Appearance before the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs on OAG Report 8: Emergency Management in First Nations Communities - Indigenous Services Canada, December 1, 2022
Table of contents
- Scenario Note
- Opening Remarks
- OAG Report
- Previous ISC Emergency Management Audits and Management Action Plans
- ISC Management Action Plan
- Emergency Management Assistance Program
- Infrastructure/Structural Mitigation
- Fire Protection
- Emergency Management
- High Risk Areas and Flood Insurance
- Service Transfer and Indigenous led Approaches to Emergency Management
- Emergency Management Deck
- Purpose
- ISC's National Role in Emergency Management
- Federal Emergency Management Alignment
- Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP)
- Supporting Resiliency
- Advancing Multilateral Emergency Management Agreements
- Emergency Management in BC
- Ontario First Nation-led Emergency Management
- Challenges/Pressures
- Next Steps
- Annex 1: British Columbia - Pathway to a New Tripartite Relationship
- Annex 2: Ontario First Nations-led Emergency Management
- Annex 3: Service Agreements in each Province and Territory
- Annex 4: Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness
- Annex 5: FireSmart Program
- Annex 6: Capacity Enhancement Program
- Annex 7: Response and Recovery Program
- If pressed
- Biographies
- Additional Background Information
Scenario Note
Logistics
Date: December 1, 2022
Time: 3:30p.m. – 5:30p.m. (EST)
- 1st Hour - Minister & Officials
- 2nd Hour - Officials only
Location: In-person (Wellington Building, Room 415 – 197 Sparks Street) and virtual (hybrid)
Subject: Arctic Sovereignty, Security and Emergency Preparedness of Indigenous Peoples (to consider Auditor General of Canada Report 8: Emergency Management in First Nations Communities – Indigenous Services Canada)
Appearing
Indigenous Services Canada (ISC)
1st Hour
- Patty Hajdu, Minister of Indigenous Services (in person)
- Gina Wilson, Deputy Minister (in person)
- Valerie Gideon, Associate Deputy Minister (virtual)
- Joanne Wilkinson, Assistant Deputy Minister, Regional Operations (in person)
- Kenza El Bied, Director General, Sector Operations Branch, Regional Operations (in person)
2nd Hour
- Valerie Gideon
- Joanne Wilkinson
- Kenza El Bied
Context on Committee and Membership
MP Marc Garneau (LIB-QC) (Chair), former cabinet minister and MP for the riding of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount, has argued that this government is "the first government to commit not only to reconciliation but also to correcting many of the wrongs that exist with respect to indigenous peoples, and we did so as soon as we came to power in 2015" (Hansard, February 18, 2021)
MP Michael V. Mcleod (LIB-NWT) has been outspoken on the unique challenges of Indigenous communities in the North, such as the cost of living and food insecurity. During this study he has asked questions around the roles and responsibilities of different levels of government and organizations such as the Rangers during emergency situations in the North. "My first question is whether you think that additional training opportunities and planning resources would help ensure that there's no confusion in these communities and have everybody on the same page, so to speak." (INAN, June 14, 2022)
MP Patrick Weiler (LIB-BC) has been vocal about improving access to housing for Indigenous people, including in his BC riding. During the appearance of the AG, he asked about the importance of multi-lateral agreements on emergency management with the department, provinces, and Indigenous partners. (INAN, November 28, 2022)
MP Marcus Powlowski (LIB-ON) has been actively engaged on the files of Indigenous housing, northern development opportunities, and improving access to health services in Indigenous communities. During the appearance of the AG he asked why ISC was being held up as being responsible, despite many government departments having a role to play in a whole of government response to emergency situations. (INAN, November 28, 2022)
MP Jaime Battiste (LIB-NS), Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, has been a strong advocate for First Nations, Métis, and Inuit issues throughout his career. He has spoken about the inequalities that Indigenous people face, and the effects of poverty on Indigenous youth. During this study, he has asked about the roles that the Red Cross and the Canadian Armed Forces play during emergency situations. "For any leaders who have woken up to this kind of disaster, I'm wondering if you could give us this very compactly: What is the role the Red Cross plays in comparison to what the defence department does?" (INAN, October 4, 2022)
MP Jenica Atwin (LIB – NB) has focused on issues relating to Indigenous youth throughout her career, primarily focusing on education. Recently, the member has spoken out on issues relating to Indigenous housing in contrast with other intersectional influences, such as water quality, poverty and racism. During the appearance of the Auditor General on this report, she asked whether the OAG used a distinctions-based model in their audit, and whether there were glaring issues with evacuations. (INAN, November 28, 2022)
MP Jaime Schmale (CPC-ON) (Vice-Chair) Vice-Chair of the Committee and CPC Critic for Crown-Indigenous Relations, has been vocal on a wide range of Indigenous issues. Since the publishing of the Auditor General report on Emergency Management in First Nations Communities, MP Schmale has raised the report three times in the House of Commons – twice in Question Period and once via Members' Statements. "If the Minister was truly going to fund projects, why not fund the 112 infrastructure projects that would build dikes, culverts, and ditches to help mitigate the effects of climate change instead of spending three and a half times more relocating people, housing them and rebuilding the communities after the disaster hits?" (Hansard, November 18, 2022)
MP Gary Vidal (CPC-MB) is the CPC Critic for Indigenous Services. He has spoken on a wide range of Indigenous issues, including about the lack of funding allocated to Indigenous communities in the Prairies, as well as the need for better housing. He recently substituted onto the Standing Committee on Public Accounts during the appearance of ISC officials and the AG on Report 8. During that meeting he asked the AG what action ISC needed to undertake to make more tangible progress; and he asked DM Wilson about the signing of multilateral agreements for emergency management and the AG's analysis that the departmental split of INAC into ISC and CIRNAC has resulted in more funding, but not improved results. (PACP, November 25, 2022)
MP Eric Melillo (CPC-ON) is the CPC Critic for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario. He has been engaged on topics such as economic development opportunities in remote, rural and northern communities, especially northern Ontario. During the appearance of the AG, he asked about the bridge project in Pikangikum First Nation which would link the community to Provincial roads, as well as for the total cost of the 112 projects awaiting funding referenced in the OAG Report. (INAN, November 28, 2022)
MP Bob Zimmer (CPC-BC) is the CPC Critic for Northern Affairs and Arctic Sovereignty, as well as the Critic for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency. He has asked questions around fisheries, and military capabilities in the North and Arctic Sovereignty. During the appearance of the AG he asked for examples of the 112 approved infrastructure projects that were awaiting funding. (INAN, November 28, 2022)
MP Marilène Gill (BQ-QC) (Vice-Chair), is a Vice-Chair of the Committee and BQ Critic for Indigenous and Northern Affairs. During this study she asked questions regarding emergency alert systems in rural and northern communities; the role of climate change increasing intensity and frequency of emergency events, and; the development and sharing of best practices. "Something that comes up in all your testimony is that each community has experience and expertise relating to best practices. Chief Alphonse talked about forest fires, for instance. Chief Gray, for his part, talked about flooding along the shores of Chaleur Bay, which is his. Of course, all the communities have expertise. Is there somewhere that expertise can be pooled?" (INAN, September 26, 2022)
MP Lori Idlout (NDP-NU), is the NDP Critic for Indigenous Services, Crown-Indigenous Relations, and Northern Affairs. She has been very vocal on the need to address housing issues in the North. During the appearance of the AG on this report, she asked how long ISC had been aware of the requests for funding for the 112 approved, but unfunded infrastructure projects mentioned in the report. (INAN, November 28, 2022)
Recent INAN studies, reports and government responses
- Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation
- Government response to the "The Effects of the Housing Shortage on Indigenous Peoples in Canada" (Presented to the House: October 17, 2022)
- Arctic Sovereignty, Security and Emergency Preparedness of Indigenous Peoples
- Administration and Accessibility of Indigenous Peoples to the NIHB Program
- Government response to the "Barriers to Economic Development in Indigenous Communities" (Presented to the House: September 15, 2022)
The Committee's study of Arctic Sovereignty, Security and Emergency Preparedness of Indigenous Peoples began on June 3, 2022 and this will be the tenth meeting on the topic. The committee has heard from 38 witnesses including several First Nations, representatives of territorial governments, and on November 28, heard from the Auditor General of Canada regarding the report on Emergency Management in First Nations Communities. It is expected that this appearance will focus on the AG's report.
Recent INAN Motions
At the November 28, 2022 meeting of the INAN Committee, the following motions were moved:
- MP Zimmer moved a motion to compel the Ministers of Northern Affairs, Indigenous Services, and Crown-Indigenous Relations to appear before the Committee as soon as possible on Supplementary Estimates (B) 2022-2023. The motion was adopted by unanimous consent. INAN invitations for the three Ministers to appear on December 8 are in review with the respective MINOs.
- MP Vidal moved a motion to take evidence presented to the PACP Committee on November 25, 2022 into consideration by INAN in their own study. The motion was withdrawn and will be voted on instead at the December 1, 2022 meeting.
- MP Atwin moved a motion for INAN to commence a study into Bill S-219 (An Act respecting a National Ribbon Skirt Day) with witnesses appearing on December 5. The motion was adopted by unanimous consent. An invitation for CIRNAC officials to appear is anticipated.
In the Media
On November 15, 2022, various news outlets ran stories outlining the findings of the OAG Report, including the finding that the Government had not provided First Nations with appropriate supports to respond to emergencies.
- Feds failing First Nations in response to wildfires, floods: AG | CTV News
- Canada's auditor general to release reports on homelessness, cybersecurity - National | Globalnews.ca
- Politics Briefing: Auditor-General releases reports on Ottawa's performance in areas including Arctic defence and homelessness - The Globe and Mail
On November 16, 2022, the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs released a statement in response to the OAG Report, arguing that "It is deeply concerning that this 2022 Auditor General of Canada's report to the Parliament of Canada on Emergency Management in First Nations outlines the same issues we have been advocating on for years… It is a devastatingly slow response time and an irresponsible funding model. We must advocate and lobby for a new way of delivering Emergency Management Services".
Meeting Proceedings
The meeting is scheduled for December 1, 2022 from 3:30pm – 5:30pm (EST), and will be a hybrid meeting.
Witnesses who are appearing virtually will be asked to access the meeting prior to its start (3:00pm) to conduct sound/video/connectivity checks. The Zoom link will be sent directly from the House of Commons to the witnesses.
The Chair will call the meeting to order and provide instructions for the meeting proceedings. He will then introduce the witnesses and invite the Minister to deliver opening remarks. The Minister and officials will then participate in a one-hour Q&A period with INAN members (details below). The Chair will suspend the meeting at the end of the Minister's and Deputy Minister's one-hour appearance. The meeting will resume and the Q&A session will resume with the Associate Deputy Minister and ISC officials for the second hour of meeting.
It is recommended that all speakers speak slowly and at an appropriate volume to ensure they are heard by the interpreters. All witnesses are asked to mute their microphones unless they are speaking.
While simultaneous translation will be available, witnesses appearing via Zoom are asked to respond to questions in either English or French, but to limit switching between languages mid-response as this may create technology/interpretation challenges.
Following the opening remarks, there will be rounds of questions from Committee members (as listed below).
Committee members will pose their questions in the following order:
- First round (6 minutes for each Party)
- Conservative Party of Canada
- Liberal Party of Canada
- Bloc Québécois
- New Democratic Party of Canada
- Second round
- Conservative Party of Canada (5 minutes)
- Liberal Party of Canada (5 minutes)
- Bloc Québécois (2.5 minutes)
- New Democratic Party of Canada (2.5 minutes)
- Conservative Party of Canada (5 minutes)
- Liberal Party of Canada (5 minutes)
The meeting can be watched via ParlvVU, however there may be an up to 70-second delay with the webcast.
Other information for appearing in person
- Witnesses should arrive early to allow time for security screening. Screening could take 30-minutes or more for those without a Hill pass.
- There is a maximum of 4 witnesses at the table (all departments) and 8 in the public gallery in total.
Opening Remarks
Speech from The Honourable Patty Hajdu, Minister of Indigenous Services Canada
December 1, 2022
Kwe kwe, hello, bonjour!
First I want to thank the Auditor General for releasing her report on emergency management on reserve. It has helped to shine a light on this critical issue. I welcome and agree with the report's recommendations and had the opportunity to speak with the Auditor General about them earlier this month.
We know First Nations are at increased risk from threats posed by climate change. In the past 6 years we have seen record breaking wildfire and flooding seasons.
During my time as Minister of Indigenous Services I have seen first-hand the impact of the BC atmospheric river event, flooding in Manitoba and Hurricane Fiona in the Atlantic. I have become acutely aware that First Nations are on the front lines of climate change as I receive regular updates on natural hazards that impact indigenous communities.
In each of all insistences, ISC has been there working alongside First Nation partners to respond and rebuild. We will always be there to support First Nations facing emergencies.
However, we know we need to be better prepared for these extreme weather events and we need to make sure that the work is done with the principles of equity, self-determination and truth.
First Nations must be full and equal partners in decisions that affect their own communities and in emergency management planning and response. We have been working with First Nations and the provinces and territories:
- to establish comprehensive emergency management service agreements
- to increase the number of emergency management coordinators in First Nations communities
- and to identify and invest in structural mitigation projects to help communities become more resilient to potential hazards.
Out of these conversations the Emergency Management Assistance Program has evolved to support First Nations in emergency preparedness by providing capacity building training and equipment. There are now 196 emergency management coordinators in First Nations communities helping better prepare for and respond to emergency events in a culturally-relevant way. We are working to increase that number.
We have also begun to do more work in structural mitigation. Since 2016, we have invested more than $121 million to support 103 structural mitigation projects that will benefit 107 First Nations communities serving approximately 116,000 people. We need to do more of this.
Self-determination
First Nations voices must come first when determining plans for their communities. We know, integrating traditional knowledge and First Nations-led solutions into emergency management planning is crucial.
I can point to Kashechewan First Nation's on-the-land initiative, a community-driven solution to protect their communities from the potential for flooding. We supported this community-led solution that best reflects their culture and in turn enabled families to stay together, fostered stronger connections to the land and the community and ensures their health, safety and well-being.
We have also made progress toward multilateral service agreements with First Nations organizations and provinces.
For example, the Government of Canada, the Province of British Columbia and the First Nations Leadership Council have been working together through the current bilateral agreement and Memorandum of Understanding to develop a new emergency management multilateral agreement.
This will solidify First Nations' role in decisions affecting their communities and it will strengthen their capacity to prepare, mitigate, respond to and recover from future climate-related emergencies.
First signed in 2018 and renewed in February was the Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement between the Tŝilhqot'in National Government, the Government of Canada and the Government of British Columbia.
This agreement was the first of its kind in Canada and it works to build trust and strengthen relationships in the spirit of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
In addition to this, other Government initiatives outline a shared path for a more climate resilient Canada through the National Adaptation Strategy. The strategy includes $1.6 billion in new federal funding commitments to help protect communities across the country including Indigenous communities.
We need to be truthful in acknowledging that there is still much to be done including on acting on the recommendations in the Auditory General's report, in signing agreements and building structural mitigation efforts.
As Minister, my role is to press for service excellence and transformation including additional investments needed to support better emergency management services for First Nations - and that is what I will continue to do.
Meegwetch. Thank you. Merci.
OAG Report
Report 8—Emergency Management in First Nations Communities—Indigenous Services Canada
Previous ISC Emergency Management Audits and Management Action Plans
Issue Summary
- Audits of the Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) focus on whether Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) provided the emergency management support needed by First Nations communities.
Key Messages
- ISC is responsible for ensuring that First Nations communities receive emergency management services, including emergency planning, flooding prevention (such as sandbagging), and wildfire suppression.
- ISC does not provide direct emergency response services to First Nations communities. The department negotiates emergency management service agreements with provinces or other service providers, such as the Canadian Red Cross, to provide emergency services in First Nations communities.
- The recent OAG audit is the third audit of emergency management service delivery to on-reserve First Nation communities in Canada. The OAG conducted audits in 2013 and 2022. The department conducted an internal audit in 2017.
- The first audit took place in Fall 2013 and assessed Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) roles and responsibilities on-reserve in the event of an emergency, the authorities for its emergency management program with the Emergency Management Act, regional emergency management plans and development of national emergency management supporting guidelines.
- All 8 of the recommendations included in the 2013 audit were agreed with and supported by AANDC.
- One of the key outcomes of the 2013 audit was bolstering EMAP from a recovery based program to one that focused on the four pillars of emergency management.
- A second audit, this time specifically of EMAP, was released in 2017, covering a period of time between April 1, 2014 to June 30, 2016, and included a review of program governance, program design and implementation, the four pillars of emergency management, and financial management and controls.
- The 2017 audit found that, while most of the elements that would be expected of an Emergency Management Assistance program are in place, opportunities to improve exist in the areas such as access to a national all-hazards risk assessment, the revision and finalization of key program documents, improved performance indicators, and the implementation of a centralized control framework.
Background
- Audits are conducted because emergencies have significant health, environmental, and economic effects on the people affected, ranging from psychosocial trauma to lost economic opportunities. Once emergencies and evacuations are over, their effects continue to be felt by communities because it can take years to fully restore services and infrastructure.
- Over the last 13 years, First Nations communities experienced more than 1,300 emergencies leading to more than 580 evacuations affecting more than 130,000 people.
- Over the last 4 fiscal years (2018–19 to 2021–22), Indigenous Services Canada spent about $828 million on emergency management supports for First Nations communities.
- Indigenous Services Canada spent 3.5 times more on responding to emergencies than on supporting First Nations communities to prepare for them.
- As of April 2022, 39% of structural mitigation projects were eligible but waiting for funding. The greatest unmet structural mitigation needs were in British Columbia and Alberta.
- Recommendations from the 2013 audit were, in summary:
- AANDC should clarify federal roles and responsibilities.
- AANDC should align the authorities of the Emergency Management Assistance Program with the Emergency Management Act and An Emergency Management Framework for Canada.
- AANDC should finalize regional emergency management plans.
- AANDC should implement a risk based all-hazards approach.
- AANDC should streamline the funding process for the emergency management support provided to First Nations and strengthen internal controls over the management of federal emergency management funds.
- AANDC should maintain proper documentation to substantiate its assessment of program risks.
- AANDC should develop mechanisms to coordinate departmental activities for emergencies on reserves.
- In response to the 2013 audit and previous management action plans, the Government of Canada introduced a single window to secure funding for First Nation emergency costs. Furthermore, AANDC (now ISC / CIRNAC) worked with First Nations, Health Canada, Public Safety Canada, and other federal organizations as appropriate, to clarify roles and responsibilities for the delivery of emergency management services on reserve, and enhanced collaboration within the emergency management community. To complement the above, AANDC: working with Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada; developed a structural mitigation priority ranking framework and drafting a Management Control Framework for the Emergency Management Assistance Program. These were implemented in 2017.
- In the 2022 audit, the OAG found that the risk assessment developed by EMAP in response to previous audits did not meet their definition of "risk-based" and further, highlighted the waitlist of structural mitigation projects as an area to improve program delivery.
Current Status
- ISC is developing an action plan to not only address the 2022 report recommendations, but to ensure that the department supports First Nations in their efforts to manage emergencies affecting their communities.
- This work is guided by the recognition that First Nations must be full and equal partners in decisions that affect their own communities, as well as in the delivery of their own emergency management planning and response.
ISC Management Action Plan
Recommendations | Management Response / Actions | Supplemental Details | Planned Implementation Date |
---|---|---|---|
8.32 Indigenous Services Canada should work with First Nations to implement a risk-based approach to inform program planning and decisions on where to invest in preparedness and mitigation activities to maximize support to communities at highest risk of being affected by emergencies. | The department's response. Agreed. In collaboration with First Nations, Indigenous Services Canada is committed to implement a risk-based approach to inform funding decisions. Targeted investments by the department will consider, as it has to date, the communities' willingness, readiness and interest in undertaking emergency preparedness activities by empowering First Nations to take the lead in preparing for and managing emergencies. The department is committed to support First Nations in their endeavors to identify their unique communities' level of risk and priorities to seek funding from the department to enhance emergency preparedness. | ISC is committed to using a risk-based approach to better inform funding decisions. Risk management practices by integrating climate change projections and by clarifying the dimensions of risk, including causes, likelihood of occurrence and possible severity of consequences. | Ongoing – ISC will continue to work in partnership with First Nations to implement a risk-based approach. Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness (NSMP) and FireSmart funding for the 2024-25 cycle will be among the first programs to further implement a risk-based approach. |
8.36 Indigenous Services Canada should work with First Nations communities to address the backlogs of eligible but unfunded structural mitigation projects and of unreviewed structural mitigation projects to effectively allocate resources to reduce the impact of emergencies on First Nations communities. | The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is currently working with First Nations to identify the infrastructure gap, which includes structural mitigation needs. The department will support First Nations to work towards closing that gap in the long term. In addition, the department is committed to work with First Nations, as well as collaborate with central agencies, other government departments and all levels of government to leverage partnership opportunities and explore alternate financing options to meet the needs of First Nations in structural mitigation while working toward the transfer of infrastructure services. | ISC will continue to work with First Nations to identify and invest in structural mitigation projects to help communities become more resilient to potential hazards and mitigate the most urgent and safety risks. | Ongoing - with an immediate focus on highest priority projects. |
8.39 Indigenous Services Canada should, on the basis of an assessments of risks, regularly update outdated departmental and regional emergency management plans and take immediate action to develop regional emergency management plans for the 3 regions that do not have them. These plans should be used to make informed decisions and take concrete actions to assist First Nations communities with managing the risks related to emergencies. | The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada, in collaboration with First Nations, will proceed to review and update the department's national Emergency Management Plan and regional plans and will develop customized regional emergency management plans based on an assessment of risks. | ISC will begin work to immediately review and update the all Emergency Management Plans and will ensure plans are updated at least every three years. Regions that have no plans will be prioritized by the department. | Identification by the fall of 2023, ongoing implementation. |
8.42 Indigenous Services Canada, in collaboration with First Nations, should determine how many emergency management coordinator positions are required and allocate funding for these positions on the basis of risk and need to ensure First Nations have sustained capacity to manage emergencies. | The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is committed to work in partnership with First Nations to build emergency management capacity. The department also agrees that funding for emergency management positions, provided through the Emergency Management Assistance Program's capacity enhancement funding stream, should be expanded. Emergency management coordinators, of which the department currently funds 196 full or part-time positions across the country, provide First Nations with valuable emergency preparedness and planning capacity. The department is diligently working to secure additional funding to provide more positions to First Nations communities. | ISC will work to continually assess the number of Emergency Management Coordinators by leveraging the planned development of a new risk based approach. For example, this approach will emphasize the importance of assessing vulnerability to all hazards in order to determine the number of coordinators needed. | Ongoing. |
8.62 Indigenous Services Canada should, in collaboration with First Nations, provincial governments and other service providers, ensure that First Nations communities receive the emergency management services they need by
|
The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is committed to work in partnership with First Nations and emergency management partners to establish comprehensive emergency management service agreements. | ISC is working with First Nations to engage with their members on their vision for emergency management, as well as funding going to enable First Nation partners to develop their own First Nation-led emergency management models. This will help set the stage for multilateral discussions that bring all partners together to develop new multilateral service agreements.
