and continues to reimburse the province for costs incurred for wildfire suppression services on reserve.
  • Significant events in Ontario First Nations communities include:
    • Wabaseemoong Independent Nations: Evacuated to Kenora and Winnipeg due to Water treatment plant failure on December 21st. Community is currently planning repatriation. Community infrastructure suffered burst pipes while evacuated. Repairs are ongoing.
    • Oneida Nation the Thames: Community aquifer reached critically low levels in December 17th. Water was shipped to the community in short-term. By January 25th Aquifer had stabilized and situation resolved.
    • Attawapiskat: Impacted by flooding in May 2022, 111 people evacuated for ~5 days to Mississauga.

Quebec

Issue Summary

  • Discussions with the Government of Quebec (between 2010 and 2019) resulted in an agreement to reimburse the Province of Quebec for response and recovery expenses only (it does not include the other pillars, i.e. prevention-mitigation and emergency preparedness).
  • The agreement with Quebec remains fragile as; First Nations and Indigenous organizations were not consulted, the agreement excludes communities that are not considered on reserve, and it does not consider emergency management in a holistic manner (public health and social crises are not considered).
  • The province has asked Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) to commit to updating the list of communities eligible for the EMAP. The interpretation of the eligibility of communities for EMAP will need to be clarified within ISC.

Key Messages

  • Discussions with representatives of the Government of Quebec will be necessary in order to encourage the recognition of First Nations as partners in emergency management in Quebec, notably within multilateral agreements.
  • Maintaining and growing the capacity of First Nations is a priority of ISC and the Quebec region and, as a result, initiatives are currently in place to support capacity building of Indigenous communities and organizations.
  • The region is exploring, with Indigenous partners, possible actions to advance the assumption of emergency management services by them.

Background

Bilateral Agreements
  • A five-year service agreement (2019-2023) was signed with the Government of Quebec to provide support to First Nations communities when their capacity to respond is exceeded. The Government of Quebec invoices ISC for expenses incurred by Quebec departments and agencies when a request for assistance to First Nations is referred to them by ISC. No intervention from Quebec has been required since the signing of this agreement. Claims submitted in the past have been for intervention expenses only.
  • A five-year agreement was also signed (2017-2022) between the ISC Regional Office and the Canadian Red Cross to reimburse costs associated with disaster services assistance, training and awareness, and was extended until March 31, 2023. Beyond the 2022-23 fiscal year, it is expected that the relationship with the Red Cross will continue with the signing of a new agreement.
  • A five-year agreement (2019-2023) was signed with the Societé de protection des forêts contre feu (SOPFEU) to reimburse costs associated with wildland surveillance and suppression services. Work to revise this agreement has begun in the region but with inflation and the current cost of fuel, the funds required to maintain this agreement will need to be increased to better represent actual and future costs. The province and the SOPFEU would like to sign 7-10 year agreements rather than 5-year agreements.
  • To date, discussions on multilateral agreements have been slow to progress. This can be attributed to the province's position regarding the jurisdiction of First Nations in emergency management and a lack of awareness from the province and First Nations on Canada's new policy direction on multilateral emergency management service agreements.
  • To open the dialogue with the province, the Quebec Regional Director General and the Director General of Regional Operations will meet with the Quebec Associate Deputy Minister of Emergency Preparedness in April.

Key Partners

  • The Grand Council of the Waban-Aki Nation (GCNWA) provides support to First Nation communities in Quebec before, during and after disasters, in coordination with tribal councils and various levels of government. It works within the four pillars of emergency management: prevention, preparedness, response and recovery in support of local communities. The GCNWA do not have the mandate to speak on behalf of all Quebec First Nations for emergency management, but have taken a keen interest in developing their capacity to support First Nations in the province. As a result, ISC funds 5 Emergency Management Coordinator positions within GCNWA.  
  • The Assembly of First Nations of Quebec-Labrador (AFNQL) and its commissions hold monthly discussions with the ISC Regional Office. The First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services Commission (FNQLHSSC) have shown an interest in becoming involved in supporting communities in emergency management. Discussions with the AFNQL will have to take place on the tripartite approach to emergency management (First Nations - federal - provincial).

Current Status

Agreements
  • The Quebec Regional Office is currently focusing on the renewal of the Quebec, Canadian Red Cross and SOPFEU agreements, in addition to reactivating discussions for a tripartite approach to the implementation of the bilateral agreement with the province. Two of these agreements (SOPFEU and the Government of Quebec) require the Secrétariat du Québec aux relations canadiennes to obtain an order-in-council from the Government of Quebec to authorize the organizations to sign the bilateral agreement.
First Nations Capabilities
  • ISC is exploring options to ensure adequate emergency management capacity in First Nations and Indigenous organizations, including funding for dedicated emergency management positions in all EMAP eligible First Nations.
  • The Grand Council of the Waban Aki Nation has expressed interest in providing emergency management services to First Nations in Quebec. The Quebec Region has taken the opportunity to support their capacity building with funding provided since 2019.

Atlantic Canada

Issue Summary

  • Emergency Management, regional overview and key events for First Nations in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.

Key Messages

  • The Atlantic region consists of 33 First Nations with reserve lands, and approximately 50 inhabited communities throughout four Atlantic provinces. The region is susceptible to emergency events that include hurricanes, overland flooding, severe weather events such as ice storms and failures of critical infrastructure.
  • ISC Atlantic Emergency Management Assistance program staff engage regularly with regional emergency management partners including the provincial emergency measures organizations and Public Safety Canada. While dialogue is good, there is room for growth including formal multilateral agreements to support Indigenous partners being an equal player and decision maker at the table.
  • Following Hurricane Fiona, Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) received reports of flooding, erosion, downed trees, damages to infrastructure as a result of winds and power outages. Currently, the department is supporting recovery efforts in affected provinces.

Background

Preparedness:
  • As of March 2022, 22 of 33 Atlantic First Nations have completed or are working on all-hazard risk assessments. In addition,17 Atlantic First Nations have up-to-date community emergency management plans, and seven additional First Nations are currently completing their plans.
  • From April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022, ISC Atlantic invested $2.79 million to support preparedness and nonstructural mitigation projects led by First Nations and tribal councils in the Atlantic region.
  • Of the $2.79 million invested, $876,308 includes funding for seven full-time First Nation capacity positions dedicated to emergency management from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022. These positions are throughout the four provinces and funding for the positions is established in partnership with First Nation and Inuit Health Branch emergency management funding.
  • The capacity positions recently led an all-Atlantic First Nation emergency management preparedness workshop with over 100 participants, including representatives from provincial emergency measures organizations and ISC.
Emergency Management Partnerships:
  • A departmental objective is the establishment of multilateral service agreements between ISC, First Nations and Provinces and/or emergency management service providers to ensure inclusion of First Nations as "full and equal partners" at the negotiation and decision-making table with respect to emergency management.
  • While there are no formal multilateral service agreements established in the Atlantic region, regular engagement with key emergency management partners, specifically Provincial Emergency Measures Organizations and Public Safety Canada, occur.
  • Currently a bilateral service agreement is renewed annually with the Province of Prince Edward Island until a multilateral agreement is established.
  • These engagements are key to preparing for and responding to emergency events impacting the region and First Nations, and the relationship is working well.
  • Example of engagements include provinces and Public Safety Canada participating at First Nation preparedness workshops and training, attending after action reviews following an emergency event and bilateral/trilateral meetings on emerging topics and issues.
  • ISC Atlantic includes the provinces and Public Safety Canada on all situational awareness messages regarding emergency situations and ISC officials participate on all provincial emergency operations calls.
  • In addition, provinces have invited First Nations on operational calls for emergency events such as the recent wildfire in Newfoundland.
Hurricane Fiona:
  • On September 23, 2022, Hurricane Fiona made landfall near Canso Nova Scotia,  bringing high winds and rain in the region, affecting all Atlantic provinces.
  • The advance work included activating emergency response plans and pre-storm preparedness measures such as purchasing food and medical supplies as well ensuring flood mitigation plans, generators and communication equipment were operational.
NFLD Wildfire:
  • In late July 2022, a wildfire in central Newfoundland intermittently cut off highway access to the Miawpukek First Nation, then caused an extended closure from August 3-9.
  • On August 6, the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador declared a state of emergency for the area impacted by significant smoke and for communities, including Miawpukek, cut off due to highway closure.
  • Throughout the event, ISC and First Nation representatives were fully engaged with the provincial emergency operations centres for situational awareness updates and request for supports such as essential supplies.
  • Response work was done in a coordinated manner with all impacted partners, including First Nations, at the table.
  • In follow-up to the event, Miawpukek First Nation is proposing to undertake essential work including a firebreak for the community and a review/update to their emergency management and evacuation plan; the province and Public Safety Canada will be part of this work with ISC and the First Nation.

