Appearance before the Standing Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples Update on S-3 - An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général), June 10, 2022

Logistics

Date: Friday, June 10, 2022

Time: 3:00 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.
(APPA hearing other witnesses from 2:00 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.)

Location: Room C128, Senate of Canada Building and by videoconference

Subject: Review of the implementation of An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général) (S-3) with a focus on "First Nation Registration Process and Population Projections for Status First Nations moving forward"

Appearing

Indigenous Services Canada (ISC)

• Christiane Fox, Deputy Minister
• John Gordon (Principal, Individual Affairs Branch, Regional Operations), as the Indian Registrar, Office of the Indian Registrar, Individual Affairs Branch
• Michael Walsh, Senior Director, Registration and Integrated Program Management, Individuals Affairs Branch, Regional Operations

Other witnesses expected to appear before ISC (TBC):

• Statistics Canada & PBO
• Individuals / Stakeholders

Context

This meeting is a follow-up of the May 16, 2022, APPA meeting which considered several topics, including "Inequities in registration under the Indian Act." During that meeting, Deputy Minister Fox, Assistant Deputy Minister – Regional Operations Paula Hadden-Jokiel, and Senior Director of Registration and Integrated Program Management Michael Walsh appeared for 30 minutes on that topic. It is anticipated that this meeting will focus on the mechanics of the registration process and population projections of Status First Nations Peoples moving forward.

Minister Hajdu was invited to appear, but was unable to attend due to scheduling conflicts. The Chair of APPA wrote a letter indicating they wanted a written response to five questions on:

1. what is being done to address inequities in registration,
2. what actions are taken to ensure no new inequities are being created, whether it is establishing service standards and timelines for people applying for Status and for those who protest a decision,
3. why there are delays,
4. efforts to simplify the registration process, and
5. ISC's plan to remove itself from involvement in registration under the Indian Act.

See Annex A for responses provided to APPA on May 20, 2022.

APPA launched a broad study on the constitutional, treaty, political and legal responsibilities to First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples on March 28, 2022. It focused on Reclaiming Power and Place: The Final Report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, as well as on An act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Supreme Court of Quebec's decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général) — previously known as Bill S-3.

APPA held three meetings on S-3 (March 28, 2022, May 2 and 16, 2022). Witnesses testified that it's taking too long for Indigenous women to receive registration and the Government of Canada should hire and train more people to speed up the registration process. Some said the bill did not remove all sex-based discrimination, and Canada's approach with its Indian registration and band membership provisions runs contrary to international obligations.

During the May 16 meeting, DM Fox was asked about:

• The process of registration,
• How long it takes for the registrar to make decisions,
• What is being done to speed up the process,
• How many protests are waiting a decision,
• The consultation process for the second-generation cut-off; and,
• How many remaining inequities are being dealt with.

She received three follow-ups from the meeting (Annex B):

• On the process for protests,
• The authority of ISC to decide on status provisions; and,
• The consultation for the second-generation cut-off.

During other meetings, the Senators expressed concerns:

• With the implementation of the Act,
• With the length of time it is taking for registration,
• With the waiting list and red tape,
• The appeals process,
• How to improve the application process,
• How S-3 should be amended to address sex-based discrimination,
• Whether UNDRIP may become a key guidepost in addressing the issue of asserting the right to self-determination, and
• Whether the Indian Act should be abolished and replaced with a robust self-government model directed by First Nations, Inuit and Métis.

Other meetings since May 16, 2022 (unrelated to Bill S-3):

• May 30 and June 3, 2022: The subject matter of elements contained in Divisions 2 and 3 of Part 5 of Bill C-19, Budget Implementation Act, 2022, No. 1
  • The committee heard from ISC officials and Justice Canada on May 30. Senators asked about:
    • Developments since the Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act (the Act) came into effect in 2013, subsequent calls from First Nations for the repeal and replacement of the Act; and the pause since 2015 on the development of regulations (there are currently no federal regulations under the Act);
    • The December 2021 Safe Drinking Water Class Action Litigation Settlement Agreement;
    • Whether the proposed replacement legislation would include the ability to create bylaws on safe drinking water,
    • What the government was doing to ensure Indigenous people had clean water, and analysis of future lawsuits
• June 6, 2022:
  • The committee met in-camera to consider draft reports regarding "the constitutional, treaty, political and legal responsibilities to First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples", and the subject matter of Bill C-19.

Meeting Proceedings

The Deputy Minister will have five minutes to deliver opening remarks. This will be followed by Q&A. APPA does not have a predetermined speaking order by Senate group. Every Senator has five minutes to ask questions during the first round of questions. During the second round, senators who raise their hand can ask additional questions.

Annex A: Standing Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples – Written Questions

An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général)

Annex B: Standing Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples, May 16, 2022 – Follow-up Questions

An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général)

Senator Francis (PSG) asked: The process for Protests, how long does the registrar take to make decisions, and how many protests are waiting for a decision. Mr. Walsh responded that once an individual receives a decision, the person has up to three years to protest that. It usually takes 6 months to process the application, depending on the request. He said he would provide the rest of the response in writing.

Response: The legislated Protest process is defined in section 14.2 of the Indian Act. Per section 14.2(1) of the Act, a Protest can be submitted within 3 years following a decision (addition, deletion or omission) under the Indian Act. Depending on the individual in question, a Protest can be submitted by the person themselves, by the person's representative, a Band council or a member of the Band to which the individual is affiliated.

The processing time of each file varies based on complexity of the case (ancestry, life events, etc.) and communication with individuals to verify or obtain additional information. Every effort is made to complete a Protest in 6 months from receipt of any additional information. The Protest provisions specify a higher standard of care because it is as a result of an investigation, rather than an outcome of an application. As a result, care is taken to ensure each file is given the proper due diligence. Once presented to the Registrar for decision, in the majority of the cases, a decision will be rendered within weeks.

Since Protest decisions are final and conclusive, individuals may instead choose to reapply with new and substantive evidence to preserve their Protest rights once all available evidence has been considered.

Following the coming into force of the legislative provisions of S-3, first in 2017 and again in 2019, the Department proactively reviewed its Protest inventory to render decisions on impacted files due to S-3. This review was essential in ensuring files which had previously been denied, but now meet the provisions to be entitled to registration, received entitlement decisions.

As of May 17, 2022, the Department has 254 Protest files awaiting decision and 3 files with the Registrar for decision.

Senator Brazeau (Non-Affiliated) asked: if Indigenous Services Canada could table with Committee the written document that gives the Department the authority to decide status provisions, and how many times the Department has recommended to the Minister to get out of the business of who gets First Nations status in the country and who does not since 1985.