Where service agreements and wildfire agreements already exist, at the next annual cycle opportunity for renewal, all eligible First Nations will be asked to confirm their explicit inclusion. Where no agreements currently exist, negotiations will be started or accelerated and will also list all First Nations that have agreed to be included. Should a First Nation not agree to be listed, activation procedures will continue to be followed and ISC will look for opportunities to increase support for First Nations-led approaches to emergency management. |
Ongoing - ISC has already launched engagement related to establishing new emergency management service agreements and will work to update wildfire agreements in the coming fiscal year. |
8.66 Indigenous Services Canada should develop performance indicators to allow the department to measure progress against the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and use these indicators to track and report publicly on progress. | The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada agrees that certain performance indicators could be improved to better measure progress against the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Moving forward, the department will ask its programs that use performance indicators related to emergency management to review and consider revising how they measure progress against the Sustainable Development Goals. The review process should involve programs analyzing both the federal and departmental sustainable development strategies as well as the Sustainable Development Goal targets to understand how the programs could best measure progress and to identify which performance indicators should be utilized to do so.
The Government of Canada also reports on progress made to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals domestically and uses performance indicators from the Canadian Indicator Framework (see Taking Action Together – Canada's 2021 Annual Report on the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals). The Department supports this whole-of-government process by providing information on relevant departmental actions and initiatives that contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals. |
In consultation with ESDC as the lead for measuring progress against the Sustainable Development Goals and in partnership with Statistics Canada that has developed the Canadian Indicator Framework for SDGs Data Hub, ISC will review and revise how it measures progress against the SDGs within the next annual reporting cycle. | 2024 – While internal work with begin immediately, the department is aligned with Statistics Canada's strategic three year review of the "Canadian Indicator Framework" scheduled for 2024. |
8.68 Indigenous Services Canada should, in collaboration with First Nations, provincial governments and other service providers, ensure that First Nations communities receive the emergency management services they need by
|
The department's response. Agreed. Indigenous Services Canada is committed to work in partnership with First Nations and emergency management partners to establish comprehensive emergency management service agreements that will define comparability of services and monitoring and reporting components to identify and address shortcomings for continuous improvement. | Future multilateral comprehensive emergency management agreement negotiations will include and define agreed upon comparability of services and monitoring and reporting mechanisms that will allow gaps to be addressed as part of a continuous improvement approach. | Ongoing - A calendar with timelines and milestones will be developed in partnership with First Nations and Emergency Management Stakeholders by the fall of 2023. |
Emergency Management Assistance Program
Issue Summary
- In partnership with First Nations communities, provincial and territorial governments and non-government organizations, Indigenous Services Canada's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) helps communities on reserve access emergency assistance services.
- EMAP provides funding to First Nations communities so they can build resiliency, prepare for natural hazards and respond to them using the four pillars of emergency management: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery.
Key Messages
- The Government continues to negotiate multilateral agreements with First Nations and the provinces and territories, to work towards a more inclusive emergency management system.
- The government is committed to work in partnership with First Nations and emergency management partners to establish comprehensive emergency management service agreements that will define comparability of service as well as monitoring and reporting components to identify and address shortcomings for continuous improvement.
- Climate change is disproportionally impacting Indigenous communities due to their remote locations, close ties to the land and reliance on natural resources. Supporting Indigenous communities to ensure the health and safety of these communities is a top government priority.
- EMAP supports emergency management services and works to ensure the health and safety of First Nation residents. A robust emergency management plan that focuses on an all hazard approach is the key to increasing community resiliency.
- Engaging Indigenous leaders, and implementing adaptation measures are key to reducing impacts and increasing resiliency in communities. The Government will continue to work with communities to use their local knowledge.
- The Government is committed to enhancing First Nations community capacity and preparing for emergency events, especially in the context of climate change.
- Indigenous Services Canada's (ISC) EMAP continues to support culturally competent responses during evacuations and an emphasis is placed on improved community engagement during the recovery phase.
- These efforts will result in more resilient communities and improved health, safety and economic outcomes.
Background
- ISC's EMAP Program helps communities on reserve access emergency assistance services. EMAP provides funding to First Nation communities so they can build resiliency, prepare for natural hazards and respond to emergencies using the four pillars of emergency management (mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery).
- ISC works with provincial and territorial governments to ensure First Nation communities have access to comparable emergency assistance services available to other residents in their respective jurisdictions.
- Provinces and territories are responsible for emergency management within their areas of jurisdiction and therefore, have the expertise and capacity to deliver services on behalf of ISC. To ensure that First Nation communities have the assistance they need within the broader provincial or territorial emergency management system, ISC is in regular contact with provincial and territorial emergency management officials.
- ISC is working with First Nation leaders across the country, and the provinces and territories to advance trilateral emergency management agreements. These agreements will see First Nations becomes full and equal partners in emergency management moving forward.
- ISC works with Public Safety Canada to prepare for future emergencies, and focus on recovery efforts from recent events.
Response
Issue Summary
- The Emergency Management Assistance Program's (EMAP) response funding stream provides appropriate and necessary actions to manage the short-term consequences of an imminent or occurring emergency.
- EMAP has seen a notable increase in annual costs associated with response efforts Almost $500M has been reimbursed over the last ten years and $85M was reimbursed in fiscal year 2021-2022 for response efforts.
Key Messages
- The department provides timely response activities to First Nations that experience an emergency event, takes actions to prevent loss of life or injury and mitigate damages to infrastructure and environment.
- The department aims to provide response services to First Nations that are comparable to non-First Nation communities.
- The department has developed a Building Back Better Strategy Guide that supports risk reduction and community recovery. One of the key principles of this guide is to provide social, cultural and psychological support to aid community recovery.
- With increased pressures from climate change and a notable increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the EMAP's response pillar is essential in protecting the health and safety of on-reserve First Nations members and their infrastructure from hazards.
- The department continuously strives to meet the changing needs of First Nations communities. One recent initiative was the inclusion of Health Emergencies into EMAP Terms and Conditions (April 2022), which allows ISC to better support communities with their response to health emergencies.
- The department supports the resiliency of First Nation communities to respond to and recover from emergency events by encouraging collaborative partnerships, ensuring provincial comparability, and supporting cultural continuity.
Background
- The response pillar protects the health and safety of on-reserve First Nations members and their infrastructure from natural or accidental hazards.
- Eligible response activities may include measures to mitigate damages and protect people and infrastructure, actions that decrease the chance of evacuations or support evacuations when unavoidable, and actions associated with addressing health emergencies.
- A health emergency may include communicable, disease outbreaks, food and waste contamination, environmental health hazards and mental wellness emergencies.
- ISC works with provincial and territorial governments to ensure First Nation communities have access to comparable emergency assistance services available to other residents in their respective jurisdictions.
- In relation to evacuations, the response program aims to:
- address the gap between the much higher likelihood of evacuation on reserve as compared to off reserve,
- minimize the impacts of First Nations during evacuations.
Current Status
- Due to an increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the costs associated with response activities has increased over time.
- EMAP'S Response & Recovery A-Base funding of $29.3M has consistently not been sufficient and annual off-cycle requests are required to meet response needs.
- With Budget 2022, EMAP was able to access additional A-base funding of $85.7M per year over 3 years for Response and Recovery.
- On average, First Nation communities experience 54 flood emergencies, 32 wildland fires and 36 other emergencies, including public health emergencies annually.
- Over 144,000 First Nation community members living on reserve have been evacuated since 2009.
Recovery
Issue Summary
- The Emergency Management Assistance Program's (EMAP) recovery funding stream supports measures taken after an emergency to repair and restore conditions to an acceptable level that existed prior to the emergency.
- EMAP has seen a notable increase in annual costs associated with recovery efforts. Over $400M has been reimbursed over the last ten years and over $67M was reimbursed in fiscal year 2021-2022 for recovery efforts.
Key Messages
- The department supports the resiliency of First Nation communities to recover from emergency events by returning evacuees to their communities as quickly and as safely as possible, by encouraging collaborative partnerships, ensuring provincial comparability, and supporting cultural continuity.
- The department has developed a Building Back Better Strategy Guide that supports the restoration of communities and assets in a manner that reduces the vulnerability of First Nation communities to disasters and strengthens the First Nations' community resilience. In consultation with impacted First Nations, a recovery project plan may include mitigation measures to improve its planning for future emergency events.
- With increased pressures from climate change and a notable increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the EMAP's recovery pillar is essential to assist First Nations with the remediation work required on impacted infrastructure and houses to restore them to pre-disaster conditions as rapidly as possible.
- The department continuously strives to meet the changing needs of First Nations communities. One recent initiative was the inclusion of Health Emergencies to EMAP Terms and Conditions (May 2022). This allows the department to better support communities with recovery activities in relation to health emergencies by providing holistic and culturally appropriate strategies to address health and social concerns following an emergency.
Background
- The recovery pillar involves efforts which serves those on reserve residents that have damages to their primary residence and community infrastructure.
- Recovery measures may commence during the response phase.
- First Nation residents are supported in the clean-up, restoration, repair, and replacement of basic and essential property through the recovery stream of EMAP.
- Building back better is a recovery framework that centres on supporting the restoration of communities and assets in a manner that achieves two goals:
- Reduces the vulnerability of First Nation communities to disasters
- Strengthens the First Nations' community resilience
- First Nations, tribal councils, provincial, territorial and other emergency service partners will be supported to adopt and implement activities that support the EMAP build back better goals.
- Mitigation enhancements undertaken within repair or reconstruction projects of damaged infrastructure to reduce vulnerability to future emergencies are considered for EMAP eligibility.
Current Status
- Due to an increase in the frequency and severity of emergency events, the costs associated with recovery activities has increased over time.
- EMAP'S Response & Recovery A-Base funding of $29.3M has consistently been exceeded and annual off-cycle requests are required to meet response needs.
- With Budget 2022, EMAP was successful in accessing additional A-base funding of $85.7M per year over 3 years for Response and Recovery.
Mitigation and Preparedness
Issue Summary
- The Auditor General of Canada's report, Managing Emergencies in First Nations Communities, included a number of findings on the Department's mitigation and preparedness programs, notably that ISC's actions were more reactive than preventative and that ISC had not identified capacity needs of First Nations communities and highest-risk First Nations communities.
- ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) directly supports on-reserve communities through the Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness funding stream, FireSmart program and the Capacity Enhancement program. These program elements strengthen communities, build resilience and directly support:
- mitigation - activities and practices designed to avoid or minimize impacts of an emergency; and
- preparedness - planning and readiness measures to enable effective response to and recovery from an emergency.
Key Messages
- The department's Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness funding stream, and its FireSmart, and Capacity Enhancement programs are part of the proactive approach to emergency management and directly support First Nations across the country.
- In alignment with our mandate to transfer services, ISC's mitigation and preparedness programs support First Nation communities to identify needs and develop specific projects to address emergency events. This includes enhancement of emergency management capacity by increasing emergency coordinator positions in communities. ISC will continue to support these positions as requested by First Nations to ensure the sustainably of capacity to manage emergencies.
- ISC is committed to respecting First Nation and Tribal Council autonomy during all phases of emergency events and supports communities as they administer their own emergency services. As such, the department respects that Emergency Management plans are community owned and updated when the First Nation deems necessary.
- The Risk level of a community is considered by ISC regional offices during the proposal review process in conjunction with the First Nation Partner who has requested ISC funding. The Risk level is also taken into account by EMAP in the determination of regional allocations for the preparedness funding streams using the following criteria: cost of First Nation emergencies, population, number of community-reported Emergencies, remoteness, and number of First Nation bands.
- Funding for mitigation and preparedness proposals has increased over the last years due to increased visibility of ISC programs and an awareness of the benefits of mitigation and preparedness measures. However, we acknowledge that more needs to do be done, so we are continuing to expand our reach and support initiatives across the country in collaboration with First Nations, especially in high risk areas.
Background
- The Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness program ($69 million over 5 years, starting in FY 2019-2020) supports small-scale projects undertaken by First Nations communities on reserve to prepare for and mitigate emergencies caused by natural disasters. Programming includes emergency management plan development and testing, all-hazard risk assessments, flood mapping, and emergency management forums.
- The FireSmart program ($47.72 million over 5 years, starting in FY 2019-2020) enhances First Nation communities' wildfire management capacity by supporting wildland fire non-structural mitigation and preparedness initiatives. Programming includes training First Nations teams in wildfire suppression duties, wildfire risk assessments, as well as fuel management and vegetation clearing, which reduces the intensity and spread of wildfires.
- The Capacity Enhancement program ($43.6 million over 5 years, starting in FY 2019-2020; $12.9 million ongoing) supports community disaster resilience by providing funding for First Nations to hire emergency management coordinators.
Current Status
Proposals for the mitigation and preparedness programs are reviewed on an ongoing basis until funding is exhausted. The mitigation and preparedness programs stay flexible to adapt and answer needs identified by First Nation communities as they prepare for future potential emergencies.
Funding
- From FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22, more than $53 million has been allocated in support of Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness projects.
- In FY 2021-22, $17,532,809 was allocated to support Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness projects.
- From FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22, $25,8 million has been allocated in support of FireSmart projects.
- In FY 2021-22, $10,128,048 was allocated to support FireSmart projects.
- From FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22, nearly $26,9 million has been allocated in support of capacity enhancement in communities.
- In FY 2021-22, $12,381,507 was allocated to support the hiring of emergency management coordinators in communities.
Infrastructure/Structural Mitigation
Issue Summary
- Through the First Nation Infrastructure Fund (FNIF), Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) funds eight types of Other Community Infrastructure: roads and bridges, connectivity, cultural and recreational facilities, fire protection, energy systems, planning and skills, band administrative buildings and structural mitigation projects.
- These infrastructure assets are key to the social and economic well-being of communities and make communities more sustainable and resilient to natural hazardous events.
- Structural mitigation projects are infrastructure projects that prevent and modify hazards, segregating hazards by keeping them away from people and assets, and altering the design and construction of assets to make them resilient to potential hazards. Currently, community-identified structural mitigation project needs far exceed currently available, dedicated structural mitigation funds.
Key Messages
- Emergency management includes four pillars: hazard mitigation and prevention, emergency preparedness, emergency response, and recovery activities.
- The FNIF supports hazard mitigation and prevention projects to address the first pillar, and works closely with ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program as they address preparedness, response and recovery projects.
- Through the FNIF, ISC works with First Nation communities on reserves to mitigate natural hazards and provides dedicated funding for climate resilience infrastructure through structural mitigation. This includes maintaining winter road integrity, building dikes, sea walls, nature-based infrastructure, fire breaks, erosion controls, culverts, and projects to protect schools and water and wastewater systems from a changing climate as well as floods, landslides, wildfires, permafrost thaw, and other natural disasters.
Background
Indigenous communities are increasingly vulnerable to climate-related and other natural hazards due to remoteness, community size, inadequate infrastructure, socio-economic conditions, limited access to emergency management resources and community capacity.
It is more cost-effective to invest in mitigation and preparedness efforts than to respond to emergencies when they occur. Public Safety Canada estimated that for every $1 invested in mitigation efforts, $7 to $10 can be saved in post-recovery costs.
Although supporting resilient infrastructure on reserves is a priority for ISC, there is limited dedicated funding for mitigating natural disasters and climate adaptation. To support our partners, ISC works with various government departments that provide funding to First Nation recipients through a variety of programs, including:
- Collaborating with Infrastructure Canada on the Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Fund;
- Working with Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, responsible to support First Nation communities identify and assess climate risks through First Nations Adapt Program, and Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) on the development of the National Adaptation Strategy;
- Participating, in partnership with other federal government departments, in the Joint Committee on Climate Action co-chaired by the Assembly of First Nations and ECCC whose objective is to advance climate change adaptation and mitigation measures for First Nations.
Structural mitigation projects have dedicated, fenced funding under the FNIF of $12 million per year from 2020-21 to 2023-24. After that, structural mitigation projects will only be eligible to receive a limited share of funding for other community infrastructure project priorities eligible under the FNIF.
Current Status
Since 2016 and as of June 30, 2022, ISC has invested more than $1.6 billion in targeted funds to support 2,501 Other Community Infrastructure projects, 1,696 of which are completed.
As of June 30, 2022, and since 2016, ISC has invested $121.1 million to support 103 infrastructure adaptation/structural mitigation projects. These projects will benefit 107 First Nation communities serving approximately 116,000 people.
According to data collected through the First Nation Communities' Infrastructure Investment Plans, there are currently 94 planned and unfunded structural mitigation project proposals from First Nation communities, with an estimated cost of approximately $358 million. This represents a net change from the 112 unfunded projects in the OAG finding since: 3 projects are now in progress, 16 projects are now closed, and 1 new unfunded project was added.
To respond to the growing need to address climate change impacts and to close the gap between the funding that is available and the projects that are identified by First Nation partners, additional funding for structural mitigation projects is required.
Fire Protection
Issue Summary
- ISC supports fire protection in First Nations through the Capital Facilities and Maintenance Program, which includes support for core fire safety services to protect people and infrastructure, including housing. Fire protection includes more than trucks and fire halls; it requires individual knowledge (e.g., escape plans), private equipment (e.g., smoke alarms and fire extinguishers), trained firefighters in appropriate numbers, and appropriate governance structures.
- First Nation Band Councils manage on-reserve fire protection services. Between 2016-2017 and 2020-2021, ISC provided an average of $37.3 million annually in targeted funding for fire protection, including annual averages of:
- $7.1 million for capital investments (i.e., fire trucks, fire halls, etc.);
- $13.9 million for the operations and maintenance of assets;
- $5.2 million for firefighter training; and,
- $11.1 million in additional targeted and statutory funding.
- Budget 2022 provided $39.2 million over five years to support wildland-urban firefighting equipment and training for on-reserve communities. Communities with the highest risk of a wildfire event are prioritized for receiving this funding.
- First Nation communities are disproportionately impacted by fires with on-reserve mortality rates at 10.4 times higher than the Canadian average (1980-1999 data). Off-reserve Indigenous mortality rates are 5.3 times higher than the Canadian average (2021).
- Inadequate and overcrowded housing, a lack of smoke detectors, varied levels of fire services, and a lack of compliance with building and fire codes all contribute to this matter. Small and remote communities face additional challenges as they are often unable to maintain the number of firefighters required to be able to respond to a fire. Many of these communities do not have neighbouring municipalities from which to purchase services.
- Since 2010, ISC has maintained a five-year fire protection strategy. The first version of this strategy was developed with a number of interested organizations, while, in 2015, a renewed strategy was drafted in partnership with the Aboriginal Firefighters Association of Canada. The latest strategy is has been co-developed with the Assembly of First Nations, but has not yet been published.
- ISC provides support, through funding agreements with eligible recipients, in the planning, acquisition, design, construction, and disposal of capital assets, including fire protection infrastructure. As a condition of funding recipients must ensure the infrastructure adheres to provincial or territorial fire protection statutes and regulations (as specified in the Protocol for ISC-Funded Infrastructure). In the absence of provincial or territorial statutes and regulations pertaining to fire protection, the National Fire Code of Canada applies.
- While ISC encourages the Protocol for ISC-Funded Infrastructure to be applied to all infrastructure and housing on-reserve, there are limited enforcement mechanisms as there is no specific on-reserve legislative or regulatory building and fire code regime.
- To support the development of an Indigenous Fire Marshal's Office, the Aboriginal Firefighters Association of Canada led engagement sessions with Indigenous communities and stakeholders throughout 2018 and 2019. The purpose of the engagement was to seek input on the scope, mandate, governance structure, and any associated legislation for an Indigenous Fire Marshal's Office.
- Following engagement activities, the Aboriginal Fire Fighters Association of Canada (now the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council) determined that "the development of a national fire protection act should be the mandate of Indigenous leadership with technical support from (the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council)" and stopped actively pursuing the development of a compliance, and enforcement approach to fire protection.
- The Assembly of First Nations (AFN) also does not support a legislative approach to enforcing compliance with building and fire codes.
Key Messages
- The Government recognizes that Indigenous communities are disproportionately affected by fire incidents that can have devastating impacts on families and communities.
- Between 2016-17 and 2020-21, an annual average of $37.3 million was provided for fire protection services on reserve – not including band support funding. This includes $5.2 million for fire protection services training and $13.9 million for operations and maintenance annually.
- Fire education and prevention are key to reducing the number of injuries and deaths caused by fire. That is why we are continuing to support partner-led education and prevention campaigns.
- Budget 2022 provides $39.2 million over five years, starting in 2022-23, to support the purchase of firefighting equipment by First Nation communities.
Background
On reserves, fire protection is managed by the First Nation band council. ISC provides funding for fire protection every year as part of the First Nation's core capital funding.
The level of funding each First Nation receives for fire protection is determined through a regionally based formula. It looks at several factors, including the number of buildings on the reserve, population, local environment and how close the reserve is to other communities.
First Nation band councils can use these funds to run their own fire departments or to contract fire protection services from nearby communities. If a First Nation decides to have a contract with a nearby community, it is the responsibility of the First Nation to manage that agreement. First Nations may also access 9-1-1 services through agreements with provinces. First Nations may choose to use certain fire protection funding on other priorities.