Current Status

  • While significant accomplishments have been made in the Atlantic region on emergency preparedness, we recognize there is more work to be done – this includes additional planning, training and additional human capacity to focus on preparing for and responding to emergency events.
  • The emergency management capacity positions established in the Atlantic region in fiscal year 2020-2021 are key to emergency preparedness and continue to provide valuable support and resources as they are active full-time positions. These dedicated positions coordinate preparedness work and support their member communities during emergency response and through the recovery process. The positions were also fully involved with the COVID-19 pandemic response, coordinating supports during outbreaks that impacted First Nation communities.
  • ISC's Atlantic region has been able to support eligible preparedness and nonstructural mitigation projects as they are received. With no deadline for proposals, ISC Atlantic can respond to First Nations needs as they are brought forward, allowing flexible planning for First Nations. ISC Atlantic Emergency Management staff have also collaborated with First Nation and Inuit Health Branch programs to support First Nations emergency management projects and capacity positions.
  • At this point in time, there are no formal multilateral emergency management service agreements in place between ISC, the four Atlantic provinces and First Nations. We recognize this is a gap and are working diligently with partners on a path forward. With the relationships established between the parties, we hope to build on that and formalize multilateral services agreements.
  • The bilateral service agreement between ISC and Prince Edward Island has been in place for over five years; it is renewed annually and there is a good relationship between the province, ISC and First Nations. Through this relationship, work is underway and negotiations continue on a multilateral service agreement to have First Nations at the table as full and equal partners.
  • ISC have had initial discussions with one Tribal Council in New Brunswick on a multilateral service agreement and work is underway to engage the other two Tribal Councils. Through initial discussions with New Brunswick Emergency Measures Organization, they are supportive of a multilateral agreement and currently provides emergency management support to First Nations.
  • Discussions of a multilateral agreement in Nova Scotia date back to 2013-14 and since COVID-19, discussions have stalled as the focus turned to COVID-19 response. The department is looking to reengage these discussions, particularly since Capacity positions have been established in the two Tribal Councils in Nova Scotia that represent all First Nations in the province.
  • In Newfoundland and Labrador, no discussions on a multilateral service agreement have occurred to date. The provincial stance on the topic is emergency management for on-reserve is a Federal responsibility. Despite this, during the wildland fire in Newfoundland during the summer of 2022, First Nations and ISC work collaboratively with the province as well as neighbouring communities during the response.

High Risk Areas and Flood Insurance

Issue Summary

  • Flooding is the most expensive recurring natural hazard in Canada, the cost of which is consistently increasing.
  • ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program provides First Nation communities with financial support for preparing for, mitigating, responding to, and recovering from emergency events including floods.
  • ISC is working with counterparts at Public Safety Canada to explore initiatives for flood risk reduction such identifying areas at high risk of floods and flood insurance products for residential buildings.

Key Messages

  • Many First Nations communities face higher than average flood risk. Some communities face recurring and long term impacts from flooding. Notable examples are Kashechewan First Nation (ON) and Peguis First Nation (MB).
  • Indigenous Services Canada continues to work closely with First Nations, provincial partners and community organizations to plan, address and mitigate flooding. First Nations are supported in leading efforts to address their current flooding situations.
  • We will continue to work closely with partners to ensure that information is always shared in a timely manner, and proper preventative and mitigation measures are in place so communities are well prepared for floods.
  • The Emergency Management Assistance Program will continue to work with First Nation leadership in recovering from flood seasons, expediting support for projects to mitigate future impacts.
  • The department supports all on-reserve First Nations communities that experience flooding by reimbursing costs associated with responding to and recovering from the event. If an evacuation of a community and its members is required, all associated costs of the evacuation are supported.
  • ISC is working with other government departments, primarily Public Safety Canada, to develop flood risk mitigation strategies for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.
  • ISC supports flood mitigation on-reserve by providing funding for flood mapping through the Emergency Management Assistance Program and structural mitigation initiatives through the department's First Nations Infrastructure Fund.

Background

Kashechewan First Nation

  • In 2017 the Government of Canada and Kashechewan First Nation signed an agreement to explore options for relocating the community to higher ground. Beginning in 2020, Kashechewan First Nation began an On-The-Land Initiative where community members an estimated 1,400 residents from Kashechewan and 500 from neighbouring Fort Albany self-isolate in their traditional hunting camps for approximately one month.
  • Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) approved funding of up to $4.2 million through the Emergency Management Assistance Program to support the purchase of necessary provisions, supplies and equipment for the On-the-Land initiative, as well as for the transportation of residents to and from the hunting camps.

Peguis First Nation

  • Peguis First Nation was relocated in 1907 to its current location at the flood-prone Fisher River delta. The community experiences flooding every 3-4 years on average.
  • Peguis First Nation experiences recurring flooding and has had long term evacuees since 2011. Despite recurring flooding, the community has no permanent flood mitigation measures and relies on temporary measures such as sandbagging when flooding occurs.
  • To support flood mitigation efforts during the 2022 floods, the Government of Canada provided Peguis First Nation with $2.5 million in funding.

Flood Insurance:

  • In light of the growing threat to the safety of Canadian communities due to climate change and continued urbanization in high-risk flood areas, the Government of Canada is moving forward with a number of measures to help Canadians reduce their financial and physical vulnerability to flooding.
  • Public Safety Canada has been mandated to review and advance a flood risk plan for Canada; one of the plan's components includes establishing a national task force to review and develop options for a national affordable flood insurance program and measures for potential relocation. As part of that effort, Public Safety has recently released Adapting to Rising Flood Risk: An Analysis of Insurance Solutions for Canada which outlines options for bringing affordable flood insurance to Canadians.
  • To ensure the considerations of First Nations on reserve are included in this work, ISC and the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) co-lead a Steering Committee and a Technical Working Group on First Nations Home Flood Insurance Needs to gain a baseline understanding of flood insurance on-reserve and to capture on reserve needs through First Nation-led engagement.
  • The Steering Committee on First Nations Home Flood Insurance Needs will provide an opportunity for First Nation communities to contribute their knowledge and lived experiences in preparing for and responding to flooding.
  • Flood insurance can be purchased through insurance providers. Many First Nations communities face such an extreme risk of flooding that insurance firms are unwilling in offer flood insurance on those reserves. Uninsured properties on-reserve that suffer flooding damage are covered under ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program's Response and Recovery funding.
  • Residential insurance accessibility is limited on reserve as many insurance firms are hesitant to provide insurance on reserve. Insurance firm hesitation stems from a variety of factors such as lack of risk data/analysis, unclear liability, lack of accredited services on reserve (ex: firefighting), or high costs to insure.
  • The cost of flood insurance is often unaffordable in First Nation communities that face a high risk of floods. This reality leaves ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program as the only remaining option for financial compensation for flood damage on-reserve.

Flood Mapping:

  • ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program provides funding through its Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness funding stream to support flood mapping activities on reserve. Some communities have conducted their own flood mapping project but the results of which are not recorded by ISC.
  • Off reserve, flood mapping is largely conducted by provincial governments and its public accessibility varies by province. There is currently no publicly available national flood risk map.
  • Public Safety Canada is exploring options of more comprehensive flood mapping to provide a better understanding of flood risk across Canada.

High Risk Areas:

  • First Nation communities, in aggregate, face some of the highest risk of flooding in the country.
  • Due to a lack of available flood mapping data, the extent of flood risk faced by First Nation communities is not clear.
  • ISC is working to support Public Safety Canada efforts to create more comprehensive and accurate flood mapping tools to ensure communities, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous, are aware of the risks they face and are able to mitigate those risks.

Current Status

  • ISC supports First Nations at risk of flooding by providing funding for both structural and non-structural mitigation strategies and reimburses costs associated with responding to and recovering from active flooding in on-reserve First Nations communities.
  • As of August 31st 2022, First Nation communities have experienced 61 flooding events in the 2022 fiscal year. The cost to response and recover from these events totals $65 million.
  • Public Safety Canada leads federal government efforts to develop national flood risk mitigation strategies. ISC supports Public Safety in this effort by providing considerations for First Nations specific contexts such as advice for implementing strategies on-reserve.

Service Transfer and Indigenous led Approaches to Emergency Management

Emergency Management Plans and Multilateral Agreements

Issue Summary

  • Currently, Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) has eight bilateral agreements with provinces and territories (P/Ts) to deliver emergency management services to on-reserve First Nations.
  • As First Nations were not included as signatories in these agreements, ISC is now moving towards establishing multilateral emergency management service agreements to include First Nations as full and equal partners.
  • New agreements will ensure First Nations are at the forefront of decision making when it comes to strengthening capacity and resiliency to better equip communities for the effects of climate change and increases in emergencies.

Key Messages

  • As First Nations continue to express a desire to be considered as partners in the delivery of emergency management services, the department is actively listening and working to develop new multilateral agreements. The department is also working to strengthen capacity and engaging First Nations on approaches that are aligned with their vision.
  • The department is taking steps to develop multilateral service agreements. This includes engaging and initiating conversations with all partners to identify the right tools. New regional strategies are being used to inform a cohesive national approach for the future of emergency management service delivery for all on-reserve First Nations.
  • New initiatives, such as the signing of a Trilateral Memorandum of Understanding in British Columbia and an innovative Joint Command Governance Model in Ontario, demonstrate the collaborative direction that we are moving towards which supports our service transfer mandate.
  • Multilateral agreements will help advance the transfer and control over the development of emergency management services to First Nations and support their right to self-determination.

Background

  • Eight bilateral agreements have been established across Canada. As some of these agreements are set to expire within the next few years, ISC is using this as an opportunity to transition its approach to move forward with multilateral agreements that include the department, provinces and territories or third parties, and First Nation communities as full and equal partners.
  • To ensure the full engagement of First Nation partners, ISC is working to develop regional strategies that take into account each regional context.
  • British Columbia has made notable progress towards developing a multilateral agreement by signing a Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC) and the Province of British Columbia in 2017. This MOU established a process to advance meaningful recognition and enhance capacity in emergency management. This preliminary agreement outlines the ongoing commitment to incorporate Indigenous knowledge, and  Indigenous decision-making, and ensures First Nations have the capacity to prevent and respond to emergencies.
    • The Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and the First Nations Summit have put forward resolutions requesting approval to develop negotiation models for First Nations' consideration in order for them to engage in negotiation with Canada and British Columbia on the new multilateral agreement.
    • The FNLC has agreed to develop a framework agreement to support negotiations, modelled after other frameworks for Health, Education and modern treaties. Work is anticipated to begin in Fall 2022.
  • Ontario has also made progress towards the development of a multilateral agreement. In 2022, a Joint Command Governance Model was developed between ISC, Indigenous partners and the province in advance of the wildfire and flood season to streamline the process from when a First Nation makes a request for help to the point of providing a coordinated emergency response.
    • As part of this Joint Command, ISC will help fund two First Nation-led proposals, which in turn help strengthen capacity and create emergency management models for First Nations to build from when establishing multilateral service agreements.
  • In Manitoba, multiple First Nation-led partners have expressed an interest in leading emergency management for First Nations in their region. Interested partners include, but are not limited to, the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, the Southern Chiefs Organization, Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak Inc., and individual First Nations.

Current Status

  • Over  the past 3 years, from 2019-20 to 2021-22, $1.37 million was made available to support First Nations-led engagement on emergency management services agreements. This provided an opportunity for First Nation communities to share their views on emergency management and articulate their vision for the future, however many of these engagements and discussions were put on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Now that the country is learning and adapting from the COVID-19 pandemic, a renewed approach is being sought between ISC and its partners to discuss multilateral service agreements particularly with one that integrates health emergency preparedness and preparing/adapting to climate change impacts.
British Columbia:
  • There is a 10-year wildfire management agreement and bilateral service agreement between the Province of British Columbia and Indigenous Services Canada. These agreements are expected to expire in 2026 and 2027, respectively.
  • In British Columbia, the Tsilhqot'in National Government (TNG), ISC, and the province developed the Tsilhqot'in Collaborative Agreement on Emergency Management in 2018, and renewed it in 2022 for 5 years. This agreement strengthens the capacity of TNG communities in emergency management.  
  • The First Nation Emergency Services Society (FNESS) in British Columbia is aiming to develop a Regional Action Plan by March 2023, which will outline the direction many First Nations would like to take on emergency management (e.g., governance models, funding models, capacity needs). This will pave the way for the development of a multilateral agreement in the province.
  • Work will begin this Fall between ISC, the First Nations Leadership Council and the province in developing a new tripartite framework which will support negotiations for the agreement.
Ontario:
  • There is a ten-year bilateral emergency management service agreement between Indigenous Services Canada and the Government of Ontario.
  • There is a Wildfire Management Agreement between the province and Indigenous Services Canada that provides funds for the province's first responder and wildfire suppression role on-reserve. This agreement was signed in 1991 between Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. It covers the annual recovery basis amount for wildfire suppression costs.
  • In 2022, the Ontario Regional Office introduced a Joint Command governance model, with First Nation partners, Ontario and ISC. As part of the model, ISC will help fund First Nation-led proposals by the Independent First Nations Alliance and Missanabie Cree First Nation. These initiatives will help strengthen capacity and emergency management models for First Nations.
  • ISC and Ontario participated in an August 2022 Partners Workshop to discuss enhancements to communication protocols and a path toward a multilateral service agreement.
  • This Fall, ISC will collect the lessons learned/key takeaways from the First Nation-led approaches to emergency management service delivery to help inform negotiations towards multilateral agreements.
  • ISC drafted a letter to First Nation partners in Ontario inviting them to discuss a regional strategy for multilateral service agreements. The letter outlines a phased approach that includes engagement with First Nation partners, the provincial government, and other service delivery partners.
Manitoba:
  • ISC has a five-year bilateral service agreement with the Canadian Red Cross that will expire in March 2023 and will be renewed until March 2024.
  • The Wildfire Management Agreement between the province of Manitoba and ISC allocates $5.6M to the province annually. Any amount over the base allocation is funded via the Response and Recovery program through the Emergency Management Assistance Program.
  • There are ongoing discussions on developing a hybrid multilateral service agreement that expands the roles and responsibilities of First Nation partners, while maintaining the Canadian Red Cross as a primary partner for providing emergency services to First Nation communities until a full transition to a First Nation-led emergency management model is complete.
  • Funding has been distributed to the Manitoba Assembly of Chiefs, Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak, Southern Chiefs' Organization, Island Lake Tribal Council to facilitate engagement sessions and conduct a needs analysis on emergency management for their member communities.
  • ISC is now looking to these Indigenous Representative Organizations to outline a strategy based on engagements that determine key roles and responsibilities of existing and potential partners, specific to the future of emergency management in Manitoba.
Yukon Territory:
  • There is a seven-year bilateral agreement between the Government of Yukon and Indigenous Services Canada that is set to expire in March 2023 and will be extended for another year.
  • There is no wildfire agreement in place with the Government of Yukon.
  • There is interest in the territory to establish a Memorandum of Understanding or a multilateral agreement between Canada, the Yukon Government, and the 17 First Nations who are currently eligible for ISC funding (14 Yukon and 3 Northern BC First Nations).
  • To convene all partners, the CIRNAC Yukon Regional Office is working with the Directorate to host an emergency management forum in Fall 2023 or Winter 2024.
Northwest Territories:
  • There is a five-year bilateral agreement between the Government of the Northwest Territories and Indigenous Services Canada for emergency preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation that was signed on February 10, 2016. The bilateral agreement has been renewed yearly maintaining the status quo.
  • There is no wildfire management agreement with the Northwest Territories.
  • Over the next fiscal year, the department will work with the Regional Office to engage the two First Nations to determine the priorities and needs of the two First Nations and update the service agreement to reflect this.
Alberta:
  • There is a ten-year bilateral agreement between the Alberta Emergency Management Agency and Indigenous Services Canada that was signed in 2014.
  • There is a ten-year wildfire management agreement that was signed in 2015 with Alberta's Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry which expires in March 2025.
  • The ISC Alberta Regional Office is planning an Emergency Management Chief's Forum in partnership with the province of Alberta (Alberta Emergency Management Agency) March 7, 2023 in Edmonton. This will be an opportunity for the new Directorate to support the Alberta regional team and strengthen the overall dialogue in an effort towards First Nations' participation in new multilateral emergency management service agreements.
Saskatchewan:
  • There is no bilateral service agreement in Saskatchewan however, Indigenous Services Canada have a Letter of Understanding for on-reserve Emergency Management services.
  • There is a 1993 wildfire management agreement with the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency for 50-50 cost sharing between ISC and the province to fund fire suppression.
  • Funding has been provided to five Tribal Councils (Meadow Lake, Prince Albert, Saskatoon, Yorkton, and File Hills Qu'Appelle) to fund a temporary resource in each Tribal Council who will engage with their member communities to conceptualize their vision for emergency management and develop all-hazards concept models. This will help communities to be in a position to begin engaging with ISC and the province on the contents of a multilateral service agreement.
Quebec:
  • There is a five-year bilateral service agreement between Indigenous Services Canada and the Province of Quebec that was signed on March 20, 2019.
  • There is a four-year bilateral wildfire management agreement between Indigenous Services Canada and the Societe de Protection des Forets under which it agreed to reimburse the latter for costs associated with emergency management and forest firefighting services. This agreement was signed by Indigenous Services Canada and the Societe De Protection des Forets in January 2019. It is in effect from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023.
  • To date, discussions on multilateral agreements have been slow to progress, but upcoming meetings have been scheduled with the province of Quebec to build awareness on Canada's new policy direction on multilateral emergency management service agreements.
Prince Edward Island:
  • There is a five-year bilateral agreement in place between the Government of Prince Edward Island and Indigenous Services Canada that is set to expire in March 2023 and will be renewed.
  • There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs. Prior to COVID-19, multilateral agreement negotiations were ongoing with the two First Nations in PEI, but put on hold due to the pandemic. Next steps require re-engaging First Nations and the province in order to bring them back to the negotiation table.
New Brunswick:
  • There is no bilateral nor wildfire management agreement in place in the province of New Brunswick.
  • There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs.
  • North Shore Micmac District Council has expressed interest in a new emergency management service agreement and plans to coordinate with the other two Tribal Councils (Mawiw Council Inc. and Wolastoqey Tribal Council Inc.) in the province to develop a plan forward.
  • The province has been responsive to First Nations' emergency management needs and is keen in moving forward with a multilateral agreement.
Nova Scotia:
  • There is no bilateral nor wildfire management agreement in place in the province of Nova Scotia.
  • There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs.
  • Discussions towards a multilateral agreement in Nova Scotia date back to 2013-14, however, were inconclusive. Since COVID-19 there have been no further conversations on multilateral agreements with First Nations and the province. Next steps include re-engaging with the two Tribal Councils in the province to discuss multilateral service agreements and how they can be engaged on it.
Newfoundland and Labrador:
  • There is no bilateral nor wildfire management agreement in place in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
  • There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs.
  • Pursuing a multilateral agreement is not considered a priority for the provincial government, as they believe that First Nation emergency management is solely a federal responsibility. Given the capacity and remoteness of some First Nation communities (e.g., fly-in-fly-out), there are notable risks to not having any service agreement in place in the event of a major emergency event.
Nunavut:
  • There is no signed service agreement Nunavut as there are no First Nation reserves in the territory.

Forward Planning and EMAP Evolution

Issue Summary

  • Since the inception of the Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) in 2014, which created a single-window approach for First Nations on-reserve to access emergency management supports, the emergency management landscape has evolved and become more complex.
  • Climate change has increased the frequency and severity of emergencies, and First Nation partners are increasingly looking for autonomy in program development and delivery, and to be considered as partners in governance and decision making tables.
  • Additionally, the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) indicated that emergency management service agreements and wildfire agreements should include all First Nations.
  • As a result, an emergency management transformation is needed to better meet the needs of First Nations and provide communities and organizations with the necessary supports to exercise self-determination and self-governance. EMAP is looking at meeting these challenges through creating more financial flexibility, specifically when dealing with mitigation and preparedness measures, moving forward.

Key Messages

  • ISC is committed to developing a nation-to-nation relationship with First Nation partners, who are increasingly expressing a desire to be more involved in the development and delivery of emergency management services.
  • The OAG has indicated that First Nations should be included in the establishment and implementation of service agreements.
  • The department is actively working to develop new multilateral emergency management service agreements in each region with First Nation partners to create full and equal partnerships.
  • Engaging Indigenous leaders, and implementing adaptation measures and new or innovative approaches is key to reducing impacts and increasing resiliency in communities. The Government will continue to work with communities to use their local knowledge.
  • The Government is committed to enhancing First Nations community capacity and preparing for emergency events, especially in the context of climate change. It plans to do this through increasing financial flexibility, increasing access to funding for First Nation communities, and the freedom to use the funds in a manner best suited to their community.
  • Following recommendations in the OAG Report, the department has put forward plans to update EMAP to allow for more proactive funding measures and increasing the program's ability to adapt to needs identified by First Nations. The department aims to make the program more flexible in order to better align with a true all-hazards approach to emergency management.

Background

  • Since April 1, 2014, the Department has been providing emergency management services under four pillars – mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery – to on-reserve First Nation communities through the EMAP. Services were traditionally governed by emergency management service agreements between the Government of Canada and the provinces and territories.
  • Budget 2019 provided $201 million over five years, starting in 2019-20, with $49.4 million per year ongoing to support increased resiliency and emergency management on-reserve, including health emergencies. This led to the establishment of key program streams, such as the implementation of Emergency Management Coordinators in on-reserve First Nation communities and the establishment of the Firesmart program.
  • In April 2019, ISC signed a Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding on Emergency Management Services with the First Nation Leadership Council (FNLC) and the Province of British Columbia. This established a foundation with First Nation partners to create a relationship based on full and equal partnership and begins a shift from bilateral service agreements between ISC and the provinces and territories to establishing agreements with the full inclusion of First Nation partners.
  • Further program evolution occurred in 2021 where EMAP's Treasury Board Submission served as a vehicle to permanently include health emergencies under the program to support a more holistic approach to emergency management response and recovery. Building on this success, ISC is now exploring forward looking program changes that could broaden the scope of EMAP and lead to improved service delivery in on-reserve First Nation communities.

Current Status

  • ISC is developing a strategic path forward to develop a consistent approach to developing multilateral service agreements, focusing on financial flexibility, with First Nation partners and provincial and territorial counterparts. These plans are being informed through engagement with Regional Office colleagues and First Nation partners.
  • ISC will build on 2019 investments and continue to target funding opportunities to expand EMAP and the department's ability to provide more timely, and higher-quality services to First Nation on-reserve communities.
  • ISC will continue to engage First Nation partners and other partners on how to expand and enhance the EMAP program to better meet the needs of First Nation communities, and create an environment of First Nation-led service delivery.

Emergency Management Deck

Purpose

  • Provide an overview of ISC's national role in emergency management and detail the department's Emergency Management Assistance Program.
  • Outline departmental efforts to advance multilateral agreements with a focus on BC and Ontario.
  • Describe emergency management in BC, outline key partners and their roles, and detail priority actions.
  • Identify existing challenges and pressures as well as critical next steps.

ISC's National Role in Emergency Management

The department provides direct funding to First Nations communities through EMAP to strengthen resiliency, prepare for hazards and respond to them using the four pillars of emergency management: Mitigation; Preparedness; Response; and Recovery.

Emergency Management Assistance Program

EMAP helps communities on reserve access emergency assistance services, including health emergencies. The program also provides funding to provinces, territories and non-government organizations to support on-reserve emergency management.

ISC partner programs within emergency management:

  • First Nations & Inuit Health Branch: Health EM provides funding support for health emergency preparedness, capacity building and knowledge mobilization.
  • Indigenous Community Support Fund: The "single window" funding approach that provided more than $1.8B to Indigenous leadership and organizations to prevent, prepare and respond to COVID-19.
  • First Nation Infrastructure Fund (FNIF): Strategic investments in critical and permanent infrastructure support on-reserve communities by modifying hazards and making the design and construction of assets more resilient.
  • Structural Fire Protection: core capital funding to First Nations on an annual basis that can be used for fire protection services as well as fire insurance.

Co-Chairs of Cabinet Committee on Safety, Security and Emergencies

"You will exercise leadership and coordinate efforts to strengthen emergency management in Canada, ensuring a strategic, integrated and proactive approach across all hazards, including public health emergencies."
Minister of Emergency Preparedness
"Work with First Nations and provincial and territorial government partners to strengthen the governance and service delivery for First Nations emergency preparedness, management and recovery."
Minister of Indigenous Services

Federal Emergency Management Alignment

ISC is aligned and coordinated to provide holistic, all-hazard emergency management services, while simultaneously building capacity in First Nations communities for the eventual transfer of services to self-determining First Nation-led organizations.

Public Safety Canada

Federal Emergency Response Plan (FERP), Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements (DFAA), FPT Emergency Management Action Plan, Task Force on Flood Insurance and Relocation

Privy Council of Canada

New Role for the Minister of Emergency Prepardness Strengthening Horizontal Coordination on Federal Activities Coordination. New EM FPTI apporaches

Natural Resources Canada

Wildland Fire Budget 2022, Flood Risk Mapping & Flood Portal

Transport Canada

Supply Chain and Critical Infrastructure Reliability, Travel-Related Considerations to EM System

Environment and Climate Change Canada

Strategic Assessment of Climate Change, National Adaptation Strategy, Indigenous Gardians

Employment and Social Development Canada

Social Support during Emergency Events

Infrastructure Canada

Climate Resilient Infrastructure Investments, Lead for Broader Infrastructure Approach

Health Portfolio

Mental Wellness Lead, Strategic Stockpiles and Health Surveillance

Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP)

EMAP increasingly provides opportunities for collaboration and the transfer of responsibilities, and helps facilitate First Nation control over the development and delivery of services.

Response

Activities designed to address the short-term effects of an emergency and reduce loss and suffering

Recovery

Activities to restore physical, social and economic activities to pre-event levels or better

Non-structural preparedness and mitigation

Readiness measures to enable effective response to and recovery from an emergency or minimize impacts of an emergency

Firesmart and forest fire suppression

Activities to specifically mitigate against wildland fire and aid in forest fire suppression preparedness

Total funds reimbursed by EMAP (in millions of dollars) by fiscal year
Fiscal year Response Recovery Non-structural preparedness and mitigation FireSmart and forest fire suppression Total
2005-2006 $11,381,919 $4,666,942 $8,064,114 $7,431,105 $31,544,080
2006-2007 $25,014,763 $7,100,593 $2,367,947 $12,770,459 $47,253,762
2007-2008 $671,301 $0 $3,309,756 $14,883,816 $18,864,873
2008-2009 $9,780,601 $1,070,894 $2,988,723 $15,082,335 $28,922,553
2009-2010 $3,469,490 $1,818,106 $3,300,949 $17,940,411 $26,528,956
2010-2011 $13,047,313 $4,801,186 $6,270,132 $17,947,307 $42,065,938
2011-2012 $95,480,615 $29,050,660 $20,576,544 $15,968,126 $161,075,945
2012-2013 $18,394,292 $14,447,769 $7,244,948 $16,210,258 $56,297,267
2013-2014 $36,577,662 $15,164,072 $5,887,725 $19,262,210 $76,891,669
2014-2015 $51,475,055 $30,886,943 $6,697,288 $16,239,924 $105,299,210
2015-2016 $39,489,275 $34,958,649 $9,790,614 $27,718,780 $111,957,318
2016-2017 $49,785,960 $32,314,729 $12,338,712 $21,247,299 $115,686,700
2017-2018 $75,000,212 $27,554,603 $16,712,499 $17,596,345 $136,863,659
2018-2019 $58,506,497 $63,921,380 $25,325,220 $11,706,262 $159,459,359
2019-2020 $108,042,465 $71,610,646 $19,259,746 $6,394,187 $205,307,044
2020-2021 $31,125,329 $38,328,816 $16,279,578 $9,276,447 $95,010,170
2021-2022 $78,011,127 $76,477,437 $17,532,809 $10,128,048 $182,149,421

Supporting Resiliency

Total over 5 years: $169 million (ISC) + $48 million (Fire Smart/Public Safety)

  • $1.37 million over 3 years: Collaboration & Governance
    • to engage FNs across CA in development of trilateral emergency management service agreements
  • $43.63 million: Capacity Building
    • For funding dedicated to EM notional positions in FNs (planning, training, response).
  • $69 million over 5 years: Prevention, Mitigation and Preparedness
    • Over 5 years for projects for preparedness & non-structural mitigation (e.g. training, planning, & exercises, etc.)
  • $48 million over 4 years: Infrastructure/structural mitigation
    • In new costs over 5 years to support structural mitigation projects.
  • $48 million over 5 years: FireSmart
    • for work over 5 years to prevent and prepare against wildland fires (e.g. fire mapping, training, fuel reduction, etc.)
  • $7.2 million: 11 FTEs
    • For salaries and O&M for surge capacity & to increase ISC's capacity to deliver EM services related to natural disaster emergencies
FN EM notional positions
Text alternative for: FN EM notional positions

Total nominal positions funded of Emergency Management coordinators in each province/territory:

  • Yukon: 1
  • Northwest Territories: 1
  • British Columbia: 13
  • Alberta: 10
  • Saskatchewan: 15
  • Manitoba: 22
  • Ontario: 21
  • Quebec: 6
  • Atlantic provinces: 7

Advancing Multilateral Emergency Management Agreements

ISC is moving towards the co-development of multilateral EM service agreements to enable First Nations to take a larger role in EM. Through a more holistic approach, Canada and First Nations can better manage risks at the local level and strengthen collective resilience.

  • PTs are responsible for operating EM programs and ISC works with PTs for the provision of EM services on reserve.
  • ISC coordinates EM service agreements among First Nations, PTs and NGOs (e.g., CRC) which vary in scope, but ultimately ensure that First Nations are integrated into PT systems.
  • ISC is now identifying next steps in developing regional strategies to reach multilateral agreements. Strategies will support a national plan for the future of EM service delivery.
  • COVID-19 placed a pause on the momentum to reach multilateral agreements, but provided a new perspective on EM.
  • Multilateral progress made in BC and ON and new investments support First Nation-led service delivery and capacity.
  • Minister Blair to chair Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources & Forestry EM meeting in Nov. (Min.Hajdu TBD).
  • PSC is leading preparations to ensure representation from NIOs. ISC is supporting and working with key partners to assess whether invitations will be extended to Regional Chiefs, other First Nations, and local partners and experts.

Yukon: Working to establish MOU with FNs by March 2023

Northwest Territories: FNs expressed satisfaction with the current agreement

British Columbia: Tripartite MOU signed in 2019 with FNLC and work underway to develop action plan and negation positions; 2018 CEMA with Tsilhqot'in government

Alberta: More discussions with FN partners are needed to determine best approach

Saskatchewan: TCs and FNs moving forward to develop collaborative agreements to support EM planning

Manitoba: AMC determining way forward for FN partners to take on EM services

Ontario: Moving ahead with FN-led EM service delivery projects in 2022 and progress towards multilateral approach

Quebec: more discussions with FN partners are needed to determine best approach

Atlantic: multilateral agreements discussion with two FN communities in PEI; more discussions with FN partners in other provinces needed to determine best approach

Emergency Management in BC

First Nations Emergency Management

  • BC has three Indigenous Representative Organizations (BC Assembly of First Nations, First Nations Summit, and the Union of BC Indian Chiefs) who come together to work on common interests as the First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC).
  • There are 203 First Nations in BC, the majority of whom have never signed treaties with the Crown. As the rights and title holders, these First Nations must be consulted individually by Canada. They are not represented by the political organizations, tribal councils or the FNLC.
  • In BC, the EM service agreement is with Emergency Management British Columbia (EMBC).
  • Upon signing in 2017, BC First Nations objected under the principle of "nothing about us without us". As a result, following resolutions to negotiate from the three political assemblies, ISC, EMBC and the FNLC negotiated a Tripartite MOU on EM Services that was signed on April 27, 2019. The intent of the MOU is to ensure that First Nations are included as full partners in both the governance and operations of emergency management on-reserve. As a next step, Canada and BC have declared their desire to negotiate a new service agreement that includes First Nations.
  • Through EMBC, ISC reimburses eligible response and recovery costs. In addition, EMAP supports First Nation partners in their efforts to increase community-based capacity and disaster resilience through mitigation and preparedness activities.
  • ISC also has a service agreement with BC Wildfire Service to provide wildfire suppression support on reserve.

First Nations' Emergency Services Society (FNESS)

  • With funding from ISC, FNESS delivers the FireSmart programming to BC First Nations communities.
  • FireSmart builds skills in First Nations communities to prevent and prepare against wildland fires.
  • FNESS is a key provider of EM services to First Nations communities.
  • FNESS works closely with First Nations communities, EMBC, ISC, to support First Nations EM initiatives.
  • FNESS evolved from the Society of Native Indian Fire Fighters of BC (est. 1986). Initial objectives were to help reduce the number of fire-related deaths on reserve, but changed emphasis to incorporate a greater spectrum of EM services. In 1994, the Society of Native Indian Fire Fighters of BC changed its name to FNESS to reflect its growing diversity of services provided.
  • In BC, First Nations increasingly link EM to broader issues, including climate change and land use stewardship. First Nations and their political organizations are seeking to advance self determination and inherent jurisdiction within the context of EM.
  • FNESS works closely with communities, EMBC, ISC and stakeholders, to support the implementation of EM activities with First Nations communities. FNESS supports First Nations in developing and sustaining safer and healthier communities and delivers EM focused programs and services.
  • FNESS delivers approximately $2,364,678.67 per year under the Fire Smart program on behalf of ISC. In 2022-2023, ISC provided over $11M to FNESS to support their work in all four pillars of emergency management. This includes: $2.7M for community fire services; $2.6M for forest fuel management; and $5.8M to support emergency planning, preparedness, response and recovery.
  • The Province also recently provided a grant of $10M to support First Nation emergency response.
  • FNLC has expressed their support for the FNESS and the need for increased capacity and funding. ISC is currently engaged with the FNLIC and the Province on implementing the current EM Services MOU and establishing a new trilateral relationship.
  • FNESS is currently engaging with First Nations to determine the best governance structure to ensure that it represents all BC First Nations.

After action reports and priority actions

2017
  • Canada-BC sign Bilateral Service Agreement
  • Worst Wildfire season on record
  • BC Commissions independent review co-chaired by George Abbott and Chief Maureen Chapman
  • Tsilhqot'in National Government (TNG) report - The Fires Awakened Us
2018
  • Wildfire season surpasses 2017 as worst on record
  • BC Releases after action report – Addressing the New Normal outlining 108 Federal and Provincial Actions
  • INAN Committee releases From the Ashes (PDF) report outlining 11 recommendations
  • TNG Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement (CEMA)
  • Trail By Fire: Nadleh Whut'en and the Shovel Lake Fire Report
  • TahltanStrong: Alkali Lake Fire 2018 Report
2019
  • Canada-BC-FNLC enter into a tripartite Emergency Management MOU
  • Canada commits to advancing the United Nations Sendai Framework for Disaster Reduction in Section F of Emergency Management MOU
2020
  • COVID-19 – First Nations prevent, protect and respond with Indigenous Community Support Funding
  • Canada commits to develop a National Adaptation Strategy
2021
  • Unprecedented Wildfire and Atmospheric River Events
  • Creation of Committee of British Columbia and Federal Ministers on Disaster Response and Climate Resilience
  • BC First Nations Climate Change Action Plan including urgent calls for emergency management action
  • TNG COVID-19 report
2022
  • TNG Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement (CEMA) renewed, signed in May 2022
  • Canada-BC express their intent to open discussions and negotiations regarding the Bi-lateral Agreement and include First Nations in a new relationship within the four pillars of EM
  • UBCIC and FNS put forward resolutions for the FNLC to engage with First Nations to provide possible negotiation models to be considered in order for First Nations to engage in negotiation with Canada-BC on the new trilateral agreement.

Ontario First Nation-led Emergency Management

ISC is working with three First Nation partners and the province on proposals for increased First Nation-led emergency management services, serving as a spring board for a new multilateral agreement.

Joint Command Governance Model

When there is an emergency event in a first nation community, a request for help goes to a no wrong door approach. The request can go to IFNA, emergency services, emergency management coordinators, (tribal councils), Indigenous Services Canada duty officer, provincial emergency operation center, Missanabie Cree First Nation/ISN Maskwa duty officer, or the "stronger together" team. These groups come together in a joint command call to do a risk assessment, decision making and approval process. This call includes various levels such as federal, Ontario/provincial and Indigenous partners. As required, and at the request of the chief, other partners can be notified, including Indigenous partners, other First Nations leadership, host communities, health and social service providers, NGOs, provinces, and other federal departments. All partners that are notified then work together to produce a response to the emergency event.

Ontario First Nation-led Emergency Management
Text alternative for: Ontario First Nation-led Emergency Management

Independent First Nations Alliance: plans to lead an Emergency Operations Centre out of Sioux Lookout.

Missanabie Cree: plans to set up an Indigenous Emergency Operations Centre in Sault Ste. Marie and expand their Island View Camp to boost evacuation capacity.

Six Nations: has initiated a "Stronger Together" team model to ensure health and wrap-around supports are available to evacuees.

Challenges/Pressures

First Nations communities are particularly vulnerable to natural hazards and climate change pressures. Many are at high risk of floods and 80% are located in areas prone to wildland fire. They are also significantly more likely to be evacuated than those off-reserve and take longer to recover due to their location and remoteness.
Concerns on the level of engagement with First Nations communities across all aspects of EM (mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery). First Nations communities often have limited capacity for EM and face delays with timely support due to complex multijurisdictional relationships and processes.
First Nations leaders have noted disparities faced by on-reserve communities in EM and are seeking a stronger role and recognition as partners in the development and implementation of EM services.
First Nations communities are not yet fully engaged at decision-making tables and FPTI dynamics have not shifted to meet challenges. Jurisdictional issues can delay timely supports.

Next Steps

  • Partner with First Nations, regional, national and federal governments to review and reflect on lessons learned, leverage EMAP programming, consider all aspects of EM in the planning and preparedness process, and align efforts to promote Indigenous led initiatives.
  • Ongoing involvement and engagement of Indigenous partners to ensure their inclusion in FPTI forums and as full and equal partners in emergency management on reserve (e.g., advancement of multilateral agreements). Local knowledge and expertise must be better integrated in emergency planning and risk assessment.
  • Further capacity building, EMAP programming and financial coordination to continue discussions and coordination of investments and authorities needed.

Annex 1: British Columbia - Pathway to a New Tripartite Relationship

The current phase of emergency management partnerships in BC centres around first nations. Nations currently have bilateral service agreements with Canada and BC, FNHA and EMBC have a letter of understanding, FNLC, Canada, and EMBC have a tripartite memorandum of understanding, First Nations and EMBC have regional partnership tables, and TNG, Canada, EMBC have a collaborative EM agreement.

The current tripartite memorandum of understanding between FNLC, Canada, and BC has a governance and structure consisting of political level engagement with minister and FNLC executives, senior official level engagement with senior officials and FNLC staff, technical level engagement with technical working group developing a working plan, a province wide forum, and the First Nation Emergency Services Society (FNESS).

The in-progress nation-based collaborative EM agreements, include TNG, Canada, and BC; IRNE, Canada, and BC; NTC, CANADA, and, BC; and SHC, Canada and BC, with future agreements with other nations being developed.

The First Nations in BC will define a new paradigm for emergency management, beginning with the First Nation regional action plan that will be supported by the current tripartite memorandum of understanding.

The continuing pathway to a new tripartite relationship will be supported by FNHA and EMBC in the letter of understanding, First Nations and EMBC's regional partnership tables, and nation-based collaborative EM agreements between first nations, Canada and British Columbia. This will be codeveloped and supported by instruments, such as the UN declaration of the rights of Indigenous peoples, all of which will lead to new partnerships with British Columbia's first nations, Canada and the province of British Columbia.

This work is affected by provincial legislation impacting emergency management, such as the Declaration Act action plan, which is currently being drafted; the Emergency Program Act, which is currently being engaged upon; the Forest and Range Practices Act, which is being debated, and the Environment Assessment Act, which has been passed.

The current state in British Columbia's emergency management is emergency management partnerships with Canada and British Columbia that have a bilateral service agreement and the tripartite memorandum of understanding between Canada, BC, and the FNLC. Currently, the First Nations Emergency Services Society has an annual proposal based funding model. The nation-based collaborative emergency management agreements have an annual proposal based on the model for tables to discuss Nation-specific emergency management issues and concerns. The nation-based emergency management coordinators are 12 position supporting 110 First Nation communities. The United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples currently have the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (UNDRIPA), plus the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA).

British Columbia is moving towards a new partnership with BC First Nations, Canada, and the province of British Columbia. The First Nations Emergency Services Society will have ongoing stable resources to support BC First Nations. The nation-based collaborative emergency management agreements will have ongoing stable resources to support nation priorities. The nation-based emergency management coordinators will have increased capacity to support 203 First Nation communities. The United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples will have changes to federal departments and legislation impacting emergency management, while DRIPA will have changes to provincial ministries and legislation impacting emergency management.

Pathway To A New Multilateral Relationship In Ontario for Emergency Management

Current Status

ISC-ON Bilateral Service Agreement:

  • 10-year bilateral agreement between ISC and the Ontario Ministry of the Solicitor General
  • Review underway, expires 2028
  • Not fully inclusive of First Nation partners
Step 1: Spring 2022

Bolster FN EM Leadership:

  • Formalize Joint Command approach to include Indigenous partner leads
  • Fund First Nation-led projects for 2022 season
  • Build capacity with Indigenous partners
Step 2: Summer-Fall 2022

Identify Partners:

  • Identify additional First Nation partners
  • Establish objectives of future discussions and negotiations
  • First Nations, ISC, and Ontario engage and secure their respective mandates
Step 3: Present

Engage on New EM Paradigm:

  • Engage through Chiefs of Ontario
  • Provide engagement supports if needed
  • Set scope and parameters
  • Identify shared vision and areas for improvement
  • Build on lessons learned, 2022 projects
Step 4: March 2023

Multilateral MOUs:

  • Establish process and governance for negotiations
  • Mechanisms to advance discussions (e.g. technical working group)
  • Ratification by ISC, province, and First Nations
Step 5: Spring 2023

Co-develop New Paradigm:

  • Solidify governance model, roles and relationship
  • Detail specific program functions and activities to be transferred
  • Determine funding, evaluation and reporting
Step 6: Spring-Summer 2023

Authority to Sign New Agreements:

  • First Nations, ISC, and Ontario acquire their respective authority for signature
  • Signatures from ISC HQ and Region, Ontario, and First Nation partners
Step 7: Fall 2023

Multilateral Service Agreements:

  • Implement longstanding multilateral EM service agreement(s)
  • May require multiple agreements with different First Nation partners
  • Set the foundation for service transfer

Objectives of a Multilateral Approach

  • Inclusive of First Nations as full and equal partners
  • Supports the right to self-determination
  • Full inclusion in decision-making and implementation mechanisms
  • Foundation for ISC service transfer mandate

Emergency Management Mechanisms

  • Provincial Emergency Operations Centre
  • First Nation Emergency Management Operations and Ontario regional partnerships
  • ISC Emergency Management Assistance Program funding streams

Indigenous Partner Leads

  • Independent First Nations Alliance
  • Missanabie Cree/ISN Maskwa
  • Mushkegowuk Council & partners; Tribal Councils
  • Indigenous Representative Organizations NAN, COO, AN, GCT3, AIAI, Independents

Annex 2: Ontario First Nations-led Emergency Management

Joint Command Governance Model

When there is an emergency event in a first nation community, a request for help goes to a no wrong door approach. The request can go to IFNA, emergency services, emergency management coordinators, (tribal councils), Indigenous Services Canada duty officer, provincial emergency operation center, Missanabie Cree First Nation/ISN Maskwa duty officer, or the "stronger together" team. These groups come together in a joint command call to do a risk assessment, decision making and approval process. This call includes various levels such as federal, Ontario/provincial and Indigenous partners. As required, and at the request of the chief, other partners can be notified, including Indigenous partners, other First Nations leadership, host communities, health and social service providers, NGOs, provinces, and other federal departments. All partners that are notified then work together to produce a response to the emergency event.

Indigenous Partner Leads for 2022 season

A) Independent First Nations Alliance (IFNA) (Sioux Lookout)
  • Indigenous-led Emergency Operations Centre to Service IFNA's 5 member communities.
  • Services include:
    • shelter in place capacity
    • incident command on site
    • deployable incident management team
    • coordination of evacuation services
    • operations centre at host side
    • return to community
B) Missanabie Cree / ISN Maskwa (Sault Ste. Marie)
  • Indigenous-led Emergency operations centre out of Sault Ste. Marie.
  • 24/7 call centre and supporting database/software application.
  • Expansion of Island View camp (on reserve) to host evacuees in hard side units.
  • Support wellness and encourage traditional activities (E.G., smudging, fishing, hunting).
  • Working with nearby First Nations to support enhanced ability to host evacuees and safeguard evacuated communities.
C) Mushkegowuk Council
  • Fund two emergency management coordinators.
  • Can support any First Nation within their purview, and can support other First Nations when requested.
  • Ensure that First Nation community members have 24/7 access to emergency services.
  • First Nations under Mushkegowuk Tribal Council: Attawapiskat, Chapleau Cree, Fort Albany, Kaschechewan, Missianbie Cree, Moose Cree, Taykwa Tagamou, Weenusk.

Annex 3: Service Agreements in each Province and Territory

Alberta

10-year bilateral agreement signed in 2014 between the Alberta Emergency Management Agency and Indigenous Services Canada

British Columbia

  • 10-year bilateral agreement signed in 2017 with the Government of British Columbia
  • Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2019 between the Government of British Columbia, the First Nation Leadership Council and Indigenous Services Canada
  • A Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement was signed in 2018 between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and Indigenous Sberrvicietsicsahnacdaolumbia

Manitoba

5-year bilateral service agreement signed in 2017 between the Canadian Red Cross and Indigenous Services Canada, renewed on an ongoing basis

N.W.T.

Bilateral agreement signed in 2015 between the Government of the Northwest Territories and Indigenous Services Canada

Ontario

10-year bilateral agreement signed in 2018 between the Government of Ontario and Indigenous Services Canada

P.E.I.

5-year bilateral agreement signed in 2015 between the Government of Prince Edward Island and Indigenous Services Canada, renewed on an ongoing basis

Quebec

  • 5-year bilateral agreement signed in 2019 between the Government of Quebec and Indigenous Services Canada
  • 5-year bilateral agreement signed in 2017 between the Canadian Red Cross and Indigenous Services Canada for preparedness and training

Yukon

  • 7-year bilateral agreement signed in 2016 between the Government of Yukon and Indigenous Services Canada

There are no signed service agreements in:

  • Newfoundland & Labrador
  • Nova Scotia
  • New Brunswick
  • Saskatchewan
  • Nunavut (as there are no First Nation reserves in the territory)

Annex 4: Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness

Number of projects funded

2014-2015: (16 Projects)

2019-2020: (150 Projects)

$69M over 5 years

  • The Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness stream supports small-scale projects that help communities prepare for emergencies and reduce their impacts, including:
    • Developing and testing emergency management plans;
    • All hazard risk identification and vulnerability assessments;
    • Wildfire prevention and preparedness.
  • Projects aim to reduce risk by enhancing First Nations knowledge, capacity and skills.
  • Funding proposals for the program have increased considerably over the last five years due to increased visibility of this EMAP component and increased awareness of the benefits of mitigation measures.

Annex 5: FireSmart Program

$47.7M over 5 years

  • The FireSmart program builds skills in First Nations communities to prevent and prepare against wildland fires.
  • Programming involves training First Nations teams in wildfire suppression duties, as well as fuel management and vegetation clearing, which reduces the intensity and spread of wildfires.
  • FireSmart also leverages Indigenous knowledge of the local environment and terrain to improve emergency planning, preparation and response to wildfires.

Annex 6: Capacity Enhancement Program

$43.6M over 5 years

  • The Capacity Enhancement Program supports community disaster resilience by providing funding for First Nations to hire emergency management coordinators.
  • EMAP is currently working with partners to identify priorities and specific requirements for the Emergency Management coordinators over the next 5 years.

Total nominal positions funded of Emergency Management coordinators in each province/territory:

  • Yukon: 1
  • Northwest Territories: 1
  • British Columbia: 13
  • Alberta: 10
  • Saskatchewan: 15
  • Manitoba: 22
  • Ontario: 21
  • Quebec: 6
  • Atlantic provinces: 7

Annex 7: Response and Recovery Program

Pikangikum Evacuation (May 2019)

Approx. $100 million per year

  • The Response and Recovery funding stream aims to:
    • Address the gap between the much higher likelihood of evacuation on reserve compared to off reserve;
    • Minimize the impacts on First Nations during evacuations;
    • Return First Nations to their communities as quickly as is safe to do so;
    • Build back better these communities to enhance community resilience.
  • The program reimburses the cost of response and recovery activities due to emergencies, to help ensure the health, well-being and safety of First Nation residents and protect and restore their community assets.

COVID-19 Specific Funding - Indigenous Community Support Fund

Issue Summary

  • The Indigenous Community Support Fund (ICFS) was established as a no-wrong door approach to provide direct funding to Indigenous leadership and organizations for community-based solutions to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the spread of COVID-19.
  • The ICSF supports First Nations communities and organizations, including self-governing and modern treaty nations; Inuit communities and organizations in Inuit Nunangat; Métis Nation communities and organizations; and Urban and off-reserve Indigenous communities and organizations.
  • The Government of Canada continues to provide support to Indigenous communities as they face ongoing challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic as we transition to the wind-down of COVID-19 related funding.

Key Messages

  • Since March 2020, more than $2 billion has been allocated to the Indigenous Community Support Fund.
  • Funding has been disbursed via a combination of direct allocations, which provide flexibility to partners to identify and support their own priorities, and a needs-based process, to ensure continued access to funding for urgent needs.
  • Budget 2022 invested an additional $190.5 million in 2022-23 to the Indigenous Community Support Fund. An additional $50 million in funding was announced on August 2, 2022, bringing the Government of Canada's total investment to the Indigenous Community Support Fund in 2022-23 to $240.5 million.
  • Budget 2022 funding has been implemented using a combination of direct allocations and needs-based funding processes.

Background

  • The Indigenous Community Support Fund was introduced in March 2020 to provide funding to Indigenous communities and organizations to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, and has been playing a supporting role to the First Nations Inuit and Health Branch-led pandemic response, dedicating financial resources to cover eligible expenses that First Nations Inuit and Health Branch does not assume. Since March 2020, the Government of Canada has allocated more than $2 billion to Indigenous Community Support Fund.
  • The Indigenous Community Support Fund is delivered via the program authorities of three existing programs: the Emergency Management Assistance Program and the Capital Facilities and Maintenance Program for First Nations on reserve, while funding to support off-reserve Indigenous organizations and communities, Inuit and Métis, Self-Governing and Modern Treaty Nations are allocated via the Urban Programming for Indigenous People.
  • The temporary amendments to the Emergency Management Assistance Program and the Urban Programming for Indigenous People terms and conditions have been extended until March 31, 2024 to facilitate the carry-forward of unspent funds and to effectively wind-down existing projects.
  • The Indigenous Community Support Fund has utilized a combination of three delivery models to allocate funds to eligible recipients: direct allocations to First Nations, Inuit and the Métis Nation utilizing a funding formula methodology; a proposal needs-based approach for all distinctions-based groups; and, contingency funding allocations to respond rapidly to acute pressures, such as outbreaks.
  • Commonly funded activities include: perimeter security, the purchase of personal protective equipment, measures to address food insecurity, incremental staff costs, mental wellness, cultural, and seniors supports, and preparedness measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
  • Budget 2022 announced an additional $190.5 million in funding for the Indigenous Community Support Fund to continue to support Indigenous communities and organizations in their efforts to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. On August 2, 2022, Finance Canada approved the transfer of an additional $50 million in funding, originally allocated towards the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch Public Health envelope, to supplement the Indigenous Community Support Fund, bringing the total Indigenous Community Support Fund funding this year to $240.5 million. Funding will be distributed via a combination of direct allocations to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis communities based on previously used formulas, and through a needs-based process open to urban and off-reserve Indigenous communities and organizations.

Current Status

  • The pandemic has underscored ongoing gaps and challenges within Indigenous communities, particularly for vulnerable community members. Communities and organizations have received significant supports in areas of food and perimeter security, which must be phased out cautiously and with careful consideration to avoid future funding gaps.
  • As the pandemic has progressed, Indigenous needs have shifted to include vaccine roll out supports (e.g., public communications material), mobile clinics for urban/off reserve members), as well as mental health, elder and cultural supports. These activities have specifically targeted areas not traditionally covered by the COVID-19 Public Health Response Fund, including for urban and off reserve Indigenous communities and organizations.
  • As the department shifts towards a recovery and winding down phase, the aforementioned needs are anticipated to remain a priority (e.g., mental health, elder, and cultural supports), in addition to activities including but not limited to recovery activities such as retrofitting or removing temporary COVID-19-related minor infrastructure, and updating community pandemic plans with lessons learned.
  • Through two tranches in July and October 2022, a total of $200 million has been transferred to regional offices for distribution of direct allocations to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. The distribution is the following:
    • $148.3M for First Nations on-reserve, Self-Governing and Modern Treaty Nations;
    • $31M for Inuit; and
    • $20.7M for the Métis Nation.
  • $40.5M has been set aside for an ongoing needs-based request process open to urban and off-reserve Indigenous communities and organizations.
  • Additionally, $57.6 million in re-profiled 2021-22 funding is set aside as a contingency fund to ensure funds are available for outbreaks and other unforeseen circumstances.
  • First Nations and Inuit may also access funding to address their COVID-19 response needs, where applicable, through the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch's Public Health funding envelope.

Emergency Management in the North

Issue Summary

  • ISC is responsible for 16 First Nation communities through the Emergency Management Assistance Program in Yukon and Northwest Territories. ISC does not have emergency management jurisdiction in Nunavut as there are no on reserve First Nation communities in the territory.
  • First Nation partners in the North have expressed a desire to become involved in emergency management and decision-making processes.
  • Responsibility for emergency management services in the North rests with the territorial governments. The territorial governments are responsible for providing emergency services to all residents throughout all communities in the territories. Each territorial government has an emergency management/measures act which outlines the roles and responsibilities of local authorities, the territorial government, and the federal government.

Key Messages

  • When an emergency event occurs,  we have seen how all partners are able to mobilize and work closely together to respond to the needs of all communities.
  • ISC maintains effective communications with the territorial governments and First Nation partners, which is crucial during an emergency and to ensure that First Nations are able to access the recovery supports needed.
  • To prepare against the threat of climate change, First Nation partners are interested in strengthening their capacity, partly through the development of a new multilateral service agreement on emergency management.  
  • ISC is working closely with First Nation leaders and territorial governments to advance plans and initiatives that incorporate First Nations as full and equal partners in emergency management. 
  • ISC will also continue to work with First Nation leaders to provide culturally competent emergency services to First Nation communities in the North.

Background

  • Emergency management in the North (Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut) functions similarly to the rest of Canada. Each territorial government has its own emergency management/measures act, which outlines how local authorities, the territorial government and federal government respond to an emergency.
  • Many Indigenous communities have their own emergency management plans and will often work in collaboration with territorial governments to conduct emergency management activities. The territorial governments will provide funding and resources to communities for emergency planning and response.
  • When an emergency impacts an Indigenous community, it is the responsibility of local authorities to respond. If the emergency response exceeds the capacity of local authorities, then the territorial government will be requested to assist. If the capacity of the territorial government is exhausted, then the federal government will be asked to step in. 
  • Public Safety Canada is responsible for the coordination of emergency management across the federal government, and monitors emergency events in all three territories. Public Safety only provides support at the request of the territorial government, and once all resources have been exhausted.
  • Although many Indigenous communities in the North are considered low-risk for emergencies, many emergencies require intervention from the federal government. This is largely due to a lack of resources and funding available at the territorial level.
  • The Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) at ISC supports on reserve First Nation communities. The Program works in partnership with First Nation partners and provincial and territorial governments.
  • EMAP does not have operations in Nunavut as there are no on reserve First Nation communities in the territory and residents of the territory are supported by the Nunavut Emergency Management Organization. However, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC) programs such as the Climate Change Preparedness in the North indirectly contribute to emergency capacity building in Indigenous communities.
  • There are only two on reserve First Nation communities in the Northwest Territories and 14 First Nation communities in the Yukon, 11 of which are self-governing. There are no reserves as defined by the Indian Act in the Yukon, instead, First Nation communities are classified as "lands set aside".

Current Status

Yukon:

  • In June and July 2022, seven First Nation communities experienced flooding events, with one community requiring partial evacuation. All evacuees have been repatriated.
  • There is a strong interest among First Nation communities in Yukon to become involved in emergency services. ISC is planning to hold a Forum to engage First Nations in the region on a multilateral agreement within the next year.
  • The current bilateral service agreement between ISC and the Yukon Government is expiring March 2023, but will likely be renewed for an additional 1-2 years

Northwest Territories:

  • In May 2022, K'at'lodeeche First Nation – one of the two on-reserve communities in the territory – experienced a flooding event requiring evacuation. There are nine long-term evacuees from this event who have not been repatriated as of February 2023.
  • The two First Nation communities have small on-reserve populations and lie either adjacent to or within other municipalities. Both First Nations are considered low-risk for emergencies and natural hazards.
  • There is a bilateral service agreement between ISC and the Government of the Northwest Territories to provide emergency services to the two on-reserve communities, which will expire March 2023, and will be renewed for an additional year.

Nunavut:

  • In August 2022, Iqaluit declared a state of emergency due to water shortages as a result of lack of rain over the summer months. The state of emergency did not require evacuation.
  • Search and rescue, and equipment and resource allocation are the main priorities for the Nunavut Government in emergency management.
  • The Climate Change Preparedness in the North program at Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs supports Indigenous communities in Nunavut by funding climate change adaptation projects. This indirectly supports community capacity building to address emergencies at the local level.

Roles and Responsibilities F/P/T/FN

Issue Summary

  • Roles and responsibilities for emergency management in the field are shared between citizens, First Nations communities, provinces and territories, and the federal government under the Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP).
  • Increasing complexity and intensity of emergency events requires alignment and collaboration between different levels of government, First Nations and emergency management practitioners.  

Key messages

  • Emergency management in Canada is a shared responsibility between federal, provincial and territorial governments and their partners, including First Nation partners, where each level of government has their own set of emergency management laws and governance models within their respective jurisdictions.
  • ISC is responsible for providing advice and support (when requested) to the affected First Nation, province, or territory during an emergency event. Following an emergency event, ISC is responsible for reimbursing the province, territory, First Nation or service delivery partner for eligible costs associated with emergency response and recovery.
  • Provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the provision of emergency services to communities during an emergency event under their respective provincial or territorial emergency management systems.
  • First Nation communities are responsible for identifying imminent or emerging threats to the community and using all available local resources to respond to the threat. They are also responsible for notifying ISC and provincial or territorial emergency management officials if a threat is beyond their community's response capacity.
  •  First Nation community members are responsible for taking all available measures to protect their own health, safety and personal property during emergency events.

Background

  • Emergency management in Canada is a shared responsibility between federal, provincial and territorial governments and their partners, including First Nation partners, where each level of government has their own set of emergency management laws and governance models within their respective jurisdictions.
  • As part of ISC's obligations under the Emergency Management Act and delegated authority as per the Indian Act, the Minister of ISC has responsibility to support First Nations on reserves in emergency management.
  • ISC funding is primarily provided under ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP), which is eligible to communities on reserves who have been impacted by an emergency event, or where a proposed project directly supports a First Nation on reserve.
  • EMAP also provides funding to First Nations communities so they can build resiliency, prepare for natural hazards and respond to them using the 4 pillars of emergency management: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. As of April 1, 2022, EMAP has been expanded to help ISC better respond to health emergencies, including public health outbreaks and crisis.
  • In an emergency, the first response is almost always by the local authorities or at the provincial or territorial level because disasters occur most often locally. Should a provincial or territorial government require resources beyond their capacity to cope in an emergency or disaster, the federal government responds rapidly to any request for assistance by a provincial or territorial government.
  • ISC works with provincial and territorial governments to ensure First Nations have access to comparable emergency assistance services available to other residents in their respective jurisdiction.
  • To ensure that First Nation communities on-reserve have access to emergency assistance services comparable to those available to other residents in their respective jurisdiction, ISC works with provincial and territorial governments through negotiated service agreements to deliver emergency management services to First Nation communities.
  • These agreements also detail the division of roles and responsibilities of the parties to the agreement.
  • ISC strongly encourages First Nation communities to develop and implement emergency management plans and to build resiliency through activities and initiatives that build mitigation and preparedness. Project funding is available for First Nations to develop their own emergency management plans and other preparedness and non-structural mitigation initiatives and can apply through EMAP.

Current Status

  • In recognition of First Nation peoples' right to self-determination, ISC is exploring opportunities to transition to new multilateral approaches where First Nations are included in emergency management as full and equal partners.
  • ISC is currently working with the BC and Ontario regions to develop a new multilateral service agreement that will include First Nation communities as full and equal partners in emergency management, ensuring that they have their own distinct roles and responsibilities in the emergency management framework.
  • To support response coordination ISC works with various partners including provincial/territorial governments, other federal departments such as Public Safety Canada, and third party providers (e.g., Canadian Red Cross). In the event that responsibilities are unclear, ISC works with all partners to clarify roles and support response coordination.

EMAP Performance Management

Issue Summary

  • ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) has significantly evolved to incorporate all four pillars of emergency management since its inception and adopted an all-hazards approach.
  • In 2019, the program secured funds ($211 million over 5 years) to support First Nation communities with preparedness and mitigation activities through a newly formed Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness fund, Capacity Enhancement program, and FireSmart program.
  • EMAP uses multiple indicators to measures its work, including the percentage of long-term and short-term evacuees repatriated within a given timeframe.
    • Regarding the "percentage of evacuees that have returned to their community within three months". Results for this indicator have remained high over the last few fiscal years, and in 2021-2022 the result was 97.9%.  
  • ISC is currently in the process of renewing its Departmental Results Framework for the upcoming fiscal year. As a result, many programs, including EMAP, will be consolidated and realigned under new service areas with more targeted indicators.
  • The program also measures its performance by reporting annually on the outcomes and results of its program indicators, transfer payment programs, GBA+ data collection and on progress made towards the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
  • EMAP is committed to addressing ongoing reporting and performance management issues while also identifying opportunities to increase funding for mitigation and preparedness activities.

Key Messages

  • ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program was originally developed to support response and recovery activities on reserve. Since its inception, the program has significantly expanded in scope and scale, now supporting mitigation and preparedness activities.
  • As the number of climate emergencies continue to rise on a yearly basis, the program continues to provide much of its funding to response and recovery activities. For ISC to evolve and further proactive spending, additional prevention and mitigation funding will be needed.
  • As the Emergency Management Assistance Program continues to evolve, ISC will work to find innovative ways to improve on reporting and performance measurement mechanisms.

Background

  • When EMAP was conceptualized in 2013, the program's scope primarily focused on the response and recovery with a fixed budget of $29 million, an amount that was often quickly exceeded and required the department to secure additional funds.
  • Since 2013, the program significantly expanded in scale and scope to include all four pillars of emergency management and now offers funding for mitigation and preparedness projects and initiatives. In 2022-2023, the program Service Agreements, Non-Structural Mitigation Preparedness, Capacity Building and FireSmart exceeds $70 million, and has secured response and recovery funding for over $127 million. Despite this increase, funds are depleted annually.  
  • Over the past 10 years, the EMAP has reimbursed more than $536 million in response costs and over $396 million in recovery costs to First Nation communities.
  • The program has also has funded over $137 million in non-structural mitigation and preparedness projects since 2012, an average of $13.7 million in funded projects annually.
  • In addition, EMAP has been making significant strides to incorporate First Nations as full and equal partners in emergency management. The program is actively working to develop multilateral service agreements with First Nation partners and provincial and territorial governments. These type of agreements help pave the way for service transfer while also leveraging strengths, incorporating First Nation local knowledge and expertise into emergency management.
  • In 2018, ISC signed the Collaborative Agreement on Emergency Management with the Tsilhqot'in National Government and the Province of British Columbia, and renewed it in 2022 for 5 years. This agreement builds the capacity of TNG communities in emergency management, as well as the 2019 Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding on Emergency Management Services with the First Nations Leadership Council and the Province of British Columbia.

Performance Measurement

  • EMAP reports annually on outcomes and results of its program indicators.
  • There are numerous indicators the program uses to measure progress for each of its funding streams, however, there are two main indicators primarily reports on. The first is the "percentage of long-term evacuees who have returned home or have a scheduled date within two years after their evacuation". Results for this indicator have fluctuated over time, as many factors can increase the repatriation date for long-term evacuees, including but not limited to: infrastructure issues, health and safety concerns, logistics, community remoteness, etc. The results for this indicator in 2021-2022 was 77.5%. Last year's result is comparatively lower than previous years as many current long-term evacuees are from the 2021 British Columbia Atmospheric River event, which had widespread and catastrophic impacts.
  • The other main indicator the program reports on is the "percentage of evacuees that have returned to their community within three months". Results for this indicator have remained consistently high, and typically sit at over 97%. The results for this indicator in 2021-2022 was 97.9%
  • Data collection is continuous, however, reporting on indicators occurs towards the end of each fiscal year, ahead of the release of the ISC's Departmental Results Report.
  • In addition to indicators, the program reports on progress made towards its transfer payment programs, GBA+ data collection, and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
  • EMAP also measures its performance through its Integrated Business Plan, which outlines the program's planning, business and Human Resources commitments for the upcoming fiscal year. Work on the Integrated Business Plan begins halfway through the fiscal year and takes several months to complete.
  • ISC is renewing its Departmental Results Framework for the upcoming fiscal year. The renewal process will result in various programs, including the Emergency Management Assistance Program, being consolidated and realigned into six different service areas. EMAP will now fall under the Infrastructure and Environments program inventory.

Current Status

  • ISC is currently examining how to better improve performance management capabilities and how to address ongoing program concerns. Moving forward, EMAP will review its program indicators and consider revising how they measure progress against the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
  • The review process will involve the program analyzing both the federal and departmental sustainable development strategies as well as the Sustainable Development Goals targets to understand how the program could best measure progress and to identify which performance indicators should be utilized to do so.
  • In addition, the program will implement a risk-based approach to inform funding decisions. Targeted investments by the department will consider, as it has to date, the communities' willingness, readiness and interest in undertaking emergency preparedness activities by empowering First Nations to take the lead in preparing for and managing emergencies.
  • ISC is committed to support First Nations in their endeavors to identify their unique communities' level of risk and priorities to seek funding from the department to enhance emergency preparedness.

Did you find what you were looking for?

What was wrong?

You will not receive a reply. Don't include personal information (telephone, email, SIN, financial, medical, or work details).
Maximum 300 characters

Thank you for your feedback

Date modified: