Modernization of Indigenous participation in procurement: discussion paper

This paper is intended only to stimulate discussion and feedback. The views expressed in this paper do not constitute official policy positions of the Government of Canada.

On this page

Executive summary

In 2016, a Government of Canada-wide approach to update the way in which the Government of Canada purchases goods and services was launched. As part of this procurement modernization process, Crown-Indigenous relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC) started a review of the federal approach to Indigenous participation in procurement (Indigenous procurement), including the 22 year-old Procurement Strategy for Aboriginal Business (PSAB). CIRNAC's goal is to strengthen procurement policies, guidelines and mechanisms to maximize the participation of and benefit to Indigenous peoples, businesses and communities. The modernization of Indigenous participation in procurement contributes to reconciliation between Canadians and Indigenous peoples by encouraging Indigenous business development and socio-economic outcomes that support the path to self-determination.

Each year, the Government of Canada purchases approximately $18 billion in goods and services from the private sector to support the ongoing delivery of federal programs and services. While Indigenous peoples represent nearly 5% of the Canadian population, targeted Indigenous procurements under PSAB totaled $93.5 million in 2015, representing less than 1% of all federal procurements. However, under PSAB, Indigenous benefit plans in larger contracts such as Indigenous training, employment and sub-contracting targets could account for another $500 million per year in benefits, although data is not consistently tracked.

The Indigenous market income was expected to be above $30 billion for 2016, according to the Toronto Dominion Bank (PDF). Economists estimate that Canada would be $27.7 billion richer every year if Indigenous income levels were comparable to the rest of the population, resulting in a 1.5% boost in Canada's GDP. Closing this gap would also result in fewer Indigenous peoples living in poverty.

As part of the modernization of the federal approach to Indigenous procurement, CIRNAC has:

These engagements have highlighted five principles that should drive a modernized Indigenous procurement policy:

CIRNAC has identified 23 considerations that could improve and modernize the Government of Canada's support for Indigenous participation in procurement that can be grouped into either supply or demand categories.

Supply: Considerations that increase the supply of Indigenous businesses that can do business with government

Demand: Considerations that increase government demand for services from Indigenous businesses

Background

The importance of the Government of Canada's relationship with Indigenous peoples is a key commitment in each ministerial mandate letter. By updating procurement policies and practices, the government hopes to contribute to the renewal of that relationship based on recognition of rights, respect, cooperation and partnership.

In October 2016, the government launched a procurement modernization process to update the way in which it purchases goods and services. This process has three themes: open and fair procurement, socio-economic procurement and innovation.

As part of the government-wide approach to procurement modernization, CIRNAC is reviewing Indigenous participation in procurement including the 22 year-old Procurement Strategy for Aboriginal Business (PSAB). By doing this, CIRNAC hopes to improve and strengthen procurement policies, guidelines and mechanisms to maximize the participation and benefit of Indigenous peoples, businesses and communities from federal programs, expenditures and investments.

Government procurement is a process leading to a contract for the acquisition of a good or a service to fulfill a need internal to the operations of the federal government.

Each year, the government purchases approximately $18 billion in goods and services from the private sector to support the ongoing delivery of federal programs and services. These procurements have the potential to promote Indigenous socio-economic development. Competing for and working on contracts with the government can help build the skills of workers, increase the experience and size of a business, and secure partnerships which provide access to additional resources and equipment. Many Indigenous business leaders have indicated that the federal procurement process is one of the main tools that has helped their business become stable and profitable.

Indigenous participation in procurement provides opportunities to Indigenous entrepreneurs who face more challenges than non-Indigenous entrepreneurs. Indigenous business owners have less access to capital and fewer established business networks than non-Indigenous entrepreneurs. Moreover, Indigenous businesses are often located remotely, which means Indigenous entrepreneurs may not have access to infrastructure like roads, airports, distribution systems or a reliable internet connection. This results in much higher costs.

Employees and owners of Indigenous businesses sometimes do not have the skills, training or experiences that are on par with the broader economy. The Indian Act, which impacts businesses on reserve, is difficult to work under and can also deter entrepreneurship. Some groups, Indigenous women for example, face additional challenges including a lack of resources for childcare, lower rates of financial literacy, shortages of technical skills and insufficient business support. Finally, Indigenous entrepreneurs must work with people and companies who might not appreciate Indigenous culture and circumstances and that do not recognize their business potential.

Even though Indigenous entrepreneurs face many obstacles, they have a big impact on their communities. Indigenous businesses are responsible for one quarter of Indigenous jobs. They are diverse: Indigenous businesses exist in all regions of the country and in all sectors and markets. While Indigenous businesses mostly serve their local markets in their own province or territory, half have customers in other provinces and territories and many have an international reach.

According to Census 2016, there are 1,673,785 Aboriginal peoples (which include First Nations, Inuit and Métis) in Canada, representing approximately 5% of the total population of Canada. With an average age almost a decade younger than the non-Indigenous Canadian population and a growth rate of 42.5% from 2006 to 2016, this population is young and is rapidly growing.