In addition to band support funding, from 2016-2017 to 2020-2021, ISC provided an average of $37.3 million annually in funding for fire protection on reserve, including annual averages of:
- $7.1 million for capital investments (fire trucks, fire halls, etc.);
- $13.9 million for operations and maintenance of assets;
- $5.2 million for firefighter training; and
- $11.1 million in additional targeted and statutory funding.
ISC's First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB) funds Mental Health Therapist services and crisis response teams for community members dealing with the devastating loss following a fire. FNIHB also ensures that resources are available to debrief first responders.
On August 16, 2019, the Minister of Indigenous Services announced Budget 2019 funding of $9.97 million over three years, starting in 2019–2020, to support the creation of an Indigenous Fire Marshal Office. The funding was to support Indigenous partners in establishing a new Indigenous Fire Marshal Office, including the structure, governance and mandate of the office. The idea was for an Indigenous Fire Marshal Office to promote fire safety and prevention, undertake public education, and support the use of fire safety, building codes and regular building inspections in Indigenous communities.
In May 2020 the Aboriginal Fire Fighters Association of Canada renamed the Indigenous Fire Marshal Office Project the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council. The Aboriginal Firefighters Association of Canada is no longer pursuing a compliance and enforcement type of organization as originally envisioned, and the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council will focus primarily on data collection, research, direct program delivery to communities, and general education / prevention initiatives.
Current Status
- A new co-developed fire protection strategy has been developed with the Assembly of First Nations, but has not yet been published.
- Budget 2022 funding for wildland-urban interface firefighting equipment and training is being delivered to First Nation communities most at risk of wildfire.
- The Department is supporting First Nations, regional partner organizations and the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council to deliver education and prevention initiatives, smoke alarm installations and purchase equipment and infrastructure.
Emergency Management
British Columbia
Issue Summary
- British Columbia has seen a series of emergencies over the past five years, with devastating fire seasons in 2017, 2018 and 2021 and compounding impacts of fires and flooding due to an atmospheric river in 2021. Following the 2018 Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs report, From the Ashes (PDF), ISC negotiated a tripartite Memorandum of Understanding with the First Nations Leadership Council and the Province of British Columbia to work collectively to advance meaningful recognition and enhanced capacity of First Nations within all pillars of emergency management. As a next step to the existing tripartite Memorandum of Understanding, and in response to increasingly intense and frequent emergency events, the parties are discussing the pathway to negotiate a new emergency management agreement with the Province of British Columbia and the First Nations Leadership Council to advance inclusion of First Nations in Emergency Management. The First Nations Leadership Council put forward resolutions at the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations, Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and First Nations Summit Annual General Assemblies related to First Nations involvement in negotiations on a new tripartite agreement for Emergency Services Funding. British Columbia Chiefs directed the First Nations Leadership Council to engage with First Nations in British Columbia and provide possible negotiation models for First Nations consideration in order for First Nations to engage in negotiation with Canada and British Columbia on the new trilateral agreement. The First Nations Leadership Council will report back to the British Columbia Chiefs with a final negotiation model for consideration.
Key Messages
- There is a continued priority to implement the current tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding with the First Nations Leadership Council and the province of British Columbia and establish a new trilateral relationship for First Nations Emergency Management in British Columbia.
- In recent months, there has been notable progress made in British Columbia towards creating a new pathway for Emergency Management in British Columbia, and investments have been made to support First Nation-led service delivery, which builds regional capacity.
- Canada is committed to true and lasting reconciliation with First Nations in British Columbia and will work to develop a new relationship that implements the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and respecting First Nation knowledge, laws, values and approaches to ensure the inclusion of First Nations within emergency management.
- A five-year extension to the Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement with the Tsilhqot'in National government was signed in May 2022, to advance a government-to-government framework for emergency and wildfire management. The agreement is the first of its kind, and the extension includes funding for implementation.
- The 2021 and 2022 wildfire season and the Atmospheric River Event resulted in complex and challenging recovery issues for First Nation communities across British Columbia. ISC recognizes the need for increased preparedness and mitigation for First Nations in British Columbia. We are working together with First Nations, Emergency Management British Columbia, the First Nations Emergency Services Society and the First Nations Health Authority with the goal to co-develop approaches for sustainable changes to improve emergency management.
- In addition to the funds provided through the Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements program, ISC has committed over $66 million in recovery funding to support affected First Nation communities in British Columbia. ISC is working closely with First Nations and partners to support complex recovery efforts, including loss of reserve land, replacing critical infrastructure and mitigating land erosion.
- There is also significant recovery work with the Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council, which includes Lytton First Nation, which is rebuilding following wildfires in line with Commitment Letters signed by the Provincial and Federal governments to work collaboratively in new ways together.
- In 2022-2023, the department provided over $11 million to the First Nations Emergency Services Society to support their work in all four pillars of emergency management: Preparedness, Mitigation, Response and Recovery in support of First Nations communities in British Columbia. Transferring emergency management service delivery to First Nations organizations is a key part of the department's work to improve emergency management planning.
Background
Tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding
- In 2017, ISC signed a service agreement with the Province of British Columbia to provide First Nations in British Columbia with the Emergency Management service equivalent to what is provided to local authorities.
- Following this bilateral agreement, British Columbia and Canada negotiated a tripartite Emergency Management Memorandum of Understanding with the First Nations Leadership Council with the goal of establishing a new trilateral relationship for First Nations emergency management.
- The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) established a process for the parties to work collectively to advance meaningful recognition and enhanced capacity of First Nations within all pillars of emergency management, including preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery. The MOU commits to advance a relationship based on the inherent right of self-determination held by First Nations, increase information sharing and capacity development, strengthen dialogue at the political, senior, and technical levels and work collaboratively to identify funding to enhance First Nations resources, infrastructure and enhanced capacity to support First Nations communities to respond, adapt to and mitigate the impact of emergency events.
- As a next step to the MOU, the parties have developed a critical pathway to support the planning to begin negotiating a tripartite agreement to replace the bilateral service agreement with the Province of British Columbia.
- During an Emergency Management Forum on June 28 and 29, 2022, hosted by the partners to the MOU (the First Nations Leadership Council, ISC and Emergency Management British Columbia), and attended by British Columbia Chiefs, First Nation Emergency Management representatives, the First Nations Leadership Council, the First Nations' Emergency Services Society, and government officials from Canada and British Columbia, the First Nations Leadership Council stressed the importance of directly integrating climate change and adaptation into the future of emergency management planning as well as the need for additional resources to support Emergency Management Coordinators for First Nations.
Previous work of the Committee
- In 2018, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs released the report From the Ashes on the 2017 wildfires. Budget 2019 included the following investments to implement recommendations from that report:
- $211 million over five years to support increased resiliency and emergency management on-reserve.
- $48 million over four years for infrastructure projects on-reserve that will protect communities from climate-related hazards.
- Budget 2022 included the following emergency management investment of $24.7 million over five years to establish a secretariat to support the Minister of Emergency Preparedness and to enhance federal coordination of emergency responses.
Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement
- In 2018, the Tŝilhqot'in National Government signed a three-year Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement with the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia.
- The agreement, the first of its kind, was prompted by issues that arose in the response to fires in Tŝilhqot'in territory in 2017. The Tŝilhqot'in National Government commissioned a report titled The Fires Awakened Us detailing problems with emergency management and listing calls to action for emergency management going forward.
- The 2018 agreement established a high-level engagement process among federal and provincial elected officials and the Tŝilhqot'in National Government.
- A five-year extension to the agreement was signed in May 2022, with a commitment of $250,000 per year from ISC to implement the agreement.
- Other First Nations in British Columbia have requested Collaborative Emergency Management Agreements, and the early stages of developing these agreements is underway.
Communities and recovery needs
- First Nations who have experienced significant land loss from the 2021 Atmospheric River events have requested that the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia replace lost land.
- In partnership with the province of British Columbia, ISC is working with the affected First Nations, including Shackan Indian Band and Nooaitch Indian Band, to assess the amount of land that has been lost due to the event as well as complete a risk assessment on the cost of mitigation for flood risks to the existing reserve versus acquiring new land.
- Lytton First Nation, a member of the Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council, was severely impacted by fires in 2021 and 2022. Following the 2021 fire, at the request of member Chiefs, Canada and British Columbia committed to working collaboratively with the Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council on wildfire recovery and rail safety.
- This recovery work, led by a collaborative leadership table, has focused on interim housing and recovery efforts. In total, 46 homes were lost in fires between 2021 and 2022. ISC has approved over $38.1 million in recovery funding to the Lytton First Nation for projects and activities including a community recovery team staffing, interim housing, community debris removal, interim community infrastructure and required assessments and inspections.
Committee of British Columbia and Federal Ministers on Disaster Response and Climate Resilience membership
- Following five meetings of the Committee, attended by twenty federal and British Columbia ministers and three representatives from the First Nations Leadership Council, the Federal government announced $870 million for British Columbia to support flood, landslide and storm recovery efforts in the province.
- The Committee also identified priorities including advancing the Tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding, providing direct supports to impacted First Nations communities, and exploring options for additions to reserves following land erosion caused by the 2021 atmospheric river event.
Current Status
Tripartite Emergency Management Services Memorandum of Understanding
- The First Nations Leadership Council put forward resolutions at the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations, Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and First Nations Summit Annual General Assemblies related to First Nations involvement in negotiations on a new tripartite agreement for Emergency Services Funding.
- The resolution supports Canada and British Columbia expanding the Bilateral Agreement to a new trilateral agreement with First Nations in British Columbia, for the purposes of ensuring satisfactory, effective and equitable funding and resourcing within the four pillars of emergency management in First Nations communities.
- British Columbia Chiefs directed the First Nations Leadership Council to engage with First Nations in British Columbia and provide possible negotiation models for First Nations consideration in order for First Nations to engage in negotiation with Canada and British Columbia on the new trilateral agreement. The First Nations Leadership Council will report back to the British Columbia Chiefs with a final negotiation model for consideration.
Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement
- The recently signed extension to the Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement with Tŝilhqot'in National Government included a provision that the parties will reach agreement by February 28, 2023, on funding from the federal and provincial governments to support the agreement over the five-year term.
- ISC is working with the Province of British Columbia and Tŝilhqot'in National Government to determine what funding is needed beyond the $250,000 per year currently committed, and to identify potential sources of funding.
- In 2022/23, ISC has committed to providing an additional $1.4 million to support the implementation of the Tŝilhqot'in National Government Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement.
- ISC is engaging in preliminary discussions with the Secwepemc Health Caucus regarding exploring a Collaborative Emergency Management. ISC is aware of nine Nation groupings interested in similar Collaborative Emergency Management Agreements representing 79 of BC's 203 First Nations and is working to establish a procedure to support new agreements.
Communities and recovery needs
- ISC British Columbia Region Emergency Management is working directly with First Nations, the Province of British Columbia and the First Nations Emergency Services Society to support recovery and mitigation efforts for communities impacted by the 2021 wildfires and atmospheric river events.
- The initial response by ISC included providing funding through the Emergency Management Assistance Program to the First Nation Emergency Services Society to assist First Nations in response to the flooding.
- Based on initial assessments of land loss, Shackan and Nooaitch Indian Bands appear to have been the worst affected from the November 2021 flooding, losing over 75 and 100 acres respectively.
- The Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council, Canada, and British Columbia Coordination Task Force continue to meet bi-weekly and held an in-person meeting on August 25, 2022 to discuss accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities.
- ISC is working closely with the First Nations Leadership Council and the First Nations' Emergency Services Society to identify opportunities to support increased communications with First Nations, especially during emergency events.
- Significant impacts to the Sumas/Fraser Valley and the priority for further partnership on flood mitigation were identified at the Committee of British Columbia and Federal Ministers on Disaster Response and Climate Resilience.
- ISC has committed to mobilizing federal departments to engage on the Committee of British Columbia and Federal Ministers on Disaster Response and Climate Resilience priority.
Other Agreements in the Region
- A Bilateral Emergency Management Service Agreement was signed with the province in 2017. The agreement has a term of 10 years.
- A Wildfire Management Agreement was signed with the province in 2016. The agreement has a term of 10 years.
ISC BC Region Emergency Management Plan
- ISC BC Region Emergency Management has a draft regional emergency management plan that is being reviewed and updated following the 2021 and 2022 emergency events and response in British Columbia.
- The plan will be updated with an expected completion date by March 31, 2023.
Alberta
Issue Summary
- Alberta's efforts to support First Nation communities in preparing for, and responding to emergency events.
Key Messages
- Our program funds Alberta Emergency Management Agency to collaborate with First Nations to create and maintain disaster plans, focusing on future emergency events and how to prepare for them.
- We engage with First Nations to determine if additional resources, training and development are required in Wildfire prevention and protection, Emergency Preparedness, and Disaster Mitigation and fund eligible activities based on First Nations' priorities.
- Our Government continues to engage with Indigenous leaders to support emergency preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery from emergency events, in collaboration with the province and non-governmental organizations.
Background
Agreements between ISC and province of Alberta
- ISC and the province of Alberta have two 10-year agreements related to Emergency Management.
- Wildfire agreement: runs from 2015 to 2025 focusing on cost sharing pre-suppress, detections, prevention, and firefighting activities in the forest protection area.
- Emergency management agreement: runs from 2014 to 2024 with Alberta Emergency Management Agency focusing on providing training, emergency exercises, an annual emergency management conference, and information management supports during emergency events.
- Local disaster is led by the community, which can request support from the Alberta Emergency Management Agency (agency). In large scale events requiring large scale response, Alberta Emergency Management Agency leads the provincial coordination of response during emergencies, including prevention, preparedness, response and recovery. The agency also works to ensure public services, such as government services and first responders, are available during a crisis that exceeds the responding community's capacity.
Engagement with First Nations on the future of emergency management
- Through capacity funding, Alberta supported the staffing of an Emergency Management Coordinator for each of the treaty areas in Alberta. In the 2020-2021 fiscal year, this funding was expanded to tribal councils.
- The additional coordinators are focused on gaining First Nation experience to assist the government in negotiating a new multilateral agreement beyond 2023.
- In 2022, ISC has prioritized the engagement with Nations that identified a need for individual representation on perspective of the future of Emergency Management. The department is evaluating potential funding models that would equitably support Alberta Nations in all four pillars of Emergency Management.
Dene Tha' First Nation Flooding Event
- In May 2022, the Dene Tha' First Nation evacuated 874 individuals due to flooding. The damage has been extensive. As of November 1, 2022, approximately 13 Nation members remain evacuated until repairs to severely damaged homes are completed.
- ISC regional and headquarters staff toured the community in October 2022 and met with Dene Tha' First Nation representatives to discuss emergency management rebuilding and mitigation work.
- Dene Tha' First Nation has requested additional dedicated resources and been supported for two casual positions to complete their claim submission.
- Dene Tha' First Nation also requested an extension of funding support for mental wellness services and have been advised that additional flood related mental wellness supports are eligible until March 2023.
- A follow-up meeting between ISC regional staff and Dene Tha' First Nation representatives regarding mitigation feasibility options for the identified high risk areas is forth coming.
- Due to the cost of the response efforts ISC regional and headquarters staff work in partnership to receive approval to increase the $30 million maximum amount payable in 2022-2023 to a First Nation in order to flow appropriate funds to Dene Tha' First Nation to pay the outstanding response invoices.
Current Status
- The agreement with Alberta Emergency Management Agency will expire in 2024, however, there is a possibly of an extension. Further, the wildfire agreement is set to expire in 2025. This agreement may also be extended.
- Engagement sessions with Indigenous communities in Alberta on the future of emergency management are ongoing. As of August 31, 2022, 14 First Nations, and one tribal council have participated in initial engagement discussions. The First Nations and tribal council will provide further comments on the future of emergency management in Alberta.
- The Dene Tha' First Nation is waiting for ISC to expand the annual funding limitations and secure additional emergency management funding. Once the limitations are expanded, and additional funding is secured, the First Nation will be eligible to receive a reimbursement for expenses incurred in responding to the disaster event.
Saskatchewan
Issue Summary
The Saskatchewan Region consists of 9 Tribal Councils and 70 First Nations (10 of which are Independent from a Tribal Council). The Region is susceptible to emergency events including wildfire, flood, severe weather, extended power outages and impacts to critical infrastructure resulting from natural disasters. The region is also susceptible to health and social emergencies, brought on by the lingering effects of the pandemic, inter-generational trauma, and gaps in community infrastructure.
As of April 1, 2022, the Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) expanded its scope to better respond to all-hazard emergency situations within current authorities, including public health emergencies in First Nation communities. By working in partnership, Indigenous Services Canada is advancing reconciliation through an all-hazard emergency management approach that includes four phases: mitigation/prevention, preparedness, response and recovery.
The Emergency Management Assistance Program along with the Health Emergency Management/Communicable Disease Emergencies Program have developed processes to meet the needs of our First Nation partners. Moving forward, ISC will work to ensure the consistent delivery of EMAP (within current authorities) and its work to advance self-determination. The department is committed to continuing to engage and work with Indigenous partners to establish shared priorities as they relate to All Hazards Emergency Management working towards a more coordinated and inclusive approach to support all hazards preparedness, response, and recovery.
ISC encourages and supports the development of emergency response plans that includes a health component and in which community responsibilities and processes are consistent and efficient. This includes support for dedicated Emergency Management Coordinator positions at the community level to develop all-hazard emergency plans, community risk assessments and training.
Key Messages
- ISC Saskatchewan Region has adopted an all-hazards approach to emergency management. Integrated emergency management is a shared responsibility between all levels of government and First Nations partners. Within Indigenous Services Canada (ISC), Emergency Management (EM) and Health Emergency Management (HEM) are aligning themselves to work together when responding to on-reserve emergency events.
- In partnership with First Nations communities, provincial and non-government organizations, Indigenous Services Canada's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) supports First Nation communities on reserve to access emergency assistance services comparable to services provided off-reserve.
- EMAP aims to be flexible, culturally sensitive, responsive to the unique strengths and customs of First Nation communities, and adaptive to the evolving challenges resulting from emergency events.
- This all hazards approach to Emergency Management supports the direction of Indigenous partners within Saskatchewan Region during emergency events to provide access to additional emergency supports in a streamlined manner. This approach also provides Indigenous partners with up to date information and communications on current status in community and creates an opportunity for partners to have direct access to updates and ISC supports.
- Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) Regional Emergency Management Program engages and has built relationships with First Nations, Tribal Councils, Indigenous organizations (Saskatchewan First Nations Emergency Management, Northern Inter-Tribal Health Authority), and federal/provincial/agency partners (i.e., Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency, Public Safety Canada, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Canadian Red Cross) to ensure a full spectrum of supports are in place to support First Nations during emergency events.
- ISC continues to engage closely with First Nations partners to establish shared priorities as they relate to Emergency Management.
- ISC Saskatchewan Region has developed a Critical Response Team (CRT) approach, working collaboratively with partners, to ensure regional coordination, program support and expertise during event response to support First Nations. This streamlined methodology aligns with the department's service excellence approach and provides partners a one window approach to emergency response.
- A recent emergency event that occurred in the Region that impacted a First Nation (James Smith Cree Nation) required extensive coordination and communication with the community's emergency management coordinator and leadership, as well as multiple Tribal Council emergency management coordinators and mental wellness providers to ensure community requests for supports were coordinated in a timely and effective manner.
- Throughout the event, ISC senior leadership, staff and partners remain fully engaged with First Nation leadership and representatives for situational awareness updates, requests for support, coordination of resources, communications with internal and external partners and ensuring essential services and supplies requested by the community were in place to support response.
- The Regional coordinated response supports First Nation natural disaster and health emergencies, implementing lessons learned from First Nation responses and investments into capacity development to manage emergency events and are supported through ISC's All Hazards Emergency Management Assistance Program.
Background
Preparedness
- ISC's Regional Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) currently supports 68 of 70 First Nations, 7 of 9 Tribal Councils, and Saskatchewan First Nation Emergency Management Organization (SKFNEM) with funding supports to continue to build and enhance emergency management capacity at the community level with a focus on completion of all-hazard emergency plans and risk assessments including FireSmart activities. The program also supports communities directly with response and recovery costs.
- ISC First Nations Inuit Health Branch has invested significantly into community capacity development to respond to social and health emergencies, through mental wellness, communicable disease, health protection and promotion programming. This includes the expansion of mental wellness teams, opioid agonist treatment sites, and access to multiple training opportunities to respond to social emergencies for community staff.
- ISC holds a wildfire management agreement with the province, signed in 1993, which provides funding to the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency (SPSA) for wildfire suppression costs on reserve within the forest boundary.
- The majority of wildfires in the provinces occur in the forest boundary, which is in the northern part of the province. The SPSA and First Nations partners work together to ensure wildfire suppression services are available across the province for any First Nation in need of assistance. ISC supports the First Nation portion of the cost share agreement (50-50) with the SPSA to contract First Nation fire suppression crews.
- The ISC Saskatchewan Region is working toward supporting Tribal Councils to continue to develop emergency management models on an aggregate level inclusive of associated costing. The models will deem the "way forward" in emergency management respective to each Tribal Council area and affiliated First Nations.
- In 2022-2023, ISC Saskatchewan Region will have invested $4,485,975 in support of preparedness and capacity development led by First Nations and Tribal Councils, including FireSmart supports.
- Recent preparedness activities include Tribal Councils Emergency Management program coordinators working with the Canadian Red Cross to develop emergency social services capacity and training to support communities with expertise to manage emergency evacuations. In addition, preparedness activities include wildland firefighting and search and recovery capacity and training.
- The ISC Saskatchewan Region also provides funding support for the Saskatchewan First Nations Emergency Management Forum led by First Nations as an avenue to gather all First Nations and Tribal Council emergency management coordinators and teams to network with each other and partners, as well as share emergency management model development and capacity growth. The 2022 Forum was held November 7-10, 2022 showcasing First Nation and Tribal Council emergency management capacity development and working together to support each other in preparedness and during emergency events.
- First Nation and Tribal Council Emergency Management Coordinators have also developed a Technical Working Group focused on working together to enhance capacity and training opportunities including identification of service and support gaps.
Emergency Management Partnerships
- While there is no formal bilateral service agreement established in the Saskatchewan Region, regular engagement with key emergency management partners, specifically Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency and Public Safety Canada occurs and includes situational awareness messaging regarding emergency situations. ISC officials participate on First Nation and provincial operations calls.
- No bilateral service agreement between ISC and the Province has been established due to criticisms by Saskatchewan First Nations that the federal and provincial government should not enter into such an agreement without First Nations at the table.
- Out of respect, ISC is beginning to engage First Nation partners on discussions related to a new path forward toward development of emergency management models which may include multilateral service agreement arrangements.
- The ongoing engagement is key for partners in preparing for and responding to emergency events impacting First Nations and the relationships are working well in coordinating response supports.
- A recent example of engagement includes coordination of partners in developing all-hazard preparedness and response, with a recent focus on social emergencies (i.e., enhanced policing and health supports on reserve to support drug, alcohol, and gang issues). Ongoing meetings on emerging topics, issues, and available federal/provincial supports are also discussed.
Current Status
- Regional Emergency Management continues to engage and work with First Nations, Tribal Councils, and federal/provincial partners to support First Nations capacity development on reserve through all pillars of emergency management. This includes identifying areas for additional resources and supports for planning, training, and human capacity to move forward in managing and decision-making.
- ISC Saskatchewan Region continues to support First Nations needs related to emergency management preparedness, response, and recovery as they are brought forward. At the request of the First Nation, the Regional Emergency Management Team coordinates and leverages program supports inclusive of health emergencies, impacts to infrastructure, and environmental hazards.
- ISC Saskatchewan Region continues to engage First Nation leadership on monthly calls where All Hazards Emergency response is discussed and direction is received from community leadership.
Manitoba
Issue Management
- Indigenous Service Canada's (ISC) Manitoba Region has a service agreement with the Canadian Red Cross to provide response services to First Nation communities during emergency events at the request of the Nation. This agreement expires on March 31, 2023. It is expected that this agreement will be extended for the next fiscal year.
- Multi-lateral relationships are being explored with Indigenous Organizations in Manitoba, to assist in supporting First Nations affected by emergency events.
- ISC-Manitoba Region maintains an annual agreement with the Province of Manitoba's Wildfire Services for wildfire suppression on-reserve.
Key Message
- The Government of Canada continues to engage with Indigenous leaders to support emergency preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery from floods, in collaboration with provinces and non-governmental organizations.
- The department is committed to supporting First Nation communities requests for long-term plans and strategies to prepare for and mitigate against the increasing number of emergency events, which in turn reduces response activities.
- ISC's capacity enhancement funding provides support to all First Nations and Tribal Councils in Manitoba to enhance capacity by employing emergency coordinators.
- Spring and summer weather systems brought significant rain to southern Manitoba, causing overland flooding, loss of road access and evacuations. ISC worked directly with First Nations, the Province of Manitoba, and the Canadian Red Cross (CRC) to provide support to evacuated community members.
- As of November 16, 2022, 569 Peguis First Nation evacuees have been transitioned to long term evacuee supports through the Canadian Red Cross.
- ISC has provided advance payments in the amount of $7.5M. The Nation has provided one large submission totaling $8.9M that is currently under review by regional officials.
- ISC, Peguis First Nation and the Province of Manitoba will establish a working group to actively and comprehensively plan for long-term solutions.
Background
ISC established a 5-year service agreement with the CRC effective April 1, 2017, which provides preparedness and response services to First Nations in Manitoba during emergency situations as requested by the Nation. The agreement was renewed for an additional year, expiring March 31, 2023.
In emergencies such as wildfire and flood, First Nations in Manitoba can request the supports of the CRC, through ISC, to provide evacuee services. This may include emergency lodging and meals, reception, activities, personal services and family reunification services, financial assistance to address incremental costs of being out of their homes, the process of returning to their community once an emergency is over and it is safe to return.
Due to record levels of precipitation beginning in the spring and summer of 2022, widespread unprecedented overland flooding occurred throughout the central and southern portions of Manitoba.
ISC supported the following related to the 2022 spring and summer flooding:
- 27 First Nation communities requesting supports for flood mitigation and response activities;
- 8 First Nation communities declaring a state of local emergency;
- 7 First Nation communities experiencing partial evacuations due to road closures and flooding of houses and community infrastructure; and,
- 1 First Nation community experiencing a full evacuation.
Current Status
To date in 2022, two major events affected First Nations in Manitoba: spring and summer weather conditions (widespread flooding, extreme precipitation, over saturation of soils) and a 53,000ha wildfire in northwest Manitoba.
Due to flooding, the Peguis First Nation experienced a full evacuation, supported by the Canadian Red Cross beginning May 1, 2022.
Due to the wildfire and subsequent long-term hydro outage, Mathias Colomb Cree Nation experienced a full evacuation of 2,173 individuals, supported by ISC and the Canadian Red Cross, for a total of 45 days.
In 2022-23 (April 1 – October 31), the Regional Emergency Management team:
- Received 95 initial emergency calls to the ISC-RO 24/7 Duty Officer from 28 First Nations and 9 stakeholders.
- Responded to 18 severe weather events and three wildfires impacting 30 First Nations and 2 Nations experiencing issues with community safety.
- Supported the full evacuation of one Nation due to wildfire (2,173 evacuees).
- Supported partial evacuation of 12 First Nations (2384 evacuees) due to flooding and severe weather events.
- Supporting 15 Nations through post event recovery efforts.
2022 Evacuated Communities | Number of Individuals evacuated | 2022 long-term evacuees remaining |
---|---|---|
Peguis First Nation | 2,006 | 569 |
Pine Creek First Nation | 30 | fully repatriated |
Little Saskatchewan First Nation | 2 | fully repatriated |
Pauingassi First Nation | 39 | 9 |
Little Grand Rapids First Nation | 21 | fully repatriated |
Sioux Valley Dakota Nation | 13 | fully repatriated |
O-Pipon-Na-Piwin Cree Nation | 23 | fully repatriated |
Sapotaweyak Cree Nation | 3 priority-one medical | fully repatriated |
Long Plain First Nation | 155 | fully repatriated |
Fisher River Cree Nation | 3 households | fully repatriated |
Kinonjeoshtegon First Nation | 35 | fully repatriated |
Sagkeeng First Nation | 2 households | fully repatriated |
Roseau River First Nation | 4 households | fully repatriated |
Mathias Colomb Cree Nation | 2,173 | fully repatriated |
Ontario
Issue Summary
Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) works closely with communities to support their response efforts, administering response and mitigation funding through the Emergency Management Assistance Program. First Nations communities along the James Bay and Hudson Bay coasts are disproportionately affected by flooding. During the 2022 flooding season, ISC introduced the Joint Command Approach to accelerate emergency management risk assessments and decision-making processes with key partners.
Currently, ISC and the Province of Ontario have a bilateral Emergency Management Service Agreement to ensure that First Nations on reserve receive emergency management services when needed. The department recognizes the opportunity to work with First Nations as full and equal partners in emergency management service agreements and response activities. To address this, the department is undertaking initiatives to develop and implement multilateral service agreements with Indigenous-led organizations across the province.
Key Messages
- Our Government continues to engage with Indigenous leaders as full and equal partners to support emergency preparedness, mitigation, and response and recovery efforts, in collaboration with provincial and non-governmental organizations.
- The Joint Command approach to emergency management was implemented during the 2022 spring flood season to ensure the full and equal participation of First Nations and Indigenous partners, streamline the processes for risk assessments, evacuation decision-making, and funding approvals so that partners could implement rapid responses.
- Given that there is no one-size-fits-all model, the department is advancing multilateral service agreements with Ontario and Indigenous-led organizations, while also prioritizing capacity building, so that First Nations are best equipped to manage emergencies in their communities.
Background
- Under the Emergency Management Assistance Program, ISC provides funding to First Nations, Tribal Councils, Indigenous Representative Organizations and other Indigenous-led organizations to mitigate and recover from emergencies. The Canadian Armed forces accepted the request for assistance to evacuate communities impacted by 2022 spring flooding along James Bay and Hudson Bay, including Kashechewan, Fort Albany and Attawapiskat. All persons evacuated have been repatriated back to their respective communities.
- The 2022 wildfire season saw significantly fewer fires (221) than the 10-year average of 825, and last year's peak of 1,198 total wildfires. Nevertheless, the department's commitment to build First Nation emergency response capacity and to build back better will help ensure Indigenous communities are prepared for future events.
- ISC funds a network of Emergency Management Coordinators, which include Indigenous subject matter experts who are able to deploy to First Nations in crisis. Funding support for coordinator positions are allocated to Indigenous organizations where most of the emergencies historically happen, aiding in rapid response efforts.
- The current 10-year bilateral agreement between ISC and Ontario expires in 2028, however work is underway to engage First Nations on the development of multilateral agreements that recognize First Nations as full and equal partners in decision-making processes and implementation mechanisms, supporting the right to self-determination, and building a foundation for the department's service transfer mandate.
- "Indigenous Services Canada funded a cost-effective community-driven initiative for evacuations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kashechewan First Nation is in northern Ontario on the western coast of James Bay. The on-reserve population in 2019 was 1,825 band members. Kashechewan is a fly-in community without an all-season road. The closest urban community is Timmins, about 460 kilometres away. Every year since 2012, the community has been evacuated because of flooding or as a precaution because of the risk of spring flooding. Typically, the community was evacuated to host communities in northern Ontario. In both 2020 and 2021, community members were evacuated because of the risk of flooding. Rather than staying in a host community, the First Nation requested and received funding from Indigenous Services Canada to remain on their land and move to higher ground on their traditional hunting camps. Each of these evacuations lasted about 6 weeks. While they were living on their land, members participated in safe and culturally relevant activities, such as traditional community food harvesting and gathering, intergenerational knowledge sharing, and Indigenous language education. The cost of the 2 evacuations in 2020 and 2021 was about $140 per person per day compared with about $235 per person per day to evacuate to host communities in 2018 and 2019."
Current Status
- ISC supports First Nations affected by emergencies with expedited response and recovery invoice reconciliation processes and funding. The department is also advancing funding for projects that prepare for and mitigate risks ahead of the 2023 flood season.
- ISC is continuing to make investments in Indigenous-led and culturally appropriate training at the community level such as: ISN Maskwa all female evacuation support specialty security training in Thunder Bay in March 2022; mental health first aid; evacuation support specialist protection training in 2021; basic security guard training including first aid and CPR; critical incident stress debriefing; and search and rescue.
- ISC is working with partners to develop a regional strategy for multilateral emergency management service agreements. A proposed approach has been circulated to guide discussions with First Nation partners, including Chiefs of Ontario and other Indigenous-led organizations, as well as the province of Ontario.
- The department has proposed the following phased approach:
- Bolster First Nation Emergency Management leadership, which includes formalizing the Joint Command approach;
- Identify First Nation partners;
- Engage on the new Emergency Management paradigm;
- Develop a Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding;
- Co-develop the new paradigm with First Nation partners;
- Develop Authority to Sign new agreements; and,
- Implement Multilateral Service Agreements.
- Concurrently, ISC is working with the province and First Nation partners on a "lessons learned" process to evaluate and improve existing emergency management mitigation and response processes. Looking forward, to respond to concerns from the province of Ontario, ISC will work with partners to clarify roles and responsibilities associated with the communication and dissemination of timely and critical information, in addition to review options for safe and culturally appropriate evacuation facilities.
- A Wildfire Management Agreement was signed with the province in 1991. The agreement has no set termination date and continues to reimburse the province for costs incurred for wildfire suppression services on reserve.
Quebec
Issue Summary
- Discussions with the Government of Quebec (between 2010 and 2019) resulted in an agreement to reimburse the Province of Quebec for response and recovery expenses only (it does not include the other pillars, i.e. prevention-mitigation and emergency preparedness).
- The agreement with Quebec remains fragile as; First Nations and Indigenous organizations were not consulted, the agreement excludes communities that are not considered on-reserve, and it does not consider emergency management in a holistic manner (public health and social crises are not considered).
- The province has asked Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) to commit to updating the list of communities eligible for the EMAP. The interpretation of the eligibility of communities for EMAP will need to be clarified within ISC.
Key Messages
- Discussions with representatives of the Government of Quebec will be necessary in order to encourage the recognition of First Nations as partners in emergency management in Quebec, notably within multilateral agreements.
- Maintaining and growing the capacity of First Nations is a priority of ISC and the Quebec region and, as a result, initiatives are currently in place to support capacity building of Indigenous communities and organizations.
- The region is exploring, with Indigenous partners, possible actions to advance the assumption of emergency management services by them.
Background
Bilateral Agreements
- A five-year service agreement (2019-2023) was signed with the Government of Quebec to provide support to First Nations communities when their capacity to respond is exceeded. The Government of Quebec invoices ISC for expenses incurred by Quebec departments and agencies when a request for assistance to First Nations is referred to them by ISC. No intervention from Quebec has been required since the signing of this agreement. Claims submitted in the past have been for intervention expenses only.
- A five-year agreement was also signed (2017-2022) between the ISC Regional Office and the Canadian Red Cross to reimburse costs associated with disaster services assistance, training and awareness, and was extended until March 31, 2023. Beyond the 2022-23 fiscal year, it is expected that the relationship with the Red Cross will continue with the signing of a new agreement.
- A six-year agreement (2019-2023) was signed with the Societé de protection des forêts contre feu (SOPFEU) to reimburse costs associated with wildland surveillance and suppression services. Work to revise this agreement has begun in the region but with inflation and the current cost of fuel, the funds required to maintain this agreement will need to be increased to better represent actual and future costs. The province and the SOPFEU would like to sign 7-10 year agreements rather than 5-year agreements.
Key Partners
- The Grand Council of the Waban-Aki Nation (GCNWA) provides support to First Nation communities in Quebec before, during and after disasters, in coordination with tribal councils and various levels of government. It works within the four pillars of emergency management: prevention, preparedness, response and recovery in support of local communities. The GCNWA do not have the mandate to speak on behalf of all Quebec First Nations for emergency management, but have taken a keen interest in developing their capacity to support First Nations in the province. As a result, ISC funds 5 Emergency Management Coordinator positions within GCNWA.
- The Assembly of First Nations of Quebec-Labrador (AFNQL) and its commissions hold monthly discussions with the ISC Regional Office. The First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services Commission (FNQLHSSC) have shown an interest in becoming involved in supporting communities in emergency management. Discussions with the AFNQL will have to take place on the tripartite approach to emergency management (First Nations - federal - provincial).
Current Status
Agreements
- The Quebec Regional Office is currently focusing on the renewal of the Quebec, Canadian Red Cross and SOPFEU agreements, in addition to reactivating discussions for a tripartite approach to the implementation of the bilateral agreement with the province. Two of these agreements (SOPFEU and the Government of Quebec) require the Secrétariat du Québec aux relations canadiennes to obtain an order-in-council from the Government of Quebec to authorize the organizations to sign the bilateral agreement.
First Nations Capabilities
- ISC is exploring options to ensure adequate emergency management capacity in First Nations and Indigenous organizations, including funding for dedicated emergency management positions in all EMAP eligible First Nations.
- The Grand Council of the Waban Aki Nation has expressed interest in providing emergency management services to First Nations in Quebec. The Quebec Region has taken the opportunity to support their capacity building with funding provided since 2019.
Atlantic Canada
Issue Summary
- Emergency Management, regional overview and key events for First Nations in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.
Key Messages
- The Atlantic region consists of 33 First Nations with reserve lands, and approximately 50 inhabited communities throughout four Atlantic provinces. The region is susceptible to emergency events that include hurricanes, overland flooding, severe weather events such as ice storms and failures of critical infrastructure.
- ISC Atlantic Emergency Management Assistance program staff engage regularly with regional emergency management partners including the provincial emergency measures organizations and Public Safety Canada. While dialogue is good, there is room for growth including formal multi-lateral agreements to support Indigenous partners being an equal player and decision maker at the table.
- Following Hurricane Fiona, Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) received reports of flooding, erosion, downed trees, damages to infrastructure as a result of winds and power outages. Currently, the department is supporting recovery efforts in affected provinces.
Background
Preparedness
- As of March 2022, 22 of 33 Atlantic First Nations have completed or are working on all-hazard risk assessments. In addition,17 Atlantic First Nations have up-to-date community emergency management plans, and seven additional First Nations are currently completing their plans.
- From April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022, ISC Atlantic invested $2.79 million to support preparedness and non-structural mitigation projects led by First Nations and tribal councils in the Atlantic region.
- Of the $2.79 million invested, $876,308 includes funding for seven full time First Nation capacity positions dedicated to emergency management from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022. These positions are throughout the four provinces and funding for the positions is established in partnership with First Nation and Inuit Health Branch emergency management funding.
- The capacity positions recently led an all-Atlantic First Nation emergency management preparedness workshop with over 100 participants, including representatives from provincial emergency measures organizations and ISC.
Emergency Management Partnerships
- A departmental objective is the establishment of multi-lateral service agreements between ISC, First Nations and Provinces and/or emergency management service providers to ensure inclusion of First Nations as "full and equal partners" at the negotiation and decision making table with respect to emergency management.
- While there are no formal multi-lateral service agreements established in the Atlantic region, regular engagement with key emergency management partners, specifically Provincial Emergency Measures Organizations and Public Safety Canada, occur.
- Currently a bilateral service agreement is renewed annually with the Province of Prince Edward Island until a multilateral agreement is established.
- These engagements are key to preparing for and responding to emergency events impacting the region and First Nations, and the relationship is working well.
- Example of engagements include provinces and Public Safety Canada participating at First Nation preparedness workshops and training, attending after action reviews following an emergency event and bilateral/trilateral meetings on emerging topics and issues.
- ISC Atlantic includes the provinces and Public Safety Canada on all situational awareness messages regarding emergency situations and ISC officials participate on all provincial emergency operations calls.
- In addition, provinces have invited First Nations on operational calls for emergency events such as the recent wildfire in Newfoundland.
Hurricane Fiona
- On September 23, 2022, Hurricane Fiona made landfall near Canso Nova Scotia, bringing high winds and rain in the region, affecting all Atlantic provinces.
- The advance work included activating emergency response plans and pre-storm preparedness measures such as purchasing food and medical supplies as well ensuring flood mitigation plans, generators and communication equipment were operational.
NFLD Wildfire
- In late July 2022, a wildfire in central Newfoundland intermittently cut off highway access to the Miawpukek First Nation, then caused an extended closure from August 3-9.
- On August 6, the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador declared a state of emergency for the area impacted by significant smoke and for communities, including Miawpukek, cut off due to highway closure.
- Throughout the event, ISC and First Nation representatives were fully engaged with the provincial emergency operations centres for situational awareness updates and request for supports such as essential supplies.
- Response work was done in a coordinated manner with all impacted stakeholders, including First Nations, at the table.
- In follow-up to the event, Miawpukek First Nation is proposing to undertake essential work including a firebreak for the community and a review/update to their emergency management and evacuation plan; the province and Public Safety Canada will be part of this work with ISC and the First Nation.
Current Status
- While significant accomplishments have been made in the Atlantic region on emergency preparedness, we recognize there is more work to be done – this includes additional planning, training and additional human capacity to focus on preparing for and responding to emergency events.
- The emergency management capacity positions established in the Atlantic region in fiscal year 2020-2021 are key to emergency preparedness and continue to provide valuable support and resources as they are active full time positions. These dedicated positions coordinate preparedness work and support their member communities during emergency response and through the recovery process. The positions were also fully involved with the COVID-19 pandemic response, coordinating supports during outbreaks that impacted First Nation communities.
- ISC's Atlantic region has been able to support eligible preparedness and non-structural mitigation projects as they are received. With no deadline for proposals, ISC Atlantic can respond to First Nations needs as they are brought forward, allowing flexible planning for First Nations. ISC Atlantic Emergency Management staff have also collaborated with First Nation and Inuit Health Branch programs to support First Nations emergency management projects and capacity positions.
- At this point in time, there are no formal multi-lateral emergency management service agreements in place between ISC, the four Atlantic provinces and First Nations. We recognize this is a gap and are working diligently with stakeholders on a path forward. With the relationships established between the parties, we hope to build on that and formalize multi-lateral services agreements.
- The bilateral service agreement between ISC and Prince Edward Island has been in place for over five years; it is renewed annually and there is a good relationship between the province, ISC and First Nations. Through this relationship, work is underway and negotiations continue on a multi-lateral service agreement to have First Nations at the table as full and equal partners.
- ISC have had initial discussions with one Tribal Council in New Brunswick on a multi-lateral service agreement and work is underway to engage the other two Tribal Councils. Through initial discussions with New Brunswick Emergency Measures Organization, they are supportive of a multi-lateral agreement and currently provides emergency management support to First Nations.
- Discussions of a multi-lateral agreement in Nova Scotia date back to 2013-14 and since COVID-19, discussions have stalled as the focus turned to COVID-19 response. The department is looking to reengage these discussions, particularly since Capacity positions have been established in the two Tribal Councils in Nova Scotia that represent all Frist Nations in the province.
- In Newfoundland and Labrador, no discussions on a multi-lateral service agreement have occurred to date. The provincial stance on the topic is emergency management for on-reserve is a Federal responsibility. Despite this, during the wildland fire in Newfoundland during the summer of 2022, First Nations and ISC work collaboratively with the province as well as neighbouring communities during the response.
High Risk Areas and Flood Insurance
Issue Summary
- Flooding is the most expensive recurring natural hazard in Canada, the cost of which is consistently increasing.
- ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program provides First Nation communities with financial support for preparing for, mitigating, responding to, and recovering from emergency events including floods.
- ISC is working with counterparts at Public Safety Canada to explore initiatives for flood risk reduction such identifying areas at high risk of floods and flood insurance products for residential buildings.
Key Messages
- Many First Nations communities face higher than average flood risk. Some communities face recurring and long term impacts from flooding. Notable examples are Kashechewan First Nation (ON) and Peguis First Nation (MB).
- Indigenous Services Canada continues to work closely with First Nations, provincial partners and community organizations to plan, address and mitigate flooding. First Nations are supported in leading efforts to address their current flooding situations.