Deputy Fox said: The Government continues to monitor registration rates and impact on programs and services, and there is an effort to put in more resources to improve processing times … there are programs in place - such as Jordan's Principle – that do not require registration to get services. (She committed to provide the rest of the response in writing.)

Response: The Indian Act (section 3) provides the Minister of Indigenous Services with the authority on provisions.

Section 3 of the Indian Act states: The Minister of Indigenous Services shall be the superintendent general of Indian affairs. This is further clarified in section 5 of the Indian Act where it states 5 (1) There shall be maintained in the Department an Indian Register in which shall be recorded the name of every person who is entitled to be registered as an Indian under this Act.

Although we cannot confirm the exact number of times the Department has recommended to move beyond the Indian Act regarding First Nation registration and membership the Department has regularly affirmed this intention through the consultation processes and Parliamentary processes associated with Bill C-31 (1985), Bill C-3 (2011) and Bill S-3 (2018).

Point of Clarification in response to Senator Christmas' question
Senator Christmas: It's about three years ago now that the Ministerial Special Representative Claudette Dumont-Smith had filed a report, and in her report she mentions that the greatest concern raised throughout her process was the secondgeneration cut-off, and she mentions in her report that in the not-so-distant future some communities will no longer have any registered members.

She had recommended that a separate and more in-depth consultation process begin on this topic of second-generation cut-off. Deputy minister, can you give us an update of where we are in that consultation process as to how soon the second-generation cut-off issue can be dealt with?

Deputy Fox: Thank you very much for the question. As you noted, back in August of 2019 the cut-off was removed from the section 6 registration provisions of the Indian Act, and that was, as you know, in order to ensure that there would no longer be differential treatment between whether it's the patriarch or matriarch lines. We did have a final report published on Bill S-3 and tabled in December of 2020, but you're absolutely right that we do need to continue to consult; and in fact, as part of our ongoing communications, as well as the Nicholas civil litigation, we have made a commitment as a department to continue to engage. That engagement will, in my view, not start and end in a particular time frame; but through our commitment to a legislative process on the cut-off, on the other inequities that remain, we would work with partners, and we're starting those discussions now.

The Chair: Thank you. Being mindful of time, before we go to Senator Coyle, I want to remind officials of the deadline of the end of the week for follow-up answers.

Response: Under S-3, the 1951 cut-off was removed, thereby ensuring that under the section 6 registration provisions of the Indian Act there is no differential treatment between matrilineal and patrilineal lines. While this means that S-3 has addressed sex-based inequities in the registration provisions of the Indian Act, the Final Report to Parliament on the Review of S-3 (tabled in December 2020) acknowledged that the Department needs to take steps to address the remaining inequities in registration under the Indian Act, including the second generation cut-off. As with all potential changes to legislation that have a direct impact on our First Nations partners, the government is committed to meaningful consultations before any changes are brought to Parliament for consideration.

In the December 2020 Report, the Department committed to continue its collaboration with First Nations and other stakeholders on solutions and any necessary amendments to the registration provisions that would support the Department on the path to getting out of the business of Indian registration.

Since November 2020, Juristes Power Law (JPL) has been representing the plaintiffs in the Nicholas civil litigation that seeks Government of Canada to remedy the inequities caused by the enfranchisement.

On January 6, 2022, an abeyance agreement came into force, with the understanding that Canada would initiate the Parliamentary process required to propose the legislative changes needed to address those inequities. On March 2, 2022, the Minister along with Juristes Power Law, publicly announced the abeyance and highlighted the shared objective of addressing the ongoing legacy impacts of enfranchisement. This agreement allows departmental resources to actively focus on the pursuit of the authorities required to introduce the legislative remedy.

With the pursuit of the authorities required for legislative amendments on enfranchisement are underway, the Department remains committed to addressing additional remaining inequities including the second generation cut-off, as recommended by First Nations during the Collaborative Process and reported on by the Minister's Special Representative, Claudette Dumont-Smith in her report.

At this time, there is no consensus on a solution for the second-generation cut-off. The Department recognizes that co-developing a collaborative consultation process with First Nations is required, to ensure that First Nations' substantive preferences and needs are met as a future remedy for the second-generation cut-off is developed. This issue is important because both First Nations bands and First Nation individuals are impacted by the second generation cut-off.

The second generation cut-off was raised by the United Nation's Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women's Matson decision (March 2022). Canada has six months to respond to the decision and Canada has yet to file a response. The Department engages the Feminist Alliance for International Action on the implementation of S-3 and has adopted a number of their suggestions including the priority processing of applications of those 65 years and older. The Department values Feminist Alliance for International Action as experts and advocates and will continue to engage them on solutions to address remaining inequities including the second generation cut off.

Speaking notes for
Christiane Fox, Deputy Minister
Indigenous Services Canada

Update on Bill S-3
An Act to amend the Indian Act, in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada

Senate Chambers
June 10, 2022

Kwe kwe, Ullukkut [Ood-loo-koot], Tansi, hello, bonjour!

I would like to acknowledge that I am speaking to you from the traditional and unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people.

Thank you for another opportunity to update the committee on our department's progress in implementing Bill S-3. I welcome this chance to reinforce the Government of Canada's commitments to gender equality and reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples, which this legislation underscores.

Bill S-3 confirms that Canada is determined to redress the challenges and injustices faced by many Indigenous women and their families due to sex-based inequities under the Indian Act. The Act reinstates entitlement to generations of First Nations people – including those who may have been previously denied entitlement – to registration under the Indian Act.

Mr Chair, I understand that you seek clarity regarding the numbers associated with registrations to date compared to the projected figures when this process began in 2017.

I am pleased to report that, as of April 4 this year, a total of 45,663 applications had been received since Bill S-3 came into force. Of those, nearly 86 percent have been finalized or partially completed, with approximately 6,500 applications remaining to be processed.

We know that some are complex cases and it will likely take time, but we are committed to serving the public and processing cases as timely as possible. The Department acknowledges the impacts of delays in registration and is taking steps to modernize the process to make it more efficient and client-centred.

We continue to make key investments in processing capacity to ensure wait times for individuals continue to improve.

We are working to improve the partnership process with Indigenous organizations, including the Assembly of First Nations and Native Women's Association of Canada, to provide more information about registration and how to apply for those newly entitled.

I can also confirm the successful prioritization of older applicants who were newly entitled under S-3. Applications from all individuals 75+ years or older have been completed and 61 files remain from individuals 65 years and over.