The size of the Indigenous economy was expected to be over $30 billion dollars in 2016. The National Aboriginal Economic Development Board, in its Aboriginal Economic Benchmarking Report (PDF), observed that "the rapidly growing numbers of self-employed Indigenous Canadians suggests a strong entrepreneurial spirit within Indigenous communities, and potential for continued growth under the right conditions". The growth in self-employment among Indigenous peoples is more than three times the national average for non-Indigenous Canadians.

Clearly, there is significant potential to use procurement to create more opportunities for Indigenous peoples in Canada. The relative youth of the Indigenous population and entrepreneurs more specifically, the impressive growth rate of Indigenous small business and self-employment, the impact of Indigenous business on local employment, the widespread presence of Indigenous businesses, Indigenous proximity to Canada's natural resources and increasing control over lands and resources are all significant developments.

Moreover, successes in other countries speak to the strong potential of the procurement modernization initiative here in Canada. Australia set a target to increase Indigenous procurement from 0.5% to 3% over a 5-year period. The target was based on the population of Indigenous peoples, which according to their 2016 census, is nearly 3% of the total Australian population. Australia exceeded its 3% target after two years.

The modernization of the policy to increase Indigenous participation in procurement has included:

This discussion paper summarizes everything learned to date and identifies 23 policy modernization areas for consideration.

Current approach to Indigenous participation in procurement

The Government of Canada generally approaches Indigenous participation in procurement through the 1996 Procurement Strategy for Aboriginal Business (PSAB) and to satisfy economic measures identified in some modern treaties. PSAB is the primary tool used by the government to address the under-representation of Indigenous participation within federal procurement processes. PSAB enhances the creation, growth and long-term viability of Indigenous businesses by empowering them to successfully compete for federal procurement opportunities.

The strategy is implemented through 5 key approaches:

  1. Mandatory set-asides
    • Procurements are required to be set-aside which means that only Indigenous businesses can compete against other Indigenous businesses for the contract
    • This will occur only if Indigenous peoples make up at least 80% of the population in the procurement area, the Indigenous population will be the recipient of the good, service or construction and the value of the contract is over $5,000
  2. Voluntary set-asides
    • A procurement may be voluntarily set-aside under PSAB if Indigenous capacity exists and where operational requirements, best value, prudence, probity and sound contracting management can be assured
  3. Indigenous Participation Components (IPC) or Indigenous benefit plans
    • In tendering large and complex contracts, the government may set-aside a portion of the value of a contract for Indigenous participation which can be direct or indirect
    • Direct IPC refers to Indigenous sub-contracting and employment, while indirect IPC refers to scholarships, training and bursaries
  4. Joint venturing
    • Through PSAB, an Indigenous business may form a joint venture with a non-Indigenous business in order to increase business capacity
  5. Targets, data collection and reporting
    • PSAB requires federal departments to set annual non-mandatory targets and relies on data collected from federal departments to produce performance reports on Indigenous procurement. The last report was published in 2014
    • Data collection and integrity issues have created reporting delays

To be considered an Indigenous business under PSAB, the following criteria must be met:

More details can be found in the Procurement Strategy for Aboriginal Business Booklet.

Program integrity is maintained through various methods, including certification forms, audits and registration in the Indigenous Business Directory.

Certification forms: When a contract is set-aside under PSAB, Indigenous businesses must self-declare they adhere to PSAB criteria by signing certification forms. Certified businesses can be audited at any time. If a complaint regarding non-compliance is received, an audit is done

Audits: For contracts valued at or greater than $2 million a mandatory pre-award audit is conducted. The contracting authority may also request a post-award audit to ensure that the contractor meets PSAB criteria during the contract duration. Finally, a random audit is used to ensure the integrity of the Indigenous Business Directory by guaranteeing that businesses registered under the PSAB are compliant with the requirements set out in the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's Contracting Policy Notice 1996-6

Indigenous Business Directory: The Indigenous Business Directory is a search engine available to private industry, municipal and provincial governments and the federal procurement community for identifying qualified Indigenous suppliers in various sectors. When a business registers in the Indigenous Business Directory, they self-declare that they adhere to the eligibility requirements set out under PSAB. Government departments can also proactively seek out Indigenous businesses and register them in the directory at any time prior to awarding the contract

CIRNAC is currently working with departments on over 25 major procurement processes to incorporate employment, training and business sub-contracting targets.  Since, data is not consistently tracked and is subject to uncertainty, the benefits to these procurements have not yet been determined

Three departments have roles in implementing PSAB:

CIRNAC supports the implementation of PSAB by:

TBS is responsible for providing policy direction to support federal departments in the application of PSAB. Where CIRNAC proposes an amendment to directives or related policy instruments, Cabinet is responsible for the review and approval of the proposed changes.

PSPC coordinates its efforts with CIRNAC to inform Indigenous businesses across Canada about the policy and federal contracting requirements and opportunities. PSPC provides training on how to do business with the federal government and provides annual federal Indigenous business procurement data results from government departments and agencies to CIRNAC.