- We will continue to work closely with partners to ensure that information is always shared in a timely manner, and proper preventative and mitigation measures are in place so communities are well prepared for floods.
- The Emergency Management Assistance Program will continue to work with First Nation leadership in recovering from flood seasons, expediting support for projects to mitigate future impacts.
- The department supports all on-reserve First Nations communities that experience flooding by reimbursing costs associated with responding to and recovering from the event. If an evacuation of a community and its members is required, all associated costs of the evacuation are supported.
- ISC is working with other government departments, primarily Public Safety Canada, to develop flood risk mitigation strategies for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.
- ISC supports flood mitigation on-reserve by providing funding for flood mapping through the Emergency Management Assistance Program and structural mitigation initiatives through the department's First Nations Infrastructure Fund.
Background
Kashechewan First Nation
- In 2017 the Government of Canada and Kashechewan First Nation signed an agreement to explore options for relocating the community to higher ground. Beginning in 2020, Kashechewan First Nation began an On-The-Land Initiative where community members an estimated 1,400 residents from Kashechewan and 500 from neighbouring Fort Albany self-isolate in their traditional hunting camps for approximately one month.
- Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) approved funding of up to $4.2 million through the Emergency Management Assistance Program to support the purchase of necessary provisions, supplies and equipment for the On-the-Land initiative, as well as for the transportation of residents to and from the hunting camps.
Peguis First Nation
- Peguis First Nation was relocated in 1907 to its current location at the flood-prone Fisher River delta. The community experiences flooding every 3-4 years on average.
- Peguis First Nation experiences recurring flooding and has had long term evacuees since 2011. Despite recurring flooding, the community has no permanent flood mitigation measures and relies on temporary measures such as sandbagging when flooding occurs.
- To support flood mitigation efforts during the 2022 floods, the Government of Canada provided Peguis First Nation with $2.5 million in funding.
Flood Insurance
- In light of the growing threat to the safety of Canadian communities due to climate change and continued urbanization in high-risk flood areas, the Government of Canada is moving forward with a number of measures to help Canadians reduce their financial and physical vulnerability to flooding.
- Public Safety Canada has been mandated to review and advance a flood risk plan for Canada; one of the plan's components includes establishing a national task force to review and develop options for a national affordable flood insurance program and measures for potential relocation. As part of that effort, Public Safety has recently released Adapting to Rising Flood Risk: An Analysis of Insurance Solutions for Canada which outlines options for bringing affordable flood insurance to Canadians.
- To ensure the considerations of First Nations on reserve are included in this work, ISC and the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) co-lead a Steering Committee and a Technical Working Group on First Nations Home Flood Insurance Needs to gain a baseline understanding of flood insurance on-reserve and to capture on reserve needs through First Nation-led engagement.
- The Steering Committee on First Nations Home Flood Insurance Needs will provide an opportunity for First Nation communities to contribute their knowledge and lived experiences in preparing for and responding to flooding.
- Flood insurance can be purchased through insurance providers. Many First Nations communities face such an extreme risk of flooding that insurance firms are unwilling in offer flood insurance on those reserves. Uninsured properties on-reserve that suffer flooding damage are covered under ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program's Response and Recovery funding.
- Residential insurance accessibility is limited on reserve as many insurance firms are hesitant to provide insurance on reserve. Insurance firm hesitation stems from a variety of factors such as lack of risk data/analysis, unclear liability, lack of accredited services on reserve (ex: firefighting), or high costs to insure.
- The cost of flood insurance is often unaffordable in First Nation communities that face a high risk of floods. This reality leaves ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program as the only remaining option for financial compensation for flood damage on-reserve.
Flood Mapping
- ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program provides funding through its Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness funding stream to support flood mapping activities on reserve. Some communities have conducted their own flood mapping project but the results of which are not recorded by ISC.
- Off reserve, flood mapping is largely conducted by provincial governments and its public accessibility varies by province. There is currently no publicly available national flood risk map.
- Public Safety Canada is exploring options of more comprehensive flood mapping to provide a better understanding of flood risk across Canada.
High Risk Areas
- First Nation communities, in aggregate, face some of the highest risk of flooding in the country.
- Due to a lack of available flood mapping data, the extent of flood risk faced by First Nation communities is not clear.
- ISC is working to support Public Safety Canada efforts to create more comprehensive and accurate flood mapping tools to ensure communities, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous, are aware of the risks they face and are able to mitigate those risks.
Current Status
- ISC supports First Nations at risk of flooding by providing funding for both structural and non-structural mitigation strategies and reimburses costs associated with responding to and recovering from active flooding in on-reserve First Nations communities.
- As of August 31st 2022, First Nation communities have experienced 61 flooding events in the 2022 fiscal year. The cost to response and recover from these events totals $65 million.
- Public Safety Canada leads federal government efforts to develop national flood risk mitigation strategies. ISC supports Public Safety in this effort by providing considerations for First Nations specific contexts such as advice for implementing strategies on-reserve.
Service Transfer and Indigenous led Approaches to Emergency Management
Emergency Management Plans and Multilateral Agreements
Issue Summary
- Currently, Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) has eight bilateral agreements with provinces and territories (P/Ts) to deliver emergency management services to on-reserve First Nations.
- As First Nations were not included as signatories in these agreements, ISC is now moving towards establishing multilateral emergency management service agreements to include First Nations as full and equal partners.
- New agreements will ensure First Nations are at the forefront of decision making when it comes to building capacity and resiliency to better equip communities from the effects climate change and increases in emergencies.
Key Messages
- As First Nations are increasingly expressing a desire to be considered as partners in the delivery of emergency management services, the department is actively listening and working to develop new multilateral agreements. The department is also working to build capacity and engaging First Nations on approaches that are aligned with their vision.
- The department is taking steps to develop multilateral service agreements. This includes engaging and initiating conversations with all partners to identify the right tools. New regional strategies are being used to inform a cohesive national approach for the future of emergency management service delivery for all on-reserve First Nations.
- New initiatives, such as the signing of a Trilateral MOU in British Columbia and an innovative Joint Command Governance Model in Ontario, demonstrate the collaborative direction that we are moving towards which supports our service transfer mandate.
- Multilateral agreements will help advance the transfer and control over the development of emergency management services to First Nations and advance reconciliation.
Background
- Eight bilateral agreements have been established across Canada. As some of these agreements are set to expire within the next few years, ISC is using this as an opportunity to transition its approach to move forward with multilateral agreements that include the department, provinces and territories or third parties, and First Nation communities as full and equal partners.
- To ensure the full engagement of First Nation partners, ISC is working to develop regional strategies that take into account each regional context.
- British Columbia has made notable progress towards developing a multilateral agreement by signing a Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding with the First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC) and the province of British Columbia in 2017. This MOU established a process to advance meaningful recognition and enhance capacity in emergency management. This preliminary agreement outlines the ongoing commitment to incorporate Indigenous knowledge, Indigenous decision-making, and gives First Nations the capacity to prevent and respond to emergencies.
- The Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and the First Nations Summit have put forward resolutions requesting approval to develop negotiation models for First Nations' consideration in order for them to engage in negotiation with Canada and British Columbia on the new multilateral agreement.
- The FNLC has agreed to develop a framework agreement to support negotiations, modelled after other frameworks for Health, Education and modern treaties. Work is anticipated to begin in Fall 2022.
- Ontario has also made progress towards the development of a multilateral agreement. In 2022, a Joint Command Governance Model was developed between ISC, Indigenous partners and the province in advance of the wildfire and flood season to streamline the process from when a First Nation makes a request for help to the point of providing a coordinated emergency response.
- As part of this Joint Command, ISC will help fund two First Nation-led proposals, which in turn help build capacity and emergency management models for First Nations to build from when establishing multilateral service agreements.
- In Manitoba, multiple First Nation-led partners that have expressed an interest in leading emergency management for First Nations in their region. Interested partners include, but are not limited to, the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, the Southern Chiefs Organization, Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak Inc., and individual First Nations.
Current Status
- Over the past 3 years, from 2019-20 to 2021-22, $1.37 million was made available to support First Nations-led engagement on emergency management services agreements. This provided an opportunity for First Nation communities to share their views on emergency management and articulate their vision for the future, however many of these engagements and discussions were put on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Now that the country is learning and adapting from the COVID-19 pandemic, a renewed approach is being sought between ISC and its partners to discuss multilateral service agreements particularly with one that integrates health emergency preparedness and preparing/adapting to climate change impacts.
British Columbia
- There is a 10-year wildfire management agreement and bilateral service agreement between the province of British Columbia and Indigenous Services Canada. These agreements are expected to expire in 2026 and 2027, respectively.
- In British Columbia, the Tsilhqot'in National Government (TNG), ISC, and the province developed the Tsilhqot'in Collaborative Agreement on Emergency Management in 2018, and renewed it in 2022 for 5 years. This agreement builds the capacity of TNG communities in emergency management.
- The First Nation Emergency Services Society (FNESS) in British Columbia is aiming to develop a Regional Action Plan by March 2023, which will outline the direction many First Nations would like to take on emergency management (e.g., governance models, funding models, capacity needs). This will pave the way for the development of a multilateral agreement in the province.
- Work will begin this Fall between ISC, the First Nations Leadership Council and the province in developing a new tripartite framework which will support negotiations for the agreement.
Ontario
- There is a ten-year bilateral emergency management service agreement between Indigenous Services Canada and the Government of Ontario.
- There is Wildfire Management Agreement between the province and Indigenous Services Canada that provides funds for the province's first responder and wildfire suppression role on-reserve. This agreement was signed in 1991 between Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. It covers the annual recovery basis amount for wildfire suppression costs.
- In 2022, the Ontario Regional Office introduced a Joint Command governance model, with First Nation partners, Ontario and ISC. As part of the model, ISC will help fund First Nation-led proposals by the Independent First Nations Alliance and Missanabie Cree First Nation. These initiatives will help build capacity and emergency management models for First Nations.
- ISC and Ontario participated in an August 2022 Partners Workshop to discuss enhancements to communication protocols and a path toward a multilateral service agreement.
- This Fall, ISC will collect the lessons learned/key takeaways from the First Nation-led approaches to emergency management service delivery to help inform negotiations towards multilateral agreements.
- ISC drafted a letter to First Nation partners in Ontario inviting them to discuss a regional strategy for multilateral service agreements. The letter outlines a phased approach that includes engagement with First Nation partners, the provincial government, and other service delivery partners.
Manitoba
- ISC has a five-year bilateral service agreement with the Canadian Red Cross that will expire in March 2023.
- The Wildfire Management Agreement between the province of Manitoba and ISC allocates $5.6M to the province annually. Any amount over the base allocation is funded via the Response and Recovery program through the Emergency Management Assistance Program.
- There are ongoing discussions on developing a hybrid multilateral service agreement that expands the roles and responsibilities of First Nation partners, while maintaining the Canadian Red Cross as a primary partner for providing emergency services to First Nation communities until a full transition to a First Nation-led emergency management model is complete.
Yukon Territory
- There is seven-year bilateral agreement between the Government of Yukon and Indigenous Services Canada that is set to expire in March 2023.
- There is no wildfire agreement in place with the Government of Yukon.
Northwest Territories
- There is a five-year bilateral agreement between the Government of the Northwest Territories and Indigenous Services Canada for emergency preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation that was signed on February 10, 2016. The bilateral agreement has been renewed yearly maintaining the status quo.
- There is no wildfire management agreement with the Northwest Territories.
Alberta
- There is a ten-year bilateral agreement between the Alberta Emergency Management Agency and Indigenous Services Canada that was signed in 2014.
- There is a ten-year wildfire management agreement that was signed in 2015 with Alberta's Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry which expires in March 2025.
Saskatchewan
- There is no bilateral service agreement in Saskatchewan however, Indigenous Services Canada have a Letter of Understanding for on-reserve EM services.
- There is a 1993 wildfire management agreement with the Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency for 50-50 cost sharing between ISC and the province to fund fire suppression.
Quebec
- There is a five-year bilateral service agreement between Indigenous Services Canada and the Province of Quebec that was signed on March 20, 2019.
- There is a four-year bilateral wildfire management agreement between Indigenous Services Canada and the Societe de Protection des Forets under which it agreed to reimburse the latter for costs associated with emergency management and forest firefighting services. This agreement was signed by Indigenous Services Canada and the Societe de Protection des Forets in January 2019. It is in effect from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023.
Prince Edward Island
- There is a five-year bilateral agreement in place between the Government of Prince Edward Island and Indigenous Services Canada that is set to expire in March 2023.
- There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs.
New Brunswick
- There is no bilateral nor wildfire management agreement in place in the province of New Brunswick.
- There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs.
Nova Scotia
- There is no bilateral nor wildfire management agreement in place in the province of Nova Scotia.
- There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs.
Newfoundland and Labrador
- There is no bilateral nor wildfire management agreement in place in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
- There is a perpetual allocation of $10,000 a year to the province for wildfire suppression costs.
Nunavut
- There is no signed service agreement Nunavut as there are no First Nation reserves in the territory.
Forward Planning and EMAP Evolution
Issue Summary
- Since the inception of the Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) in 2014, which created a single-window approach for First Nations on-reserve to access emergency management supports, the emergency management landscape has evolved and become more complex.
- Climate change has increased the frequency and severity of emergencies, and First Nation partners are increasingly looking for autonomy in program development and delivery, and to be considered as partners in governance and decision making tables.
- Additionally, the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) indicated that emergency management service agreements and wildfire agreements should include all First Nations.
- As a result, an emergency management transformation is needed to better meet the needs of First Nations and provide communities and organizations with the necessary supports to exercise self-determination and self-governance. EMAP is looking at meeting these challenges through creating more financial flexibility, specifically when dealing with mitigation and preparedness measures, moving forward.
Key Messages
- ISC is committed to developing a nation-to-nation relationship with First Nation partners, who are increasingly expressing a desire to be more involved in the development and delivery of emergency management services.
- The OAG has indicated that First Nations should be included in the establishment and implementation of service agreements.
- The department is actively working to develop new multilateral emergency management service agreements in each region with First Nation partners to create full and equal partnerships.
- Engaging Indigenous leaders, and implementing adaptation measures and new or innovative approaches is key to reducing impacts and increasing resiliency in communities. The Government will continue to work with communities to use their local knowledge.
- The Government is committed to enhancing First Nations community capacity and preparing for emergency events, especially in the context of climate change. It plans to do this through increasing financial flexibility, increasing access to funding for First Nation communities, and the freedom to use the funds in a manner best suited to their community.
- Following recommendations in the OAG Report, the department has put forward plans to update EMAP to allow for more proactive funding measures and increasing the program's ability to adapt to needs identified by First Nations. The department aims to make the program more flexible in order to better align with a true all-hazards approach to emergency management.
Background
- Since April 1, 2014, the Department has been providing emergency management services under four pillars – mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery – to on-reserve First Nation communities through the EMAP. Services were traditionally governed by emergency management service agreements between the Government of Canada and the provinces and territories.
- Budget 2019 provided $201 million over five years, starting in 2019-20, with $49.4 million per year ongoing to support increased resiliency and emergency management on-reserve, including health emergencies. This led to the establishment of key program streams, such as the implementation of Emergency Management Coordinators in on-reserve First Nation communities and the establishment of the FireSmart program.
- In April 2019, ISC signed a Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding on Emergency Management Services with the First Nation Leadership Council (FNLC) and the Province of British Columbia. This established a foundation with First Nation partners to create a relationship based on full and equal partnership and begins a shift from bilateral service agreements between ISC and the provinces and territories to establishing agreements with the full inclusion of First Nation partners.
- Further program evolution occurred in 2021 where EMAP's Treasury Board Submission served as a vehicle to permanently include health emergencies under the program to support a more holistic approach to emergency management response and recovery. Building on this success, ISC is now exploring forward looking program changes that could broaden the scope of EMAP and lead to improved service delivery in on-reserve First Nation communities.
Current Status
- ISC is developing a strategic path forward to develop a consistent approach to developing multilateral service agreements, focusing on financial flexibility, with First Nation partners and provincial and territorial counterparts. These plans are being informed through engagement with Regional Office colleagues and First Nation partners.
- ISC will build on 2019 investments and continue to target funding opportunities to expand EMAP and the department's ability to provide more timely, and higher-quality services to First Nation on-reserve communities.
- ISC will continue to engage First Nation partners and other partners on how to expand and enhance the EMAP program to better meet the needs of First Nation communities, and create an environment of First Nation-led service delivery.
Emergency Management Deck
Purpose
- Provide an overview of ISC's national role in emergency management and detail the department's Emergency Management Assistance Program.
- Outline departmental efforts to advance multilateral agreements with a focus on BC and Ontario.
- Describe emergency management in BC, outline key partners and their roles, and detail priority actions.
- Identify existing challenges and pressures as well as critical next steps.
ISC's National Role in Emergency Management
The department provides direct funding to First Nations communities through EMAP to strengthen resiliency, prepare for hazards and respond to them using the four pillars of emergency management: Mitigation; Preparedness; Response; and Recovery.
Emergency Management Assistance Program
EMAP helps communities on reserve access emergency assistance services, including health emergencies. The program also provides funding to provinces, territories and non-government organizations to support on-reserve emergency management.
ISC partner programs within emergency management:
- First Nations & Inuit Health Branch: Health EM provides funding support for health emergency preparedness, capacity building and knowledge mobilization.
- Indigenous Community Support Fund: The "single window" funding approach that provided more than $1.8B to Indigenous leadership and organizations to prevent, prepare and respond to COVID-19.
- First Nation Infrastructure Fund (FNIF): Strategic investments in critical and permanent infrastructure support on-reserve communities by modifying hazards and making the design and construction of assets more resilient.
- Structural Fire Protection: core capital funding to First Nations on an annual basis that can be used for fire protection services as well as fire insurance.
Co-Chairs of Cabinet Committee on Safety, Security and Emergencies
"You will exercise leadership and coordinate efforts to strengthen emergency management in Canada, ensuring a strategic, integrated and proactive approach across all hazards, including public health emergencies."
"Work with First Nations and provincial and territorial government partners to strengthen the governance and service delivery for First Nations emergency preparedness, management and recovery."
Federal Emergency Management Alignment
ISC is aligned and coordinated to provide holistic, all-hazard emergency management services, while simultaneously building capacity in First Nations communities for the eventual transfer of services to self-determining First Nation-led organizations.
Public Safety Canada
Federal Emergency Response Plan (FERP), Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements (DFAA), FPT Emergency Management Action Plan, Task Force on Flood Insurance and Relocation
Privy Council of Canada
New Role for the Minister of Emergency Prepardness Strengthening Horizontal Coordination on Federal Activities Coordination. New EM FPTI apporaches
Natural Resources Canada
Wildland Fire Budget 2022, Flood Risk Mapping & Flood Portal
Transport Canada
Supply Chain and Critical Infrastructure Reliability, Travel-Related Considerations to EM System
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Strategic Assessment of Climate Change, National Adaptation Strategy, Indigenous Gardians
Employment and Social Development Canada
Social Support during Emergency Events
Infrastructure Canada
Climate Resilient Infrastructure Investments, Lead for Broader Infrastructure Approach
Health Portfolio
Mental Wellness Lead, Strategic Stockpiles and Health Surveillance
Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP)
EMAP increasingly provides opportunities for collaboration and the transfer of responsibilities, and helps facilitate First Nation control over the development and delivery of services.
Activities designed to address the short-term effects of an emergency and reduce loss and suffering
Activities to restore physical, social and economic activities to pre-event levels or better
Readiness measures to enable effective response to and recovery from an emergency or minimize impacts of an emergency
Activities to specifically mitigate against wildland fire and aid in forest fire suppression preparedness
Fiscal year | Response | Recovery | Non-structural preparedness and mitigation | FireSmart and forest fire suppression | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005-2006 | $11,381,919 | $4,666,942 | $8,064,114 | $7,431,105 | $31,544,080 |
2006-2007 | $25,014,763 | $7,100,593 | $2,367,947 | $12,770,459 | $47,253,762 |
2007-2008 | $671,301 | $0 | $3,309,756 | $14,883,816 | $18,864,873 |
2008-2009 | $9,780,601 | $1,070,894 | $2,988,723 | $15,082,335 | $28,922,553 |
2009-2010 | $3,469,490 | $1,818,106 | $3,300,949 | $17,940,411 | $26,528,956 |
2010-2011 | $13,047,313 | $4,801,186 | $6,270,132 | $17,947,307 | $42,065,938 |
2011-2012 | $95,480,615 | $29,050,660 | $20,576,544 | $15,968,126 | $161,075,945 |
2012-2013 | $18,394,292 | $14,447,769 | $7,244,948 | $16,210,258 | $56,297,267 |
2013-2014 | $36,577,662 | $15,164,072 | $5,887,725 | $19,262,210 | $76,891,669 |
2014-2015 | $51,475,055 | $30,886,943 | $6,697,288 | $16,239,924 | $105,299,210 |
2015-2016 | $39,489,275 | $34,958,649 | $9,790,614 | $27,718,780 | $111,957,318 |
2016-2017 | $49,785,960 | $32,314,729 | $12,338,712 | $21,247,299 | $115,686,700 |
2017-2018 | $75,000,212 | $27,554,603 | $16,712,499 | $17,596,345 | $136,863,659 |
2018-2019 | $58,506,497 | $63,921,380 | $25,325,220 | $11,706,262 | $159,459,359 |
2019-2020 | $108,042,465 | $71,610,646 | $19,259,746 | $6,394,187 | $205,307,044 |
2020-2021 | $31,125,329 | $38,328,816 | $16,279,578 | $9,276,447 | $95,010,170 |
2021-2022 | $78,011,127 | $76,477,437 | $17,532,809 | $10,128,048 | $182,149,421 |
Supporting Resiliency
Total over 5 years: $169 million (ISC) + $48 million (Fire Smart/Public Safety)
- $1.37 million over 3 years: Collaboration & Governance
- to engage FNs across CA in development of trilateral emergency management service agreements
- $43.63 million: Capacity Building
- For funding dedicated to EM notional positions in FNs (planning, training, response).
- $69 million over 5 years: Prevention, Mitigation and Preparedness
- Over 5 years for projects for preparedness & non-structural mitigation (e.g. training, planning, & exercises, etc.)
- $48 million over 4 years: Infrastructure/structural mitigation
- In new costs over 5 years to support structural mitigation projects.
- $48 million over 5 years: FireSmart
- for work over 5 years to prevent and prepare against wildland fires (e.g. fire mapping, training, fuel reduction, etc.)
- $7.2 million: 11 FTEs
- For salaries and O&M for surge capacity & to increase ISC's capacity to deliver EM services related to natural disaster emergencies
Advancing Multilateral Emergency Management Agreements
ISC is moving towards the co-development of multilateral EM service agreements to enable First Nations to take a larger role in EM. Through a more holistic approach, Canada and First Nations can better manage risks at the local level and strengthen collective resilience.
- PTs are responsible for operating EM programs and ISC works with PTs for the provision of EM services on reserve.
- ISC coordinates EM service agreements among First Nations, PTs and NGOs (e.g., CRC) which vary in scope, but ultimately ensure that First Nations are integrated into PT systems.
- ISC is now identifying next steps in developing regional strategies to reach multilateral agreements. Strategies will support a national plan for the future of EM service delivery.
- COVID-19 placed a pause on the momentum to reach multilateral agreements, but provided a new perspective on EM.
- Multilateral progress made in BC and ON and new investments support First Nation-led service delivery and capacity.
- Minister Blair to chair Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources & Forestry EM meeting in Nov. (Min.Hajdu TBD).
- PSC is leading preparations to ensure representation from NIOs. ISC is supporting and working with key partners to assess whether invitations will be extended to Regional Chiefs, other First Nations, and local partners and experts.
Yukon: Working to establish MOU with FNs by March 2023
Northwest Territories: FNs expressed satisfaction with the current agreement
British Columbia: Tripartite MOU signed in 2019 with FNLC and work underway to develop action plan and negation positions; 2018 CEMA with Tsilhqot'in government
Alberta: More discussions with FN partners are needed to determine best approach
Saskatchewan: TCs and FNs moving forward to develop collaborative agreements to support EM planning
Manitoba: AMC determining way forward for FN partners to take on EM services
Ontario: Moving ahead with FN-led EM service delivery projects in 2022 and progress towards multilateral approach
Quebec: more discussions with FN partners are needed to determine best approach
Atlantic: multilateral agreements discussion with two FN communities in PEI; more discussions with FN partners in other provinces needed to determine best approach
Emergency Management in BC
First Nations Emergency Management
- BC has three Indigenous Representative Organizations (BC Assembly of First Nations, First Nations Summit, and the Union of BC Indian Chiefs) who come together to work on common interests as the First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC).
- There are 203 First Nations in BC, the majority of whom have never signed treaties with the Crown. As the rights and title holders, these First Nations must be consulted individually by Canada. They are not represented by the political organizations, tribal councils or the FNLC.
- In BC, the EM service agreement is with Emergency Management British Columbia (EMBC).
- Upon signing in 2017, BC First Nations objected under the principle of "nothing about us without us". As a result, following resolutions to negotiate from the three political assemblies, ISC, EMBC and the FNLC negotiated a Tripartite MOU on EM Services that was signed on April 27, 2019. The intent of the MOU is to ensure that First Nations are included as full partners in both the governance and operations of emergency management on-reserve. As a next step, Canada and BC have declared their desire to negotiate a new service agreement that includes First Nations.
- Through EMBC, ISC reimburses eligible response and recovery costs. In addition, EMAP supports First Nation partners in their efforts to increase community-based capacity and disaster resilience through mitigation and preparedness activities.
- ISC also has a service agreement with BC Wildfire Service to provide wildfire suppression support on reserve.
First Nations' Emergency Services Society (FNESS)
- With funding from ISC, FNESS delivers the FireSmart programming to BC First Nations communities.
- FireSmart builds skills in First Nations communities to prevent and prepare against wildland fires.
- FNESS is a key provider of EM services to First Nations communities.
- FNESS works closely with First Nations communities, EMBC, ISC, to support First Nations EM initiatives.
- FNESS evolved from the Society of Native Indian Fire Fighters of BC (est. 1986). Initial objectives were to help reduce the number of fire-related deaths on reserve, but changed emphasis to incorporate a greater spectrum of EM services. In 1994, the Society of Native Indian Fire Fighters of BC changed its name to FNESS to reflect its growing diversity of services provided.
- In BC, First Nations increasingly link EM to broader issues, including climate change and land use stewardship. First Nations and their political organizations are seeking to advance self determination and inherent jurisdiction within the context of EM.
- FNESS works closely with communities, EMBC, ISC and stakeholders, to support the implementation of EM activities with First Nations communities. FNESS supports First Nations in developing and sustaining safer and healthier communities and delivers EM focused programs and services.
- FNESS delivers approximately $2,364,678.67 per year under the Fire Smart program on behalf of ISC. In 2022-2023, ISC provided over $11M to FNESS to support their work in all four pillars of emergency management. This includes: $2.7M for community fire services; $2.6M for forest fuel management; and $5.8M to support emergency planning, preparedness, response and recovery.
- The Province also recently provided a grant of $10M to support First Nation emergency response.
- FNLC has expressed their support for the FNESS and the need for increased capacity and funding. ISC is currently engaged with the FNLIC and the Province on implementing the current EM Services MOU and establishing a new trilateral relationship.
- FNESS is currently engaging with First Nations to determine the best governance structure to ensure that it represents all BC First Nations.
After action reports and priority actions
2017
- Canada-BC sign Bilateral Service Agreement
- Worst Wildfire season on record
- BC Commissions independent review co-chaired by George Abbott and Chief Maureen Chapman
- Tsilhqot'in National Government (TNG) report - The Fires Awakened Us
2018
- Wildfire season surpasses 2017 as worst on record
- BC Releases after action report – Addressing the New Normal outlining 108 Federal and Provincial Actions
- INAN Committee releases From the Ashes (PDF) report outlining 11 recommendations
- TNG Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement (CEMA)
- Trail By Fire: Nadleh Whut'en and the Shovel Lake Fire Report
- TahltanStrong: Alkali Lake Fire 2018 Report
2019
- Canada-BC-FNLC enter into a tripartite Emergency Management MOU
- Canada commits to advancing the United Nations Sendai Framework for Disaster Reduction in Section F of Emergency Management MOU
2020
- COVID-19 – First Nations prevent, protect and respond with Indigenous Community Support Funding
- Canada commits to develop a National Adaptation Strategy
2021
- Unprecedented Wildfire and Atmospheric River Events
- Creation of Committee of British Columbia and Federal Ministers on Disaster Response and Climate Resilience
- BC First Nations Climate Change Action Plan including urgent calls for emergency management action
- TNG COVID-19 report
2022
- TNG Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement (CEMA) renewed, signed in May 2022
- Canada-BC express their intent to open discussions and negotiations regarding the Bi-lateral Agreement and include First Nations in a new relationship within the four pillars of EM
- UBCIC and FNS put forward resolutions for the FNLC to engage with First Nations to provide possible negotiation models to be considered in order for First Nations to engage in negotiation with Canada-BC on the new trilateral agreement.
Ontario First Nation-led Emergency Management
ISC is working with three First Nation partners and the province on proposals for increased First Nation-led emergency management services, serving as a spring board for a new multilateral agreement.
Joint Command Governance Model
When there is an emergency event in a first nation community, a request for help goes to a no wrong door approach. The request can go to IFNA, emergency services, emergency management coordinators, (tribal councils), Indigenous Services Canada duty officer, provincial emergency operation center, Missanabie Cree First Nation/ISN Maskwa duty officer, or the "stronger together" team. These groups come together in a joint command call to do a risk assessment, decision making and approval process. This call includes various levels such as federal, Ontario/provincial and Indigenous partners. As required, and at the request of the chief, other partners can be notified, including Indigenous partners, other First Nations leadership, host communities, health and social service providers, NGOs, provinces, and other federal departments. All partners that are notified then work together to produce a response to the emergency event.
Challenges/Pressures
Next Steps
- Partner with First Nations, regional, national and federal governments to review and reflect on lessons learned, leverage EMAP programming, consider all aspects of EM in the planning and preparedness process, and align efforts to promote Indigenous led initiatives.
- Ongoing involvement and engagement of Indigenous partners to ensure their inclusion in FPTI forums and as full and equal partners in emergency management on reserve (e.g., advancement of multilateral agreements). Local knowledge and expertise must be better integrated in emergency planning and risk assessment.
- Further capacity building, EMAP programming and financial coordination to continue discussions and coordination of investments and authorities needed.
Annex 1: British Columbia - Pathway to a New Tripartite Relationship
The current phase of emergency management partnerships in BC centres around first nations. Nations currently have bilateral service agreements with Canada and BC, FNHA and EMBC have a letter of understanding, FNLC, Canada, and EMBC have a tripartite memorandum of understanding, First Nations and EMBC have regional partnership tables, and TNG, Canada, EMBC have a collaborative EM agreement.
The current tripartite memorandum of understanding between FNLC, Canada, and BC has a governance and structure consisting of political level engagement with minister and FNLC executives, senior official level engagement with senior officials and FNLC staff, technical level engagement with technical working group developing a working plan, a province wide forum, and the First Nation Emergency Services Society (FNESS).
The in-progress nation-based collaborative EM agreements, include TNG, Canada, and BC; IRNE, Canada, and BC; NTC, CANADA, and, BC; and SHC, Canada and BC, with future agreements with other nations being developed.
The First Nations in BC will define a new paradigm for emergency management, beginning with the First Nation regional action plan that will be supported by the current tripartite memorandum of understanding.
The continuing pathway to a new tripartite relationship will be supported by FNHA and EMBC in the letter of understanding, First Nations and EMBC's regional partnership tables, and nation-based collaborative EM agreements between first nations, Canada and British Columbia. This will be codeveloped and supported by instruments, such as the UN declaration of the rights of Indigenous peoples, all of which will lead to new partnerships with British Columbia's first nations, Canada and the province of British Columbia.
This work is affected by provincial legislation impacting emergency management, such as the Declaration Act action plan, which is currently being drafted; the Emergency Program Act, which is currently being engaged upon; the Forest and Range Practices Act, which is being debated, and the Environment Assessment Act, which has been passed.
The current state in British Columbia's emergency management is emergency management partnerships with Canada and British Columbia that have a bilateral service agreement and the tripartite memorandum of understanding between Canada, BC, and the FNLC. Currently, the First Nations Emergency Services Society has an annual proposal based funding model. The nation-based collaborative emergency management agreements have an annual proposal based on the model for tables to discuss Nation-specific emergency management issues and concerns. The nation-based emergency management coordinators are 12 position supporting 110 First Nation communities. The United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples currently have the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (UNDRIPA), plus the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA).
British Columbia is moving towards a new partnership with BC First Nations, Canada, and the province of British Columbia. The First Nations Emergency Services Society will have ongoing stable resources to support BC First Nations. The nation-based collaborative emergency management agreements will have ongoing stable resources to support nation priorities. The nation-based emergency management coordinators will have increased capacity to support 203 First Nation communities. The United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples will have changes to federal departments and legislation impacting emergency management, while DRIPA will have changes to provincial ministries and legislation impacting emergency management.
Pathway To A New Multilateral Relationship In Ontario for Emergency Management
Current Status
ISC-ON Bilateral Service Agreement:
- 10-year bilateral agreement between ISC and the Ontario Ministry of the Solicitor General
- Review underway, expires 2028
- Not fully inclusive of First Nation partners
Step 1: Spring 2022
Bolster FN EM Leadership:
- Formalize Joint Command approach to include Indigenous partner leads
- Fund First Nation-led projects for 2022 season
- Build capacity with Indigenous partners
Step 2: Summer-Fall 2022
Identify Partners:
- Identify additional First Nation partners
- Establish objectives of future discussions and negotiations
- First Nations, ISC, and Ontario engage and secure their respective mandates
Step 3: Present
Engage on New EM Paradigm:
- Engage through Chiefs of Ontario
- Provide engagement supports if needed
- Set scope and parameters
- Identify shared vision and areas for improvement
- Build on lessons learned, 2022 projects
Step 4: March 2023
Multilateral MOUs:
- Establish process and governance for negotiations
- Mechanisms to advance discussions (e.g. technical working group)
- Ratification by ISC, province, and First Nations
Step 5: Spring 2023
Co-develop New Paradigm:
- Solidify governance model, roles and relationship
- Detail specific program functions and activities to be transferred
- Determine funding, evaluation and reporting
Step 6: Spring-Summer 2023
Authority to Sign New Agreements:
- First Nations, ISC, and Ontario acquire their respective authority for signature
- Signatures from ISC HQ and Region, Ontario, and First Nation partners
Step 7: Fall 2023
Multilateral Service Agreements:
- Implement longstanding multilateral EM service agreement(s)
- May require multiple agreements with different First Nation partners
- Set the foundation for service transfer
Objectives of a Multilateral Approach
- Inclusive of First Nations as full and equal partners
- Supports the right to self-determination
- Full inclusion in decision-making and implementation mechanisms
- Foundation for ISC service transfer mandate
Emergency Management Mechanisms
- Provincial Emergency Operations Centre
- First Nation Emergency Management Operations and Ontario regional partnerships
- ISC Emergency Management Assistance Program funding streams
Indigenous Partner Leads
- Independent First Nations Alliance
- Missanabie Cree/ISN Maskwa
- Mushkegowuk Council & partners; Tribal Councils
- Indigenous Representative Organizations NAN, COO, AN, GCT3, AIAI, Independents
Annex 2: Ontario First Nations-led Emergency Management
Joint Command Governance Model
When there is an emergency event in a first nation community, a request for help goes to a no wrong door approach. The request can go to IFNA, emergency services, emergency management coordinators, (tribal councils), Indigenous Services Canada duty officer, provincial emergency operation center, Missanabie Cree First Nation/ISN Maskwa duty officer, or the "stronger together" team. These groups come together in a joint command call to do a risk assessment, decision making and approval process. This call includes various levels such as federal, Ontario/provincial and Indigenous partners. As required, and at the request of the chief, other partners can be notified, including Indigenous partners, other First Nations leadership, host communities, health and social service providers, NGOs, provinces, and other federal departments. All partners that are notified then work together to produce a response to the emergency event.
Indigenous Partner Leads for 2022 season
A) Independent First Nations Alliance (IFNA) (Sioux Lookout)
- Indigenous-led Emergency Operations Centre to Service IFNA's 5 member communities.
- Services include:
- shelter in place capacity
- incident command on site
- deployable incident management team
- coordination of evacuation services
- operations centre at host side
- return to community
B) Missanabie Cree / ISN Maskwa (Sault Ste. Marie)
- Indigenous-led Emergency operations centre out of Sault Ste. Marie.
- 24/7 call centre and supporting database/software application.
- Expansion of Island View camp (on reserve) to host evacuees in hard side units.
- Support wellness and encourage traditional activities (E.G., smudging, fishing, hunting).
- Working with nearby First Nations to support enhanced ability to host evacuees and safeguard evacuated communities.
C) Mushkegowuk Council
- Fund two emergency management coordinators.
- Can support any First Nation within their purview, and can support other First Nations when requested.
- Ensure that First Nation community members have 24/7 access to emergency services.
- First Nations under Mushkegowuk Tribal Council: Attawapiskat, Chapleau Cree, Fort Albany, Kaschechewan, Missianbie Cree, Moose Cree, Taykwa Tagamou, Weenusk.
Annex 3: Service Agreements in each Province and Territory
Alberta
10-year bilateral agreement signed in 2014 between the Alberta Emergency Management Agency and Indigenous Services Canada
British Columbia
- 10-year bilateral agreement signed in 2017 with the Government of British Columbia
- Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2019 between the Government of British Columbia, the First Nation Leadership Council and Indigenous Services Canada
- A Collaborative Emergency Management Agreement was signed in 2018 between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and Indigenous Sberrvicietsicsahnacdaolumbia
Manitoba
5-year bilateral service agreement signed in 2017 between the Canadian Red Cross and Indigenous Services Canada, renewed on an ongoing basis
N.W.T.
Bilateral agreement signed in 2015 between the Government of the Northwest Territories and Indigenous Services Canada
Ontario
10-year bilateral agreement signed in 2018 between the Government of Ontario and Indigenous Services Canada
P.E.I.
5-year bilateral agreement signed in 2015 between the Government of Prince Edward Island and Indigenous Services Canada, renewed on an ongoing basis
Quebec
- 5-year bilateral agreement signed in 2019 between the Government of Quebec and Indigenous Services Canada
- 5-year bilateral agreement signed in 2017 between the Canadian Red Cross and Indigenous Services Canada for preparedness and training
Yukon
- 7-year bilateral agreement signed in 2016 between the Government of Yukon and Indigenous Services Canada
There are no signed service agreements in:
- Newfoundland & Labrador
- Nova Scotia
- New Brunswick
- Saskatchewan
- Nunavut (as there are no First Nation reserves in the territory)
Annex 4: Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness
Number of projects funded
2014-2015: (16 Projects)
2019-2020: (150 Projects)
$69M over 5 years
- The Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness stream supports small-scale projects that help communities prepare for emergencies and reduce their impacts, including:
- Developing and testing emergency management plans;
- All hazard risk identification and vulnerability assessments;
- Wildfire prevention and preparedness.
- Projects aim to reduce risk by enhancing First Nations knowledge, capacity and skills.
- Funding proposals for the program have increased considerably over the last five years due to increased visibility of this EMAP component and increased awareness of the benefits of mitigation measures.
Annex 5: FireSmart Program
$47.7M over 5 years
- The FireSmart program builds skills in First Nations communities to prevent and prepare against wildland fires.
- Programming involves training First Nations teams in wildfire suppression duties, as well as fuel management and vegetation clearing, which reduces the intensity and spread of wildfires.
- FireSmart also leverages Indigenous knowledge of the local environment and terrain to improve emergency planning, preparation and response to wildfires.
Annex 6: Capacity Enhancement Program
$43.6M over 5 years
- The Capacity Enhancement Program supports community disaster resilience by providing funding for First Nations to hire emergency management coordinators.
- EMAP is currently working with partners to identify priorities and specific requirements for the Emergency Management coordinators over the next 5 years.
Total nominal positions funded of Emergency Management coordinators in each province/territory:
- Yukon: 1
- Northwest Territories: 1
- British Columbia: 13
- Alberta: 10
- Saskatchewan: 15
- Manitoba: 22
- Ontario: 21
- Quebec: 6
- Atlantic provinces: 7
Annex 7: Response and Recovery Program
Pikangikum Evacuation (May 2019)
Approx. $100 million per year
- The Response and Recovery funding stream aims to:
- Address the gap between the much higher likelihood of evacuation on reserve compared to off reserve;
- Minimize the impacts on First Nations during evacuations;
- Return First Nations to their communities as quickly as is safe to do so;
- Build back better these communities to enhance community resilience.
- The program reimburses the cost of response and recovery activities due to emergencies, to help ensure the health, well-being and safety of First Nation residents and protect and restore their community assets.
If pressed
COVID-19 Specific Funding - Indigenous Community Support Fund
Issue Summary
- The Government of Canada recognizes that First Nation, Inuit and Métis Peoples are among the most at risk and face unique challenges in addressing COVID-19. During the COVID-19 crisis, the health and wellbeing of First Nation, Inuit and Métis, including those living in urban areas and off reserve, has been and will remain Indigenous Services Canada's (ISC) primary focus.
- The COVID-19 pandemic response in Canada has entered a transitionary phase, with jurisdictions easing restrictions, and the focus moving towards recovery. However, risks associated with COVID-19 remain, especially when considering the possibility of new Variants of Concern.
- It is within this evolving landscape, the need to balance a transition towards recovery while remaining flexible and diligent towards emerging and residual risks, that the Indigenous Community Support Fund advances into 2022-23. In close collaboration with First Nations, Inuit and the Métis Nation, the Minister continues to deliver distinctions-based support in response to COVID-19.
Key Messages
- The Indigenous Community Support Fund was established as a no wrong-door approach to provide direct funding to Indigenous leadership and organizations to ensure Indigenous leadership and organizations have the flexibility required to design and implement community-based solutions to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the spread of COVID-19 in their communities.
- Since March 2020, more than $2 billion has been allocated to the Indigenous Community Support Fund.
- The Government of Canada continues to provide support to Indigenous communities as they face ongoing challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic as we transition to the wind-down of COVID-19-related funding.
- Funding has been disbursed via a combination of direct allocations, which provide flexibility to partners to identify and support their own priorities, and a needs-based process, to ensure continued access to funding for urgent needs.
- Budget 2022 invested an additional $190.5 million in 2022-23 to the Indigenous Community Support Fund. An additional $50 million in funding was announced on August 2, 2022, bringing the Government of Canada's total investment to the Indigenous Community Support Fund in 2022-23 to $240.5 million.
- Budget 2022 funding will be similarly implemented using a combination of direct allocations and needs-based funding processes.
Background
- The Indigenous Community Support Fund was introduced in March 2020 to provide funding to Indigenous communities and organizations to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, and has been playing a supporting role to the First Nations Inuit and Health Branch-led pandemic response, dedicating financial resources to cover eligible expenses that First Nations Inuit and Health Branch does not assume. Since March 2020, the Government of Canada has allocated more than $2 billion to Indigenous Community Support Fund.
- The Indigenous Community Support Fund is delivered via the program authorities of three existing programs: the Emergency Management Assistance Program and the Capital Facilities and Maintenance Program for First Nations on reserve, while funding to support off-reserve Indigenous organizations and communities, Inuit and Métis, Self-Governing and Modern Treaty Nations are allocated via the Urban Programming for Indigenous People. The temporary amendments to the Emergency Management Assistance Program and the Urban Programming for Indigenous People terms and conditions remain valid until March 31, 2023.
- The Indigenous Community Support Fund has utilized a combination of three delivery models to allocate funds to eligible recipients: direct allocations to First Nations, Inuit and the Métis Nation utilizing a funding formula methodology; a proposal needs-based approach for all distinctions-based groups; and, contingency funding allocations to respond rapidly to acute pressures, such as outbreaks. Commonly funded activities include: perimeter security, the purchase of personal protective equipment, measures to address food insecurity, incremental staff costs, mental wellness, cultural, and seniors supports, and preparedness measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
- Budget 2022 announced an additional $190.5 million in funding for the Indigenous Community Support Fund to continue to support Indigenous communities and organizations in their efforts to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. On August 2, 2022, Finance Canada approved the transfer of an additional $50 million in funding, originally allocated towards the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch Public Health envelope, to supplement the Indigenous Community Support Fund, bringing the total Indigenous Community Support Fund funding this year to $240.5 million. Funding will be distributed via a combination of direct allocations to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis communities based on previously used formulas, and through a needs-based process open to urban and off-reserve Indigenous communities and organizations.
Current Status
- The pandemic has underscored ongoing gaps and challenges within Indigenous communities, particularly for vulnerable community members. Communities and organizations have received significant supports in areas of food and perimeter security, which must be phased out cautiously and with careful consideration to avoid future funding gaps.
- As the pandemic has progressed, Indigenous needs have shifted to include vaccine roll out supports (e.g., public communications material), mobile clinics for urban/off reserve members), as well as mental health, elder and cultural supports. These activities have specifically targeted areas not traditionally covered by the COVID-19 Public Health Response Fund, including for urban and off reserve Indigenous communities and organizations.
- As the department shifts towards a recovery and winding down phase, the aforementioned needs are anticipated to remain a priority (e.g., mental health, elder, and cultural supports), in addition to activities including but not limited to recovery activities such as retrofitting or removing temporary COVID-19-related minor infrastructure, and updating community pandemic plans with lessons learned.
- Through two tranches in July and October 2022, a total of $200 million has been transferred to regional offices for distribution of direct allocations to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. The distribution is the following:
- $148.3M for First Nations on-reserve, Self-Governing and Modern Treaty Nations;
- $31M for Inuit; and
- $20.7M for the Métis Nation.
- $40.5M has been set aside for an ongoing needs-based request process open to urban and off-reserve Indigenous communities and organizations.
- Additionally, $57.6 million in re-profiled 2021-22 funding is set aside as a contingency fund to ensure funds are available for outbreaks and other unforeseen circumstances.
- First Nations and Inuit may also access funding to address their COVID-19 response needs, where applicable, through the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch's Public Health funding envelope.
Emergency Management in the North
Issue Summary
- ISC is responsible for 16 First Nation communities through the Emergency Management Assistance Program in Yukon and Northwest Territories. ISC does not have emergency management jurisdiction in Nunavut as there are no on reserve First Nation communities in the territory.
- First Nation partners in the North have expressed a desire to become involved in emergency management and decision-making processes.
- Responsibility for emergency management services in the North rests with the territorial governments. The territorial governments are responsible for providing emergency services to all residents throughout all communities in the territories. Each territorial government has an emergency management/measures act which outlines the roles and responsibilities of local authorities, the territorial government, and the federal government.
Key Messages
- When an emergency event occurs, such as the recent flooding this past summer, we have seen how all partners are able to mobilize and work closely together to respond to the needs of all communities.
- ISC maintains effective communications with the territorial governments and First Nation partners, which is crucial during an emergency and to ensure that First Nations are able to access the recovery supports needed.
- To prepare against the threat of climate change, First Nation partners are interested in strengthening their capacity, partly through the development of a new multilateral service agreement on emergency management.
- ISC is working closely with First Nation leaders and territorial governments to advance plans and initiatives that incorporate First Nations as full and equal partners in emergency management.
- ISC will also continue to work with First Nation leaders to provide culturally competent emergency services to First Nation communities in the North.
Background
- Emergency management in the North (Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut) functions similarly to the rest of Canada. Each territorial government has its own emergency management/measures act, which outlines how local authorities, the territorial government and federal government respond to an emergency.
- Many Indigenous communities have their own emergency management plans and will often work in collaboration with territorial governments to conduct emergency management activities. The territorial governments will provide funding and resources to communities for emergency planning and response.
- When an emergency impacts an Indigenous community, it is the responsibility of local authorities to respond. If the emergency response exceeds the capacity of local authorities, then the territorial government will be requested to assist. If the capacity of the territorial government is exhausted, then the federal government will be asked to step in.
- Public Safety Canada is responsible for the coordination of emergency management across the federal government, and monitors emergency events in all three territories. Public Safety only provides support at the request of the territorial government, and once all resources have been exhausted.
- Although many Indigenous communities in the North are considered low-risk for emergencies, many emergencies require intervention from the federal government. This is largely due to a lack of resources and funding available at the territorial level.
- The Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) at ISC supports on reserve First Nation communities. The Program works in partnership with First Nation partners and provincial and territorial governments.
- EMAP does not have operations in Nunavut as there are no on reserve First Nation communities in the territory and residents of the territory are supported by the Nunavut Emergency Management Organization. However, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC) programs such as the Climate Change Preparedness in the North indirectly contribute to emergency capacity building in Indigenous communities.
- There are only two on reserve First Nation communities in the Northwest Territories and 14 First Nation communities in the Yukon, 11 of which are self-governing. There are no reserves as defined by the Indian Act in the Yukon, instead, First Nation communities are classified as "lands set aside".
Current Status
Yukon
- In June and July 2022, seven First Nation communities experienced flooding events, with one community requiring partial evacuation. All evacuees have been repatriated.
- There is a strong interest among First Nation communities in Yukon to become involved in emergency services. There is an opportunity to incorporate First Nations into a new type of agreement, as the current bilateral service agreement between ISC and the Yukon Government is expiring March 2023.
Northwest Territories
- In May 2022, K'at'lodeeche First Nation – one of the two on-reserve communities in the territory – experienced a flooding event requiring evacuation. There are currently nine evacuees who have not been repatriated as of late August 2022.
- The two First Nation communities have small on-reserve populations and lie either adjacent to or within other municipalities. Both First Nations are considered low-risk for emergencies and natural hazards.
- There is a bilateral service agreement between ISC and the Government of the Northwest Territories to provide emergency services to the two on-reserve communities, which will expire March 2023.
Nunavut
- In August 2022, Iqaluit declared a state of emergency due to water shortages as a result of lack of rain over the summer months. The state of emergency did not require evacuation.
- Search and rescue, and equipment and resource allocation are the main priorities for the Nunavut Government in emergency management.
- The Climate Change Preparedness in the North program at Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs supports Indigenous communities in Nunavut by funding climate change adaptation projects. This indirectly supports community capacity building to address emergencies at the local level.
Roles and Responsibilities
Issue Summary
- Increasing complexity and intensity of emergency events requires alignment and collaboration between different levels of government, First Nations and emergency management practitioners.
Key Messages
- Emergency management in Canada is a shared responsibility between federal, provincial and territorial governments and their partners, including First Nation partners, where each level of government has their own set of emergency management laws and governance models within their respective jurisdictions.
- ISC is responsible for providing advice and support (when requested) to the affected First Nation, province, or territory during an emergency event. Following an emergency event, ISC is responsible for reimbursing the province, territory, First Nation or service delivery partner for eligible costs associated with emergency response and recovery.
- Provincial and territorial governments are responsible for the provision of emergency services to communities during an emergency event under their respective provincial or territorial emergency management systems.
- First Nation communities are responsible for identifying imminent or emerging threats to the community and using all available local resources to respond to the threat. They are also responsible for notifying ISC and provincial or territorial emergency management officials if a threat is beyond their community's response capacity.
- First Nation community members are responsible for taking all available measures to protect their own health, safety and personal property during emergency events.
Background
- Emergency management in Canada is a shared responsibility between federal, provincial and territorial governments and their partners, including First Nation partners, where each level of government has their own set of emergency management laws and governance models within their respective jurisdictions.
- As part of ISC's obligations under the Emergency Management Act and delegated authority as per the Indian Act, the Minister of ISC has responsibility to support First Nations on reserves in emergency management.
- ISC funding is primarily provided under ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP), which is eligible to communities on reserves who have been impacted by an emergency event, or where a proposed project directly supports a First Nation on reserve.
- EMAP also provides funding to First Nations communities so they can build resiliency, prepare for natural hazards and respond to them using the 4 pillars of emergency management: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. As of April 1, 2022, EMAP has been expanded to help ISC better respond to health emergencies, including public health outbreaks and crisis.
- In an emergency, the first response is almost always by the local authorities or at the provincial or territorial level because disasters occur most often locally. Should a provincial or territorial government require resources beyond their capacity to cope in an emergency or disaster, the federal government responds rapidly to any request for assistance by a provincial or territorial government.
- ISC works with provincial and territorial governments to ensure First Nations have access to comparable emergency assistance services available to other residents in their respective jurisdiction.
- To ensure that First Nation communities on-reserve have access to emergency assistance services comparable to those available to other residents in their respective jurisdiction, ISC works with provincial and territorial governments through negotiated service agreements to deliver emergency management services to First Nation communities.
- These agreements also detail the division of roles and responsibilities of the parties to the agreement.
- ISC strongly encourages First Nation communities to develop and implement emergency management plans and to build resiliency through activities and initiatives that build mitigation and preparedness. Project funding is available for First Nations to develop their own emergency management plans and other preparedness and non-structural mitigation initiatives and can apply through EMAP.
Current Status
- In recognition of First Nation peoples' right to self-determination, ISC is exploring opportunities to transition to new multilateral approaches where First Nations are included in emergency management as full and equal partners.
- ISC is currently working with the BC and Ontario regions to develop a new multilateral service agreement that will include First Nation communities as full and equal partners in emergency management, ensuring that they have their own distinct roles and responsibilities in the emergency management framework.
- To support response coordination ISC works with various partners including provincial/territorial governments, other federal departments such as Public Safety Canada, and third party providers (e.g., Canadian Red Cross). In the event that responsibilities are unclear, ISC works with all partners to clarify roles and support response coordination.
Performance Management
Issue Summary
- ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program (EMAP) has significantly evolved to incorporate all four pillars of emergency management since its inception and adopted an all-hazards approach.
- In 2019, the program secured funds ($211 million over 5 years) to support First Nation communities with preparedness and mitigation activities through a newly formed Non-Structural Mitigation and Preparedness fund, Capacity Enhancement program, and FireSmart program.
- EMAP uses multiple indicators to measures its work, including the percentage of long-term and short-term evacuees repatriated within a given timeframe.
- Regarding the "percentage of evacuees that have returned to their community within three months". Results for this indicator have remained high over the last few fiscal years, and in 2021-2022 the result was 97.9%.
- ISC is currently in the process of renewing its Departmental Results Framework for the upcoming fiscal year. As a result, many programs, including EMAP, will be consolidated and realigned under new service areas with more targeted indicators.
- The program also measures its performance by reporting annually on the outcomes and results of its program indicators, transfer payment programs, GBA+ data collection and on progress made towards the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
- EMAP is committed to addressing ongoing reporting and performance management issues while also identifying opportunities to increase funding for mitigation and preparedness activities.
Key Messages
- ISC's Emergency Management Assistance Program was originally developed to support response and recovery activities on reserve. Since its inception, the program has significantly expanded in scope and scale, now supporting mitigation and preparedness activities.
- As the number of climate emergencies continue to rise on a yearly basis, the program continues to provide much of its funding to response and recovery activities. For ISC to evolve and further proactive spending, additional prevention and mitigation funding will be needed.
- As the Emergency Management Assistance Program continues to evolve, ISC will work to find innovative ways to improve on reporting and performance measurement mechanisms.
Background
- When EMAP was conceptualized in 2013, the program's scope primarily focused on the response and recovery with a fixed budget of $29 million, an amount that was often quickly exceeded and required the department to secure additional funds.
- Since 2013, the program significantly expanded in scale and scope to include all four pillars of emergency management and now offers funding for mitigation and preparedness projects and initiatives. In 2022-2023, the program Service Agreements, Non-Structural Mitigation Preparedness, Capacity Building and FireSmart exceeds $70 million, and has secured response and recovery funding for over $127 million. Despite this increase, funds are depleted annually.
- Over the past 10 years, the EMAP has reimbursed more than $536 million in response costs and over $396 million in recovery costs to First Nation communities.
- The program has also has funded over $137 million in non-structural mitigation and preparedness projects since 2012, an average of $13.7 million in funded projects annually.
- In addition, EMAP has been making significant strides to incorporate First Nations as full and equal partners in emergency management. The program is actively working to develop multilateral service agreements with First Nation partners and provincial and territorial governments. These type of agreements help pave the way for service transfer while also leveraging strengths, incorporating First Nation local knowledge and expertise into emergency management.
- In 2018, ISC signed the Collaborative Agreement on Emergency Management with the Tsilhqot'in National Government and the Province of British Columbia, and renewed it in 2022 for 5 years. This agreement builds the capacity of TNG communities in emergency management, as well as the 2019 Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding on Emergency Management Services with the First Nations Leadership Council and the Province of British Columbia.
Performance Measurement
- EMAP reports annually on outcomes and results of its program indicators.
- There are numerous indicators the program uses to measure progress for each of its funding streams, however, there are two main indicators primarily reports on. The first is the "percentage of long-term evacuees who have returned home or have a scheduled date within two years after their evacuation". Results for this indicator have fluctuated over time, as many factors can increase the repatriation date for long-term evacuees, including but not limited to: infrastructure issues, health and safety concerns, logistics, community remoteness, etc. The results for this indicator in 2021-2022 was 77.5%. Last year's result is comparatively lower than previous years as many current long-term evacuees are from the 2021 British Columbia Atmospheric River event, which had widespread and catastrophic impacts.
- The other main indicator the program reports on is the "percentage of evacuees that have returned to their community within three months". Results for this indicator have remained consistently high, and typically sit at over 97%. The results for this indicator in 2021-2022 was 97.9%.
- Data collection is continuous, however, reporting on indicators occurs towards the end of each fiscal year, ahead of the release of the ISC's Departmental Results Report.
- In addition to indicators, the program reports on progress made towards its transfer payment programs, GBA+ data collection, and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
- EMAP also measures its performance through its Integrated Business Plan, which outlines the program's planning, business and Human Resources commitments for the upcoming fiscal year. Work on the Integrated Business Plan begins halfway through the fiscal year and takes several months to complete.
- ISC is renewing its Departmental Results Framework for the upcoming fiscal year. The renewal process will result in various programs, including the Emergency Management Assistance Program, being consolidated and realigned into six different service areas. EMAP will now fall under the Infrastructure and Environments program inventory.
Current Status
- ISC is currently examining how to better improve performance management capabilities and how to address ongoing program concerns. Moving forward, EMAP will review its program indicators and consider revising how they measure progress against the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
- The review process will involve the program analyzing both the federal and departmental sustainable development strategies as well as the Sustainable Development Goals targets to understand how the program could best measure progress and to identify which performance indicators should be utilized to do so.
- In addition, the program will implement a risk-based approach to inform funding decisions. Targeted investments by the department will consider, as it has to date, the communities' willingness, readiness and interest in undertaking emergency preparedness activities by empowering First Nations to take the lead in preparing for and managing emergencies.
- ISC is committed to support First Nations in their endeavors to identify their unique communities' level of risk and priorities to seek funding from the department to enhance emergency preparedness.
Biographies
INAN biographies
The Hon. Marc Garneau, Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount, QC INAN Chair
Biographical Information
Born in Quebec City, Quebec, the Honourable Marc Garneau was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008, and re-elected in 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2021.
Mr. Garneau graduated from the Royal Military College of Canada in 1970 with a Bachelor of Science in engineering physics and began his career in the Canadian Forces Maritime Command. In 1973 he received a PhD in electrical engineering from the Imperial College of Science and Technology in London, England.
From 1982 to 1983, he attended the Canadian Forces Command and Staff College in Toronto. While there, he was promoted to the rank of commander and was subsequently promoted to captain(N). Mr. Garneau retired from the Canadian Forces in 1989.
Mr. Garneau was also one of the first six Canadian Astronauts and he became the first Canadian in outer space in October 1984. In February 2001, he was appointed executive vice-president of the Canadian Space Agency and became its president in November 2001.
Mr. Garneau was Minister of Transport from 2015-2021 and Minister of Foreign Affairs January-October 2021. Mr. Garneau is currently not in Cabinet.
Jamie Schmale, Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock, ON
Critic for Indigenous Services; Vice-Chair INAN
Biographical Information
Born in Brampton, ON, Jamie Schmale was elected to the House of Commons for the first time in 2015, and re-elected in 2019 and 2021.
Prior to his election, Mr. Schmale served as the executive assistant and campaign manager for former Conservative MP Barry Devolin (Haliburton-Kawartha Lakes-Brock, Ontario). He graduated from the Radio Broadcasting program at Loyalist College in Ontario and started his career as a news anchor. He later became a news director for CHUM media.
Mr. Schmale was the critic for Crown-Indigenous Relations in the 43rd Parliament. In the 42nd Parliament, Mr. Schmale served as the opposition critic for Northern Economic Development, and Deputy Critic for Natural Resources. He was a member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs (2015-2017) and the Standing Committee on Natural Resources (2017-2019).
Currently, Mr. Schmale serves as the critic for Indigenous Services.
Marilène Gill, Manicouagan, QC Critic Indigenous and Northern Affairs; Vice-Chair INAN
Biographical Information
Born in Sorel, QC, Marilène Gill was first elected to the House of Commons in 2015, and was re-elected in 2019 and 2021.
Prior to her election, Mrs. Gill was teaching at the college level and pursuing doctoral studies in literature. Her background also includes roles as a unionist, development officer, coordinator of the Table de concertation en condition feminine de la Côte-Nord. She is also involved in the Conseil des arts et des lettres du Québec (CALQ). She has also acted as literary director for Éditions Trois-Pistoles, and has published personal works there for which she has received several awards and grants. Mrs. Gill was also political attaché to Michel Guimond, former member and chief whip of the Bloc Québécois.
Mrs. Gill is deputy whip, chair of the Young Families Caucus and critic for Indigenous and Northern Affairs for the Bloc Québécois.
Jenica Atwin, Fredericton, NB
Biographical Information
Jenica Atwin grew up in Oromocto, NB. She was first elected to the House of Commons in 2019 as a Member of the Green Party before joining the Liberal Party in June 2021.
Mrs. Atwin completed a Master's in Education at the University of New Brunswick.
Prior to being elected, she was an education consultant and researcher at a First Nations Education Centre. In 2016, she co-organized a spin-off of We Day focused on introducing First Nations youth to one another and helping those who have recently moved off of reserves.
She is a new member of INAN. She previously served on the COVID-19 Pandemic Committee.
Jaime Battiste, Sydney—Victoria, NS Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations
Biographical Information
Born on the Eskasoni First Nation, NS, Jaime Battiste was elected to the House of Commons in 2019 and re-elected in 2021. He is the first Mi'kmaw Member of Parliament in Canada.
Mr. Battiste graduated from Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University in 2004. He has held positions as a Professor, Senior Advisor, Citizenship Coordinator, and as a Regional Chief for the Assembly of First Nations.
Mr. Battiste's volunteer work over the years involves athletics, youth advocacy, community events, and advocacy for the Mi'kmaq Nation. He is a member of the Aboriginal Sport Circle and a part owner of the Eskasoni Junior B Eagles.
Mr. Battiste served as a representative to the Assembly of First Nation's National Youth Council from 2001-2006. In 2005, the National Aboriginal Healing Organization named him as one of the "National Aboriginal Role Models in Canada." In 2006, as the Chair of the Assembly of First Nations Youth Council, he was one of the founding members of the Mi'kmaw Maliseet Atlantic Youth Council (MMAYC), an organization that represents and advocates for Mi'kmaw and Maliseet youth within the Atlantic region. In 2018, Mr. Battiste was recognized with the Sovereign's Medal for Volunteers, which is a Canadian decoration to honour volunteers who have made significant and continual contributions to their community.
Mr. Battiste was named Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations in December 2021.
He has been a member of INAN since February 2020 and has previously been a member of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans.
Michael V. Mcleod, Northwest Territories, NWT
Biographical Information
Born in Fort Providence, NWT, Michael Mcleod was first elected to the House of Commons in 2015 and re-elected in 2019 and 2021.
Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. McLeod served Northwest Territories residents as a member of the Legislative Assembly from 1999-2011 and advised clients in the tourism industry as Tourism Development Officer for the Government of the Northwest Territories. He also previously served as mayor of Fort Providence, president of his Métis Local, and vice-president of Deh Cho Regional Council.
Mr. McLeod earned a diploma in Management Studies from Arctic College and began his career as a self-employed contractor. He has been a member of the Northwest Territories Tourism, NWT Public Utilities, and Mackenzie Valley Environment Impact Review Boards. The latter's mission, conducting fair and timely environmental assessments, remains a key interest.
Mr. McLeod was previously a member of INAN 2016-2017 and has served as a member of the Standing Committee on Finance and as Chair of the Arctic and Northern Caucus.
Marcus Powlowski, Thunder Bay—Rainy River, ON
Biographical Information
Born in Fort William, ON, Marcus Powlowski was first elected to the House of Commons in 2019 and re-elected in 2021.
Prior to being elected, Mr. Powlowski served as a physician in the Emergency Room at Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre. In addition to being a medical doctor, he has two law degrees - LL.B, LL.M from the universities of Toronto and Georgetown, respectively. He also attended Harvard University and obtained a Masters of Public Health in Health Law and Policy.
Mr. Powlowski worked as a doctor for two years in northern First Nations communities, and for seven years practicing medicine in several developing countries in Africa and Oceania. For several years, he worked as a consultant in health legislation for the World Health Organization. He also volunteered on a medical project in Ethiopia.
Mr. Powlowski has been a member of INAN since February 2020 and has also sat on the COVID-19 Pandemic Committee and the Standing Committee on Health.
Patrick Weiler, West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country, BC
Biographical Information
Born in West Vancouver, BC, Patrick Weiler was first elected to Parliament in 2019 and re-elected in 2021.
Prior to his election, Mr. Weiler was an advocate for safeguarding the environment as an environmental and natural resource management lawyer, representing First Nations, small businesses, municipalities, and non-profit organizations in Canada and internationally. Mr. Weiler has also worked in partnership with the United Nations and international development agencies, with a mission to improve the governance of natural resources and management of aquatic ecosystems.
Mr. Weiler completed a Bachelor of Arts at McGill University and received his Juris Doctor degree from the University of British Columbia's Faculty of Law.
Mr. Weiler served on the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, and the bi-partisan Climate Caucus and Tourism Caucus.
Gary Vidal, Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River, SK Critic for Crown-Indigenous Relations
Biographical Information
Gary was born and raised in Meadow Lake in the Desnethé – Missinippi – Churchill River district. He has lived, worked, played, volunteered, and served there his entire life. He graduated from Carpenter High School in 1983 and went on to study at the University of Saskatchewan and Briercrest Bible College. He is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CGA) and was a partner in the accounting firm Pliska Vidal & Co.
Gary was elected Mayor of the City of Meadow Lake in September of 2011 where he served his community until his resignation in March of 2019. He was elected ViceChair of the Saskatchewan City Mayors Caucus from 2016-2018. He was appointed to the SaskWater Board of Directors in 2008 where he served nearly a decade until 2017. During that time, he held various roles including Chair of the Government and Corporate Responsibility Committee, Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and finally, Chair of the Board from 2015-2017.
Over the years, Gary has volunteered in a variety of leadership capacities in his local church as well as on the board of Bethel Gospel Camp, an interdenominational children's bible camp. Other volunteer activities include coaching and managing minor hockey, baseball, and soccer teams.
In 2012 he was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal.
Mr. Vidal previously served as the critic for Indigenous Services, and is currently the critic for Crown-Indigenous Relations. He has been a member of INAN since February 2020 and also sat on the Special Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic during the last Parliament (2019-2021).
Bob Zimmer, Prince George – Peace River – Northern Rockies, BC
Biographical information
Bob was born in Dawson Creek, BC and raised in Fort St. John, BC. Bob began his career working for his father's family carpentry business where he learned the values of honesty, integrity, and hard work. Through these fundamentals, Bob obtained his Red Seal Journeyman Carpentry Certification and went on to own his own construction business.
He received an undergraduate degree from Trinity Western University in human kinetics and history/political science. Bob also obtained a bachelor's of education degree from the University of British Columbia. He worked his way through University as the head coach for Langley's TWU varsity rugby team. After graduating from the University of British Columbia, Bob moved back to St. John where he taught for seven years and continued to work in construction building several homes.
Bob was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Prince George – Peace River in 2011 and then re-elected as the Member of Parliament for Prince George – Peace River – Northern Rockies in 2015 and again in 2019.
Bob serves as the Co-Chair of the Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus and was Shadow for Minister for Northern Affairs and Northern Economic Development Agency from November 2019 to September 2020.
Since coming into office, Bob has sat on several committees including the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, the Standing Committee for Natural Resources, Standing Committee for Veterans Affairs, and the Standing Committee for Procedure and House Affairs. He has also served as Chair of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy, and Ethics, Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, Critic for Asia-Pacific Gateway, Chair of the BC/Yukon Conservative Caucus, and Chair of the National Prayer Breakfast.
Bob is a long-time member of the Fort St. John Sunrise Rotary Club, volunteers for many local events and organizations, and well as volunteers and attends his local church with his wife Val and their four children Kristian, David, Tim, and Bobbie
Eric Melillo, Kenora, ON
Biographical information
Eric Melillo is the Member of Parliament for the riding of Kenora. He was elected in the 2019 and 2021 general elections.
Prior to entering politics, he worked as an Associate within a business consulting firm, and as a Policy Research Analyst for a non-partisan think tank. Eric also served as a political staffer while he completed his Bachelor of Arts in Economics at Lakehead University.
Since being elected to Parliament, Eric has been working to deliver positive changes to northwestern Ontario. By standing up to support critical infrastructure projects, meaningful supports for Indigenous communities, and creating better economic opportunities for all. Eric has been a strong representative for the people of the Kenora riding.
Eric was born and raised in Kenora, where he lives with his wife Danaka and their dog Oakley.
Lori Idlout, Nunavut, NV Critic – Northern Affairs; Critic – Indigenous Services; Critic – Crown-Indigenous Relations
Biographical Information
Born in Igloolik, NU, Lori Idlout was first elected to the House of Commons in 2021.
Prior to her election Ms. Idlout practiced law in Iqaluit with her own firm, Qusugaq Law. She represented the group protesting against the Baffinland Iron Mine's expansion, as well as serving as the technical adviser for the Ikajutit Hunters and Trappers Organization during a public hearing on the issue. Between 2004 and 2011, Ms. Idlout served as the executive director of the Nunavut Embrace Life Council, a not-for-profit organization committed to suicide prevention. She had previously worked for Nunavut's Department of Health and Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated as a policy analyst, and was the founder of Coalition of Nunavut DEAs as a director of the Iqaluit District Education Authority in order to advocate for educational services.
Ms. Idlout received a bachelor's degree in psychology from Lakehead University in 1997, and a doctorate in law from the University of Ottawa (2018).
She is a new member of INAN and the NDP critic for Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs, and Indigenous Services.
Additional Background Information
Summary of November 23, 2022 Meeting of APPA on Examining the constitutional, treaty, political and legal responsibilities to First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples
Date: November 23, 2022
Time: 6:45 p.m.. – 8:45 p.m.
Report Prepared by: Glenn Burley, Sr. Parliamentary Affairs Advisor
Topics of Meeting
Examine the constitutional, treaty, political and legal responsibilities to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples - Briefings on Indigenous Affairs and Follow up on the Cannabis Act
Members in Attendance
Independent Senators Group (ISG)
- Kim Pate
- Mary Coyle
- Beverley Busson
Canadian Senators Group (CSG)
- Scott Tannas
Progressive Senate Group (PSG)
- Brian Francis (Chair)
- Michelle Audette
Conservative Party of Canada (CPC)
- Yonah Martin
Unaffiliated
- Patti LaBoucane-Benson
Witnesses
Panel One: Follow up on the Cannabis Act
Indigenous Bar Association
- Drew Lafond, President
Ilisaqsivik Society
- Jukeepa Hainnu, Vice Chair, Ilisaqsivik Society Board of Directors
Panel Two: Briefings on Indigenous Affairs
Office of the Auditor General of Canada
- Karen Hogan, Auditor General of Canada
- Glenn Wheeler, Principal
Panel Three: Briefings on Indigenous Affairs
Office of the Correctional Investigator
- Ivan Zinger, Correctional Investigator of Canada
Summary of Speeches
President Lafond spoke to the report on the legalization of cannabis that APPA published in 2018 which wrote of issues central to Indigenous communities on this topic. He strongly believes that Indigenous communities have an inherent right to self-determination which extends to the regulation of cannabis. He strongly urged the government to recognize these rights and to operationalize them in the legislation. He said that by not acting right away, the federal government has already done damage. He outlined how currently some First Nations rely on section 35 ground to regulate cannabis on reserve, but that some First Nations have decided to stay completely out of it. He again stated that rights must be recognized in law. He also noted that Indigenous communities that are engaged in the regulation of cannabis are not getting the support from the provinces that are required to be able to enforce the regulations.
Vice Chair Hainnu outlined the wide range of programs and services that the Ilisaqsivik Society provides to residents of Clyde River, that are created and delivered by Inuit people, in Inuktitut, and have been in operation for 25 years. Their main goal is to increase wellbeing and advance self-development. They operate a wellness centre, a research centre, and are engaged in social enterprise. She spoke about the need for a new wellness centre as the building is very outdated and too small. The building used to be a community centre, but was deemed unfit for use 20 years ago. She described how currently 2-3 counsellors share one office.
Auditor General Hogan described how her office has repeatedly raised issues around the disparities in outcomes for Indigenous people in Canada. Since 2015, she said the OAG has reported on health, land claims, reintegration of offenders, employment programs, safe drinking water, and support during the COVID-19 pandemic, to name some. She described how this report of emergency management and preparedness echoes the calls of the 2013 report on this subject, in that it is ISC has not provided First Nations with the support needed to manage emergencies like floods and wildfires. She noted that the current approach is more reactive than proactive/preventative, spending 3.5 times more recovering from emergencies than on preparation and mitigation efforts. She said that there is currently a backlog of 112 ISC approved infrastructure projects that have yet to be funded, and that until the department shifts its focus to prevention, this trend is likely to continue. She also described the work done by the OAG on safe drinking water, and on resources provided in response to COVID-19. She said that while the federal government committed to eliminating all long term advisories by March 31, 2021, as the deadline approached, 60 advisories remained in 41 communities, and that 50% had been in effect for over 10 years. She said that until the 30 year old funding formula and outdated operational approach changed, it is unclear that the objectives will be met. Regarding the COVID-19 response, it was clear that ISC adapted quickly, expanding access to PPE and first responders. While ISC was unable to meet almost half of the requests for additional health staff, overall they did help. In her closing she outlined that for 2023, the OAG plans on conducting an audit of First Nations housing needs. She also outlined how her office works to perform audits in the 3 territories, providing examples of recent audits of corrections in Nunavut; addictions treatment in the Northwest Territories; housing and mental health in the Yukon; and that next year they will audit child and family services in Nunavut.
Correctional Investigator Zinger provided some general context of his role and the role of Corrections Canada. He noted that with a budget of $2.9 billion per year, CSC has roughly 12,500 incarcerated individuals, 9,000 parolees, 43 penitentiaries, and 9,000 employees. With 1 staff for every 1.2 prisoner, Canada's staffing ratio is the highest in the world. He outlined how currently there are empty cells right now equivalent to 8 full penitentiaries. He described Indigenous incarceration as always being a priority for his office and that they have made more than 70 recommendations to CSC on this issue. The latest includes 7 recommendations that were contained within the November 1, 2022 released 2021-22 Annual report, which provides Part 1 of the 10 year progress update since Spirit Matters: Indigenous Issues in Federal Corrections. He noted that work on Part 2 of that progress update is currently underway. He summed up the findings as there having been marginal progress to improve outcomes over the last 10 years. Indigenous people currently account for 32% of the incarcerated population; they are more likely to experience use of force; be labelled gang members; attempt suicide; commit suicide; spend more time in custody; and experience higher recidivism rates. He noted that the situation is even worse for Indigenous women, who now account for 50% of the incarcerated population.
Key Questions
Senator LaBoucane-Benson (unaffiliated) asked Mr. Lafond what support is required to eliminate the hesitancy of Indigenous communities to exercise their right to regulate cannabis. Mr. Lafond said the first step is to provide a legislative basis to enforce First Nations laws on reserve and to allow the RCMP to do so as well. In a follow-up, Senator LaBoucane-Benson noted this is an issue the Land Management Board recently raised at this committee, that is, the RCMP doesn't enforce their land codes. She then asked if a Centre of Excellence model, such as the Centre developed to share best practices and idea following the passage of Bill C-92 would be helpful for cannabis regulation. Mr. Lafond said this was a great question and a Centre to collect, analyze and synthesize the experience of First Nations that have undertaken cannabis regulation would be good.
Senator Tannas (CSG) asked about enforcement of cannabis regulation/laws/by-laws in Indigenous communities. He noted that if the community doesn't have their own force, they would look to the RCMP, but the RCMP doesn't enforce First Nations' law. He said in other areas of jurisdiction, Indigenous created and lead institutions have been created and grown to become leaders in their field. He asked if there is anything like that occurring in this realm. Mr. Lafond said currently there is not. He believes this is because without federal recognition and enforcement, it comes down to the provinces to recognize rights. This has limited the ability of First Nations to get involved in all aspects of cannabis. They can't obtain bank loans, insurance, and licenses; and as a result, they can't get audits done. All of this results in the ability to build capacity and knowledge being hampered.
Senator Coyle (ISG) asked Ms. Hainnu if she has noticed a change in the work being done on mental health and addictions since the Cannabis Act came into effect. Ms. Hainnu said that the changes have supported less fortunate families. Cannabis has become cheaper in the region, medicinal usage for conditions has been successful, less criminalization of users and less people engaged in selling of illicit cannabis has reduced criminal activity in the area.
Senator Francis (PSG) mentioned that the committee had sent a letter to the OAG requesting an audit be done on the registration process, and that the OAG had declined the request. He asked if the OAG would reconsider this. AG Hogan reiterated that their next Indigenous focused audit will be on housing needs next year. She recognized the need to reform registration and expressed hope the committee would help drive that change, and that the OAG will keep their eyes on this.
Senator LaBoucane-Benson (unaffiliated) noted that ISC has increased spending by $180 million over 3 years, but that it sounded like this was insufficient. She asked what response the Minister has given to the OAG findings. AG Hogan said that she has spoken with the Deputy Minister. Concerns with infrastructure budgeting was discussed, and she noted that something different needs to happen moving forward. While there is a large pot of funding, it is being split into too many small programs with rigid requirements. Emergency management is one such small pool. As a result, with the current funding rates, it would take 24 years to fully fund the 112 projects currently in the approved backlog. She said a more proactive approach is needed.
Senator Martin (CPC) asked about the financial impacts of reactive spending versus preventative funding, and what types of projects were backlogged in BC specifically. Principal Wheeler said BC is similar to other regions in terms of their projects, and outlined the difference between structural infrastructure, such as a dam, and non-structural infrastructure, such as flood mapping. He noted that the 112 backlogged projects are structural and that if in place, would reduce the impact of a natural disaster. He said that for every $1 in prevention, $6 in response and recovery would be saved. In a follow-up, Senator Martin noted that Minister Hajdu had recently been touting the increase in spending, so with these backlogs in mind, she asked if the issue is of funding shortfall or mismanagement. AG Hogan said that it comes down to not enough funding being allocated in upfront prevention and preparedness. The AG did not believe that there was mismanagement, but instead that the allocation of funding should be prioritized differently.
Senator Audette (PSG), after several other Senators asked about the OAG prioritizing a study on the registration process, linked discrimination in registration to the upcoming housing audit. She explained that it is known that the Indian Act took status away from many individuals and families, for generations. As a result, the impact of loss of status would need to be factored into the review on housing needs, as without recognizing this, the information obtained would under-represent the true needs. AG Hogan said this was a very interesting angle that she would look into.
Senator Pate (ISG) asked if it was true that 76% of women in structural intervention within CSC are Indigenous. Mr. Zinger confirmed that was the case. In a follow-up, Senator Pate spoke to sections 81 and 84 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act which in part, provide for the creation and running of healing lodges. When these provisions were written, she said it was to help address overrepresentation of Indigenous people in corrections which at that point was only 10%. Since then, CSC has limited the scope of these policies, including limiting eligibility to only minimum security inmates. Mr. Zinger noted that when the Mulroney government enacted the legislation in 1992, it was considered a ground breaking, progressive policy that the world took note of. However, progress on implementing these provisions stalled around 2000, as noted in the Spirit Matters report. In the last 10 years, only 1 new section 81 facility has been created, and despite the small number of facilities and over representation of Indigenous peoples in the system, there exists a 50% vacancy rate. He said that of the $2.9 billion in annual funding, to be effective, $500 million over 10 years should be spent to build capacity and that this could be done without any job losses.
Senator Francis (PSG) asked about the recommendation to create a Deputy Commissioner for Indigenous people. Mr. Zinger said that the office has been making that recommendation for 12 years. Finally, he said a House of Commons committee began echoing the call, and it was put forward in the Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. He said after all this pressure, a competition was finally run for the position. Originally, internally, it was made external. However, he criticized the fact that it wasn't a new position, and was instead a DG level position (EX-03) that already existed – Director General, Indigenous Initiative Branch – being relabelled. He questioned how effective it would be to have a DG level Deputy Commissioner on the executive board when everyone else on the board was ADM level (EX-04).
Follow-up Items
No follow-up items, but the Chair noted this would be the last meeting as part of the Cannabis Act follow-up.
Transcript
The Standing Senate Committee on Indigenous Peoples - Evidence
Summary of November 25, 2022 Meeting of PACP on Report 8, Emergency Management in First Nations Communities
Date: November 25, 2022
Time: 1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
Report Prepared by: Jonathan Heggie, Sr. Parliamentary Affairs Advisor
Topic of Meeting
Report 8, Emergency Management in First Nations Communities – Indigenous Services Canada, of the 2022 Reports 5 to 8 of the Auditor General of Canada
Members in Attendance
Liberal Party of Canada (LIB)
- Jean Yip (Chair)
- Valerie Bradford
- Han Dong
- Brenda Shanahan
- Iqwinder Gaheer
Conservative Party of Canada (CPC)
- Michael Kram
- Kelly McCauley
- Gary Vidal
Bloq Québecois (BQ)
- Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné (Vice Chair)
New Democratic Party of Canada (NDP)
- Blake Desjarlais
Witnesses
Indigenous Services Canada
- Gina Wilson, Deputy Minister
- Valerie Gideon, Associate Deputy Minister
- Joanne Wilkinson, Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Regional Operations (by videoconference)
- Kenza El Bied, Director General, Sector Operations Branch, Regional Operations (by videoconference)
Office of the Auditor General
- Karen Hogan, Auditor General of Canada
- Glenn Wheeler, Principal
- Doreen Deveen, Director
Summary of Speeches
Karen Hogan spoke to the increased frequency of emergencies such as floods and wildfires, and that First Nations are disproportionately affected because of their relative remoteness and socio-economic circumstances. She also referenced previous Office of the Auditor General (OAG) audits which highlighted the same issues, arguing that the department's actions have been more reactive than preventative, and that it was spending 3.5 times more on response and recovery than preparation and mitigation, which according to Public Safety, for every $1 invested in preparedness and mitigation, $6 can be saved in emergency response and recovery costs. She closed by saying that "concrete actions are needed to address these long-standing issues, and government needs to be held accountable."
Gina Wilson began by agreeing with the recommendations of the OAG, and spoke to how the work of the Department to address critical gaps in emergency management aligns with those recommendations, guided by two principles: First Nations having input into their own planning, and that they are full partners in decisions affecting their communities. While focused on prevention, the Department is developing emergency management plans and multilateral service agreements with First Nations. She also highlighted examples the Department's significant investments and recent activities to respond to emergencies, such as Hurricane Fiona in September 2022.
Key Questions
MP Kelly McCauley (CPC) asked about shifting funding from recovery to being more proactive. DM Wilson agreed and argued the shift needed to be made broadly in Canada, not just at the Department, and said they were actively working towards that shift.
MP Valerie Bradford (LIB) asked about unmet structural mitigation needs being met, especially the backlog of projects in Alberta and British Columbia, as well as what further work could be done by the Department without further resources. DM Wilson said that with the finite resources of the Department, that discussions with First Nation partners on priorities helps in making those difficult choices.
MP Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné (BQ) asked why after 3 reports from the OAG, why there was so little progress being made despite climate change accelerating these issues and the Department still being focused on response instead of proactive measures. A/DM Gideon said that the Department was in a transition period of working more proactively, but that provinces and territories needed to get involved as well. She also noted that regardless of whether there were agreements in place, the Department is always ready to support communities in need.
MP Blake Desjarlais (NDP) asked who was responsible for the ongoing shortcomings and systemic failures following decades of reports by the OAG. DM Wilson responded that "all of us" (Provinces/Territories/Federal Government/Parliamentarians/Canadians) are responsible.
MP Gary Vidal (CPC) asked what concrete action ISC needed to undertake to begin making more tangible progress. Auditor General (AG) Hogan said that while all levels of government need to begin investing in prevention measures, ISC would need to consider the magnitude of the issue by evaluating the funding and capacity needs of all First Nation communities in order to better estimate the resources required. While she argued the Department's responsiveness to emergencies was sufficient, she encouraged ISC to develop a comprehensive action plan moving forward to deal with proactive measures.
MP Michael Kram (CPC) asked about the community of Kashechewan in Ontario, and whether their regular evacuations due to flooding would continue. SADM Wilkinson said that the recent "On-the-land" Initiative was both a cultural exercise as well as a cost-effective alternative to evacuating the entire community elsewhere in the province. She also highlighted that until 2013, the program at ISC was a responsive program in nature, and not until the 2013 OAG audit did the program begin shifting to proactive mitigation efforts. MP Kram also asked whether the community was asking for a permanent solution and SADM Wilkinson indicated that those discussions with the community were ongoing.
MP Brenda Shanahan (LIB) asked about what impact INAC being split into ISC and CIRNAC had on service delivery. A/DM Gideon responded that the new Department included bringing the First Nations Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB) into the fold, which helped the Department offer better supports (including mental health supports) for affected communities and highlighted the shift from the Department offering services, to working towards self-determination of First Nation partners.
MP Iqwinder Gaheer (LIB) asked about GBA+ consideration at the Department. A/DM Gideon said all sectors at ISC had focal points, as well as a centralized team, which ensures that all reporting gets intersectional analysis, including all Cabinet submissions.
MP Blake Desjarlais (NDP) asked about the First Nation Infrastructure Fund and whether the Department had sufficient funding to undertake all necessary projects. SADM Wilkinson said that 100% of available funding is spent, and that the Department also leverages other partnerships. When asked by MP Desjarlais whether the Department was requesting additional resources, DM Wilson confirmed that it was.
MP Gary Vidal (CPC) asked about the Public Safety suggestion that for every dollar spent on mitigation, up to six dollars could be saved from recovery funding, and why there were not more multilateral agreements in place for emergency management. DM Wilson said that regardless of agreements being in place, the Department is there to support communities, and is still investing in capacity building within communities.
MP Michael Kram (CPC) cited an article from Thunder Bay Newswatch which implied that Kashechewan First Nation was awaiting a government decision on relocation of the community. DM Wilson said that there was no formal request, but that the Department has been in ongoing discussions with the community over a number of years, and that it was an extremely complex process. She also agreed to get back to the Committee with the most recent date that Departmental officials were in discussions with Kashechewan on this issue.
MP Gary Vidal (CPC) asked about a Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) Report from May, 2022 which suggested that despite increases in funding following the split of INAC into ISC and CIRNAC, their analysis showed that more funding didn't result in improved results. DM Wilson agreed with the question and she was optimistic, and that through working smarter and continually improving, the Department would make progress.
Follow-up Items
- Date of the most recent discussion between Department officials and Kashechewan First Nation regarding permanent relocation of the community.