As a result of these efforts, 31,704 people have been added to the Indian register. This brings the total registered population in Canada to 1,049,183 as of June 1, 2022.

Mr. Chair, I realize these numbers are lower than some initial forecasts. Some estimates anticipated that as many as 88,500 applications would have been received by now. I will offer background and context to explain the difference in what was projected and what has materialized.

In preparation for Bill S-3, Indigenous Services Canada accepted demographic projections based on work done by Demographer Stewart Clatworthy as well as the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer. As you know, in 2017 both published reports which were based on differing assumptions.

The department accepted a range of projections suggesting that 270,000 to 450,000 individuals could be eligible for registration under Bill S-3. Based on those figures, we estimated an average of 27,000 to 45,000 new registrations per year, over 10 years.

More recently, Statistics Canada analyzed demographics as part of its projections of Indigenous populations and households in Canada, based on the results of the 2016 Census and 2016 register data. This analysis of data sources, methods, assumptions, and scenarios was published in October 2021. It provided more up-to-date Bill S-3 registration assumptions for the period of 2018 to 2041.

Mr. Chair, the latest Indigenous population projections differ significantly from those of previous years. Statistics Canada now recognizes that the future number of Bill S-3 registrations may be lower than the initial estimated range, and that uptake may occur over a longer period.

Under the new models from Statistics Canada – and based on its highest projection over the 2018 to 2041 period – Bill S-3 may yield an average of 11,000 newly entitled individuals per year over 23 years. This is aligned much more closely, and is consistent with, ISC's current rate for receiving and processing applications.

Wherever the final numbers may lead, I reaffirm our department's determination to ensure every individual eligible to benefit from this legislation is afforded the opportunity to submit an application.

We have invested over $40 million to engage with First Nations to increase awareness of Bill S-3, strengthen processing capacity, develop policy changes, and advance digital solutions, including an online application process.

Undeniably, more remains to be done to fix band membership and registration-related issues in the Indian Act . ISC continues to co-develop solutions with First Nations partners to address the remaining inequities that impact First Nations Peoples and their inherent rights.

I am confident that our collaboration with First Nations, experts and allies will create a constructive path forward.

Meegwetch. Qujannamiik [Koo-ya-na-meek]. Marsee. Thank you. Merci.

Issue summary

In 2016, Bill S-3 was introduced in response to the 2015 Descheneaux decision, which found that the registration provisions in section 6 of the Indian Act violated equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter).

As they were, the registration provisions perpetuated a difference in treatment concerning entitlement to registration between First Nations women as compared to First Nations men and their respective descendants.

S-3 came fully into force to redress sex-based inequities in the registration provisions. The implementation of S-3 has resulted in registration category amendments for over 125,000 registered individuals; extended the capacity to pass on eligibility to their descendants to over 57,000 individuals; and to date, has resulted in over 45,000 new S-3 specific applications received.

Key messages

• The implementation of S-3 responds to the Calls for Justice outlined in the Final Report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls and aligns with the Government's commitment to reconciliation.
• While S-3 addressed known sex-based inequities in the registration provisions of the Indian Act, their residual impacts persist and other inequities still require redress. Solutions to these issues are being considered in ongoing engagement with First Nations, experts and advocates.

Background

In July 2016, the Government of Canada introduced a staged approach in response to the Descheneaux decision that included legislative amendments to the registration provisions of the Indian Act in order to address sex-based inequities in registration.

In 2017, the first set of amendments came into force to address sex-based inequities in the registration provisions, including the differential treatment of siblings, cousins, and minor children omitted from the Register. At this time, a new provision was also introduced to support applicants with unknown or unstated parentage; the Indian Registrar is now required to review a range of evidence and draw every reasonable inference in favor of the applicant in determining entitlement to registration.

Between 2018 and 2019, the Collaborative Process on Indian Registration, Band Membership and First Nations Citizenship occurred across the country. Consultations were led by Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, with Indigenous partners and more than 400 communities on how best to bring S-3 into force.

In August 2019, further amendments removed what is known as the "1951 cut-off." Now, descendants born prior to April 17, 1985, or born of a marriage before that date to Indian women who lost eligibility for registration or were removed from band lists due to marriage to non-Indian men dating back to 1869, are entitled to registration under the Indian Act.

This meant that known sex-based inequities in the section 6 registration provisions of the Indian Act had been addressed.

Bill S-3 required the responsible Minister to report to Parliament three times.

1. On May 10, 2018, the First Report to Parliament was tabled and reviewed the co-design of the Collaborative Process.
2. On June 12, 2019, the Second Report to Parliament was tabled and reviewed the status and findings of the Collaborative Process.
3. On December 11, 2020, the Final Report to Parliament was tabled and reviewed the implementation of S-3.

Implementation Process

In response to S-3 fully coming into force and to assist in application assessment and processing capacity, the Department introduced policy solutions, technical efficiencies and hired and trained additional staff at the dedicated S-3 processing unit in Winnipeg. The Department stood up a new processing unit Quebec city to further support the processing of S-3 applications.

The Department continues to seek additional investments to improve processing capacity and client experience, such as the development of online tools.

As a result of S-3, some individuals registered under subsection 6(2) became eligible for a category amendment to 6(1) which allowed the transmission of status to their descendants. The Department proactively automated over 125,000 category amendments of individuals. Over 57,000 already registered individuals are now able to pass on entitlement to their descendants because of the change in legislation. The Department developed and distributed communications products through stakeholders, organizational partners, and provincial and territorial groups to highlight how the implementation of S-3 has resulted in more individuals becoming eligible for registration, as well as more individuals receiving an amendment to their entitlement category. Through ongoing engagement, the Department will continue to share more information and encourage the public to seek status verification.

Due to the paper-based, mail-in nature of applications for registration, productivity early in the pandemic was reduced. Processing has now exceeded pre-COVID rates.

Current status

The service standard for the processing of applications for registration remains 6 months but in 10% of cases can take longer, for example, when genealogical research is required to link the applicant to an entitled ancestor. That said, some applications are processed very quickly at regional offices, for example, when the child of two parents is already registered. As of April 4, 2022, 45,663 applications have been received under S-3: 28,152 newly entitled applicants have been registered, and 6504 applications remain in the inventory. This is in addition to the processing of regular registration applications.

The Department continues to invest in, strategize, and activate a robust plan to ensure that S-3 is better understood by the public. We continue to strategize and seek new modes of outreach.

The Department continues broad outreach with First Nations and Indigenous partners on S-3 in order to encourage individuals to apply. New public communications materials were created to explain how S-3 impacts individuals and affects registration. A robust communications package with information on S-3, registration, FAQs, and other materials to distribute to communities, partners, and organizations across Canada were developed to draw awareness to S-3. This information was shared through Indigenous Link, a partner organization, connected to over 28,000 unique Indigenous organizations, businesses, and other groups across Canada. In order to strategically reach an even broader range of the newly eligible population, the Department: shared information through Women and Gender Equality Canada; shared information with child and family service organizations at the provincial level; and distributed our communications package to over 1000 women's and seniors' organizations across Canada.

The Department's outreach to urban communities and urban Indigenous organizations has sought to build awareness among and provide support to individuals newly entitled to registration under S-3.To support the transfer of services, over the last year, the Department has increased its number of trusted source partnerships from 3 to 12 with more on the way. These partners have been delegated by the department as a reliable source of information and assist clients through status card processing and providing information on registration including S-3.

The Department is working collaboratively with First Nations partners on outreach and awareness activities to reach individuals who may be eligible for registration. These partners include the Assembly of First Nations, the Native Women's Association of Canada, and the Feminist Alliance for International Action. The Department also continues to meet bilaterally and multilaterally with First Nations on outreach and awareness sessions relating to S-3.

While S-3 addressed sex-based inequities, a number of outstanding inequities in the registration and band membership provisions remain and require redress. Building on the momentum of S-3, the Department is working to address these remaining issues. By proactively righting historic wrongs and working in cooperation with Indigenous peoples, we will continue to advance reconciliation and support a renewed relationship between Canada and Indigenous peoples.

Issue summary

At the four-year mark, the Department has seen one half of the S-3 applications it had initially anticipated and the number of newly registered individuals is also lower than expected. As a result, the impacts to date to programs and services associated with registration under the Indian Act are minimal.

The implementation of S-3 to-date has not yielded funding pressures on programs linked to Indian status. The Department continues to engage with provinces, territories, and First Nation communities to monitor any impacts associated with S-3, and is committed to ongoing outreach and timely access to programs and services for those newly entitled.

Key messages

• The Final report to Parliament on S-3 was tabled in December 2020, and reviewed the implementation of S-3, including its impacts on programs and services. It is available publicly online.
• The Department received half the anticipated number of applications, resulting in fewer than expected newly registered individuals. Accordingly, the impact to programs and services for individuals registered under the Indian Act has been minimal.
• As part of the implementation of S-3, the Department continues to monitor registration rates and associated impacts to programs and services to inform future investments at both the individual and community levels.

Background

At the four-year mark, the Department has seen one half of the S-3 applications it had initially anticipated and the number of newly registered individuals is also lower than expected.

The Department continues to engage with provinces, territories, and First Nation communities to monitor any impacts associated with S-3, and is committed to ongoing outreach and timely access to programs and services for those newly entitled.

Current status

Between December 2017 and April 4, 2022, the Department was projected to receive approximately 88,000 applications; it received 45,663 applications identified as S-3. This has resulted in:

• 28,152 registrations;
• 37,438 processed files;
• 1,721 partially processed files; and
• 6504 are currently in the inventory awaiting review.

The first four years of the implementation of S-3 have not yielded any significant funding pressures on programs linked to Indian status. However, the Department is monitoring registration rates in order to ensure resources be made available should it be determined that S-3 has resulted in additional pressures to programs.

Issue summary

The Second Report to Parliament on S-3 highlighted the findings of extensive consultation with First Nations and other partners during the Collaborative Process on Indian Registration, Band Membership and First Nation Citizenship and noted that there was general agreement concerning the need to remove the 1951 cut-off.

On August 15, 2019, the 1951 cut-off was removed from the registration provisions of the Indian Act. The registration provisions are now aligned for patrilineal and matrilineal lines, going back to 1869.

While known sex-based inequities have been addressed in the registration provisions, the Department recognizes that their residual effects continue to be experienced. It also recognizes that other inequities in the registration provisions persist, including the second generation cut-off, enfranchisement and scrip, which were concerns raised by witnesses at recent committee appearances.

Key messages

• On August 15, 2019, the 1951 cut-off was removed from the section 6 registration provisions of the Indian Act after extensive consultations with First Nations and partners.
• The removal of the 1951 cut-off ensured that there is no longer be differential treatment between patrilineal and matrilineal lines.
• The Final Report to Parliament on S-3 was tabled in December 2020, and highlighted that a range of remaining inequities persist in the registration provisions of the Indian Act, which is available online.

Background

The 1951 cut-off was removed from the registration provisions on August 15, 2019, after extensive consultation with First Nations and other partners during the Collaborative Process on Indian Registration, Band Membership and First Nation Citizenship. The 2019 Report to Parliament on Indian Registration, Band Membership and First Nation Citizenship indicated general agreement for the removal of the 1951 cut-off.

All 6(1)(c) provisions of the Indian Act were repealed or replaced with new 6(1)(a) provisions. These amended provisions now recognize descendants of women who married non-Indian men the same as descendants of men who married non-Indian women.

The registration provisions are now aligned for patrilineal and matrilineal lines going back to 1869. Those newly eligible include grandchildren born prior to September 4, 1951, of women who were removed from their First Nation's band list or lost status because of their marriage to a non-Indian man. Now, descendants born prior to April 17, 1985, (or of a marriage before that date) of women who lost status or were removed from band lists because of their marriage to non-status men going back to 1869 are entitled to registration under the Indian Act.

While known sex-based inequities have been addressed, the Department recognizes that both residual effects of these previous sex-based inequities, other persisting inequities in the registration provisions remain. These include: the "second-generation cut-off," scrip, and enfranchisement.

On November 23, 2020, Juristes Power Law wrote to Minister Marc Miller, Minister Carolyn Bennett, and Minister David Lametti alleging a Charter violation and requesting that the Government of Canada agree to remedy inequities relating to enfranchisement in the registration provisions of the Indian Act.

On June 10, 2021, Juristes Power Law filed the Nicholas Civil Litigation on this issue. The Department's position in the Nicholas Civil Litigation is informed by our understanding of the discriminatory nature of enfranchisement and solutions will be co-produced in collaboration with our partners.

Engagement with First Nations on the issue of enfranchisement dates back to the Collaborative Process on Indian Registration, Band Memberships and First Nation Citizenship in 2018. Ryan Beaton from Juristes Power Law appeared before the Senate Committee on May 2, 2022.

Current status

Issue summary

The Final Report to Parliament on the Review of S-3 highlighted that while known sex-based inequities have been addressed in the registration provisions of the Indian Act, the Department recognizes that their residual effects continue to be experienced.

It also recognizes that other inequities in the registration provisions persist, including the second generation cut-off, enfranchisement and scrip. The Department continues to build on the momentum of S-3 and works towards addressing these remaining inequities. Engagement with partners on potential solutions is ongoing.

The Department is currently working to resolve enfranchisement inequities as outlined in the Nicholas civil action. On January 6, 2022, the Nicholas abeyance agreement came into force, with the understanding that the Government of Canada would initiate the Parliamentary process required to propose the legislative change needed to address enfranchisement related inequities.

The Department is actively seeking the necessary authorities to bring about changes in a timely manner, to honour the abeyance agreement and ensuring that family histories of enfranchisement no longer impact entitlement to registration under the Indian Act.

Key messages

• While S-3 addressed sex-based inequities in the section 6 registration provisions of the Indian Act, the Department acknowledges that the residual impacts of sex-based discrimination in historic law and policy persist.
• The Department is currently working with partners on how to address these and is in an abeyance agreement with litigants seeking to remedy the issue of enfranchisement.
• In collaboration with First Nations, experts and advocates, solutions are being considered for other remaining inequities, including the second generation cut-off, scrip and cross border issues.
• A full legislative process will be required to address these inequities, and collaboration and engagement with Indigenous partners will be necessary to ensure any future amendments reflect their perspectives and are supported by them.

Background

The Final Report to Parliament on the Review of S-3 (tabled in December 2020) determined that while sex-based inequities were addressed in the registration provisions of the Indian Act, there are residual impacts of historic law and policy, as well as other remaining inequities in registration including enfranchisement, the taking of scrip, Section 10 and 11 band membership issues, deregistration, and the "second generation cut-off."

Engagement with First Nations and partners is ongoing to determine how best to address the other remaining concerns such as second generation cut-off, scrip, cross-border issues and band membership concerns. To support engagement, the Department is working collaboratively with partners, including the Assembly of First Nations, the Native Women's Association of Canada, and the Feminist Alliance for International Action. These organizations offer provincial and territorial connections to effectively reach First Nations and First Nation organizations across the country. This is supplemented by direct connection with communities through its existing registration administration related programs.

Some of the most common recommendations made by participants during the Collaborative Process to address other inequities under the Indian Act were:

• share more information, provide funding for ongoing discussions, and co-develop solutions to any further changes or fixes to the Indian Act with First Nations, especially with Indigenous women, leaders, and Elders;
• address inequities to ensure that any direct descendant from a First Nation or registered Indian can be registered
  • one registered parent should be sufficient in order to pass on status to a child ("one-parent rule");
• provide increased funding for First Nations for any subsequent changes to the Indian Act that results in more people being entitled to registration or band membership;
• simplify the legislation: individuals should simply be registered or not and there should be no categories of registration;
• simplify the application process for registration, reduce the requirements, and provide more information and assistance to applicants;
• provide First Nations with support and resources to assist their people in determining ancestry for both registration and membership, including funding for staff, access to records, databases, research, and capacity building for First Nations registration/membership administrators;
  • the burden of proof is on the applicant but it is the government who holds all records. This information should be made available to First Nations and the public;
• support and empower First Nations to define who their own citizens are, in accordance with the treaties and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, rather than continued registration through the Indian Act.

Current status

Issue summary

Since 2017, the Department has committed over $40 million towards S-3. This includes making a number of processing and policy changes to enhance and modernize operations; over $34.5 million in scaling up processing capacity; and over $5.5 million on engagement, outreach and monitoring of impacts.

All of these investments aim to improve the client experience and ensure applicants receive timely access to programs and services.

Key messages

• Canada has invested over $40 million to engage with First Nations to increase awareness of S-3, improve processing capacity, develop policy changes and advance digital solutions, including an online application, all of which have led to greater processing efficiency for S-3 impacted individuals.
• The Department acknowledges the impacts of delays in registration and is taking steps to modernize the process to make it more efficient and client-centered.
• The Department has entered into partnerships with Indigenous organizations, including the Assembly of First Nations and Native Women's Association of Canada, to provide more information about registration and how to apply for those newly entitled. A positive working relationship with the Feminist Alliance for International Action has also informed the Department's S-3 outreach and communications strategy.

Background

To date, the Department has put in place numerous provisions:

• Enhancing processing capacity to support an increase in applications. In addition to ramping up processing capacity in the Winnipeg Processing Unit, a secondary Quebec City Processing Unit was established to enhance overall capacity to render entitlement decisions and further support the processing of applications for French speaking clients.
• The integration of registration and collection of individuals' ancestral information to the great-grandparent level. Doing so improves the Department's ability to research and determine entitlement and ensures clarity in ancestry and facilitates faster file processing for subsequent generations.
• Developing an advanced digital tool to modernize the Department's application process for both registration and Secure Certificate of Indian Status (SCIS).
• The reduction of the number of applicants needed to reapply by holding applications for those eligible under the removal of the "1951 cut-off" instead of denying them in the first phase of S-3.
• Proactively amending category codes. The Department has undertaken over 125,000 category amendments as a result of these legislative changes, and continues process these amendments today.
• Simplifying the application process and processing requirements.
• Introducing new guidance and tools for department staff to address complex cases, such as unknown or unstated parentage cases.
• Updating policy guidance and training for departmental staff across the regions.
• Prioritizing processing files of persons over 75 years of age with applications in the queue. This is to ensure that the elders who may have the lived experience of discrimination caused by sex-based inequities in the provisions of the Act have their applications processed efficiently.
• Digitizing records in order to more efficiently access an applicant's information and family genealogy.
• Implementing non-binary gender identifiers on both registration and Secure Certificate of Indian Status applications.
• Leveraging existing agreements with provincial Vital Statistics Agencies to reduce the burden on applicants who need to acquire information about their birth, their families, and their ancestry.
• Developed partnerships with First Nation organizations, Canada Post Corporation and Correctional Services Canada.

Furthermore, the Department is working collaboratively with other partners including the Assembly of First Nations, the Native Women's Association of Canada, and the Feminist Alliance for International Action to support provincial and territorial engagement with First Nations and First Nation organizations to reach individuals outside the reach of the Department.

Current status

The Department continues to invest in the above policy and process changes as it works towards the full implementation of S-3. The Department continues to meet with partners to collaborate on the full implementation of S-3.

Issue summary

The Indian Act is an extension of Canada's colonial history. While it has been generally viewed as an archaic and paternalistic piece of federal legislation, there is no clear consensus on a way forward.

Many First Nations peoples are outspoken that both the provisions of Indian Status and the federally-maintained Indian Register are important in identifying individuals with clear Aboriginal and Treaty rights.

Conversely, other express that Indian Act bands should have complete control to determine both their own membership and who qualifies for Indian Status based on principles beyond ancestry.

Understanding these different views is important as the Department works to ensure that service transfers and/or possible amendments to legislation reflect the perspectives of the individuals who will be impacted.

Ultimately, the Indian Act will never be fully aligned with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Yet, legislative amendments continue to be required in order to ensure the impacts of its colonial provisions do not continue unabated (e.g. the sex discrimination addressed by S-3). These amendments are requisite next steps prior to the complete transfer of responsibilities to First Nations.

Key messages

• Canada acknowledges that First Nations in Canada have a right to self-determination. The Department has been mandated to move beyond the Indian Act.
• Transferring an increased number of administrative responsibilities to Indian Registration Administrators and Trusted Source Partners, as well as the care and control of programs to First Nations will enable an increase in First Nations control over and involvement in service delivery.
• Engagement with First Nations and partners will continue to develop a path forward to eliminate remaining inequities in the Indian Act as a step towards supporting broad self-determination, self-governance and self-reliance for all interested First Nations.

Background

The Registrar has the authority to devolve and delegate administrative responsibilities. This delegation currently allows for changes to the Indian Register by certain headquarters and regional staff and certain Indian Registration Administrators working for an Indian Act band.

Current status

Canada is actively looking at approaches for longer-term solutions with and for First Nations to take control of their membership separate from the Indian Act, and ISC is actively working towards legislative amendments that would enable the development of off-ramps needed for full transition away from the Indian Act.

Issue summary

Since  2017, the Department has committed over $40 million towards S-3. This includes making a number of processing and policy changes to enhance and modernize operations; over $30 million in scaling up processing capacity; and over $10 million on engagement, outreach and monitoring of impacts. All these investments improve the client experience and ensure applicants impacted by S-3 receive timely access to programs and services.

The Department has created a robust communications plan to reach individuals who may be eligible for status and has explored partnership opportunities with stakeholders to support these efforts.

Key messages

• The Government of Canada has invested over $40 million to support S-3 implementation, including engagement and outreach to ensure impacted populations are informed about the changes to the law.
• The Department has activated a communications strategy to reach those newly eligible, and broadly distributed a robust and engaging information package to partners using multiple channels to reach the broadest possible audience.
• Outreach and engagement continue to be critically important to the continued implementation of S-3, to inform future investments, and to address outstanding concerns and remaining inequities in the registration provisions under the Indian Act.

Background

Since the completion of The Collaborative Process on Indian Registration, Band Membership and First Nation Citizenship in 2018-2019, representatives from over 237 First Nation communities and Indigenous organizations attended 19 Broader Reform Events to continue discussion on remaining inequities in the Indian Act. To date, Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) continues to follow up with First Nations who request an update about the implementation of S-3. ISC has developed several trusted source partnerships with urban Indigenous service providers to support S-3 outreach, establishing 9 new partnerships in 2021-2022.

The Department continues to work with Indigenous organizations on S-3. The Assembly of First Nations was provided contribution funding in 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 to accomplish a number of deliverables relating to S-3, including the development of a video on recent amendments to the registration provisions of the Indian Act and a discussion paper on possible solutions to the remaining inequities. The Native Women's Association of Canada was provided funding over two fiscal years for 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 to undertake outreach through its affiliate organization at the grassroots level. The Indigenous Bar Association and affiliate organizations of the Feminist Alliance for International Action have expressed interest in similar partnerships to support this ongoing work. The Department has integrated several of the recommendations for S-3 implementation presented by Feminist Alliance for International Action, including priority processing applications for those 65+ and extending the reach of our communications strategy in an effort to reach a broader audience.

The Department implemented a robust communications plan to reach individuals who may be eligible for status and launched content through an external partner, Indigenous Link, for public consumption. The package on S-3 contains public-facing material in both official languages with the intent of building awareness, highlighting how the recent legislative changes may entitle more individuals to Indian status, and informing the public on the registration process for S-3 applications and where to apply. These products were distributed to over 28,000 unique email addresses at various Indigenous organizations, businesses, and band offices early in the 2021-2022 fiscal year. This material was also distributed to organizational partners, provincial and territorial groups, as well as over organizations that cater to women, children, and the senior population. Further work on the communications is being undertaken to help reach an even wider audience, and to develop and promote newer, informative material for the public on S-3 and registration.

While in-person engagement continues to be suspended due to COVID-19, the Department has successfully pivoted to a virtual engagement strategy.

Current status

The Department continues to work with Indigenous organizations on S-3 implementation, and is continuing to consider new ways to engage S-3 impacted individuals to inform them of their right to entitlement under the amended law.

Recently this has included, sharing information through Women and Gender Equality Canada; sharing information with child and family service organizations at the provincial level; and distributing our communications package to over 1000 women's and seniors' organizations across Canada. Increased investments in the Department's outreach to urban communities and urban Indigenous organizations has sought to build awareness among and provide support to individuals newly entitled to registration under S-3.

The Minister and departmental officials have met with the Feminist Alliance's S-3 Working Group on multiple occasions and worked to ensure their suggestions on implementing S-3 were incorporated into the Department's strategic implementation approach. These suggestions included successful policy solutions and working towards increased efficiency through modernization and workflow management in the registration process to ensure timely registration of all S-3 impacted files.

In a recent meeting with the Minister, the Feminist Alliance requested that the Department assess the possibility of using pre-established universal communication channels to notify individuals of possible entitlement, and the Department will reach out to government departments like Employment and Social Development Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency.

Issue summary

Enfranchisement was an assimilationist policy that was in force between 1857 and 1985. It was guided by the colonial objective to see First Nations abandon their traditional way of life and adopt the "civilized" customs of colonial settler society. Individuals were enfranchised by application ('voluntarily') or by virtue of profession/living outside of Canada ('involuntarily'). While previous legislation under Bill C-31 (1985), reinstated individuals who had been enfranchised, these provisions do not allow them to transmit status to their descendants to the same extent as those who have no history of enfranchisement.

On November 23, 2020, Juristes Power Law wrote to Minister Marc Miller, Minister Carolyn Bennett, and Minister David Lametti alleging a Charter violation and requesting that the Government of Canada agree to remedy inequities relating to enfranchisement in the registration provisions of the Indian Act. On June 10, 2021, Juristes Power Law filed the Nicholas Civil Litigation on this issue.

On January 6, 2022, an abeyance agreement came into force, with the understanding that the Government of Canada would initiate the Parliamentary process required to propose the legislative change needed to address enfranchisement related inequities.

Key messages

• Canada acknowledges that enfranchisement is one of the remaining inequities in registration under the Indian Act. Addressing enfranchisement was recommended by partners during the Collaborative Process and in each Report to Parliament on S-3, and our unequivocal commitment to eliminating its impacts remains.
• An abeyance agreement in the Nicholas Civil Case reflects our commitment of seeking a timely legislative solution that will address the discriminatory policy of enfranchisement and the impacts it has on people and their descendants today
• The Department is committed to collaborating on solutions with our Indigenous partners as we work towards addressing all of the remaining inequities in registration. A full legislative process is required to address these inequities in the Indian Act, and collaboration and engagement with Indigenous partners is needed to ensure any amendments are supported by First Nations, Parliamentarians and individuals.

Background

The Final Report to Parliament on the Review of S-3 was tabled in December 2020. It determined that while sex-based inequities were addressed in the registration provisions of the Indian Act, both the residual impacts of historic law and policy, and other inequities remain. The Final Report acknowledges that enfranchisement is one of the remaining inequities. The Report conveys the Department's understanding of the discriminatory nature of enfranchisement, highlights the commitment to redress this issue, and notes that engagement on a solution continues.

Prior to 1951, the Indian Act defined a 'person' as "an individual other than an Indian." An Indigenous person's only avenue to being recognized as a "person" was to give up their Indian status, which was known as "voluntary" enfranchisement. Once enfranchised, they became recognized as "persons" but gave up associated legal rights and benefits of being a status Indian. Ultimately, the purpose of enfranchisement was to assimilate 'Indians' into settler society.

In 1985, C-31 reinstated individuals through subsection 6(1)(d) if they enfranchised by application or 6(1)(e) if it was involuntary. While reinstated, the individuals entitled under these categories cannot transmit status to their descendants to the same extent as individuals entitled under the 6(1)(a) provisions, including those who gained eligibility under S-3. As a result, the lived experience of inequities related to enfranchisement continue to impact the descendants of these men and women.

The Department's position in the Nicholas Civil Litigation is informed by our understanding of the discriminatory nature of enfranchisement and solutions will be co-produced in collaboration with our partners. Engagement with First Nations on the issue of enfranchisement dates back to the Collaborative Process on Indian Registration, Band Membership and First Nations Citizenship in 2018.

On November 23, 2020, Juristes Power Law wrote to Minister Marc Miller, Minister Carolyn Bennett, and Minister David Lametti alleging a Charter violation and requesting that the Government of Canada agree to remedy inequities relating to enfranchisement in the registration provisions of the Indian Act. On June 10, 2021, Juristes Power Law filed the Nicholas Civil Litigation on this issue.

On January 6, 2022, an abeyance agreement came into force, with the understanding that the Government of Canada would initiate the Parliamentary process required to propose the legislative change needed to address enfranchisement related inequities. A press release was released on March 2, 2022, reaffirming this commitment.

Current status

On March 2, 2022, along with Juristes Power Law publicly announced the abeyance and highlighted the shared objective of addressing the ongoing impact of enfranchisement. This agreement allows departmental resources to actively focus on the pursuit of a legislative remedy that will ensure that those equal entitlement to registration under the Indian Act for those with family histories of enfranchisement.

Issue summary

The Department continues to implement its robust outreach plan to encourage individuals who are newly entitled under S-3 to apply for registration. We are working with partners, including the Assembly of First Nations, the Native Women's Association of Canada, and the Feminist Alliance for International Action, to ensure effective grassroots community engagement.

Outreach efforts will be strengthened through stakeholders and partners' channels in the months ahead. The Department is integrating outreach strategies suggested by partners and, in turn, our outreach efforts are being amplified through stakeholders and partners' channels.

While sex-based inequities have been addressed in registration, we recognize other wrongs still exist and we plan to take steps to address them.

Key messages

Indigenous Services Canada continues to undertake outreach on S-3 to inform all those impacted by the legislative changes.

The Department continues to make key investments in processing capacity to ensure wait times for individuals continue to improve.

The Department will be informed by updated demographic estimates published by Statistics Canada in Fall 2021.

Background

S-3 addressed sex-based discrimination in the registration provisions and the Final Report to Parliament, tabled on December 11, 2020, highlighted next steps:

1. Continue to work with partners and advocates on outreach and communications.

Feedback makes it clear that S-3 and its provisions are not well understood. The Department will continue its communications efforts and outreach plan addressing S-3 and how the new legislation may impact individuals who are registered or could be entitled to registration under the Indian Act. Continued engagement with First Nations is necessary to understand and monitor the impacts of S‑3 over time. The Department will continue its outreach to urban communities and Indigenous organizations to ensure that those who may not yet know that they are newly entitled to registration are aware of the legislative changes and are provided the opportunity and support to apply. The Department will continue to engage with First Nations on the implementation of S-3 and report back on any funding related pressures on programs. Ongoing collaboration with the Assembly of First Nations, the Native Women's Association of Canada, and the Feminist Alliance for International Action will continue to support engagement by reaching First Nations communities across all provinces and territories to better understand the impacts of S-3. Collaboration with Indigenous Link, an organization connected to First Nations and First Nation Organizations across the country, has helped the Department share valuable and informative communications material on S-3 and registration.

2. Address the unnecessary delays in registration

The Department recognizes that unnecessary delays in registration exists and impact equitable access to benefits and services especially for those who are newly entitled under S-3.  There has been an improvement in processing capacity resulting from the establishment of the Quebec City Processing Unit and ramping up capacity in the existing Winnipeg Processing Unit. The Department will continue to advance efficiencies to improve client experience and reduce wait times for rendering decisions on entitlement, while implementing a national workflow realignment strategy that ensures consistent client-centered service standards regardless of point of application across the country.

3. Address the remaining inequities in registration

Moving forward, the Department continues to take steps to address the remaining inequities in registration under the Indian Act.  Using the research and information from First Nations partners and stakeholders, the Department continues to collaborate on solutions and any necessary amendments to the registration provisions of the Indian Act to ensure that the Department remains on the path to "getting out of the business of Indian registration."

Current status

The Department has activated the 3 next steps identified above, and is continuing outreach with the intention of achieving full and increasingly efficient implementation of S-3.

As a result, as of April 4, 2022, only 6504 applications remain to be processed. The dedicated units process over 1600 requests per month, which is more than is received resulting in shorter wait times for people applying today.

Statistics Canada's demographic simulation suggested that based on the highest projection and over the course of 2018 – 2041, S-3 may only yield an average addition of 11,000 newly entitled individuals per year over 23 years. This is in contrast to the government's accepted estimate of 270,000 individuals over 10 years.

Applications received and processed for S-3:

Total Projected Applications up to March 31, 2022:  88,500

Applications Received since December 22,  2017:  45,663

• Applications Processed to Completion:  37,438 (82%)
  • Of those, individuals registered by S-3 Processing Units:  28,152
• New Applications Remaining to be Processed:  6,504 (14.2%)
• Applications Partially Processed:  1,721 (3.8%)

85.8% of all applications have been processed or partially processed to completion.

Notable:

• English S-3 Applications:
  • Officers are now working on files with the oldest received dates from the week of July 30, 2021.
• French S-3 Applications:
  • Officers are now working on files with the oldest received dates from the week of November 5, 2021.
  • With the Quebec Processing Unit now fully operational, the English and French processing capacities can move forward on a First in First out basis.
• Priority Processing based on Age
  • All of those aged 75+ have been processed.
  • As of December 2021, 383 individuals aged 65+ have had their applications priority processed.
  • Number of individuals remaining to be priority processed based on age: 61.
• In summary, since the implementation of S-3 in 2017, the Department has received 45,663 applications for registration and processed 37,438 files. This has resulted in 28,152 people being added to the register, bringing the total registered population to 1,045,631 as of March 2022.

Issue summary

Per section 5 of the Indian Act, individuals are required to apply for registration in order to have their name added to the Indian Register.

The receipt of an application triggers a review of the applicant's entitlement to registration pursuant to the provisions of section 6 of the Indian Act. Applications are assessed to determine the applicant's entitlement to registration and confirm the identity of the applicant. The decision is then communicated to the applicant.

The Department received 45,663 applications for registration nationally under the S-3 legislation. Of those, nearly 86 percent have been finalized or partially completed, with approximately 6,500 applications remaining to be processed. Applications from all individuals 75+ years or older have been completed and 61 files remain from individuals 65 years and over. As a result of these efforts, 31,704 people have been added to the Indian register. The total registered population is 1,049,183 as of June 1, 2022.

Key messages

• Registration under the Indian Act is voluntary and requires an application to be submitted. Applicants can submit applications by mail or in person – intake points include 16 regional offices and 500 band offices at First Nations. Twelve trusted source partnerships were recently established with community-based Indigenous organizations to further increase application completion and intake capacity.
• Applications are assessed to determine if the applicant has established a direct connection to an ancestor who has the ability to pass on entitlement to their descendants.
• Ancestral research is conducted based on information provided by the applicant and applicants must provide foundational documents that link them to their entitled ancestor. Where possible, documentation is supplemented with records held by the department or at Library and Archives Canada.
• Applications are processed on a first in, first out basis. The service standard for application processing is 6 months. It is anticipated that we will meet this service standard by September 2022 as a result of increasing processing efficiencies.
• If an applicant chooses to protest a decision on their application, they must do so within three years of the date the decision was rendered by the Indian Registrar.

Background

The application process is unique with each individual; their history and life events (adoptions, etc.) and the completeness of their application will impact the determination of their entitlement as well as the time it takes to process their application.

Complete applications with established ancestries require less processing time than applications that are missing information or where ancestral entitlement has not yet been established and requires additional or extensive research.

As part of their application form, applicants are provided with a checklist of what they must provide in order to satisfy entitlement and identity requirements:

• a completed and signed application;
• an original proof of birth document listing their parent(s) name(s);
• supporting identity document(s), and name linking document(s) if applying under a name other than their birth name.

If they are applying by mail, they are also required to provide a completed Guarantor Declaration form.

When applications are received, original documentation is certified and core data (bio data, address, ancestral information) is recorded in the Indian Registration System. The application package is scanned and linked to the digital file and correspondence is sent to the applicant acknowledging receipt of their application and returning any original documentation provided.

Applications are then processed based on the data received. Processing officers evaluate the information provided and research the applicant's ancestry. The level of research required varies depending on the information provided by the applicant and whether the applicant's ancestry has been previously researched. To ensure the integrity of the Indian Register, ancestral life events going back as far as 1869 may need to be considered and assessed not only against the current Indian Act but the Act in force at the time of the event. As the depth and breadth of researched individuals in the Indian Registration System grows, research complexity and length of time required will decrease.

Where applications are incomplete, either in terms of a link from the applicant to an established ancestor (or establishing the entitlement of their ancestor) or to confirm the applicant's identity, the applicant is sent correspondence outlining the documents or information required to continue processing their application. They are encouraged to provide the requested information within 90 days. Applicants are not denied if they do not respond within this time frame but their application becomes inactive until further information is provided.

Where applications are complete and an entitlement decision can be recorded, processing officers must have documented and determined the entitlement of every generation between the applicant and their entitled ancestor. This is required to determine if entitlement can be passed on to, and by, the applicant and that the applicant meets the provisions for registration pursuant to Section 6 of the Indian Act.

Registration decisions result in the addition of the applicant to the Indian Register. Following registration, the applicant is informed in writing of their registration category, registration number, band membership or affiliation (as appropriate) and are provided proof of registration.

When an applicant does not meet the provisions for registration laid out in the Indian Act, their application is denied and they are afforded the opportunity to protest.

Previously denied applicants are able to reapply subsequent to legislative amendments or where they are able to provide additional information that supports their entitlement to registration.

Current status

The Department continues to seek opportunities to improve processing times and client service by reviewing existing processes to identify inefficiencies, leveraging technology, and realigning workload to support consistent client-centered service delivery.

Mary Coyle – Independent Seantors Group (ISG) Nova Scotia (Antigonish)

Nancy J. Hartling – Independent Senators Group (ISG) New Brunswick

David M. Arnot- Independent Senators Group (ISG) Saskatchewan

Kim Pate – Independent Senators Group (ISG) Ontario

Dan Christmas, (Deputy Chair) – Independent Senators Group (ISG) Nova Scotia

Michèle Audette – Independent Senators Group (ISG) Quebec (De Salaberry)

Donald Neil Plett – Conservative Party of Canada (C) Manitoba (Landmark)

Yonah Martin – Conservative Party of Canada (C) British Columbia (British Columbia)

Dennis Glen Patterson - Canadian Senators Group (CSG) Nunavut

Scott Tannas – Canadian Senators Group (CSG) Alberta

Sandra M. Lovelace Nicholas – Progressive Senate Group (PSG) New Brunswick

Brian Francis, (Chair) – Progressive Senate Group (PSG) Prince Edward Island

Patti LaBoucane-Benson – Non-affiliated Alberta

Patrick Brazeau – Non-affiliated Quebec (Repentigny)