In addition to PSAB, the government can take additional measures where a procurement related activity occurs in a Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement (CLCA) areas. These modern treaties are agreements made between the Government of Canada, Indigenous groups and often provinces and territories that define ongoing rights, benefits and obligations on all sides. Specific treaty rights, benefits and obligations vary depending on the time and circumstances in which they were negotiated. Treaties can be divided into two main categories: historic treaties and modern treaties.

No two CLCA's are exactly the same and are legally binding on all parties to the agreements. Some CLCAs include measures dealing with procurement, which are aimed at maximizing economic opportunities for the Indigenous groups involved in the agreement. Separating requirements into commodity or geographic groupings and using CLCA business directories and lists are examples of additional measures the government applies in CLCA areas over and above PSAB.

Indigenous participation in procurement is also pursued through other government initiatives such as the First Nations Tendering Policy, which encourages Indigenous business participation when recipients undertake procurement with grants and contribution funding.

What we have learned so far

Five principles were identified during the engagement sessions describing what successful Indigenous procurement looks like:

1. Fair

"No relationship is more important to me and to Canada than the one with Indigenous Peoples.  It is time for a renewed, nation-to-nation relationship with Indigenous peoples, based on recognition of rights, respect, co-operation and partnership".

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

Roundtable participants recognized that Indigenous procurement is "just good business", and that building Indigenous business capacity, stronger Indigenous communities and better lives for Indigenous people benefits Canada as a whole.

Under a successful Indigenous procurement strategy:

  • Federal Indigenous procurement results in an immediate increase in the percentage, number and dollar value of total procurement contracts between Indigenous businesses and the government
  • Federal procurement levels correspond with the Indigenous population in Canada
  • Indigenous businesses are being created, growing and becoming more sustainable, helping to make Indigenous people more self-sufficient
  • Economic reconciliation between Indigenous peoples and non-Indigenous people is underway
  • Both socio-economic and regional benefits are reaching Indigenous communities because of procurement contracts
  • When an Indigenous community is located near a project, it should be given priority in the bidding process. Only when local businesses cannot take on the work should the government look for businesses to fulfill its procurement contracts from outside the community. However, when this happens the government should be sure to include Indigenous benefit plans in their contracts to ensure the community is still helped by the project

2. Demonstrates leadership and commitment

The success of Indigenous procurement modernization depends on leaders and champions at all levels of government and across our society. Indigenous procurement cannot be addressed by any single government department and so a whole-of-government approach is necessary to ensure that the plan makes sense both across departments and at all levels of management and that leadership is distributed accordingly.

Under a successful Indigenous procurement strategy:

  • Indigenous procurement modernization efforts are coordinated and integrated
  • Efforts and initiatives are open, inclusive and transparent
  • Procurement targets are set high enough to ensure that the government changes its procurement practices immediately, meeting suggested targets of 5% to 15% with yearly increases of 0.5% to 1%
  • The Prime Minister's mandate letters include these targets, signalling to the government that meeting targets is a priority with the political will to back it
  • Government policies link public service executive bonuses to meeting procurement targets and impose penalties for failing to meet those targets

Acknowledging that most of the work that needs to be done occurs outside of government, Indigenous procurement promotes broad, multi-stakeholder partnerships between business and industry, local communities, civil society and other relevant groups.

"The Prime Minister should send out a mandate letter to ministers, a separate mandate letter should be sent out to departments with a 10% target—if not, they would not be entitled to bonuses."

Roundtable participant

3. Accountable and transparent

Under a successful Indigenous procurement strategy:

  • Public reporting of how departments perform when it comes to meeting their targets and ensuring success is widespread, detailed and clear
  • Reporting ensures that the public knows how procurement is broken down by geographic area, whether it is urban, rural or remote, by municipality, province or territory, by sector, commodity or dollar value and which Indigenous groups (First Nations, Inuit and Métis) they benefit

4. Supportive, innovative

Under a successful Indigenous procurement strategy:

  • Indigenous businesses are defined as being at least 51% owned and controlled by Indigenous peoples and a point system is in place to help identify acceptable balances of ownership and control for businesses that benefit from Indigenous procurement
  • The requirement that one third of a business' labour be Indigenous to qualify should be removed. Both large and small businesses should benefit from federal procurement and procurement opportunities that go to these firms and not to "shell" businesses
  • Procurement targets are set high enough and incentives to meet them are meaningful enough to ensure that the government changes its procurement practices immediately. This includes mandatory set-asides, unbundling large contracts, creating subcontracting opportunities and more opportunities for large Indigenous businesses to be prime contractors, minimum thresholds for Indigenous content, a point system to encourage Indigenous content, preferred contracting, the opening up of supply chains, matchmaking services to encourage partnerships and joint ventures, and Indigenous benefit plans

5. Streamlined, strengthened and devolved

Under a successful Indigenous procurement strategy:

  • Procurement processes are simplified and the amount of time available to apply for them (lead times) has been increased to make it easier for Indigenous businesses to apply
  • Communities receive early notification of upcoming opportunities in their region
  • Security and bid deposit requirements are reduced so that businesses with fewer resources can participate
  • The government pays for procurement contracts promptly
  • A capital pool and an Indigenous bonding product are available to help Indigenous businesses invest and grow
  • The federal procurement process increases the capacity and sustainability of Indigenous businesses
  • Indigenous economic development organizations receive local support and resources to guide and mentor Indigenous business with the federal procurement process
  • The government also makes use of online training, automated processes, workshops, self-assessments and guidance to help improve the capacity of Indigenous businesses
  • Moving the control of policies and programs affecting Indigenous peoples, communities and nations, like Indigenous procurement, to the people they affect is the shared aim of the federal government and Indigenous peoples
  • While the federal government provides support and guidance for Indigenous procurement efforts, most of the work is be done by organizations outside of government and closest to Indigenous businesses, communities and people

Considerations for policy modernization of Indigenous participation in procurement

This section outlines the current challenges in 7 areas and what people said during engagements. Applicable best practices identified from other jurisdictions are also included. Then the resulting 23 considerations for policy modernization are presented as potential approaches.

1. Introducing mandatory targets

"Reconciliation is about ensuring that everything we do today is aimed at that high standard of restoring balance in the relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people."

Justice Murray Sinclair, Chair, Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada

Although many federal departments and agencies award set-aside contracts, the majority of these are from just a few departments. To find out more consult the PSAB 2014 Annual Report.

Roundtable participants strongly supported the introduction of mandatory government-wide targets to drive Indigenous participation in procurement. They also specified that the mandatory targets need to be high enough to force departments to take action. The suggested mandatory targets range from 5% to 15% of all federal purchases. To reach the mandatory targets, participants recommended increasing the percentage of Indigenous participation in federal procurement by 0.5% to 1% per year until the government-wide targets are met.

They suggested that the targets be included in the Prime Minister's mandate letters to ministers and that management performance bonuses depend on meeting them. They also suggested penalties for failing to achieve the targets.

Other jurisdictions, such as Australia, have successfully applied mandatory targets to drive Indigenous participation in federal procurement.

Consideration 1: Committing to secure a percentage of total procurement from Indigenous business by establishing mandatory targets.

  • Under this scenario, the Government of Canada would introduce a mandatory government-wide target to increase Indigenous participation in procurement, for example, to 5% of total dollar value of federal procurement over a five-year period. According to Canada's 2016 census, Indigenous peoples make up approximately 5% of the population in Canada. This 5% target could be applied to each department or agency or, in recognizing that departments and agencies may vary in their ability to find Indigenous businesses that meet specific requirements, departments and agencies could work collectively to achieve the 5% target
  • Incentives such as the management accountability framework or executive bonuses would be explored to encourage departments to increase Indigenous participation in procurement. The targets could also be embedded in legislation

Consideration 2: Setting mandatory targets for the percentage of total departmental procurements for which a capacity study or a market analysis was performed.

  • Under this proposal, departments would set targets for the number of procurements for which a local Indigenous market analysis describing the Indigenous workforce and including both individuals and firms is performed. Where such analysis indicates that there is market capacity, contracting authorities would be required by policy to add evaluation criteria favoring the performance of the contract, or parts of the contract, by the local Indigenous community.

Consideration 3: Reporting annually to Parliament on departmental performance against established targets.

  • Reporting on departmental performance against the government-wide target would occur on an annual basis and within six month of the end of the calendar year. Data would be reported with disaggregation of data by region, industry sector, cultural group and gender where possible

2. Fostering a culture of awareness, trust and understanding within the Government of Canada

Federal government procurement is decentralized and complex, therefore, efforts to increase Indigenous participation in procurement must be coordinated and integrated. Indigenous procurement cannot be addressed by any single government department and success depends on leaders and champions at all levels of government and across society. A government-wide approach is necessary to ensure that the plan makes sense both across departments and at all levels of management and that leadership is distributed accordingly.

Some departments are taking steps to increase Indigenous participation in procurement. For example, PSPC is currently revising the Supply Manual and the Standard Acquisitions Clauses and Conditions (SACC) Manual, which are two key instruments used by federal contracting officers. The Supply Manual contains policies, procedures and references to acts and directives for the procurement of goods, services and construction. The SACC manual provides the standard texts to be used as procurement clauses and general conditions, as well as instructions on how and when these clauses and conditions are used.

PSPC will also develop policy tools and templates, as well as training material to support the procurement community in implementing modern treaty obligations in the procurement process. PSPC and CIRNAC also actively encourage the voluntary inclusion of benefits for Indigenous businesses and peoples in procurements, including in historical treaty areas and traditional lands.

The Department of National Defense is in the early stages of improving its internal governance, systems and processes for tracking and reporting on PSAB set-asides, including establishing a methodology to set measureable performance objectives.

However, despite actions taken by departments to date, roundtable participants said that the government as a whole does not have a culture that sufficiently supports Indigenous participation in procurement. In fact, the social and economic benefits of procurement both for Indigenous businesses and for Canada more generally are not widely understood and appreciated, even within the government's procurement community. This lack of awareness and reluctance to work with new suppliers is a problem among senior leaders, departments and procurement officers.

Staff who are responsible for contracting often have well-established supply chains and consider unknown suppliers risky, especially if they do not have past experience with government contracts. This problem is made worse by the fact that there are not enough opportunities for Indigenous firms to demonstrate that they can handle federal contracts. Businesses that do not have prior experience with government contracts lack experience and seem even more risky.

One way to reduce this problem of risk aversion is for TBS to change the definition of "value for money". This would encourage procurement officers to consider the value of the opportunity to create social, economic and environmental benefits for Indigenous business, communities and peoples, and thinking of project outcomes beyond their monetary value.

In addition, government officials should form partnerships with Indigenous businesses, federal government departments and overcome misperceptions about perceived complications in doing business with Indigenous firms. The procurement community often has little experience with Indigenous peoples, communities and businesses. Misconceptions about the capabilities of Indigenous suppliers to fulfill contract requirements and a widespread lack of knowledge about how to approach Indigenous business, are the result of insufficient corporate expertise in Indigenous relations, and a lack of familiarity with doing business in the Indigenous context.

Successful Indigenous procurement requires values and principles that support trust, strong relationships and mutual understanding. One of the most important ways to start building those values and making them part of the government's culture is to establish long-term personal relationships at all levels. This helps to break down misconceptions of "otherness" and build trust in its place. These relationships must be between mainstream business, federal procurement staff, supply chains and Indigenous suppliers.

People who participated in PSAB engagement sessions supported creating networks to connect federal government procurement staff with Indigenous business, especially at the local and regional levels. Participants identified the need for procurement staff to understand and develop long-term relationships with Indigenous businesses.

Special effort must be made to build an understanding of the history, challenges and strengths of Indigenous peoples. This would help people at all levels of the procurement process understand how their actions can support Canada's reconciliation efforts with Indigenous peoples.

Other jurisdictions have worked to foster a culture of awareness, trust and understanding within their organizations to support Indigenous participation in procurement. For example, SaskPower manages its Indigenous procurement through a dedicated Aboriginal Procurement Unit with the support of Aboriginal Relations and Procurement and Capital Projects. SaskPower recognizes the broader definition of "value for money" for which it considers social procurement as a good routine business practice rather than a stand-alone program.

In Australia, Supply Nation provides support to Indigenous businesses by identifying opportunities for procurement and providing opportunities for networking. It employs an engagement manager and business advisory group and uses brick-and-mortar locations for business owners and other stakeholders to meet.

Consideration 4: Establishing a high-level federal champion for Indigenous participation in procurement.

  • Indigenous participation in procurement would be actively championed by government departments' Chief Financial Officers to ensure that there is a clear mandate and commitment of senior management in the public services

Consideration 5: Establishing stronger awareness of Indigenous business capacity by procurement officers, build better relationships and work to eliminate behavioral biases.

  • Closer ties between buyers and suppliers and higher levels of trust would be encouraged through person-to-person initiatives such as networking events, site visits, in-person training, procurement mentoring, workshops and procurement information sessions
  • Establishing an Indigenous relations procurement group to work with mainstream businesses, Indigenous businesses, communities and peoples would help to change cognitive and behavioral biases of some government employees
  • Departments and agencies would undertake their own promotion and support activities for these programs

Consideration 6: Creating mandatory, comprehensive and ongoing training of procurement officers regarding Indigenous procurement.

  • Training to address Indigenous cultural competency and to correct misconceptions about the capabilities of Indigenous businesses would be updated and required for all federal procurement officers

Consideration 7: Defining the concept of "value for money" in procurement to include socio-economic impacts of Indigenous procurement.

  • This is crucial to increasing adoption of Indigenous procurement

Consideration 8: Systematically and regularly assessing federal procurement demand to identify opportunity areas.

  • As part of this initiative, the Government of Canada would study federal, provincial, territorial and private sector procurement trends to help target opportunities for Indigenous businesses

3. Establishing measurement tools and data collection systems

The government has struggled to collect accurate data and to report on Indigenous participation in procurement in a timely manner. PSAB data such as how many Indigenous businesses win non-set-aside contracts and the impacts of Aboriginal Participation Components and Aboriginal Benefit Requirements have not been reported and therefore potentially under-represent overall PSAB performance.

In addition, the data that the government has collected in the past was not detailed enough to determine whether PSAB and other initiatives targeting Indigenous participation in procurement resulted in the growth and sustainability of Indigenous businesses or increased employment, skills development or training.

People who participated in engagement sessions agreed that Indigenous participation in federal procurement should lead to an immediate increase in the number of Indigenous contracts with the Government of Canada, measured both as a percentage of all contracts and as a dollar value.

Participants were also interested in knowing the characteristics of Indigenous businesses participating in federal procurement such as region, cultural groups and gender.

Public reporting on how government departments and agencies perform when it comes to meeting their targets ensures that the public understands what Indigenous participation in procurement looks like and that departments are accountable for procurement results.

Consideration 9: Establishing more rigorous and timely data collection and analysis along with mandatory reporting requirements from procuring departments and common procurement service providers.

  • This approach would involve the establishment of a robust performance measurement and reporting system
  • The percentage, number and dollar value of all Indigenous participation in procurement would be recorded and reported including, where possible, credit-card purchases, low-dollar value contacts, standing offers, supply arrangements, PSAB set-asides, non-set-aside contacts, sub contracts and joint ventures
  • Direct and indirect impacts of Aboriginal Participation Components and Aboriginal Benefit Requirements would also be recorded and reported. The measurement of the impacts of Indigenous participation in procurement on business growth and sustainability would be monitored in addition to employment, skills development and training

4. Defining an Indigenous business

"Equitable access to procurement. The percentage of procurement should be comparable to population."

Roundtable participant

The 51% ownership and control and 33% labour requirement under PSAB were created to protect Indigenous businesses and discourage shell companies winning contracts with negligible benefits to Indigenous peoples.

In other jurisdictions, eligibility criteria for programs targeting entrepreneurs from historically disadvantaged groups generally follow PSAB's approach. Most Canadian jurisdictions also use the same eligibility requirements as PSAB but some do not require minimum Indigenous control of the business or a percentage of Indigenous labour in firms having over six employees.

Both Australia and the United States require at least 51% ownership by the target group and have a non-profit body that certifies businesses for eligibility as Indigenous or minority-owned.

While participants in the engagement sessions generally supported the 51% ownership and control requirements, they strongly recommended eliminating the 33% labour requirement. In major projects such as shipbuilding, resource development and contaminated sites restoration projects, Indigenous businesses have identified a lack of Indigenous skilled labour force as a barrier to participation. Because Indigenous workers might not have the required training for a job, legitimate Indigenous businesses may be unable to meet the employment requirements to qualify for major projects.

An alternative suggestion was to introduce a point system for ownership and control to try to make it easier for Indigenous businesses to qualify. Another suggestion was to let Indigenous rights holders decide for themselves who their own Indigenous firms are, in a spirit of reconciliation and recognizing the nation-to-nation approach.

However Indigenous business is defined, there was a strong interest by roundtable participants in the proper verification of Indigenous businesses to prevent the formation of shell companies and to ensure joint ventures and other partnerships result in real opportunities for Indigenous businesses. Strong validation and verification is needed to prevent abuse by non-Indigenous businesses.

Roundtable participants agreed that the Indigenous Business Directory should not be managed by the federal government. The Indigenous Business Directory is not the only directory of Indigenous businesses. Other directories include registries maintained by comprehensive land claim agreement groups and directories maintained by groups like the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business. One argument for housing the main directory within the government is to maintain a reliable consistent directory with businesses that meet a particular definition.

Consideration 10: Defining an Indigenous business as at least 51% owned and controlled by Indigenous peoples without a requirement for a minimum number of Indigenous employees.

  • To access federal procurement opportunities, Indigenous businesses would be defined as a limited company with at least 51% of the company's voting shares beneficially owned by Indigenous peoples, a cooperative controlled by Indigenous peoples or a sole proprietorship or partnership held by Indigenous peoples
  • To meet the requirement for control, the majority of management board members must be Indigenous. The requirement that businesses with more than six full-time employees have at least one-third Indigenous employees would no longer be applied. An Indigenous benefits plan of 10% to 30% would also be included Verification of Indigenous businesses would be conducted by the government
  • An Indigenous joint venture with at least 51% of Indigenous ownership would be eligible to participate in Indigenous procurement and there would be no labour requirement

Consideration 11: Putting in place a point system to identify Indigenous businesses (for example, points allocated for ownership, number of Indigenous employees and control criteria.), rather than current rigid requirements.

  • Businesses would be assigned points based on percentage of Indigenous ownership, control and employees, up to a maximum of 100 points. If businesses receive a minimum 51 out of 100 points, they could qualify as an Indigenous business
  • Verification of Indigenous businesses would be conducted by the government or by a competent third party, preferably Indigenous-led

Consideration 12: Asking rights-bearing Indigenous nations and organizations to define eligibility criteria for their businesses and maintain lists of qualified businesses.

  • Under this approach, nations and organizations would be responsible for the list and verification of businesses. Indigenous business directories would be under Indigenous management and control
  • Indigenous peoples would be responsible for ongoing management of directories, recruiting businesses to register and validating and verifying that registered businesses are Indigenous. Different Indigenous groups have their own directory, such as Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated and other modern treaty holders
  • The government would recognize the directories of Indigenous organizations

5. Simplifying processes and reducing barriers to Indigenous participation in federal procurement process

"Let's stop defining Indigenous business and instead turn it into a scoring component where one can earn between 0-100% block of points based on Indigenous employment and a separate one for ownership between 0-100% block of points."

Roundtable participant

Eliminating unnecessary barriers in the procurement process is particularly important. Roundtable participants said some contract requirements and measurements of success are sometimes exaggerated and not always necessary for meeting procurement goals. This creates unnecessary hoops for businesses to jump through and makes it harder for Indigenous businesses to participate. This includes:

  • unnecessary technical requirements
  • restrictions on the type of business such as minimum number of years in business or number of employees that are not related to meeting the requirements of the contract
  • specific education and certification requirements that disqualify equivalent experience
  • specific experience requirements when a combination of general and specific experience will do
  • requirements for spending before receiving payment
  • insurance and liability requirements
  • requirements for large, homogenous goods and service delivery from a single firm when delivery by multiple smaller firms would fulfill the same purpose

In addition, many aspects of the federal procurement process are still misunderstood by Indigenous firms. The process is complex by nature and there is insufficient support for Indigenous businesses. For larger procurements, Indigenous businesses struggle to enter into partnerships and joint ventures with mainstream businesses as there are few matchmaking services to encourage them.

Roundtable participants said that federal procurement should provide opportunities for both large and small Indigenous businesses. They suggested simplifying procurement processes, giving businesses more time to apply, reducing spending requirements for security and bid deposits, speeding up payment for completed projects and giving Indigenous communities early notification of upcoming procurement opportunities. They also recommended creating a capital pool and developing a bonding product to financially support Indigenous businesses.

Participants recommended using online training, automated processes, workshops, self-assessments and other forms of guidance. They suggested that the government should improve its efforts to notify Indigenous businesses, communities and Indigenous economic development organizations when procurement opportunities will soon become available.

Participants recommended that local Indigenous economic development organizations such as Aboriginal Financial Institutions offer in-person guidance and mentorship for working through the federal procurement process. This would require support and resources to Indigenous economic development organizations and for institution-building to mentor and guide Indigenous businesses through the procurement process.

The Diavik Diamond Mine in the Northwest Territories works with Indigenous communities to plan its procurement, which helps identify the training, employment and business needs of both the mine and the local workforce. Diavik formalized its commitment to provide training, employment and business opportunities to residents of Northwest Territories and guaranteed two-thirds northern employment and 40% Indigenous employment in the mine's operations.

Consideration 13: Simplifying processes and reducing barriers to increase Indigenous participation in procurement not only for Indigenous businesses, but also for procurement officers.

  • This would involve the introduction of simplified procurement processes, allowing more time for Indigenous businesses to apply, reducing spending requirements for security and bid deposits, speeding up payment for completed projects and giving Indigenous communities early notification of upcoming procurement opportunities
  • These changes would also benefit procurement officers by increasing efficiency
  • In addition, the government could invite more Indigenous suppliers to bid for projects not advertised on the Government Electronic Tendering Service
  • Creating favourable conditions for first time Indigenous bidders could be done by changing the assessment of bid evaluations and rating

Consideration 14: Supporting institution building and third-party delivery by Indigenous-led organizations, of procurement support services to Indigenous businesses.

  • The government would engage national, Indigenous-led organizations to provide the specialized support that Indigenous businesses need to succeed and grow, such as:
    • training
    • tools
    • resources to navigate the federal procurement process and improve bid-readiness
    • including "how to do business" workshops
    • assistance with bid proposals
    • assistance with proposal requirements (such as incorporation, bonding, insurance and certifications) and
    • a capacity assessment tool for Indigenous businesses to help them evaluate their strengths and weaknesses and prepare themselves to bid on contracts
  • This would include training on all types of procurement processes (federal, municipal, provincial and private sector), and provide extra support for women, disabled and youth entrepreneurs
  • Support to Indigenous businesses that are already comfortable with federal procurement would help them move permanently into mainstream markets and reduce their reliance on federal procurement

6. Identifying and building Indigenous business capacity and qualified workers

"Local and regional people located in local organizations that can work with business. These people would look for opportunities and communicate opportunities to businesses"

Roundtable participant

Indigenous capacity is often identified as a major barrier to increasing Indigenous participation in procurement. However, this perceived lack of capacity may be more a lack of information on the number, variety and expertise of existing businesses. To illustrate, the 2016 Aboriginal Business Survey (PDF) conducted by the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business reported that there were 43,305 Indigenous businesses in Canada in 2011, yet the Aboriginal Business Directory maintained by the Government of Canada records fewer than 1,800 registered firms.

While some Indigenous business capacity issues may simply be a perception due to a lack of information, there are instances where capacity development is needed. For example, 53% of Indigenous businesses have no employees and are unincorporated and often do not have the capacity to bid on large and complex projects. In addition, infrastructure, education and geographic limitations often restrict Indigenous business participation, even as subcontractors. These limitations mean that Indigenous businesses are not able to take advantage of hundreds of millions of dollars in potential contract opportunities.

While establishing its Indigenous procurement program, SaskPower focused on building supplier capacity by granting contracts directly to Indigenous firms. This created opportunities for these firms to prove that Indigenous suppliers could deliver. Now that there is confidence in Indigenous firms, they compete against mainstream businesses for contracts. Moving Indigenous firms to competitive bidding is a step towards the long-term goal to integrate Indigenous procurement into mainstream procurement.

The government needs to take steps to build Indigenous business capacity to increase their participation in federal procurement opportunities.

Consideration 15: Systematically and regularly assessing Indigenous business suppliers and business capacity to identify opportunity areas.

  • This includes opportunities for new and unproven Indigenous businesses to fulfill small and large contracts and to demonstrate that they are good business partners for procurement agents

Consideration 16: Systematically and regularly identifying Indigenous businesses for participation in procurement and increasing the number of businesses registered in the Indigenous Business Directory or alternative directories.

  • The government should conduct a yearly comprehensive business capacity study. Such a capacity study would help departments identify business capacity in opportunity areas where goods, services and construction procurements are being delivered. Businesses identified in the capacity survey would be encouraged to register in an Indigenous Business Directory

Consideration 17: Supporting Indigenous business capacity building to participate in procurement.

  • Where capacity is lacking in areas identified by the procurement demand study, the government of Canada should actively seek out opportunities to build capacity in partnership with Indigenous organizations, federal departments such as Employment and Social Development Canada other jurisdictions and academic institutions
  • The government of Canada should be available to make Indigenous organizations procurement ready

7. Transforming the federal procurement process

The Government of Canada relies on a number of mechanisms for increasing Indigenous participation in federal procurement, including mandatory and voluntary set-asides, joint-venturing, subcontracting, Aboriginal Participation Components and Aboriginal Benefit Requirements.

PSAB has historically relied mostly on procurement set-asides to target Indigenous businesses and achieve policy objectives. Expanded use of a variety of mechanisms would contribute to more opportunities for Indigenous businesses. For example, increased use of unbundling larger procurement contracts into smaller commodity or geographic components would make it possible for smaller Indigenous business suppliers to participate in the procurement process. The argument against unbundling is that larger contracts are more cost effective. However, larger contracts mean fewer firms competing, which could lead to higher costs.

A substantial group of participants to roundtables believed that strong enough procurement targets could eliminate the need for mandatory set-asides by compelling purchasing organizations to use other procurement approaches. Participants suggested unbundling large procurement contracts, requiring subcontracting opportunities on large projects, creating more opportunities for large Indigenous businesses to be prime contractors and using minimum thresholds for Indigenous content. In addition, a point system could encourage Indigenous content, as could contracts for which Indigenous bidders are preferred, opening up supply chains, and matchmaking services to encourage partnerships and joint ventures.

Consideration 18: Requiring a broader application of mandatory set-asides when Indigenous populations are above a certain percentage in the procurement area.

  • The suggested approach would have mandatory set-asides triggered when the procurement is in an area where the local population is at least 51% Indigenous. Other possible criteria to explore include type value, and purchasing organization for a given project
  • Mandatory set-asides could be applied to all contracts on or near treaty lands, urban reserves and Indigenous communities. They could also be applied to all contracts for which Indigenous peoples, communities and organizations that are the primary client group and to all contracts between certain dollar thresholds (for example, between $5,000 and $500,000)
  • Uniform application of mandatory set-asides and other Indigenous procurement tools across all federal departments and agencies would be actively encouraged

Consideration 19: Requiring Indigenous benefit plans in all major procurement processes at the conception stage.

  • For all procurements, the Government of Canada would include an Indigenous benefit plan requirement to address socio-economic benefits to Indigenous people in the community. The plan could include sub-contracting, employment or training components

Consideration 20: Require all spending proposals which include major procurements, to have mandatory Indigenous procurement plans or strategies at TBS approval stage.

  • TBS would be required to develop an Indigenous benefit plan section in its submission form for submissions that need to be approved by TBS

Consideration 21: Supporting regional and distinction-based approaches.

  • When an Indigenous community is located near a project, it would be given priority in the bidding process taking into account historical settlement patterns of certain dispersed Indigenous peoples. Only when local businesses cannot take on the work would the government look for businesses to fulfill its procurement contracts from outside the community. However, when this happens, the government would be sure to include Indigenous benefit plans in their contracts to ensure the community is still helped by the project

Consideration 22: Applying Indigenous procurement requirements to entities outside of the core federal government.

  • Currently, all government departments and agencies with budgets over $1 million are required to comply with PSAB. This includes developing procurement strategies aimed at Indigenous businesses, setting performance targets, identifying suitable set-aside opportunities and requirements and maintaining a tracking system to report on progress in meeting the performance objectives for contracting with Indigenous businesses. Governmental regulations and policies would also be enforced on crown societies and on enterprises in federally regulated industries. The federal government would also advocate for more Indigenous participation in procurement through funding agreements with provincial and territorial governments

Consideration 23: Combining Indigenous procurement with other groups such as, women, visible minorities and persons with disabilities.

  • In this case, the same policies would apply to Indigenous peoples participating in procurements and to other equity groups

Contact us

CIRNAC invites you to comment on these policy modernization considerations and propose other ideas on how the Government of Canada might grow Indigenous participation in procurement.

Economic and Business Opportunities Branch
Crown-Indigenous relations and Northern Affairs Canada
10 Wellington
Gatineau QC K1A 0H4
Tel: 1-800-400-7677
Fax: 819-956-9837
Email: aadnc.maa-ipm.aandc@canada.ca

Did you find what you were looking for?

What was wrong?

You will not receive a reply. Don't include personal information (telephone, email, SIN, financial, medical, or work details).
Maximum 300 characters

Thank you for your feedback

Date modified: